Kurumsal Yönetim Uygulamaları ve Hisse Senedi Likiditesi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği

Çalışmada hisse senetleri Borsa İstanbul'da işlem gören şirketlerde kurumsal yönetim uygulamalarının şirket hisselerinin likiditesi üzerindeki etkisi panel regresyon analizi yöntemi ile araştırılmıştır. Sonuçta, iyi kurumsal yönetim uygulamalarının hisse senedinin likiditesi üzerinde pozitif bir etkisi bulunmuştur. Ancak bu etki istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir. Çalışmanın bulguları akademisyenler ve düzenleyici kurumlar açısından önem taşımaktadır

Corporate Governence Implementations and Equity Liquidation: An Example of Borsa Istanbul

The paper tests the relationship between corporate governance and stock liquidity of the firms’ stock of which are traded in Borsa İstanbul by employing panel regression analysis. In conclusion, we find that good corporate governance practices have positive impact on stock liquidity of firms. However, this impact is not statistically significant. The findings of the paper are important for academicians and stock market regulators

___

  • Arslantaş, Cem Cüneyt (2012). Kurumsal Yönetimin Yönetim Kuruluna Yansımaları, Beta Basım Yayın Dağıtım, İstanbul
  • Breusch, T. S., Pagan, A. R. (1980). Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test And Its Applications To Model Specification In Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 239-253.
  • Cadbury, Sir Adrian (2000). World Bank, Corporate Governance: A Framework For Implementation(Foreword, Washington: World Bank).
  • Chen, W. P., Chung, H., Lee, C., & Liao, W. L. (2007). Corporate Governance And Equity Liquidity:Analysis Of S&P Transparency And Disclosure Rankings, Corporate Governance: AnInternational Review, 15(4), 644-660.
  • Chung, K. H., Elder, J., & Kim, J. C. (2010). Corporate Governance And Liquidity, Journal Of Financial& Quantitative Analysis, 45(2).
  • Chung, K. H., Kim, J. S., Park, K., & Sung, T. (2012). Corporate Governance, Legal System, AndStock Market Liquidity: Evidence Around The World. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies,41(6), 686-703.
  • Davis, J., F. Schoorman & L. Donaldson (1997). Toward A Stewardship Theory of Management, Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.
  • Ding, R., & Hou, W. (2011). Retail Investor Attention and Stock Liquidity, Available at SSRN 1786762.
  • Dumitrescu, A. (2010). Corporate Governance and Market Liquidity, Working Paper SSRN WorkingPapers.
  • Düztaş, S. (2008). Corporate Governance: The Effects Of Board Characteristics, InformationTechnology Maturity And Transparency on Company Performance, Yeditepe University, PhDThesis.
  • Erlat, H. (2006). Panel Data: A Selective Survey, Unpublished Lecture Notes, Department Of Economics, Middle East Technical University.
  • Fernando, A. C. (2009). Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies And Practices, Pearson Education India.
  • Güçlü, H. (2010). Kurumsal Yönetim Uyum Derecelendirmesi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Bankacılık ve Sigortacılık Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
  • Gürbüz, A.O., ve Y.Ergincan (2004). Kurumsal Yönetim: Türkiye’deki Durumu ve Geliştirilmesine Yönelik Öneriler, Literatür Yayınları, 116, İstanbul.
  • Haddad. A.E., AlShattarat W.K. & Nobanee H., (2009). Voluntary Disclosure And Stock MarketLiquidity: Evidence From The Jordanian Capital Market. International Journal of Accounting,Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 5(3), 285 – 309.
  • Handa, P., & Schwartz, R. A. (1996). How Best To Supply Liquidity To A Securities Market, Journal ofPortfolio Management, 22(2), 44.
  • Hart, O. (1995). Corporate Governance: Some Theory And Implications, The Economic Journal, 678-689.
  • Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests In Econometrics, Econometrica 46(6), 1251–1271.
  • Heflin F. & Shaw W.K., (2000). Block Holder Ownership And Market Liquidity, Journal of Financialand Quantitative Analysis, 35(4), 621-633.
  • Heflin F., Shaw K.W. & Wild J. J., (2005). Disclosure Policy And Market Liquidity: Impact Of DepthQuotes And Order Sizes, Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 829–866.
  • Jensen, M.C. & W.H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs AndOwnership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3(4), 305-360.
  • Kanagaretnam K., Lobo G.J. & Whalen D.J., (2007). Does Good Corporate Governance ReduceInformation Asymmetry Around Quarterly Earnings Announcements?, Journal of Accounting andPublic Policy, 26(4), 497-522.
  • Locke, P. R., & Sarkar, A. (1996). Volatility And Liquidity In Futures Markets (No. 9612). Federal Reserve Bank Of New York.
  • Loukil, Nadia & Yousfi, Ouidad (2012). Does Corporate Governance Affect Stock Liquidity In The Tunisian Stock Market? 29th International Conference Of The French Finance Association (AFFI) 2012. 7 Ağustos 2014 tarihinde http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2084708 adresinden erişildi.
  • Masdoor, K. A. (2011). Ethical Theories Of Corporate Governance, International Journal Of Governance, 1(2), 484-492.
  • Matoussi H., Karaa A. & Maghraoui R., (2004). Information Asymmetry, Disclosure Level AndSecurities Liquidity In The BVMT, Finance India, 18, 547-557.
  • OECD, (1999). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD Publications Service, France.
  • OECD (2004). Principles Of Corporate Governance. http://acts.oecd.org/Instruments/ShowInstrumentView.aspx?InstrumentID=151&InstrumentPID=147&Lang=en&Book= OECD 2004.
  • Pfeffer, J. & G. R. Salancik (1978). The External Control Of Organizations: A Resource DependencePerspective, New York, NY, Harper and Row.
  • Prasanna, P. K., & Menon, A. S. (2012). Corporate Governance And Stock Market Liquidity In India,International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 3(1), 24-45.
  • Prommin, P., Jumreornvong, S., & Jiraporn, P. (2014). The Effect of Corporate Governance On StockLiquidity: The Case Of Thailand. International Review of Economics & Finance, 32, 132-142.
  • Roche, J. (2005). Corporate Governance In Asia, Routledge.
  • Sinthupundaja, J., & Chiadamrong, N (2015). Investigation Of Thai Manufacturing Public Firms'Characteristics and Financial Strategies Towards Financial Performance's Improvement, Journalof Economics, Business And Management, 3(3), 331-337.
  • Stoll, H. R., & Whaley, R. E. (1983). Transaction Costs And The Small Firm Effect, Journal ofFinancial Economics, 12(1), 57-79.
  • Tang, K., & Wang, C. (2011). Corporate Governance And Firm Liquidity: Evidence From The ChineseStock Market, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 47, 47-60.
  • Turnbull, S. (1997). Corporate Governance: Its Scope, Concerns And Theories, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(4), 180-205.
  • Welker M., (1995). Disclosure Policy, Information Asymmetry, And Liquidity In Equity Markets,Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 801–827.
  • White, H. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator And A Direct Test ForHeteroskedasticity, Econometrica: Journal Of The Econometric Society, 817-838.
  • World Bank, (1999). Corporate Governance: Framework For Implementation, Overview, 7 Ağustos2014 tarihinde www.worldbank.org adresinden erişildi.
  • Borsa İstanbul (2014) Kurumsal Yöntim Endeksi 7 Ağustos 2014 tarihinde http://borsaistanbul.com/endeksler/bist-pay-endeksleri/kurumsal-yonetim-endeksi adresinden erişildi