Bir Savaş Yöntemi Olarak İnsani Müdahale

Humanitarian Intervention as a Method of War

War makes itself visible as a way of existence through which human condition is defined. This way of existence does not appear to be a negative feature elevated to the level of immanence in anyone's relationship with others. On the contrary, it seems to be reduced to the continuity of existence both singularly and collectively. It is because war is no longer a direct means of at-tack, at least in the sense of protecting its own existence; it has made itself le-gitimate with a new identity, in the name of "humanitarian intervention". Alt-hough the legitimizing means of this new identity in which the war makes itself visible is based on legal justifications, these justifications did not allow for a structural transformation in the concept of war itself. In other words, moral, legal and human boundaries between direct attack and humanitarian interven-tion have not been drawn. In this study, moral and legal contradictions in war initiatives attempted to be legalized and justified by immanent statements of "humanitarian intervention", will be trying to be grounded on the opposition between speech and action and it will be argued that human intervention is an-other way of war.

PDF

___

Adelman, H. (1992). The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention: The Case of the Kurdish Refugees. Public Affairs Quarterly, 6 (1), 61-87.
Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa Theologica. (Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province). http://www.ccel.org/ccel/aquinas/summa.i.html.
Arendt, H. (1998). Totalitarizmin Kaynakları: Emperyalizm. (Çev. B. S. Şener). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Fay, B. (2012). Çağdaş Sosyal Bilimler Felsefesi: Çokkültürlü Bir Yaklaşım. (Çev. İ. Türkmen). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Grotius, H. (1967). Savaş ve Barış Hukuku. (Çev. S. L. Meray). Ankara: AÜSBF Yayınları.
Habermas, J. (2007). Bölünmüş Batı. (Çev. D. Muradoğlu). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Hukuk Felsefesinin Prensipleri. (Çev. C. Karakaya). İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınlar.
Heinze, E. (2009). Waging Humanitarian War: The Ethics, Law, and Politics of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: State University of New York Press.
Hobbes, T. (1991). Leviathan. (Ed. R. Tuck). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchings, K. (2001). International Politics as Ethical Life. Ethics and International Relations. (Eds. H. Seçkinelgin & H. Shinoda). New York: Palgrave.
Kamm, F. M. (1996). Morality, Mortality: Valume II: Rights, Duties, and Status. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. (1960). Ebedi Barış Üzerine Felsefi Deneme. (Çev. Y. Abadan & S. L. Meray). Ankara: AÜSBF Yayınları.
Roberts, A. (2000). The So-called ‘Right’ of Humanitarian Intervention. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3, 3-51.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2002). The Social Contract and, The First and Second Discourses. (Ed. S. Dunn). New York: Yale University Press.
Serin, İ. (2009). Hukuk Düşünce Özgürlüğünün Güvencesi Olabilir mi? Klasik Liberal Görüşün Eleştirisi. Hukuk Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Arkivi, 21. 179-181.
Serin, İ. (2010) Kant’ın Ebedi Barış Düşüncesi Gerçekçi midir? Birinci Uluslararası Felsefe Kongresi: Özgürlük, Eşitlik ve Kardeşlik, Bursa: Asa Kitabevi, 131-133.
Tesón, F. R. (2006). Eight Principles for Humanitarian Intervention. Journal of Mili-tary Ethics, 5 (2), 93-113.
Walzer, M. (2000). Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books.
Wallerstein, I. (2007). Avrupa Evrenselciliği: İktidarın Retoriği. (Çev. S. Önal). İstanbul: Aram Yayınları.
Wendt, A. E. (2013). Anarşi Devletler Ne Anlıyorsa Odur: Güç Politikalarının Sosyal İnşası. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 39, 3-43.