Adaptation of General System Theory and Structural Family Therapy Approach to Classroom Management in Early Childhood Education

Sınıf yönetimine yönelik uygulamalar ve müdahaleler çoğunlukla davranışçı-bireysel öğrenme kuramlarını temel almaktadır. Davranışçı öğrenme kuramları bireyi ve bireyin davranışlarını uyarıcı-tepki bağı içerisinde ön plana çıkartarak çoğu zaman davranışın ortaya çıktığı bağlamı ve etkileşim örüntülerini görmezden gelmektedir. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, sınıf ortamı ile aile yaşamı arasındaki benzerlikleri ortaya koyarak sınıf içerisinde oluşan yapıyı incelemektir. Bu araştırma kapsamında, okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin sınıf yönetimi kapsamındaki deneyimleri Genel Sistemler Kuramı ve Yapısal Aile Terapisi kuramsal çerçevesi temel alınarak analiz edilmiştir. Bu araştırmada, Adana ili Yüreğir ilçesinde bulunan bir bağımsız anaokulunda çalışan sekiz öğretmenle yıl içerisinde farklı dönemlerde olmak üzere ikişer defa görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Bu görüşmelerde öğretmenin sınıf içindeki deneyimleri ve karşılaştığı durumları nasıl algıladıkları sorulmuş, bu görüşmeler kaydedilmiş ve birebir dökümü alınmıştır. Toplanan veriler içerik analizi yapılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular temel olarak; döngüsel davranış kalıpları, inanç ve değerler ve çevresel etkenler olmak üzere üç ana kategoride toplanmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, öğretmenlerin otorite kurabildiği, kuralların net ve beklentilerin tutarlı olduğu ve çocukların kendilerini ait hissettikleri sınıflarda davranış problemlerinin azaldığı ve pozitif bir sınıf atmosferinin oluştuğu görülmektedir. Bu bulgular aile araştırmaları bulgularıyla örtüşmektedir

Genel Sistemler Kuramının ve Yapısal Aile Terapisi Yaklaşımının Okul Öncesinde Sınıf Yönetimine Uyarlanması

The applications and interventions related to classroom management are often based on behaviorist learning theories. While focusing on the individual and the behavior, behaviorist learning theories often neglect the context and the patterns of communication through which the behavior arises. This study aims to examine the structure of a classroom by exploring the similarities between classroom and family life. General Systems Theory and Structural Family Therapy were used to explore and interpret preschool teachers' classroom management experiences. In this study, eight teachers working in an independent preschool in Yuregir, Adana, were chosen to be interviewed twice during different time in a year. These interviews were done to identify their classroom management approaches and explore the management problems that they were experiencing. The data were analyzed through qualitative content analysis. The findings fell into three main categories: behavioral patterns, belief systems and context. It was found that when teachers established a sense of authority in the classroom, when the rules and the expectations were clear and consistent, and when students formed a sense of belongingness in the classroom without sacrificing their sense of autonomy, then behavioral problems seemed to decrease. These findings correspond with those of family studies

___

  • Abbott, M. G. (1969). The school as a social system: Indicators for change. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,2(2), 167-174.
  • Allday, R. A., Hinkson-Lee, K. Hudson, T., Neilsen-Gatti, S., Kleinke, A., &Rüssel, C. S. (2012). Training General educators to increase behavior- specificpraise: effects on students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 37 (2), 87-98.
  • Bell, R. T. (1984). Classroom management: A gallon in a pint pot? System, 12(2), 107-115.
  • Benedict, E. A., Horner, R. H., & Squires, J. K. (2007). Assessment and implementation of positive behavior support in preschools. TECSE, 27(3), 174–192.
  • Boverie, P. E. (1991). Human systems consultant: Using family therapy in organizations.Family Therapy, 18(1), 61-71.
  • Boz, Y. (2008). Turkish student teachers' concerns about teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(4), 367-377.
  • Bozkuş, K. (2014). School as a social system. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 4(1), 49-61.
  • Brophy, J. (1988). Educating teachers about managing classroom and students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 1-18.
  • Brophy, J. & McCaslin, M. (1992). Teachers' reports of how they perceive and cope with problem students. The Elementary School Journal, 93(1), 3-68.
  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Carr, A. (2006). Family therapy: Concepts, process and practice. (2nd. Ed.) West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Campbell, D.,Coldicott, T. &Kinsella, K. (1994). Systemic work with organizations. London: Karnak Books.
  • Cothran, D. J.,Kulinna, P. H., & Garrahy, D. A. (2003). ‘‘This is kind of giving a secretaway...’’: students’ perspectives on effective class management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 435-444.
  • Deacon, S. A. (1996). Utilizing structural family therapy and systems theory in the business world. Contemporary Family Therapy, 18(4), 549-565.
  • Dong, J. (2016). A dynamic systems theory approach to development of listening strategy use and listening performance. System, 63, 149-165.
  • Emmer, E. T., Evertson, C. & Worsham, M. E. (2000).Classroom management for secondary teachers (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
  • Evertson, C. M. & Weinstein, C. S. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of classroom management. Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Larence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Downer, J. T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children's risk for school problems contribute to children's behavioral engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 36(3), 413-432
  • Georgiou, I.,Zahn, C., & Meira, B. J. (2008).A systemic framework for case-based classroom experiential learning.Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25, 807-819.
  • Getzels, J. W.,&Guba, E. G. (1957). Social behavior and the administrative process.The School Review, 65(4), 423-441.
  • Gladding, S. T. (2011). Family therapy: History, theory, and practice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Glasser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
  • Goldenberg, H. & Goldenberg, I. (2008). Family therapy. Anoverview. Belmont, CA: Thomso Brooks/Cole.
  • Greif, G. L. ( 1994). Using family therapy ideas with parenting groups in schools. Journal of Family Therapy, 16. 199-207.
  • Cuardino, C. A. & Fullerton, E. (2010). Changing behaviors by changing the classroom environment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(6).8-13.
  • Hallinan, M. (2001). School as a social system. InNeil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (Eds), International Encyclopedia of theSocial & Behavioral Sciences, (pp.13563–13567), Indiana: Elsevier.
  • Heatherington, L. (1987). Therapists ’personalitie sand theire valuation of three family therapy styles: An Empirical investigation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 13, (2). 167-178.
  • Jensen, G. E. (1954). The School as a social system.Educational Research Bulletin, Vol. 33( 2), 38-46.
  • Johansen, A., Little, S. G., & Akin-Little, A. (2011). An examination of New Zealand teachers’ attributions and perceptions of behaviour, classroom management, and the level of formal teacher training received in behaviour management. Kairaranga, 12(2), 3-12.
  • Joram, E. & Gabriele, A. J. (1998) Preservice teachers’ prior beliefs: Transforming obstacles into opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education. 14, 175-191.
  • Kast, F. E. & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1972). General SystemsTheory: Applications for organization and management. The Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 447-465
  • Keshavarz, N.,Nutbeam, D., Rowling, L., & Khavarpour, F. (2010). Schools as socialcomplexadaptive systems: A newwaytounderstandthechallenges of introducingthehealthpromotingschoolsconcept. SocialScience&Medicine 70, 1467-1474.
  • Kubany, E. S.,Sloggett, B. B., &Ogata, R. F. (1977). Training teachers in classroommanagement skills. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2,(2). 139-148.
  • Landau, B. M. (2001). Teaching classroom management: A stand-alone necessity for preparing new teachers. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 453 165
  • Lindsay, G. & Murphy, A. (1996). A systemic approach to the application of marketing theory for Charitable organisations. International Journal of Nonprofi and Voluntary Sector Marketing,1(3), 252–262.
  • Lundgren, U. P. (1982). The schoolclass as a social system. Acta Sociologica, 25(2), 187-194.
  • Fred C. Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Schools as opensystems. Schooling, 1(1), 1-5).
  • Macsuga, A. S. & Simonsen, B. (2011). Increasing teachers' use of evidence-based classroom Management strategies through consultation: Overview and case studies. Beyond Behavior, 20(2), 4-12.
  • McCaughan, N. & Palmer, B. (2004). System sthinking for harassed managers. London: Karnak.
  • Mele, C.,Pels, J., & Polese, F. (2010) A briefreview of systems theories and their managerial applications. Service Science 2(1-2):126-135.
  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Minuchin, P.,Colapinto, J. & Minuchin, S. (2007). Working with families of the poor. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Minuchin, S.,&Fishman, H. C. (1981). Familytherapytechniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. M
  • Murphy K. A., Theodore L. A., Aloiso D., Alric-Edwards J. M., &Hughes T. L. (2007). Interdependent groupcontingencyandMysteryMotivatorstoreducepreschooldisruptivebehavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 53–63.
  • O’Neill, S. & Stephenson, J. (2012). Does classroom management course workin fluence pre-service teachers’ perceived prepared nessor confidence? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1131-1143.
  • Reinke, W. M., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Merrell, K. (2008). The classroom check-up: A class wide teacher consultation model for increasing praise and decreasing disruptive behavior. School Psychology Review, 37(3), 315-332.
  • Sempowicz, T. & Hudson, P. (2011). Analysing mentoring dialogues for developing a preserviceteacher’s Classroom management practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(8), 1-16.
  • Smith, L. &King, J. (2017). A Dynamic systems approach to wait time in the second language classroom. System 68, 1-14.
  • Skyttner, L. (2001). General systems theory: Ideas and applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
  • Strein, W.,Hoagwood, K. &Cohn, A. (2003). School psychology: A publichealthperspective I.Prevention, populations, andsystemschange. Journal of School Psychology 41, 23–38.
  • Şahin, A. (2007). Systems approach as a handcuff to curb the democratization of curriculums: Systems Approach for what and for whom? Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(2), 945-951.
  • Tauber, R. T. (2007). Classroom management: Sound theory and effective practice. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group
  • Tobin, C. E. & Simpson, R. (2012). Consequence maps: A novel behavior management tool for Educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(5), 68-75.
  • Trussell, R. P.,Lewis, T. J. & Stichter, J. P. (2008). The impact of targeted classroom interventions and function-based behavior interventions on problem behaviors of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 33(3), 153-166.
  • Ünal, Z. & Ünal, A. (2012). The impact of years of teaching experience on the classroom management approaches of elementary school teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 41-60.
  • Vetere, A. (2001). Structural family therapy. Child Psychology & Psychiatry Review. 6(3), 133-139.
  • Watzlawick, P. (1984). The invented reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Worden, M. (2003). Family therapy basics(3rd. Edition). Canada: Thompson, Broke/Cole.
  • Yalçınkaya, M. (2002). Açık sistem teorisi ve okula uygulanması. G.Ü. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 22(2), 103-116.