Retrospective Evaluation of Inborn Errors of Metabolisms in the Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Retrospective Evaluation of Inborn Errors of Metabolisms in the Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Objective: Inborn errors of metabolisms (IEMs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders that can occur as a result of inherited or spontaneous mutations, are rare when considered alone, but have many diseases as a group. Although they are generally thought of as diseases of the neonatal period, 50% of these also occur outside the neonatal period, and some are not diagnosed until adulthood. The aim of this study is to examine the frequency, clinical and laboratory features of inborn errors of metabolism in the neonatal period.
Methods: The results of 60 patients who were diagnosed with IEMs as a result of the study, out of 1400 patients who were followed up and treated in the Children's Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between January 2018 and December 2020, were evaluated.
Results: In this study, it consisted of 60 cases, 30 (%50) of which were girls and 30 (%50) were boys (50%). The median age of the patients included in the study was 3 (1-25) days at admission, median weight was 3100 (1000-4000) g, and gestational week was found to be median 39 (27-40) weeks at admission. The most common complaints were feeding difficulty 43(72%), tachypnea 27 (45%) and vomiting 5 (8.3%). The most common laboratory findings were metabolic acidosis 39 (65%) and 36 (60%) hypoglycemia. There was a history of consanguinity in 46 (76.6%) cases, and a history of sibling death in 30 (50%). The mother had a history of abortion in 5 (8.3%) patients who did not have a history of sibling death. The most common diagnoses were Urea cycle disorder 13 (21.7%), organic acidemia 12 (20%), galactosemia 10 (16.7%) and amino acid metabolism disorders 9 (15%).
Conclusion: Inborn errors of metabolisms, which are a group of diseases that can occur in different spectrums with clinical, biochemical and genetic heterogeneity, should be kept in mind especially in regions where consanguineous marriages are high. In cases such as metabolic acidosis, which presents with nonspecific symptoms such as malnutrition, tachypnea and jaundice in the neonatal period and cannot be explained in laboratory examinations, care should be taken and they should be referred to centers for further investigation.
___
- 1.Stenton SL, Kremer LS, Kopajtich R, et al. Thediagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism by anintegrative "multi-omics" approach: A perspectiveencompassing genomics, transcriptomics, andproteomics. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020; 43(1): 25-35.
- 2.Jeanmonod R, Asuka E, Jeanmonod D. Inborn ErrorsOf Metabolism. 2021. In: StatPearls [Internet].Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
- 3.Brunetti-Pierri N, Parenti G, Andria G. Inborn errorsof meta¬bolism. In Buonocore G, Bracci R, Weindling M(eds). Neonatology: A Practical Approach to NeonatalDiseases. Italia: Springer. 2012: 949-66.
- 4.Kulalı F, Köse M, Çelik TC, et al. Inborn Errors ofMetabolism: A Three-Year Experience. Journal of Dr.Behcet Uz Children's Hospital. 2019; 9(2): 143-8.
- 5.Sutton VR. Inborn errors of metabolism:classification. UpToDate, 2017. Available from:https://www.uptodate. com/contents/inborn-errors-of-metabolism-classification.
- 6.Mak CM, Lee HH, Chan AY, et al. Inborn errors ofmetabo¬lism and expanded newborn screening:review and update. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2013; 50: 142-62.
- 7.Tu W, He J, Dai F, et al. Impact of inborn errors ofmetabolism on admission in a neonatal intensive careunit-a prospective cohort study. Indian J Pediatr. 2012; 79: 494-500.
- 8.Unsinn C, Das A, Valayannopoulos V, et al. Clinicalcourse of 63 patients with neonatal onset urea cycledisorders in the years 2001-2013. Orphanet J Rare Dis2016; 11: 116.
- 9.Tokatli A, Coskun T, Ozalp I. Fifteen years’experience with 212 hyperammonaemic cases at ametabolic unit. J Inherit Metab Dis 1991; 14: 698-706.
- 10.Kalkan Uçar S, Canda E, Köse M, et al. Presentationand management of classical urea cycle disorders:Lessons from our experience. Journal of Dr. Behcet UzChildren's Hospital. 2016; 6: 89-96.
- 11.Atik SU, Gürsoy S, Koçkar T, et al. Clinical,molecular, and genetic evaluation of galactosemia inTurkish children. Turk Pediatri Ars. 2016; 51(4): 204-9.
- 12.Berry GT, Walter J, Fridovich-Keil JL. Chapter 6;Disorders of Galactose Metabolism. In: Saudubray JM,Baumgartner MR, Walter J (Eds). Inborn MetabolicDiseases Diagnosis and Treatment, 6th Edition.Heidelberg: Springer Berlin; 2016: 139-46.
- 13.Bosch AM, Bakker HD, Wenniger-Prick LJ, et al.High tolerance for oral galactose in classicalgalactosaemia: dietary implications. Arch Dis Child.2004; 89(11): 1034-6.
- 14.National Newborn Screening and GeneticsResource Center. National newborn screening statusreport. 2014.
- 15.Coss KP, Doran PP, Owoeye C, et al. Classicalgalactosaemia in Ireland: incidence, complications andoutcomes of treatment. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2013; 36:21–7.
- 16.Van der Ploeg AT, Reuser AJ. Pompe’s disease.Lancet 2008; 372: 1342–53.
- 17.Fuller DD, ElMallah MK, Smith BK, et al. Therespiratory neuromuscular system in Pompe disease.Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2013; 189: 241–9.
- 18.Baştuğ O, Öztürk MA, Korkmaz L, et al. Pansitopeniile Başvuran Metilmalonik Asidemi: Olgu Sunumu.Medical Journal of Bakirkoy, 2018: 14(1).
- 19.Ogier de Baulny H, Saudubray JM. Branched-chainorganic acidurias. Semin Neonatol 2002; 7(1): 65-74.
- 20.Dionisi-Vici C, Rizzo C, Burlina AB, et al. Inbornerrors of metabolism in the Italian pediatricpopulation: a national retrospective survey. J Pediatr.2002; 140: 321-9.