___

• Ak, E. (2011). The effect of creative writing techniques on the written expression skills of 5th grade students in Turkish lessons. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Dokuz EylulUniversityInstitute of Educational Sciences, İzmir.
• Arıcı, A. F. (2008). University students’ written expression mistakes. Uludağ University Journal of Faculty of Education, 21(2), 209-220.
• Badger, R.,& White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153- 160. doi: 10.1093/elt/54.2.153
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29- 58.doi: 10.3102/00346543074001029
• *Bayat, N. (2014). The effect of the process writing approach on writing success and anxiety. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(3), 1123-1141.doi: 10.12738/estp.2014.3.1720
• Begg, C. B.,& Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation testfor publication bias. Biometrics, 50. 1088–1101.doi: 10.2307/2533446
• *Beydemir, A. (2010). The effect of creative writing approach on writing attitude, creative writing and writing achievement in Turkish classes at fıfth grade in a primary.Unpublished Master’sThesis, Pamukkale University Institute of Social Sciences, Denizli.
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2013). Introduction to meta-analysis (S. Dinçer, Trans.). Ankara: Anı.
• Boscolo, P. (2009). Writing in primary school. In Charles Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: history, society, school, individual, text(pp. 359-380). NY: LEA, Taylor & Francis.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
• Coşkun, E., Balcı, A., & Özçakmak, H. (2013). Trends in writing education: An analysis of postgraduate theses written in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93. 1526- 1530. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.076
• Culham, R. (2003). 6+1 Traits of Writing: The complete guide grades 3 and up. New York: Scholastic.
• Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: effect sizes, confidence intervals, and metaanalysis. NY: Routledge.
• De Glopper, C. M., & van Kruiningen, J. F., & Hemmen, N. (2014). Context in Writing Process Research: An exploratory analysis of context characteristics in writing process research in educational and workplace settings. Poster session presented at COWR (Conference on Writing Research) of the EARLI (European Associtation for Research on Learning and Instruction), 27-29 August 2014.
• Amsterdam, Netherlands. doi: 10.3726/978-3-653-02367-1 DeJarnette, N. K. (2008). Effect of the 6+1 trait writing model on student writing achievement.Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University, Virgina.
• Dinçer, S. (2014). Eğitim bilimlerinde uygulamalı meta-analiz. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• *Doğan, Y.,& Müldür, M. (2014). Effect of writing training provided for 7th grade students on the storywriting skills of students. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(1), 49-65.
• Dukpa, L. (1997). Using the writing process model to teach writing at the junior high school level in Durk Yul: An action research. Master’s Thesis. University of New Brunswick, Canada.
• Elbir, B.,& Yıldız, H. (2012). The evaluation of graduate studies on teaching writing in the primary school. Academic Sight International Refeered Online Journal of Social Sciences, 30, 1-11.
• Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. London, UK: CUP.
• *Erdoğan, Ö. (2012). The effects of process based creative writing activities on students’ writing expression and attitude towards writing.Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara.
• *Erdoğan, Ö.,& Yangın, B. (2014). The effect of process based creative writing activities on students’ writing expression and attitude towards writing. Journal of Faculty of Education, 14(1).
• Fragkos K., Tsagris M., & Frangos C. (2014). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Confidence intervals for Rosenthal’s Fail-Safe Number. International Scholarly Research Notices, 1–17. doi: 10.1155/2014/825383
• Gillespie, A.,& Graham, S. (2014). A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities, 80(4), 454-473. doi: 10.1177/0014402914527238
• Glass, G. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 879-896. doi: 10.1037/a0029185
• Graham, S.,& Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476. doi: 10.1037/0022- 0663.99.3.445
• Graham, S. & Sandmel, K. (2011) The Process Writing Approach: A meta-analysis, The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396-407. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
• Guy, A. E., Jr. (2009). Process writing: Reflection and the arts of writing and teaching. In S. Vilardi & M.
• Chang (Eds.), Writing based teaching: Essential practices and enduring questions (pp. 53-70). Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Gürbüz, S.,& Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Felsefe, yöntem, analiz. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Heene, M. (2010). A brief history of the Fail Safe Number in applied research. University of Graz, Austria.
• Higgins, J. P. T.,& Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21. 1539-1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186
• Hillocks, G. J. (1984).What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education, 93(1), 133-170.
• Hillocks, G. J. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
• Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychological Methods, 11(2), doi: 193-206.10.1037/1082- 989X.11.2.193
• *İzdeş, M. (2011). The effects of writing education to 7thgrade students on their story writing skills. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• *Kaldırım, A. (2014). The impact of 6+1 Analytic Writing and Evaluation Model on sixth grade middle school students’ written expression skills. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Dumlupınar University Institute of Educatioanl Sciences, Kütahya.
• *Kapar Kuvanç, E. B. (2008). The effect of creative writing techniques to students’ attitudes to Turkish course and their successes in Turkish courses. Master’s Thesis, Dokuz Eylul UniversityInstitute of Educational Sciences, İzmir.
• *Karatay, H. (2011). The effect of 4+1 planned writing and evaluation model to develop the attitudes of preservice teachers as to written expression and their writing skills. Turkish Studies, 6(3), 1029-1047. doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.2622
• Karatay, H. (2015). Süreç temelli yazma modelleri: 4+1 planlı yazma ve değerlendirme modeli. In Murat Özbay (Ed.), Yazma eğitimi (p. 21-48). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• *Korkmaz, G. (2015). The effect of creative writing method on the 6th graders’ perception of writing selfefficacy, attitudes towards writing and academic success of writing skill.Master’s Thesis, Gaziantep University Institute of Educational Sciences, Gaziantep
• Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., De Jong, P.F., & Van den Bergh, B. (2015) .Teaching children to write: a meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 299-324. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2
• Landis, J. R.,& Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
• Lipsey, M. W.,& Wilson, D. B. (2000). Practical meta analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. MEB. (2015). İlköğretim Türkçe Dersi (1.2.3.4.5.6. 7 ve 8. sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.
• Nunan, D. (2001). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. NJ: Prentice Hall. Oral, G. (2008). Yine yazı yazıyoruz. Ankara: Pegem A.
• Orwin, R. G.,& Vevea, J. L. (2009). Evaluating coding decisions. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges & J. C.
• Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 177-203). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Oswald, F. L.,& Plonsky, L. (2010). Meta-analysis in second language research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 85-110.
• *Özdemir, B. (2014). The effect of analytical writing and assessment method on pre-service Turkish teachers’ writing skills and attitudes towards writing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• *Özkara, Y. (2007). The effect of 6+1 analytic writing and evaluate model on enhancing 5th grade students’ narrative writing skills.Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• *Öztürk, E. (2007). Evaluating the creative writing skills of the 5th grades of primary education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Rogers, L. A.,& Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 879-906. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.879
• Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86. 638-641.
• Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment and adjustments. UK: John Wiley & Sons.
• *Seban, D. (2012). The effect of authoring cycle on third grade students’ attitudes towards writing, selfperception and writing ability. Education and Sciences, 37(164), 147-158.
• *Sever, E. (2013).The effect of processed writing models at the 4th level of primary school students on their writing and creative writing. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Bülent Ecevit University Institute of Social Sciences, Zonguldak.
• *Sever, E.,& Memiş, A. (2013).The effects of process-based writing models on primary school 4th grade students' spelling-punctuation skills and writing dispositions. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences 5(9).
• Sharples, M. (1998). How we write: Writing as creative design. London: Routledge.
• Sim, J.,& Wright, C. C. (2005). The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85(3), 257-268.
• Sutton, A. J. (2009). Publication bias. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 435-452) New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• *Şentürk, N. (2009). The effect of planned writing and evaluate model on enhancing 8th grade students’ expository writing skills.Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University Institute of Social Sciences, Bolu.
• Tabachnick, B. G.,& Fidell, L. S. (2015). Using multivariate statistics (Mustafa Baloğlu, Trans.) Ankara: Nobel.
• Tekşan, K. (2001). The effect of preliminary preparation on writing skills development Doctoral Dissertation, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Institute of Social Sciences, Çanakkale.
• *Temizkan, M. (2011). The effect of creative writing activities on the story writing skill. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(2), 919-940.
• Tok, M.,& Potur, Ö. (2015). Trends of the academic studies in writing education area (2010 – 2014 years). Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 3(4), 1-25.
• *Tonyalı, E. (2010). The effect of creative writing practice on the writing skills of 6th grade primary school students. Master’s Thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University Institute of Social Sciences, Bolu.
• Uyar, Y. (2016). Research on development of writing skills: Review Of last quarter century.Turkish Studies, 11(3), 2273-2294. doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.9479
• *Ülper, H.,& Uzun, L. (2009).The effect of the writing programme prepared in accordance with cognitive process model on student success. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 651–665.
• Üstün, U.,& Eryılmaz, A. (2014). A research methodology to conduct effective research syntheses: MetaAnalysis. Education and Sciences, 39(174), 1-32. doi: 10.15390/EB.2014.3379
• Wilson, D. B. (2009). Systematic coding. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 159–176). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• *Yılmaz, M.,& Aklar, S. (2015). The effect of planned writing and evaluation model on enhancing 5th grade students’ composition writing skills.Bartın University The Journal of Faculty of Education Special Issue on XIV. International Participation Symposium of Primary School Teacher Education (21- 23 May, 2015), 223-23.