THE CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY SECURITY NEXUS IN THE U.S

Küresel ölçekte değişen iklim, bugün her zamankinden daha fazla, tüm ülkelerin ulusal güvenliklerini tehdit eden yeni, doğrudan ve çok yönlü bir mesele olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Özellikle aşırı hava olayları nedeniyle iklim değişikliğinin etkileri dikkate alındığında, durumun oldukça ciddi olduğu görülmektedir. İnsanlığın ve gezegenin geleceği, bundan dolayı tehlike altında olabilir. Kasırgalar, kuraklıklar, orman yangınları ve seller, geri dönüşümü mümkün olmayan çevresel bozulmalara ve uzun süren kuraklığa neden olmakta ve bu durum, milyonlarca insanın gıda, su ve sağlık koruma güvenliğini olumsuz yönde etkilemekte ve on yıldan daha fazla bir süredir kitlesel göçlere yol açmaktadır. Gelişmiş ülkelerin büyük ölçüde sorumlu olduğu bu sorunların en kötü ve yıkıcı etkileri, doğal kaynak kıtlığı yaşayan ve iklim değişikliğinin yol açtığı bu (gibi) sorunlarla mücadele etmede sınırlı olanaklara sahip olan gelişmekte olan ülkelerde çoğunlukla görülmekte, görülecektir. Onlar (bu sorunlar), ülkelerin en maliyetli ve yıkıcı doğal felaketidir. Diğer taraftan, iklim değişikliğiyle yaratılan (bu) sorunların, ekonomik ve siyasal istikrarı, yani barış ve huzuru, tehdit etmesinin yanı sıra, özellikle dünyanın en istikrarsız bölgelerinde, ülkeler ve topluluklar arasında çatışmalara ve gerginliklere yol açabilme olasılığı bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, hem enerji ve iklim güvenliği arasındaki yakın ilişkiyi vurgulamakta ve hem iklim değişikliğinin ulusal güvenliğe ne ölçüde etkilediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Her iki politika, dünyada birlikte gerçekleşmektedir. Bu çalışmada enerjiye dayalı ABD'nin iklim güvenliği politikaları tartışılmakta ve bu çerçevede bugüne dayalı olarak analiz edilmektedir

ABD'DE İKLİM DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ VE ENERJİ GÜVENLİĞİ BAĞLANTISI

Today, more than ever before, the changing global climate is defined as a new direct and multifaceted issue threatening the national security of all countries. Considering the effects of climate change, especially through extreme weather events, the situation seems quite serious. The future of humankind and our planet may be in jeopardy due to it. Thunders, droughts, forest fires and floods have caused environmental impairments and longerlasting drought not recycled and this situation has adversely affected the food, water and sanitation security of millions of people and mass migration has happened for more than a decade. The worst and devastating effects of these problems that are belonged to largely the responsibility of developed countries, mostly are seen, or will see, developing countries which have scarce natural resources and limited facilities to adapt to these challenges caused by climate change. They are state's most costly and destructive natural disaster. Conversely, there are possibility which the problems created by climate change can lead to conflicts and tensions among the states and communities, especially on the world's most unstable regions, as well as threatening economic and political stability, that is, peace and tranquility. This study is both to emphasize the close relationship between energy and climate security and put clearly forward to what extend does national security affect by climate change. Both policies are carried out over the world together. The U.S. climate security politics based on energy demand, in this framework, is to discussed and analyzed on this basis of at present in this study

PDF

___

Adelman, D. E. (2010). "Climate Change, Federalism, and Promoting Technological Change", Alyson C. Flournoy and David M. Driesen (ed.) Beyond Environmental Law: Policy Proposals for a Better Environmental Future (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 199-221.
Andrews, R. N.L. (2006). Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A History of American Environmental Policy (New Haven: Yale University Press).
Bardoff, J. et al. (2010). "Understanding the Interaction between Energy Security and Climate Change Policy", Carlos Pascual and Jonathan Elkind (ed.), Energy Security: Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 209- 248.
Carlarne, C. (2008). "Notes from a Climate Change Pressure-Cooker: Sub- Federal Attempts at Transformation Meet National Resistance in the USA", Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 1351-1409.
Chemerinsky, E.; B. Daniels; B. Hardy; T. Profeta; C. H. Schroeder and N. S. Siegel (2008). "Environmental Law Reporter: California, Climate Change, and the Constitution", Environmental Forum - The Policy Journal of the Environmental Law Institute, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 50-63.
CNA Analysis & Solutions, Powering America's Defense: Energy and the Risks to National Security, retrieved June 23, 2010, from http:// www.greenbiz.com/sites/default/files/document/PoweringAmericasDef ense.pdf.
CNN Politics, CNN Poll: Most Americans applaud Democrats' loss of supermajority, (February 05, 2016), retrieved October 10, 2010, from http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/01/25/cnn-poll-most- americans-applaud-democrats-loss-of-supermajority/.
Colakoglu, E. (2008). Suya Erisim Baglaminda Su Guvenligi, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The Ankara University Faculty of Political Sciences the Political Sciences and Public Administration.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources United States Senate, Future Energy Needs: One Hundred Tenth Congress, Second Session to Receive Testimony on the Challenges to Meeting Future Energy Needs and to Developing the Technologies for Meeting Increased Global Energy Demand in the Context of the Need to Address Global Climate Change (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, June 25, 2008).
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources United States Senate, Proposals on Energy Research and Development: One Hundred Eleventh Congress, Receive Testimony Regarding Draft Legislative Proposals on Energy Research and Development (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, March 5, 2009).
Craig, J. R. (2003). Dwight D. Eisenhower National Security Conference 2003 (Washington, D.C., September 25-26, 2003) (Washington, D.C.: Special Publications, CMH Pub 70-90-1, 2004).
Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik (January 14, 2006), "Kasırgalar ve Seller 2006'da da Bekleniyor", Year: 19, No: 982, p. 4.
Dernbach, J. C. and S. Kakade, "Climate Change Law: An Introduction", Energy Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1 (2008), pp. 1-31.
Engel, K. (2006). "State and Local Climate Change Initiatives: What is Motivating State and Local Governments to Address a Global Problem and What Does This Say About Federalism and Environmental Law?", The Urban Lawyer, Vol. 38, No.4, pp. 1015-1029.
Erspamer, G. and S. Sprenkel (2007). "The Commerce Clause Implications of California's Climate Change Initiatives", Morrison Foerster retrieved August http://www.mofo.com/pubs/xpqPublicationDetail.aspx?xpST=PubDetai l&pub=6300. 18, 2010, from
Farber, D. A. (2008). "UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No: 1081664: Climate Change, Federalism, and the Constitution", Rehnquist Center, retrieved August 22, 2010, from http://www.rehnquistcenter.org/ Climate%20Change%20and%20Federalism %20REV.pdf.
Fay, J. A. and D. S. Golomb (2002). Energy and the Environment (New York: Oxford University Press).
Ferrey, S. and C. A. Queen (2008). "Carbon Regulation in the United States", Paul Q. Watchman (ed.), Climate Change: A Guide to Carbon Law and Practice (London: Globe Business Publishing Ltd.), pp. 211-227.
Fitzgerald, E. A. (1996). "The Constitutional Division of Powers with Respect to the Environment in the United States", Kanneth M. Holland; F. L. Morton; Brian Galligan (ed.) Federalism and the Environment: Environmental Policymaking in Australia, Canada, and the United States (Westport: Greenwood Press), pp. 19-36.
Gavit, B. C. (1932). The Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution (Bloomington: The Principia Press, Inc.).
Gold, R. and B. Casselman, "On Doomed Rig's Last Day, A Divisive Change of Plan", The Wall Street Journal, August 26, 2010, p. A1.
Herron, E. H. and S. D. King (2004). "Heavy Oil as the Key to U.S. Energy Security", Petroleum Equities Inc., (retrieved August 2, 2010), from http://www.petroleumequities.com/cgi-bin/site.cgi?p=energy security.html&t=5.
Hildreth, R. G.; D. R. Hodas; N. A. Robinson and J. G. Speth (2009). Climate Change Law: Mitigation and Adaptation (Minnesota: Thomson Reuters).
Hiltzik, M. (2010). "Oil Industry Drives Prop. 23 Campaign", Los Angeles Times (July 28, 2010), p. B.
Holland, K. M. (1996). "Introduction", Kanneth M. Holland; F. L. Morton; Brian Galligan (ed.), Federalism and the Environment: Environmental Policymaking in Australia, Canada, and the United States (Westport: Greenwood Press), pp. 1-15.
Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1998). "Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases", Ken Conca and Geoffrey D. Dabelko (ed.), Green Planet Blues: Environmental Politics from Stockholm to Kyoto (Boulder: Westview Press), pp. 287-297.
Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1999). Environment, Scarcity, and Violence (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Hodas, D. (2009). "State Law Responses to Global Warming: Is it Constitutional to think Globally and Act Locally? -2003", Richard G. Hildreth; David R. Hodas; Nicholas A. Robinson; James Gustave Speth (ed.) Climate Change Law: Mitigation and Adaptation (Minnesota: Thomson Reuters).
Hudson, B. (2010). "Commerce in Commons: A New Conception of Environmental and Natural Resources Regulation under the Commerce Clause", Stetson University College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series - Research Paper No. 2010-07, pp. 1-33.
Kelemen, R. D. (2004). The Rules of Federalism: Institutions and Regulatory Politics in the EU and Beyond (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Lieberman, J. K. (1999). A Practical Companion to the Constitution: How the Supreme Court has ruled on Issues from Abortion to Zoning (Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press).
Long, A. (2008). "International Consensus and U.S. Climate Change Litigation", William & Mary: Environmental Law & Policy Review, Vol. 33, pp. 177-218.
Martin, H. and R. D. White (2010). "Oil Spill's Toll on Tourism Estimated at $22.7 Billion", Los Angeles Times (July 23, 2010), p. B2.
Ma, Y. (2010). "China's View of Climate Change", Policy Review: A Publication of the Hoover Institution (June & July 2010), No. 161, pp. 27-43.
Mildner, S.-A. and J. Richert (2010). Obama's New Climate Policy: Opportunities and Challenges of Climate Policy Change in the U.S. (Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP) Research Paper: Berlin).
Office of the Governor, Press Release: Gov. Schwarzenegger, British Prime Minister Tony Blair Sign Historic Agreement to Collaborate on Climate Change, http://gov.ca.gov/index.php/press-release/2770/. retrieved August 13, 2010, from
Rabe, B. G. (2004). Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press).
Revkin, A. C. (2009). "Climate, Security and Politics", The New York Times, (August dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/climate-security-and-politics/. 11, 2010, from http://
Roosevelt, M. (2010a). "Judge Alters Prop. 23 Label", Los Angeles Times (August 4, 2010), p. AA4.
Roosevelt, M. (2010b). "Prop. 23 Backers Sue Over Wording", Los Angeles Times (July 29, 2010), p. AA4.
Schultz, D.; J. R. Vile and M. D. Deardorff (2010). Constitutional Law in Contemporary America: Institutions, Politics, and Process (New York: Oxford University Press).
Snyder, J. and J. Binder (2009). "The Changing Climate of Cooperative Federalism: The Dynamic Role of the States in a National Strategy to Combat Climate Change", Journal Environmental Law, Vol. 27, pp. 231-260.
The BESAC Subcommittee on Facing Our Energy Challenges in a New Era of Science (2008). New Science for a Secure and Sustainable Energy Future: A Report from the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (U.S. Department of Energy).
The Economist, "Reason, Politics, and Global Warming" (September 3, 2010), retrieved February 5, 2016, from http://www.economist.com/blogs/ democracyinamerica/2010/09/proposition_23.
The White House, National Security Strategy, retrieved June 23, 2010, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_%20 security_strategy.pdf.
U.S. EPA, "Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202 (a) of the Clean Air Act", Richard G. Hildreth; David R. Hodas; Nicholas A. Robinson; James Gustave Speth (ed.), Climate Change Law: Mitigation and Adaptation (Minnesota: Thomson Reuters, April 24, 2009).
Western Climate Initiative, Clean Energy: Creating Jobs, Protecting the Environment, (May 2010), retrieved August 13, 2010, from http:// www.westernclimateinitiative.org/component/remository/func- startdown/256/.