ADALET: KOMEDİ İLE TRAGEDYANIN DİYALEKTİK BİRLİĞİ

Modern kültürün, yalnızca edebi bir tür olarak tragedyayı değil, aynı zamanda tutkuların yıkıcı potansiyelini ifade eden trajik yaşam duygusunu ortadan kaldıran rasyonelleşme fikrince örgütlendiği tezini temele alan bu yazı, hukuku tragedya ile birlikte düşünmenin oksimonik karakterini tartışmaya açarak hukukun kendi temelleri üstüne bir refleksiyona kapı aralamayı amaçlıyor. Bu yazının perspektifinden bu tür bir refleksiyon, cebri düzenin trajik durumları dışlayan özgül sosyal tekniği olarak hukuk ile insani yaşamın belli bir açıdan sanatsal taklidi olarak tragedya tanımımıza meydan okumakla kalmaz; aynı zamanda tragedyanın modern hukukun temelinde yatan ama soğuk hukuk metinleri ve karmaşık kurumsal düzenlemeler ardına gizlenen trajik bir aporia’yı ifşa etme potansiyeli taşıdığını gösterebilir.

JUSTICE: THE DIALECTIC UNITY OF THE DIALECTIC UNITY OF

Modern culture is organized by the idea of rationalization which extinguishes the feeling of the tragic life that represent not only tragedy as a literary genre or an aesthetical category, but also the insolubility of conflict between the good ones, the contradiction and conflict in regard to the essence of life, the unexplainable arbitrariness of factual circumstances, devastating potential of passions. This very fact shows that tragedy cannot be seen solely as a means of entertainment or a literary genre. If tragedy as an aesthetical category is the artistic expression of tragic experience, it can only be understood in a cultural context that underlies experience. Tragedies are the ethos of human existence. Indeed, ancient tragic dramas are based on the metaphysical suppostion that conflict, contradiction, arbitrariness and uncertainity is implict to both the structue of human beings and to the whole universe. In this context, this article aims to offer a reflection on the foundations of law by considering the oxymoronic character of thinking law together with tragedy. From the perspective of this paper, such a reflection not only challenges our definition of tragedy as an artistic imitation of a certain aspect of human life and law as the specific social technique of forced order that excludes tragic situations; it may also show that tragedy has the potential to expose a tragic aporia that underlies modern law but is hidden behind cold legal texts and complex institutional arrangements.

___

  • AESCHYLUS (1926), Agamemnon, Libation-Bearers, Eumenides, Fragments, trans. H. Smyth, William Heinemann, London.
  • AESCHYLUS (2000), Zincire Vurulmuş Prometheus, Çev: A. Erhat-S. Eyüboğlu, İş Bankası Kültür Yay.
  • AESCHYLUS (2009), The Complete Aeschylus, Volume II: Persians and Other Plays, eds: Peter Burian-Alan Shapiro, Oxford University Press.
  • AESCHYLUS (2010), Oresteia, çev.Y. Onay, Mitos Boyut Yay, 2010.
  • AESCHYLUS (2014), The Oresteia, trans. Lloyd-Jones, Bloomsbury, London.
  • AGAMBEN, Giorgio (2001), Kutsal İnsan, Egemen İktidar ve Çıplak Hayat, çev.İ. Türkmen, Ayrıntı.
  • BARKER, Derek W.M (2009), Tragedy and Citizenship, Suny Press.
  • CORNFORD, F.M (1957), From Religion to Philosophy, Harper&Brothers Publishers.
  • De MAISTRE, JOSEPH (1993), St Petersburgh Dialogues, trans. Richard A Lebrun, McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • EAGLETON, TERRY (2003), Sweet Violence The Idea of the Tragic, Blackwell.
  • EAGLETON, TERRY (2012), Tatlı Şiddet: Trajik Kavramı, çev. Kutlu Tunca, Ayrıntı Yay.
  • HOMER (1990), The Iliad, trans. Robert Fagles, Penguin Classics.
  • McNEILL, Will (2000), “A ‘scarcely pondered word’. The place of tragedy: Heidegger, Aristotle, Sophocles”, Philosophy and Tragedy, eds.M.de Beistegui-S. Sparks, Routledge.
  • PAKSOY, Banu Kılan (2011), Tragedya ve Siyaset, Mitos Boyut Yay.
Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-6672
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: Yusuf Aydoğdu