KRANİYOTOMİLERDE ESMOLOL VE REMİFENTANİLİN HEMODİNAMİK ETKİLERİNİN VE DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Amaç: Kraniyotomi yapılan hastalarda esmolol ve remifentanil infüzyonlarının perioperatif hemodinamik değişikliklerin kontrolü, fentanil tüketimi ve derlenme süresi üzerine olan etkilerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Yöntem: Elektif kraniyotomi yapılan, ASA I-II, 40 erişkin hasta, rastgele 2 gruba ayrıldı. Grup Remifentanil’e 1 µg kg-1 yükleme ardından 0,25-1µg kg-1 dk1 remifentanil infüzyonu, Grup Esmolol’e 500 µg kg-1 yükleme ardından 100-300 µg kg1dk1 esmolol infüzyonu yapıldı. Esmolol ve remifentanil infüzyon hızı, belirlenen hedef kalp hızı ve kan basıncı (başlangıç değerlerin %20’si) değerlerine göre titre edildi. Bulgular: Kalp hızı (KH) ve ortalama arter basıncı (OAB) remifentanil ve esmolol yükleme dozunun verilmesinden sonra her iki grupta da düştü. KH ve OAB’de operasyonun 2. saatinden itibaren remifentanil grubunda daha fazla düşme tespit edildi. Ekstübasyondan sonra remifentanil grubunda KH ve OAB daha yüksek bulundu. Hedef KH ve OAB’nin sağlanabilmesi için; esmolol 100 (0,06) µg kg-1dk-1, remifentanil 0,195 (0,06) µg kg-1dk-1 infüzyon yapıldı, remifentanil grubunda ilaç infüzyon hızında daha fazla değişiklik yapılmış ve daha fazla fentanil kullanılmıştır. Esmolol grubunda derlenme daha hızlı idi (Aldrete skoru ≥9 süresi, Grup R: 15,05 (4,45) dk, Grup E: 11,50 ( 3,12) dk p=0,005). [Değerler ortalama (standart sapma)]. Sonuç: Kraniyotomi yapılan hastalarda esmolol infüzyonu remifentanil infüzyonuna göre perioperatif dönemde hemodinamik stabiliteyi daha iyi korur ve erken derlenme sağlar. Remifentanil kullanımı ise intraoperatif ve erken postoperatif dönemde daha fazla yan etki oluşması ile ilişkilidir.

COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS AND RECOVERY PROFILES OF ESMOLOL AND REMIFENTANIL IN CRANIOTOMY OPERATIONS

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare esmolol and remifentanil infusions with respect to their effect on perioperative hemodynamic stability, fentanyl consumption and recovery time in craniotomy patients. Methods: Forty ASAI-II adults scheduled for elective craniotomy were randomised into two groups. Group Remifentanil received 1 µg kg-1 loading and 0.25-1 µg kg-1 min-1 remifentanil infusion, Group Esmolol received 500 µg kg-1 loading, 100-300 µg kg1 min-1 esmolol infusion. The esmolol and remifentanil infusions were titrated according to target heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (whithin 20% of baseline values). Results: HR and MAP decreased in both groups after the loading dose. The decrease in HR and MAP was significantly more in group remifentanil after the second hour of surgery. After the extubation the HR and MAP increased significantly in group remifentanil. The required esmolol infusion rate was 100 (0,06) µg kg-1 min-1 and remifentanil infusion rate was 0,195 (0,06) µg kg-1 min-1 to achieve the targeted HR and MAP. The number of drug infusion rate changes and fentanyl consumption was higher in group remifentanil conmpared to group esmolol. The recovery was faster in group esmolol compared to group remifentanil (Time to Aldrete score ≥9, Group R: 15,05 (4,45) min, Group E: 11,50 ( 3,12) min p=0,005). [Values are mean (standart deviation)]. Conclusion: Esmolol infusion is superior to remifentanil in providing hemodynamic stability and early recovery in the perioperative period in craniotomy operations. On the other hand, remifentanil infusion is associated with intraoperative and early postoperative complications.

___

  • Citerio G, Franzosi MG, Latini R et al. Anaesthesiological strategies in elective craniotomy: randomized, equivalence, open trial – The NeuroMorfeo trial. Trials 2009; 10: 19.
  • Martorano PP, Aloj F, Baietta S, et al. Sufentanil-propofol vs remifentanil-propofol during total intravenous anesthesia for neurosurgery. A multicentre study. Minerva Anestesiol 2008; 74: 233-243.
  • Citerio G, Pesenti A, Latini R, et al. A multicentre, randomised, open-label, controlled trial evaluating equivalence of inhalational and intravenous anaesthesia during elective craniotomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29: 371-379.
  • Magni G, Baisi F, La Rosa I, et al. No difference in emergence time and early cognitive function between sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2005; 17: 134-138.
  • Grillo P, Bruder N, Auquier P, et al. Esmolol Blunts the Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity Increase During Emergence from Anesthesia in Neurosurgical Patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1145-1149.
  • Bunegin L, Albin M S, Gelineau E F. Effect of esmolol on cerebral bloodflow during intracranial hypertension and hemoragic hypovolemia. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: A424.
  • Heinke W, Zysset S, Hunt-Georgiadis M, et al. The effect of esmolol on cerebral blood flow, cerebral vasoreactivity, and cognitive performance: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Anesthesiology 2005; 102: 41-50.
  • Ravussin P. Characteristics and clinical use of esmolol. Ravussin. Minerva Anestesiol 1992; 58: 77-81.
  • Collard V, Mistraletti G, Taqi A, et al. Intraoperative esmolol infusion in the absence of opioids spares postoperative fentanyl in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1255-1262.
  • Pranevicius M, Pranevicius O. Non-opioid anesthesia with esmolol avoids opioid-induced hyperalgesia and reduces fentanyl requirement after laparoscopy. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 1048.
  • Turan G, Dinçer E, Ünlü N, ve ark. İntrakraniyal Operasyonlarda Çivili Başlık Uygulamasında Esmolol ve Remifentanilin Hemodinamik Açıdan Karşılaştırılması. Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi 2007; 35: 174-178.
  • Goma HM, Ali MZ. Control of emergence hypertension after craniotomy for brain tumor surgery. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2009; 14: 167-171.
  • Leslie K, Troedel S: Does anaesthesia care affect the outcome following craniotomy? J Clin Neurosci 2002; 9: 231-236.
  • Aldrete JA: The post-anaesthesia recovery score revisited. JClin Anaesth 1995, 7: 89-91.
  • Coloma M, Chiu JW, White PF, et al. The Use of Esmolol as an Alternative to Remifentanil During Desflurane Anesthesia for Fast-Track Outpatient Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 352-357.
  • Trekova NA, Aksel'rod BA, Tolstova IA, et al. Efficiency and controllability of esmolol (breviblock)-induced adrenergic blockade during the heart and aorta surgery. Anesteziol Reanimatol 2012; 2: 8-13.
  • Figueredo E, Garcia-Fuentes EM. Assessment of the efficacy of esmolol on the haemodynamic changes induced by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: A metaanalysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 1011-1022.
  • Yu SK, Tait G, Karkouti K, Wijeysundera D, McCluskey S, Beattie WS. The safety of perioperative esmolol: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 267-281
  • Citerio G, Pesenti A, Latini R, et al. NeuroMorfeo Study Group. A multicentre, randomised, open-label, controlled trial evaluating equivalence of inhalational and intravenous anaesthesia during elective craniotomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29: 371-379.
  • Wong AY, O'Regan AM, Irwin MG. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil for elective neurosurgical procedures: an audit of early postoperative complications. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23: 586-590.
  • Bai N, Guo Q, Cheng Z et al. Remifentanil and fentany combined with propofol administered by target controlled infusion in neurosurgery Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2009; 34: 59-62.
  • Echevarr›´a G, Elgueta F, Fierro C, et al. Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) reduces postoperative opioid-induced hyperalgesia after remifentanil–propofol anaesthesia in humans. BJA 2011; 107: 959-965.
  • Stricker PA, Kraemer FW, Ganesh A. Severe remifentanil-induced acute opioid tolerance following awake craniotomy in an adolescent. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 124-126.
  • Bilotta F, Lam AM, Doronzio A, et al. Esmolol blunts postoperative hemodynamic changes after propofol-remifentanil total intravenous fast-track neuroanesthesia for intracranial surgery. J Clin Anesth 2008; 20: 426-430.
  • Ornstein E, Young WL, Ostapkovich N, et al. Are all effects of esmolol equally rapid in onset? Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 297-300.
  • Lauta E, Abbinante C, Del Gaudio C, et al. Emergence times are similar with sevoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia: results of a multicenter RCT of patients scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2010; 22: 110-118.
  • Boztuğ N, Bigat Z, Akyuz M, et al. Does using the bispectral index (BIS) during craniotomy affect the quality of recovery? J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2006; 18: 1-4.
  • Budakçı T, Koltka EN, Sağıroğlu AE, ve ark. Kraniyotomilerde Esmolol İnfüzyonunun Etkileri. Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi 2010; 38: 35-44.
  • Del Gaudio A, Ciritella P, Perrotta F, et al. Remifentanil vs fentanyl with a target controlled propofol infusion in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions. Minerva Anestesiol 2006; 72: 309-319.
Anestezi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0578
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1993
  • Yayıncı: Betül Kartal
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

MULTİTRAVMA SONRASI RABDOMİYOLİZ GELİŞEN OLGUDA AKUT BÖBREK YETMEZLİĞİ

İSKENDER KARA, Hamit KÜÇÜK, Lale KARABIYIK, İsmail KATI

TİMPANOPLASTİ OPERASYONLARINDA HİPOTANSİF ANESTEZİ: DEKSMEDETOMİDİN VE MAGNEZYUM SÜLFATIN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

MENŞURE KAYA, Yeliz İrem TUNÇEL, SÜHEYLA ÜNVER, Nihal KADIOĞULLARI, Deniz OĞUZ

SÜNNET OLAN ÇOCUKLARDA ROPİVAKAİN İLE PENİL BLOK VE KAUDAL BLOĞUN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

ÇİĞDEM YILDIRIM GÜÇLÜ, BAŞAK CEYDA MEÇO, Ali Abbas YILMAZ, Zekeriyya ALANOĞLU, NESLİHAN ALKIŞ

KRANİYOTOMİLERDE ESMOLOL VE REMİFENTANİLİN HEMODİNAMİK ETKİLERİNİN VE DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Dilek YAZICIOĞLU, Ercan SÖNMEZ, İbrahim ÖZTÜRK, Taylan AKKAYA, Haluk GÜMÜŞ, Murat SAYIN

BÖLGE YANIK MERKEZİ YOĞUN BAKIM ÜNİTESİ’NDE TOKSİK EPİDERMAL NEKROLİZİS’Lİ HASTALAR

Tamer KUZUCUOĞLU, Ayten SARAÇOĞLU, Sezer YAKUPOĞLU, Tuncay ERHAN, Burak ERSOY, Recep DEMİRHAN

FEMUR FRAKTÜRLÜ SOL VENTRİKÜL DESTEK CİHAZLI HASTADA ANESTEZİ YÖNETİMİ

Nezih SERTÖZ, Cengiz ŞAHUTOĞLU, Esin BAŞ, Semra KARAMAN, Fatma Zekiye AŞKAR

SAĞLIK PROFESYONELLERİNİN BİTKİSEL İLAÇ KULLANAN HASTALARA YAKLAŞIMI

Vildan TAŞPINAR, Nihal GÖKBULUT ÖZASLAN, GÜVEN ÖZKAYA, Nursel KARAKELLE, Derya TÜRKASLAN, Nurcan YAVUZ, Beyazıt DİKMEN, Nermin GÖĞÜŞ

PROPOFOL VE DEKSMEDETOMİDİN İLE SEDASYON VE SİSTEMİK İNFLAMATUAR YANIT SENDROMU

Jülide ERGİL, İbrahim ÖZTÜRK, Murat SAYIN

PALYATİF BAKIMDA AĞRI TEDAVİSİ VE SORUNLAR

AYSUN ANKAY YILBAŞ, Nalan ÇELEBİ

TOTAL DİZ PROTEZİNDE PREEMPTİF DEKSKETOPROFEN TROMETAMOL VEYA PARASETAMOL/TRAMADOL KOMBİNASYONUN POSTOPERATİF ANALJEZİYE ETKİSİ

Gözde Bumin AYDIN, Reyhan POLAT, Emine ARIK, Jülide ERGİL, Birol TUNÇ, İbrahim ÖZTÜRK