Derya KAYA ŞENOL, Sema DERELİ YILMAZ, Meltem DEMİRGÖZ BAL, Nezihe KIZILKAYA BEJİ, Seval ÇALIŞKAN, Bulent URMAN

Türk insanının oosit ve sperm bağışı hakkındaki görüşleri

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türk halkının oosit / sperm bağışı hakkındaki görüşlerini belirlemektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı kesitsel tipteki bu çalışma bir üniversite hastanesinin kadın hastalıkları ve doğum polikliniğine, kadınlar ve eşlerine veri toplama formu uygulanarak yürütüldü. Veri toplama formu katılımcıların demografik özelliklerine ve oosit/sperm bağışı hakkındaki düşüncelerine ilişkin 35 sorudan oluşmaktadır. Örnekleme çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 323'ü kadın, 105'i erkek toplam 428 kişi dahil edildi. Bulgular: Kadınların %64.3’ü, erkeklerin %71.4’ü infertile çiftlerde bağışlanmış oosit/sperm kullanımını uygun bulmadığını belirtti. Katılımcıların %63.0’ü, oositler/sperm bağışçılarının ve bağışı kabul edenlerin danışmanlık alması gerektiğini söyledi. Uygun bulan kişilerin %21.5’i akraba (örneğin kızkardeşi) ve arkadaş tarafından yapılan oosit/sperm bağışını uygun bulurken, %31.8'i yabancılardan almayı uygun bulmaktadır. İlkokul mezunlarının %88.7’si, üniversite ve üzeri düzeyde mezunların %73.4'ü, çalışanların %76.7'si, gelirleri giderlerinden daha düşük olanların%86.2'si ve yaşayan çocuğu olanların %77,1'i eşlerinde çocuk sahibi olmayı engelleyen bir problem varlığında bağışlanan oosit/sperm yoluyla çocuk sahibi olmayı kabul etmeyeceklerini belirttiler. Sonuç: Katılımcıların yarıdan fazlası, infertilitede bağışlanmış oosit/sperm yoluyla çocuk sahibi olmasını uygun bulmadığını beyan etmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

oosit, sperm, donasyon, gamet donasyonu

Views of Turkish people on oocyte and sperm donation

Purpose: The aim of the study is to determine the views of the Turkish people on oocyte/sperm donation. Materials and Methods: Following informed consent, a questionnaire was given to women and their spouses who presented to obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinics of a university hospital. The data collection form consists of 35 questions about the demographics of the participants and their thoughts about oocyte / sperm donation. A total of 428 women, including 323 women and 105 men, agreed to participate in the sampling study.Results Sixty-four-point three percent of the women and 71.4% of males found use of donated oocytes/sperms in infertile couples unacceptable. Sixty-three-point one percent of the participants said that both couples receiving, and those donating oocytes/sperms should get counseling. Twenty-one point-five percent of the participants approved of infertile couples’ receiving oocytes/sperms donated by their relatives (e.g. sister) and friends and 31,8% agreed about getting them from strangers. Eighty-eight-point seven percent of the primary school graduates, 73.4% of the university graduates and postgraduates, 76.7% of the employed participants, 86.2% of the participants with an income lower than their expenses and 85.1% of the participants with live children reported to unaccept donated sperms if their spouses had a problem preventing them from having a child. Conclusion: More than half of the participants declared that it was not appropriate to have children through infertile-donated oocyte/sperm.

Keywords:

oocyt, sperm, donation, gamet donation,

PDF

___

1. Adams J, Light R. Scientific consensus, the law, and same sex parenting outcomes. Soc Sci Res. 2015;53:300–10.
2. Sabatello M. Regulating gamete donation in the U.S.: ethical, legal and social implications. Laws. 2015;4:352–76.
3. Lampic C, Svanberg AS, Sydsjö G. Attitudes towards gamete donation among IVF doctors in the Nordic countries—are they in line with national legislation? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:231-8.
4. Lampic C, Sunnerud S, Skoog Svanberg A. Nurses promote openness regarding the genetic origins after gamete Donation. ActaPeadiatr. 2007;96:1500–4.
5. Lampiao F. What do male students at the College of Medicine of the University of Malawi say about semen donation? TAF Prev Med Bull. 2013;12:75-8.
6. Culley L, Hudson N, Rapport F. Assisted conception and South Asian communities in the UK: Public perceptions of the use of donor gametes in infertility treatment. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013;16:48–53.
7. Karabacak O, Günaydin G. Oocyte donation and the factors affecting success. TurkiyeKlinikleri J Surg Med Sci. 2007;3:72-6.
8. Chamsi-Pasha H, Albar MA. Assisted reproductive technology: Islamic Sunni perspective, Hum Fertil (Camb).2015;18:107-12.
9. Inhorn MC, Patrizio P, Serour G. Third party reproductive assistance around the Mediterranean: comparing Sunni Egypt, Catholic Italy and multisectarian Lebanon. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:848-53.
10. Serour, G.I. Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:34-8.
11. Aramesh K. Iran’ s experience with surrogate motherhood: an Islamic view and ethical concerns. J Med Ethics. 2009;35:320-2 .
12. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Inhorn MC, Razeghi-Nasrabad HB, Toloo G. The “Iranian ART Revolution”: Infertility, Assisted Reproductive Technology, and Third-Party Donation in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Middle East Womens Studies. 2008;4:1-28.
13. Assisted Reproductive Treatment Applications and Assisted Reproductive Treatment Centers About regulations. Official Newspaper of Turkish Republic with the issue 29135 and dated 30 September 2014. http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/Metin.Aspx?MevzuatK od.
14. Isikoglu M. Senol Y, Berkkanoglu M, Ozgur K, Donmez L, Stones-Abbasi A. Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Turkey: first data from a secular population among the Islamic World. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:318-23.
15. Baykal B, Korkmaz C, Ceyhan ST, Goktolga U, Baser I. Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. Fertil Steril 2008;89:817-22.
16. Halvaei I, Khalili MA, Ghasemi-Esmailabad S, Nabi A, Shamsi F. Zoroastrians support oocyte and embryo donation program for infertile couples. J Reprod Infertil. 2014;15:222-8.
17. Shufaro Y and Schenker JG. The risks and outcome of pregnancy in an advanced maternal age in oocyte donation cycles.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:1703-9.
18. Akyuz A, Sever N, Karasahin E, Guvenc G, Cek S, A. survey on oocyte donation: Turkish fertile and infertile women’s opinions. Int J Fertil Steril. 2014;8:289-98.
19. Human Fertilisation& Embryology Authority, ReRegister as an identifiable donor, http://www.hfea.gov.uk/1973.html (accessed Aug. 6, 2016).
20. Denton J, Monach J, Pacey A. Infertility and assisted reproduction: counseling and psychosocial aspects. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2013;16:1.
21. Cohen G, Coan T, Ottey M, Boyd C. Sperm donor anonymity and compensation: an experiment with American sperm donors. J Law Biosci. 2016;23:468- 88.
22. Wong KA. Donor conception and “passing”, or; why Australian parents of donor-conceived children want donors who look like them. J Bioeth Inq. 2017;14:77-86.
23. Daniels CR, Heidt-Forsythe E. Gendered eugenics and the problematic of free market reproductive technologies: Sperm and egg donation in the United States. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 2012;37:719-47.
24. Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D. Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2008;37:177–96.
25. Payne JG. Reproduction in transition: Cross-border egg donation, biodesirability and new reproductive subjectivities on the European fertility market. Gender, Place & Culture. 2015;22:107–122.
26. Svanberg AS, Lampic C, Bergh T, Lundkvist O. Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Sweden. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1107-14.
27. Genuis SJ, Chang WC, Genuis SK. Public attitudes in Edmonton toward assisted reproductive technology. CMAJ. 1993;149:153-61.
28. Afshar L, Bagherı A. Embryo donation in Iran: an ethical review. Dev World Bioeth. 2013;13:119-24.
29. Wise S, Kovacs G. Secrecy, family relationships and the welfare of children born with the assistance of donor sperm: Developments in research, law and practice. Families, policy and the law: Selected essays on contemporary issues for Australia, 2014 May. https://aifs.gov.au/publications/families-policy-andlaw/9-secrecyfamily-relationships-and welfarechildren-born.Accessed May 3, 2016.
30. Purewal S, VandenAkker O. 'I feel like they were mine and I should be looking after them': an exploration of non-patient women’s attitudes towards oocyte donation. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;30:215-22.
31. Ahmadi A, Bamdad S. Assisted reproductive technologies and the Iranian community attitude towards infertility. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017;20:204- 11.
32. Stobel-Richter Y, Goldschmidt S, Brahler E, Weidner K, Beutel M. Egg donation, surrogate mothering, and cloning: Attitudes of men and women in Germany based on a representative survey. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:124-30.
33. Hudson N, Culley L, Frances R, Johnson M, Bharadwaj A. “Public” perceptions of gamete donation: A research review. Public Underst Sci. 2009;18: 61-77.