Türk İşaret Dili'nde Sınıflandırıcılar Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Bu çalışma Türk İşaret Dili'nde (TİD) sabit ve hareketli olayların anlatımında sınıflandırıcı kullanımını araştırmıştır. Beklendiği gibi, sonuçlar göstermektedir ki TİD sınıflandırıcılarınesnelerin içsel özellikleri ile yer ve hareketlerini birden fazlaanlambirim halinde belirtmek amacıyla kullanılmaktadır. Ayrıca belli bir TİD sınıflandırıcısı bir nesne kümesini gösterebilirken, belli bir nesne de bir TİD sınıflandırıcı kümesiyle gösterilebilmektedir. Çalışma TİD sınıflandırıcıları ile Amerikanİşaret Dili (ASL) ve Hırvat İşaret Dili (HZJ) sınıflandırıcılarını karşılaştırmıştır. Sonuçlar bu üç dilde de sınıflandırıcılarınişlevlerinin benzer olduğunu göstermiştir. Ancak bu üç dildebelli bir sınıflandırıcının göndergelerinin aynı olmayabileceğive belli bir göndergenin aynı sınıflandırıcı ile gösterilemeyeceği gözlemlenmiştir. Dolayısıyla, sınıflandırıcılar ikonik olmakla birlikte, sınıflandırıcıların belli bir işaret dilinin kendine aitdilbilgisinin parçası olduğu savı önerilmektedir.

Classifiers in Turkish Sign Language

This study investigated the use of classifiers in Turkish Sign Language (TİD) while describing static and motion events. As expected, the results showed that TİD uses classifiers to mark objects' intrinsic features as well as their location and motionpoly morphemically. The results indicated that a particular TİD classifier can be used to mark a set of objects and a pa rticular object can be marked with a set of TİD classifiers. The study also compared TİD classifiers with American Sign Language (ASL) and Cr oatian Sign Language (HZJ) classifiers. The results showed the functions of classifiers are similar in these three sign languages. However, referential properties of a particular classifier may not be the same and a particular referent may not be coded by the same classifier in these languages. This study suggested that even though classifiers seem to beiconic, they are part of the grammar of the given sign language.

PDF

___

Arık, Engin, (2003). "Spatial representations in Turkish and Sign Language of Turkey (TİD)". Yükseklisans Tezi. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Üniversitesi, Hollanda.

Arık, Engin , (2008a). "Locative constructions in Turkish Sign Language (TID)". Ed. R. M. de Quadros. Sign Languages: spinning and unraveling the past, pre- sent, and future. TISLR9, the Theoretical Issues in Sign Languages Research Conference. Petropolis/RJ, Brazil: Editorar Arara Azul. 15-31.

Arık, Engin , (2008b). "Body and space in representing space in Turkish, Croatian, Austrian, and American Sign Languages". Working Paper Series: 9th Con- ference on Conceptual Structure, Discourse, & Language (CSDL9). Social Science Research Network.

Arık, Engin , (2009). "Spatial language: Insights from sign and spoken languages". Doktora Tezi. West Lafayette: Purdue Üniversitesi. IN, ABD.

Arık, Engin , (2010a). A crosslinguistic study of the language of space: Sign and spoken languages. Newcastle upon Tyne, İngiltere: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Arık, Engin , (2010b). "Describing motion events in sign languages". Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46 (4): 367-390.

Arık, Engin , (2011). "Left/right and front/back in sign, speech, and co-speech gestures across languages: What do data from Turkish Sign Language, Croatian Sign Language, American Sign Language, Turkish, Croatian, and English reveal?" Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47(3): 442-469.

Arık, Engin , (2012). "Expressions of space during interaction in American Sign Lan- guage, Croatian Sign Language, and Turkish Sign Language". Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 48 (2): 179-202.

Arık, Engin , (2013, 1 Eylül). "Turkish Sign Language Bibliography". Retrieved from http://www.enginarik.com/turkish-sign-language-bibliography.

Arık, Engin , (Ed.)(2013). Current Directions in Turkish Sign Language Research. New- castle upon Tyne. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Arık, Engin ve Marina Milkovic (2007). "Perspective taking strategies in Turkish Sign Language and Croatian Sign Language". Ed. R. Shields. LSO Work- ing Papers in Linguistics 7: Proceedings of WIGL 2007: 17-31.

Arık, Engin ve Marina Milkovic, (2010). "Causative motion events in sign languages". Learning & Percep- tion 2, Supplement, 1-36 (Abstracts of the 2nd Dubrovnik Conference on Cognitive Science, 6-9 May, 2010).

Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir ve Wendy Sandler (2005). "The paradox of sign lan- guage morphology". Language 81 (2): 301-344.

Aslan Demir, Sema (2010). "Sessizliğin Dili: Türk İşaret Diline Dair Gözlemler". bilig 54: 1-20.

Baker-Shenk, Charlotte ve Dennis Cokely (1980). American Sign Language Green Books, A Teacher's Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. Washington, DC: Clerc Books.

Emmorey, Karen (2002). Language, cognition, and brain: Insights from sign lan- guage research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Emmorey, Karen ve Melissa Herzig (2003). "Categorical versus gradient proper- ties of classifier constructions in ASL". Ed. K. Emmorey. Perspectives on classifier constructions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 221-246.

Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth (1993). Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Sig- num-Verlag.

Gökgöz, Kadir ve Engin Arık (2011). "Distributional and syntactic characteristics of nonmanual markers in Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili, TİD)". MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 62: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics. 63-78.

Johnston, Trevor ve Adam Schembri (2007). Australian Sign Language (AUSLAN): An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press.

Milkovic, Marina, Sandra Bradaric-Joncic ve Ronnie B. Wilbur (2006). "Word order in Croatian Sign Language". Sign Language and Linguistics 9 (1-2): 169-206.

Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan ve Robert G. Gee (1999). The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Özsoy, Sumru, vd. (2013). "When established methods hit the sign: Methodolog- ical issues in documenting sign languages". Proceedings Book of Interna- tional Symposium on Language and Communication: Research trends and challenges. Erzurum: Mega Press. 385-393.

Özyürek, Aslı, Deniz İlkbaşaran ve Engin Arik (2005). The Turkish Sign Lan- guage Websitesi. http://turkisaretdili.ku.edu.tr/ (13.07.2012).

Özyürek, Aslı ve Pamela M. Perniss (2011). "Event representations in signed languages". Eds. J. Bohnemeyer, & E. Pederson. Event representations in language and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press. 84-107.

Özyürek, Aslı, Inge Zwitserloodand Pamela M. Perniss (2010). "Locative expres- sions in signed languages: A view from Turkish Sign Language (TID)". Linguistics 48 (5): 1111-1145.

Perniss, Pamela (2007). Space and iconicity in German Sign Laguage. Nijmegen, NL: MPI Series in Psycholinguistics, 45.

Perniss, Pamela M. ve Aslı Özyürek (2008). "Representations of action, motion and location in sign space: A comparison of German (DGS) and Turkish (TID) sign language narratives". Ed. J. Quer. Signs of the time: Selected pa- pers from TISLR 8. Seedorf: Signum Press. 353-376.

Perniss, Pamela M., Inge Zwitserlood ve Aslı Özyürek (2011). "Does space struc- ture spatial language? Linguistic encoding of space in sign languages". Eds. L. Carlson, C. Holscher, & T. Shipley. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science So- ciety. 1595-1600.

Sallandre, Marie-Anne ve Christian Cuxac (2002). "Iconicity in sign language: A theoretical and methodological point of view". Eds. I. Wachsmuth & T. Sowa. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2298: Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 173-180.

Sandler, Wendy and Diane Lillo-Martin (2006). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schembri, Adam (2003). "Rethinking "classifiers" in signed languages". Ed. K. Emmorey. Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 3-34.

Schembri, Adam, Caroline Jones and Denis Burnham (2005). "Comparing ac- tion gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and non-signers' gestures without speech". Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education 10 (3): 272-290.

Slobin, Dan, Nini Hoiting, Marlon Kuntze, Reyna Lindert, Amy Weinberg, Jenny Pyers, Michelle Anthony, Yael Biederman and Helen Thumann (2003). "A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of "classifi- ers"". Ed. K. Emmorey. Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign lan- guages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 271-296.

Sutton-Spence, Rachel ve Bencie Woll (1999). Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Supalla, Ted. (1986). "The classifier system in American Sign Language". Ed. C. Craig. Noun classification and categorization. Amsterdam: Johns Benja- mins. 181-214.

Sümer, Beyza K., Inge Zwitserlood, Pamela Perniss ve Aslı Özyürek (2012). "Devel- opment of locative expressions by Turkish deaf and hearing children: Are there modality effects?" Eds. A. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung ve A. E. Kimball. BUCLD 36: Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Volume 2. Boston: Cascadilla Press. 568-580.

Talmy, Leonard (2006). "The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language". Eds. M. Hickmann ve S. Robert. Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive processes. Philadelphia, PA: Johns Benja- mins. 207-238.

Taub, Sarah (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. NY: Cambridge University Press.

Wilcox, Sherman (2004). "Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in sign languages". Cognitive Linguistics 15(2): 119-147.

Zeshan, Ulrike (2002). "Aspects of Türk İşaret Dili (Turkish Sign Language)". Sign Language and Linguistics 6(1): 43-75.

Zeshan, Ulrike, (2003). "Sign Language in Turkey: The story of a hidden language". Turkic Languages 6 (2): 229-274.

Zwitserlood, Inge, Pamela M. Perniss ve Aslı Özyürek (2012). "Expression of plural entities in Turkish Sign Language: Are there modality effects?" Lin- gua.