Yeni Ekonomik Coğrafya ve Teorik Modelleri

Günümüzde endüstrileşme süreci ile bağlantılı olarak ekonomik aktiviteler üzerinde yığılma, yoğunlaşma ve kümelenme gibi iktisadi kavramlar ön plana çıkmakta, bu kavramları oluşturan faktörleri anlama gereksinimi artmaktadır. Bu gereksinimi karşılayan önemli teorilerden birisi Yeni Ekonomik Coğrafya yaklaşımıdır. Bu doğrultuda çalışma Yeni Ekonomik Coğrafya’nın temel kavramları özetlenerek statik ve dinamik bağlamda teorik modellerin aktarılmasını amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Yeni Ekonomik Coğrafya, Statik Yeni Ekonomik Coğrafya Modelleri, Dinamik Yeni Ekonomik Coğrafya Büyüme Modelleri

Today, relating with the process of industrialization, economic concepts such as economic agglomeration, concentration and clustering on economic activities stand out, and so the necessity of understanding the factors based on these concepts increases. One of the economic theories that fulfills this necessity is New Economic Geography (NEG). In this respect, this study aims to summarize the basic concepts of New Economic Geography and to explain the theoretical models as static and dynamic by depend on the literature.

Keywords:

New Economic Geography, Static New Economic Geographical Models, Dynamic New Economic Geographical Growth Models,

PDF

___

Baldwin, R. E. (2005). “Industry Location: The Causes”. Swedish Economic Policy Review, Vol.12, 11-29.
Baldwin, R. E. and Martin, P. (2004). “Agglomeration and Regional Growth”. V. Henderson, and J. Thisse (Ed.). Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4-60. (2671-271). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Baldwin, R. E. and Okubo, T. (2004). “Heterogeneous Firms, Agglomeration and Economic Geography: Selection and Sorting”. CEPR Discussion Papers, No.4602.
Baldwin, R. E. (1999). “Agglomeration and Endogenous Capital”. European Economic Review, 43, 253-280.
Boschma, R. A. and Frenken, K. (2009). “The Spatial Evolution of Innovation Networks: a Proximity Perspective”. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG), Urban & Regional Research Centre, No.0905. Utrecht University.
Dawkins, C. J. (2003). “Regional Development Theory: Conceptual Foundations, Classic Works and Recent Developments”. Journal of Planning Literature, 18, 131-172.
Filiztekin, A. (2006). “Türkiye’de Açıklanmış̧ Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlüklerin Evrimi”. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Dış Ticaret Politikaları, Yıl: 1, Sayı: 1, 101-116.
Fujita, M. and Thisse J. F. (2009). “New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the Occasion of Paul Krugman’s 2008 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences”. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 109-119.
Fujita, M. and Mori, T. (2005). “Frontiers of the New Economic Geography”. Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 84, Iss. 3, 78-405.
Fujita, M. and Krugman, P. (2004). “The New Economic Geography: Past, Present and the Future”. Papers in Regional Science, 83, 139–164.
Fujita, M., Krugman, P., and Venables, A. J. (1999a). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. The Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fujita, M. Krugman, P. and Mori, T. (1999b). “On the Evolution of Hierarchical Urban Systems”. European Economic Review, 43(2), 209-251.
Fujita, M. and Thisse J. F. (1996). “Economics of Agglomeration”, Journal of Japanese and International Economics, 10, 339-378.
Fujita, M. and Krugman, P. (1995). “When is the Economy Monocentric?: Von Thünen and Chamberlin Unified”. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 505-528.
Henderson, J. V., Shalizi, Z. and Venables, A. J. (2000) “Geography and Development”. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, Paper No. 2456.
Krugman, P. (1998). “The Role of Geography in Development”. Erişim tarih: 22 Ağustos 2012, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEC/Resources/847971251813753/krugman.pdf
Krugman, P. and Elizondo, L. R. (1996). “Trade Policy and The Third World Metropolis”. Journal of Development Economics, Vol.49, 137-150.
Krugman, P. Venables, A. J. (1995). “Globalization and The Inequality of Nations”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 4, 857-880.
224 / Emine Demet EKİNCİ Ş. Mustafa ERSUNGUR Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2013 17 (3): 205-224
Krugman, P. (1993). “First Nature, Second Nature and Metropolitan Location”. Journal of Regional Science, Vol.33, No.2, 129-144.
Krugman, P. (1991). „Increasing Returns and Economic Geography“. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No.31, 483-99.
Lackenbauer, J. (2004). “Catching-Up, Regional Disparities and EU Cohesion Policy: The Case of Hungary”. Managing Global Transitions, 2(2), 123-162.
Li, Y. (2008). “Industrial Agglomeration and Wage Inequality in China” [Elektronik Sürüm]. MPRA.
Ottaviano, G. I. P. and Thisse, J. F. (2004). “Agglomeration and Economic Geography”. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse (Ed.). Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Vol. 4, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Puga, D. (1999). “The Rise and Fall of Regional Inequalities”. European Economic Review, 43, 303-334.
Scott, A. J. (2006). “A Perspective of Economic Geography”. Bagchi-Sen, S. and Lawton, S. H. (Ed.). Economic Geography: Past, Present and Future. (56-80). Routledge: Oxford University Press.
Venables, A. J. (2001). “Trade, Location, and Development: An Overview of Theory”. Erişim tarih: 13 Nisan 2009, http://www.cababstractsplus.org/abstracts/ Abstract.aspx?AcNo.
Venables, A. J. (1996). “Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries”. International Economic Review, Vol. 37, No. 2, 341-359.
Wu, S. Y. (2009) Economic and Institutional Determinants of Geographical Concentration of Industries in Transition Economies: Evidence from China. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Buffalo: State University of New York, Faculty of the Graduate School.