Nörofibromatozis tip 1 tanılı hastalarda nöroradyolojik bulguların kognitif fonksiyonlara etkisi

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Nörofibromatozis Tip 1 (NF1) tanısıyla takip edilen çocukların klinik ve radyolojik bulgularının değerlendirilmesi, kognitif fonksiyonlara etki eden faktörlerin araştırılması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya 2 Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Çocuk Nöroloji Polikliniğinde NF1 tanısı alan, en az 1 yıllık izlemi olan 53 hasta alındı. Hastaların yaşı, cinsiyet dağılımı, aile öyküsü varlığı, anne-baba arasında akrabalık varlığı, zeka testleri, öğrenme güçlüğü, motor gerilik varlığı, otizm varlığı, dikkat eksikliği ve hiperaktivite bozukluğu varlığı, davranış bozukluğu varlığı, nörogörüntüleme bulguları, nöbet öyküleri, kullandığı antiepileptik ilaç sayıları açısından retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Hastaların 27’si (%50.9) kız, 26’sı (%49.1) erkekti. Yirmiyedisi (%50.9) herediter, 26’sı (%49.1) sporadik geçişliyken, herediter olanların 8’i (%29.6) anneden, 19’u (%70.4) babadan geçişli idi. Serebral manyetik rezonans görüntülemede (MRG) T2 hiperintensitesi varlığı ile hastaların kız cinsiyette olması, makrosefali varlığı ve mental retardasyon varlığı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki saptandı. Ayrıca otizm varlığı ve dikkat eksikliği hiperaktivite bozukluğu ile mental retardasyon arasında önemli bir ilişki saptandı.Sonuç: Klinik ve radyolojik olarak bazı bulgular arasında ilişki varlığı saptansa da oluş mekanizmaları bilinmemekle birlikte, makrosefali gibi tanı kriterleri içinde yer almayan ancak NF1’li hastalarda aydınlatılmayı bekleyen birliktelikler mevcuttur. 

Effect of neuroradiological findings on cognitive functions in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological findings of children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1), and to investigate the factors affecting cognitive functions. Materials and Methods: Fifty-one patients who were diagnosed as NF1 in the Pediatric Neurology Clinic of Çukurova University Medical School were included in this study. Age, sex distribution, presence of family history, presence of parental consanguinity, intelligence tests, learning disabilities, presence of motor retardation, presence of autism, presence of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder presence of behavior disorder, neuroimaging findings, seizure histories, and number of antiepileptic drugs used were evaluated retrospectively.Results: Of the patients, 27 (50.9%) were female and 26 (49.1%) were male. Twenty-seven (50.9%) were hereditary, 26 (49.1%) were sporadic, while 8 (29.6%) of the hereditary patients were from the mother and 19 (70.4%) were from the father. A statistically significant relationship was found between the presence of T2 hyperintensity in cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and female gender, presence of macrocephaly and mental retardation. Additionally, an important relationship was established between the presence of autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and mental retardation.Conclusion: Although a relationship between clinical and radiological findings have been found, there are associations waiting to be clarified in patients with NF1 who are not included in the diagnostic criteria, such as macrocephaly.

___

  • 1. Evans DG, Howard E, Giblin C, Clancy T, Spencer H, Huson SM et al. Birth incidence and prevalence of tumor-prone syndromes: estimates from a UK family genetic register service. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152:327-32.
  • 2. Ledbetter DH, Rich DC, O'Connell P, Leppert M, Carey JC. Precise localization of NF1 to 17q11.2 by balanced translocation. Am J Hum Genet. 1989;44:20- 2.
  • 3. Ferner RE, Huson SM, Thomas N, Moss C, Willshaw H, Evans DG et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2007;44:81–8.
  • 4. Beauchamp GR. Neurofibromatosis type 1 in children. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1995;93:445-72.
  • 5. Violante IR, Ribeiro MJ, Silva ED, Castelo-Branco M. Gyrification, cortical and subcortical morphometry in neurofibromatosis type 1: an uneven profile of developmental abnormalities. J Neurodev Disord. 2013;5:1-3.
  • 6. Shen MH, Harper PS, Upadhyaya M. Molecular genetics of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). J Med Genet. 1996;33:2-17.
  • 7. Hyman SL, Shores A, North KN. The nature and frequency of cognitive deficits in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology. 2005;65:1037- 44.
  • 8. North K, Joy P, Yuille D, Cocks N, Hutchins P. Specific learning disability in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: significance of MRI abnormalities. Neurology. 1994;44:878-83.
  • 9. Rosenbaum T, Engelbrecht V, Krölls W, van Dorsten FA, Hoehn-Berlage M, Lenard HG. MRI abnormalities in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): a study of men and mice. Brain Dev. 1999;21:268-73.
  • 10. Savar A, Cestari MD. Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Genetics and clinical manifestations. Seminars in Ophthamology. 2008;23:45-51.
  • 11. Neyzi O, Günöz H, Furman A, Bundak R, Gökçay G, Darendeliler F, Baş F. Türk çocuklarında vücut ağırlığı, boy uzunluğu, baş çevresi ve vücut kitle indeksi referans değerleri. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi. 2008;51:1-14.
  • 12. Engel J, Jr Chair. Report of the ILAE classification core group. Epilepsia. 2006;47:1558-68.
  • 13. Korf BR. Clinical features and pathobiology of neurofibromatosis 1. J Child Neurol. 2002;17:573-7.
  • 14. Ostendorf AP, Gutmann DH, Weisenberg JL. Epilepsy in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1. Epilepsia. 2013;54:1810.
  • 15. Creange A, Zeller J, Rostaing-Rigattieri S, Brugieres P, Wolkenstein P. Neurological complications of neurofibromatosis type 1 in adulthood. Brain. 1999;122:473-81.
  • 16. Karl McKeever, Charles W Shepherd, Hilda Crawford, Patrick J Morrison. An epidemiological, clinical and genetic survey of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 in children under sixteen years of age. J Med 2008;77:160-3.
  • 17. Adviento B, Corbin IL, Widjaja F, Desachy G, Enrique N, Rosser T et al. Autism traits in the RASopathies. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2014;51:10–2.
  • 18. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th edn. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association. 2013.
  • 19. North K, Joy P, Yuille D, Cocks N, Mobbs E, Hutchins P et al. Specific learning disability in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: significance of MRI abnormalities. Neurology. 1994;44:878-83.
  • 20. Denckla MB, Hofman K, Mazzocco MM, Melhem E, Reiss AL, Bryan RN et al. Relationship between T2- weighted hyperintensities (unidentified bright objects) and lower IQs in children with neurofibromatosis 1. Am J Med Genet. 1996;67:98-102.
  • 21. Ramanjam V, Adnams C, Ndondo A, Fieggen G, Fieggen K, Wilmshurst J. Clinical phenotype of South African Children with neurofibromatosis 1. J Child Neurol. 2006;21:63-70.
  • 22. Diggs-Andrews KA, Brown JA, Gianino SM, Rubin JB, Wozniak DF, Gutmann DH. Sex is a major determinant of neuronal dysfunction in neurofibromatosis type 1. Ann Neurol. 2014;75:309– 16..
  • 23. North K, Hyman S, Barton B. Cognitive deficits in neurofibromatosis 1. J Child Neurol 2002;17:605–12.
  • 24. Garg S, Plasschaert E, Descheemaeker MJ, Huson S, Borghgraef M, Vogels A et al. Autism spectrum disorder profile in neurofibromatosis type I. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45:1649–57.
  • 25. Hyman SL, Gill DS, Shores EA, Steinberg A, Joy P, Gibikote SV et al. Natural history of cognitive deficits and their relationship to MRI T2-hyperintensities in NF1. Neurology. 2003;60:1139–45.
  • 26. Huijbregts SC, Loitfelder M, Rombouts SA, Swaab H, Verbist BM, Arkink EB et al. Cerebral volumetric abnormalities in Neurofibromatosis type 1: associations with parent ratings of social and attention problems, executive dysfunction, and autistic mannerisms. J Neurodev Disord. 2015;7:32-40.
Cukurova Medical Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2602-3032
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1976
  • Yayıncı: Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi