Limbus vertebra tanılı kadınlarda kemik mineral yoğunluğu

Amaç: Her ne kadar genetiğin ve kümülatif mekanik stresin immatür bir iskelet sistemi üzerindeki etkilerinin limbus vertebra (LV) gelişiminde rol oynadığı öne sürülse de, LV tanılı hastalarda kemik yapı ile ilgili bir veri yoktur. Bu çalışmanın amacı LV tanısı olan kadınlarda kemik mineral yoğunluğunu (KMY) ve osteoporoz prevalansını değerlendirmek ve yaş ve vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ) eşleştirilmiş sağlıklı kadınlarla karşılaştırmaktı. Yöntem: Bu çalışma LV tanılı 171 kadın (40-49 yaş aralığında) ve LV tanısı olmayan 190 kadın üzerinde yapıldı. Lomber omurga KMY değerleri dual enerji X-ışını absorpsiyometrisi ile elde edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplam 361 kadın dahil edildi. LV tanılı hastalarda ortalama total KMY değeri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düşük (sırasıyla 0.876 ± 0.155 ve 0.966 ± 0.187 g / cm2, p

Bone mineral density status in women with limbus vertebra

Objective: Although genetics and cumulative mechanical stress on an immature skeleton have beenproposed to play a role in the development of the limbus vertebra (LV), there is no data concerning the actualdegree of bone strength and bone loss in patients with LV.The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone mineral density (BMD) and the prevalence of osteoporosis inwomen with LV and compare with age- and body mass index-matched women.Method: This study was carried out on 171 women (aged 40–49 years) with LV and 190 women withoutLV. Lumbar spine BMD values were obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.Results: A total of 361 patients were included in the study. The mean total BMD value was significantlylower (0.876 ± 0.155 vs. 0.966 ± 0.187 g/cm2, p < 0.0001), and the mean T-score value was significantlyhigher (-1.6 ± 1.41 vs. -0.8 ± 1.71, p < 0.0001) in patients with LV. Although the frequency of bothosteopenia and osteoporosis were higher in patients with LV, the difference reached statistical significanceonly for osteoporosis (p = 0.007).Conclusions: Women with LV have lower BMD values and higher osteoporosis rates than age- and BMImatchedcontrols; therefore, osteoporosis should be evaluated in these patients.

___

  • Scmorl G. Die pathologische Anatomie der Wirbelsaule. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Orthopadeschen Gesellschaft 1926; 21: 3-41.
  • Ghelman B and Freiberger RH. The limbus vertebra: an anterior disc herniation demonstrated by discography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976; 127: 854-5. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.127.5.854.
  • Yagan R. CT diagnosis of limbus vertebra. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984; 8: 149- 51.
  • Acosta V, Pariente E, Lara M, Pini SF, Rueda-Gotor J. Limbus Vertebra and Chronic Low Back Pain. Journal of Family Medicine 2016; 3: 1048.
  • Koyama K, Nakazato K, Min S, et al. COL11A1 gene is associated with limbus vertebra in gymnasts. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 586-90. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299752.
  • Bennett DL, Nassar L and DeLano MC. Lumbar spine MRI in the elite-level female gymnast with low back pain. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35: 503-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-006-0083- 7.
  • Hellstrom M, Jacobsson B, Sward L and Peterson L. Radiologic abnormalities of the thoraco-lumbar spine in athletes. Acta Radiol 1990; 31: 127-32.
  • Sward L, Hellstrom M, Jacobsson B and Karlsson L. Vertebral ring apophysis injury in athletes. Is the etiology different in the thoracic and lumbar spine? Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 841-5.
  • Jones DM, Tearse DS, el-Khoury GY, Kathol MH and Brandser EA. Radiographic abnormalities of the lumbar spine in college football players. A comparative analysis. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27: 335-38.
  • Kolt GS and Kirkby RJ. Epidemiology of injury in elite and subelite female gymnasts: a comparison of retrospective and prospective findings. Br J Sports Med 1999; 33: 312-8.
  • Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, et al. Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2014; 25: 2359-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2.
  • Arlot ME, Sornay-Rendu E, Garnero P, Vey-Marty B and Delmas PD. Apparent pre- and postmenopausal bone loss evaluated by DXA at different skeletal sites in women: the OFELY cohort. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 683-90. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.4.683.
  • Paker N, Erbil M, Otlu Z, Soy D, Uysal E. Bone mineral density in healthy Turkish women. Journal für Mineralstoffwechsel & Muskuloskelettale Erkrankungen 2005; 12: 73-76.
  • Manisali M, Ozaksoy D, Yilmaz E, et al. Bone mineral density reference values in the normal female and male population of Izmir, Turkey. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 157-62. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1371-9.
  • Alkan B, Fidan F, Tosun A, Ardicoglu Ö. Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Polikliniğimize Başvuran Hastalarda Osteoporoz İnsidansı. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi 2011; 17: 10-13.
  • Tuzun S, Eskiyurt N, Akarirmak U, et al. Incidence of hip fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis in Turkey: the FRACTURK study. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23: 949-55. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1655-5.
  • Aslan A, Karakoyun O, Guler E, et al. [Evaluation of bone mineral density, osteoporosis prevalence and regional risk factors in Turkish women living in Kastamonu: KASTURKOS study]. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2012; 23: 62-7.
  • Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al. Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15: 38-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003- 1490-4.
Cumhuriyet Tıp Dergisi (ELEKTRONİK)-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi