___

• Akıncı, M., & Yılmaz, Ö. (2016). Enflasyon-faiz oranı takası: Fisher hipotezi bağlamında Türkiye ekonomisi için dinamik en küçük kareler yöntemi. Sosyoekonomi, 24(27), 33.
• Atkins, F. J., & Coe, P. J. (2002). An ARDL bounds test of the long-run Fisher effect in the United States and Canada. Journal of Macroeconomics, 24(2), 255-266.
• Bai, J., & Ng, S. (2004). A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4), 1127-1177.
• Berument, H., & Jelassi, M. M. (2002). The Fisher hypothesis: a multi-country analysis. Applied Economics, 34(13), 1645-1655.
• Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of economic studies, 47(1), 239-253.
• Carmichael, J., & Stebbing, P. W. (1983). Fisher's Paradox and the Theory of Interest. The American Economic Review, 73(4), 619-630.
• Coşkun N. (2013). Vergi Uyarlamalı Fisher Etkisi, Ekonometrik bir Uygulama. Yüksek lisans Tezi Mersin Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Mersin.
• Eberhardt, M., & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-section Dependence in Nonstationary Panel Models: A Novel Estimator, MPRA (Munich Personal RePEc Archive), Paper No: 17692.
• Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2010). Productivity Analysis in Global Manufacturing Production. (Vol. 515).
• Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest Macmillan. New York.
• Güriş, B., & Yaşgül, Y. S. (2015). Does the Fisher hypothesis hold for the G7 countries? Evidence from ADL threshold cointegration test. Quality & Quantity, 49(6), 2549-2557.
• Innes M.H. (2006),The Relationship between Interest Rates and Inflation in South Africa: Revisiting Fisher’s Hypothesis, A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements of the degree of Masters of Commerce in Financial Markets of Rhodes Uni&rsity
• Inoue, A. (1999). Testsofcointegratingrankwithatrend-break. Journal of Econometrics, 90, 215–237.
• King, R., & Watson, M. W. (1992). Testing long run neutrality (No. w4156). National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Koustas, Z., & Serletis, A. (1999). On the Fisher effect. Journal of Monetary Economics, 44(1), 105-130.
• Köksel, B., & Destek, M. A. (2015). Türkiye ekonomisinde Fisher hipotezinin test edilmesi, 2002-2014 dönemi üzerine bir ampirik analiz. Journal of International Social Research, 8(41), 1247-1253.
• Köse N. Emirmahmutoglu F. & Aksoy S. (2012). The interest rate- inflation relationship under an inflation targeting regime: The case of Turkey. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(4), 476-485.
• Küçükaksoy, İ., & Akalın, G. (2017). Fisher Hipotezi’nin panel veri analizi ile test edilmesi: OECD ülkeleri uygulaması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 19-40.
• Li, J., & Lee, J. (2010). ADL tests for threshold cointegration. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 31(4), 241-254.
• Lopcu, K., Coşkun, N., & Değirmen, S. (2013). Do Tax Implications Change the Fisher Effect for the Turkish Economy?. Topics in Middle Eastern and North African Economies, 15.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2005). Macroeconomics. Seventh Edition, USA:Harvard University.
• Mundell, R. (1963). Inflation and real interest. Journal of Political Economy, 71(3), 280-283.
• Muth, J. F. (1961). Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 315-335.
• Nielsen, N. C. (1981). Inflation and taxation: Nominal and real rates of return. Journal of Monetary Economics, 7(2), 261-270.
• Omay, T. Hasanov, M., & Shin, Y. (2013). Testing unit root in panels with gradual structural breaks and cross section dependence. Cross section dependency conference held in Cambridge University
• Omay, T., Hasanov, M., Yüksel, A., & Yüksel, A. (2016). A note on the examination of the fisher hypothesis by using panel co-integration tests with break. Romanian Journal Of Economic Forecasting, 19(2), 13‒26.
• Omay, T., Yuksel, A., & Yuksel, A. (2015). An empirical examination of the generalized Fisher effect using cross-sectional correlation robust tests for panel cointegration. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 35, 18-29.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
• Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
• Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐ adjusted LM test of error cross‐ section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105- 127.
• Shome, D. K., Smith, S. D., & Pinkerton, J. M. (1988). The purchasing power of money and nominal interest rates: A re‐ examination. The Journal of Finance, 43(5), 1113-1125.
• Sjölander, P., Månsson, K., & Shukur, G. (2017). Testing for panel cointegration in an error-correction framework with an application to the Fisher hypothesis. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(3), 1735-1745.
• Şen, H., Kaya, A., Kaptan, S., & Cömert, M. (2020). Interest rates, inflation, and exchange rates in fragile EMEs: A fresh look at the long-run interrelationships. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 29(3), 289-318.
• T.C.M.B. (2006). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası Bilançosu Açıklamalar Rasyolar ve Para Politikası Yansımaları, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası.
• Tıraşoğlu, M. (2018). Fisher hipotezinin MINT ülkeleri için incelenmesi: eşik değerli ADL eşbütünleşme testi yaklaşımı. Ekonometri ve Istatistik Dergisi, (28), 31-43.
• Tobin, J. (1965). Money and economic growth. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 671-684.
• Tsong, C. C., & Hachicha, A. (2014). Revisiting the Fisher hypothesis for several selected developing economies: A quantile cointegration approach. Economic Issues, 19(1), 57-72.
• Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233.
• Xiao, Z. (2009). Quantile cointegrating regression. Journal of econometrics, 150(2),248-260.