Vildan KURBAN, Ramazan TETİKÇOK, Ufuk ÜNLÜ

Engelli Çocuğa Sahip Ebeveynlerin Yaşam Kaliteleri ve Etkiyen Faktörler

Giriş: Amacımız Tokat ilinde engelli çocuğa sahip ailelerin yaşam kalitelerinin değerlendirilmesi ve yaşam kalitesini etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesidir. İlişkili olabilecek faktörler tanımlanması ile literatüre katkı sağlamak hedeflenmiştir. Yöntemler: Tokat ilinde yaşayan 6-14 yaş aralığındaki 134 engelli çocuğun ebeveynleri ile aynı yaş grubundaki 136 sağlıklı çocuğun ebeveynleri, bu kesitsel ve tanımlayıcı tipteki çalışmamızın evrenini oluşturdu. Sosyo-demografik veri formu ve WHOQOL-BREF olmak üzere iki kısımdan oluşan anket formu araştırmacılar tarafından katılımcılara yüz-yüze uygulanmıştır. Bulgular:Engel türlerine göre değerlendirildiğinde, çocuklarda en fazla zihinsel engellilik (%54,4) olduğu görüldü. Katılımcıların yaşam kalitesi karşılaştırıldığında, engelli çocuğu olanlar kontrol grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde düşük bulunmuştur (p

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Engelli, Çocuk, Ebeveyn, Yaşam Kalitesi

Retrospective Comparison of Chemotherapy Plus Anti-HER2 Therapies at First-line Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Aim: We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of cisplatin plus 5-FU plus trastuzumab and mFOLFOX-6 plus trastuzumab at first-line treatment in HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer. Method: It was a retrospective observational monocentric study. Patients diagnosed with HER2-positive metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2013 and December 2020 in Dr AY Ankara Oncology TRH were screened. Patients treated at least one cycle of treatment with either CF-T or mFOLFOX-T were included. Survival outcomes and treatment compliance of patients were compared between groups. Results: Of 52 patients, 55.8% (n=29) of patients were treated with CF-T, and 44.2% (n=23) with mFOLFOX-T. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years (IQR: 52-70) in the CF-T and 64 years (IQR: 59-70) in the mFOLFOX-T groups. De novo metastatic disease comprised 96.6% (n=28) of patients in the CF-T and 69.6% (n=16) in the mFOLFOX-T groups (p=0.016). Both IHC3+ and ISH positivity were observed 82.8% (n=24) of patients in the CF-T and 56.5% (n=13) in mFOLFOX-T groups (p=0.038). The mPFS was 10.4 months (95% CI 8.7-12.2) in the CF-T and 6.5 months (95% CI 5.5-7.6) in the mFOLFOX-T groups (p=0.532). The mOS was 12.2 months (95% CI 11.3-13.2) in the CF-T and 12.5 months (95% CI 9.8-15.5) in the mFOLFOX-T groups (p=0.974). No statistically significant difference regarding at least one dose reduction (31.0% vs 21.7%, p=0.453) and at least one dose delay (24.1% vs 21.7%, p=0.838) was observed between groups. Conclusion: It was revealed that CF-T and mFOLFOX6-T had similar efficacy and tolerability in patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma.

Keywords:

metastatic gastric cancer, anti-HER2 FOLFOX, CF, FOLFOX, CF,

PDF

___

1.World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). WorldReport On Disability. Geneva. 2011.
2.WHO Global Disability Action Plan 2014-2021,Better health for all people disability. Geneva, 2015.
3.TÜİK (2013). 2011 Nüfus ve Konut Araştırması.Ankara. Yayın No: 4030
4.Fairfax A, Brehaut J, Colman I, et al. A systematicreview of the association between coping strategiesand quality of life among care givers of children withchronic illness and/or disability. BMC Pediatr.2019;19(1):215.
5.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic andstatistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edn.Washington DC: AmericanPsychiatricAssociation,2013.
6.Reichow B, Kogan C, Barbui C, Smith I, Yasamy MT,Servili C. Parent skills training for parents of childrenor adults with developmental disorders: systematicreview and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open.2014;4(8):e005799.
7. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classificationof mental and behavioural disorders: clinicaldescriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: WorldHealthOrganization, 1992.
8.Zarchi MS, Fatemi Bushehri SMM, Dehghanizadeh M.SCADI: A Standard dataset for self-care problemsclassification of children with physical and motordisability. International Journal of Medical Informatics.2018; 114: 81-87.
9.Brehaut JC, Garner RE, Miller AR, et al. Changes over time in the health of caregivers of children with healthproblems: growth-curve findings from a 10-year Canadian population-based study. Am J PublicHealth.2011;101:2308–16.
10.Isa SNI, Ishak I, Ab Rahman A, et al. Quality of LifeAmong Caregivers of Children with Special Needs inKelantan, Malaysia: The Importance of PsychosocialMediators. Malays J MedSci. 2021;28(2):128-141.
11.Ergin D, Şen N, Eryılmaz N, et al. Engelli ÇocuğaSahip Ebeveynlerin Depresyon Düzeyi Ve EtkileyenFaktörlerin Belirlenmesi. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve SağlıkBilimleri Dergisi. 2010; 10(1): 41-48.
12.Moura R, Camilo C, Luís S. As Strong as WeAreUnited: Effects of Intrapersonal and InterpersonalEmotionRegulation on Quality of Life in WomenWithBreast Cancer. Front Psychol. 2021;12:661496.
13.Kaçan HS. Engelli çocuğa sahip ebeveynlerindepresyon düzeylerinin incelenmesi. KastamonuÜniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2013; 21(2):589 - 600.
14.Eser E, Fidaner H, Fidaner C, et al. Measure ofquality of lifeWHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-Bref. 3PDergisi 1999;7(2 Suppl.):5-13.
15.Ateş E, Bilgili N. Effect of Web-Based Training onComplication Control and Quality of Life of SpinalCordDamaged Individuals: Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021; 11(2): 220-227.
16.Sivrikaya T, Çifci Tekinarslan İ. Zihinsel YetersizliğiOlan Çocuğa Sahip Annelerde Stres, Sosyal Destek veAile Yükü. AÜEBFÖED. 2013; 14(02): 17-31.
17.Gümüş R, Aluçlu MU , Sarıbaş S. Health Status ofDisabled Children and Youth Receiving Public HomeCare Services Between 2010 and 2015 in Diyarbakir,Turkey. Dicle Tıp Dergisi. 2016; 43(4): 549-553.
18. Chakraborty B, Rao A, Shenoy R, Davda L, SuprabhaBS. Stress-mediated quality of life outcomes in parentsof disabled children: A case-control study. J IndianSocPedodPrevDent. 2019;37(3):237-244.
19.Dilek B, Batmaz İ, Karakoç M, et al. Serebral palsiliçocukların annelerinde depresyon ve yaşamkalitesinin değerlendirilmesi. Marmara MedicalJournal.2013;26:94-98
20.Sheikh MH, Ashraf S, Imran N, Hussain S, AzeemMW. Psychiatric Morbidity, Perceived Stress and Ways of Coping Among Parents of ChildrenWith IntellectualDisability in Lahore, Pakistan. Cureus.2018;10(2):e2200. 21.
21.Karaduman H, Parlar H. Gelişimsel yetersizliğesahip çocuğu olan ve normal gelişim gösteren çocuğasahip ebeveynlerin aile yaşam kalitesi algılarınınincelenmesi. İZÜ Eğitim Dergisi.2020: 2 (3); 101-121.
22.Çolak B, Kahriman İ. Evaluation of FamilyBurdenand Quality of Life of Parents with Children withDisability. The American Journal of FamilyTherapy.2021, AHEAD-OF-PRINT, 1- 21.https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2021.1941421
23. Yavuz M, Şafak P. Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu, Zihin ve Çoklu Yetersizliği Olan Çocukların EbeveynlerininYaşam Doyum Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. GEFAD.2021; 41(2): 1273-1294.
24.Tekinarslan IC. A comparison study of depressionand quality of life in Turkish mothers of childrenwithDown syndrome, cerebral palsy, and autism spectrumdisorder. PsycholRep. 2013;112(1):266-287.
25.Farajzadeh A, Maroufizadeh S, Amini M. Factorsassociated with quality of life among mothers ofchildren with cerebral palsy. Int J NursPract.2020;26(3):e12811.