ETKİLEŞİMSEL FARKINDALIĞI ARTTIRMAK İÇİN KONUŞMA ÇÖZÜMLEMESİ TEMELLİ PEDAGOJİK BİR ETKİNLİK DİZİSİ

Bu çalışma, konuşma çözümlemesi araştırmalarına dayalı olan ve İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen öğrencilerin İngilizcenin etkileşimsel mekanizmalarına yönelik farkındalıklarını arttırmak amacı taşıyan bir etkinlik dizisi sunmaktadır. Etkinlik dizisi şunları içermektedir: (1) ders anlatımı (ör: söz sırası alma, dizi ve yeğleme düzeni, onarım), (2) konuşmaya yönelik etkinlikler, (3) konuşmaların ses ve görüntü kayıtları, (4) kayıtların öğrencilerle paylaşımı, (5) kayıtları defalarca ve yönlendirilmiş bir şekilde izleme ve öz değerlendirme formunu doldurma, (6) çeviri yazılarının oluşturulması ve (7) öğretmen tarafından yürütülen tüm sınıf katılımlı video tabanlı geri bildirim oturumuna katılım. Dersin geliştirilmesinde Wong ve Waring (2010) kaynak olarak kullanılmakta ve her bir basamak her bir etkileşimsel mekanizma için tekrar edilmektedir. Bu çalışmayla yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğretiminin gerçekleştirildiği lise sınıflarında uygulanmak üzere sunduğumuz etkinlik dizisi daha önce yükseköğretim sınıflarında benzer hedeflerle başarıyla uygulanmış ve farklı gruplara sunulmaya hazır hale getirilmiştir.

A SERIES OF CONVERSATION ANALYSIS BASED PEDAGOGICAL ACTIVITIES FOR INCREASING INTERACTIONAL AWARENESS

This article presents a series of activities that are informed by research on conversation analysis andused for increasing the EFL [English as a Foreign Language] learners’ awareness of interactionalmechanisms of English language. The activity series consists of (1) lecture (e.g., turn taking, sequenceand preference organization, repair), (2) conversation workshop, (3) audio and video-recording, (4)sharing the recordings with students, (5) guided watching of the recordings repeatedly and filling out aself-feedback sheet, (6) transcription, and (7) a whole class video-oriented feedback session led by theteacher. Each step is repeated for each interactional mechanism using Wong and Waring (2010) as areference for the course design. We present a series of ordered activities recalibrated for use in highschool EFL classrooms based on insights gained from previous implementation in higher educationclassrooms.

___

  • Barraja-Rohan, A. (2011). Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 479-507.
  • Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81, 285– 300.
  • Hall, J. K., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2011). L2 interactional competence and development. In J. K. Hall, J.
  • Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 1–15). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning (Vol. 6). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Huth, T., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language Teaching Research, 10, 53–79.
  • Hymes, D. (1967). On communicative competence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Hymes, D. H. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In. G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies form first generation (pp. 13- 34). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117- 142). London: Routledge.
  • Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366-372.
  • Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behaviour tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29, 404-27.
  • Nguyen, H. t. (2012). Social interaction and competence development: Learning the sequential organization of a communicative practice. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(2), 127–142.
  • Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2011). Developing “methods” for interaction: A cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 409- 424). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210-228). West Sussex: Blackwell.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 28 – 52).
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for selfcorrection in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361– 82.
  • Schegloff, E. A, & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289–327. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden: Blackwell.
  • Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis and language learning. Language Teaching, 38(4), 165-187.
  • Seedhouse, P., & Walsh, S. (2010). Learning a second language through classroom interaction. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics (pp. 127- 46). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Sert, O., Balaman, U., Daşkın, N. C., Büyükgüzel, S., & Ergül, H. (2015).
  • Konuşma çözümlemesi yöntemi [Conversation analysis methodology]. Mersin Üniversitesi Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi, MEUDED, 12(2), 1-43.
  • Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. West Sussex: Blackwell.
  • Skogmyr Marian, K., & Balaman, U. (2018). Second language interactional competence and its development: An overview of conversation analytic research on interactional change over time. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(8), e12285. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/1749 818x/2018/12/8
  • Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Waring, H. Z. (2017). Conversation analytic approaches to language and education. In K. A. King, Y. Lai, & S. May (Eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 463-474). Switzerland: Springer.
  • Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. London: Routledge.
  • Young, R. (2000). Interactional competence: Challenges for validity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics and the Language Testing Research Colloquium, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Young, F. R. (2008). Language and interaction: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.