1911

Gastrointestinal sistem şikayeti bulunan hastalarda Cyclospora cayatenensis yaygınlığı

Amaç: Çalışmamızda gastrointestinal sistem şikayeti bulunan hastalarda Cyclospora cayatenensis yaygınlığı moleküler olarak araştırılmıştır. Yöntem: Gastrointestinal sistem şikayeti bulunan 70 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Hastalardan alınan bütün örneklere nested PCR uygulandı. Bulgular: Çalışmada gastrointestinal sistem şikayeti bulunan hastalardan alınan ve Ordu Üniverstesi Tıp Fakültesi Parazitoloji Laboratuvarına gönderilen 70 adet gaita numunesi Cyclospora cayatenensis açısından moleküler olarak incelendi ve bu 70 örnekten 25 (%35,7) tanesi pozitif bulundu. Sonuç: Yapılan araştırmalarla hasta örnekleri ve çevresel öreklerden tespit edilen yüksek oranlar, bu parazitin ileride bir salgının etkeni olabileceğini düşündürmektedir. Özellikle diyareli hastalar, su ve gıda örnekleri Cyclospora gibi coccidian protozoonlar açısından da değerlendirilmelidir.

The prevalence of Cyclospora cayatenensis in patients with gastrointestinal system complaints

Objective: In our study, the prevalence of Cyclospora cayatenensis was investigated molecularly in patients withgastrointestinal complaints.Method: Seventy patients with gastrointestinal system complaints were included in the study. Nested PCR was appliedto all samples taken from patients.Results: In this study, 70 stool samples taken from the patients with gastrointestinal system complaints and sent to theparasitology laboratory of Ordu University Faculty of Medicine were examined molecularly for Cyclosporacayatenensis and of the 70 samples, 25 (35.7%) were found to be positive.Conclusions: The high rates determined from the patient samples and the environmental samples with the studiessuggest that this parasite may be the cause of an epidemic in the future. Especially diarrhea patients, water and foodsamples should be evaluated in terms of coccidian protozoa like Cyclospora.

PDF

___

Balcioglu IC, Ok UZ. Cyclosporidiosis. In: Ozcel A, ed. Medical Parasitic Diseases. 1 ed: Parasitology Association Turkey; 2007:387-396.
Almeria S, da Silva AJ, Blessington T, et al. Evaluation of the US Food and Drug Administration validated method for detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in high-risk fresh produce matrices and a method modification for a prepared dish. Food Microbiol. 2018;76:497-503.
CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Parasites-Cyclosporiasis (Cyclospora Infection) Outbreak Investigations and Updates2017.
Akış FB, Beyhan YE. Distribution of Intestinal Parasites in Patients Hospitalized in Child Intensive Care Unit. Turk J Parasitol. 2018;42:113.
Uysal HK, Adas GT, Atalik K, et al. The Prevalence of Cyclospora cayetanensis and Cryptosporidium spp. in Turkish patients infected with HIV-1. Acta parasitologica. 2017;62:557-564.
Tas ZC, Beyhan Y, Yilmaz H. Cyclospora cayetanensis, opportunistic protozoan parasite, in Van province, Turkey: A report of seven cases. Turk J Parasitol. 2016;40:166-168.
Karaman U, Daldal N, Ozer A, Enginyurt O, Erturk O. Epidemiology of Cyclospora species in humans in Malatya Province in Turkey. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8.
Yolasigmaz A, Erdogan DD, Zeyrek FY, Uner A. Incidence of cyclosporiasis in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms in western Turkey. Med Sci Monit. 2006;13:CR34-CR39.
Turgay N, Ünver-Yolasigmaz A, Oyur T, Özcem SB, Töz S. Monthly distribution of intestinal parasites detected in a part of western Turkey between May 2009-April 2010-results of acid fast and modified trichrome staining methods. Turk J Parasitol. 2012;36:71.
Karaman Ü, Kolören Z, Seferoğlu O, Ayaz E, Demirel E. Presence of parasites in environmental waters in Samsun and its districts. Turk J Parasitol. 2017;41:19-21.
Karaman U, Koloren Z, Demirel E, Ayaz E, Seferoglu O. The presence of parasites in the waters of Giresun province. Dicle Med J. 2016;43:521-522.
Dogan N, Oz Y, Kocman NU, Nursal AF. Comparison of individual differences in the direct microscopic examination in the diagnosis of intestinal parasites. Turk J Parasitol. 2012;36:211-214.