BÖLGE YANIK MERKEZİ YOĞUN BAKIM ÜNİTESİ’NDE TOKSİK EPİDERMAL NEKROLİZİS’Lİ HASTALAR

Amaç: Toksik epidermal nekrolizis (TEN) sepsis ve ölümle sonuçlanan potansiyel hayatı tehdit edici, ender görülen bir hastalıktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı hastanemiz yanık ünitesine kabul edilen 12 TEN hastasına ait mortalite oranı, ilişkili komorbiditeler, klinik ve epidemiyolojik karakteristiklerini belirlemektir. Yöntem: Yanık yoğun bakım ünitesine kabul edilen TEN tanısı konulmuş 12 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, ilaç kullanımı, cilt yanık hasarının derinliği ve yüzdesi, APACHE II skorları, cerrahi girişimler, hastanede kalış süresi, mekanik ventilasyon süresi, komplikasyonlar, mortalite ve morbidite oranları retrospektif olarak dökümante edildi. Hastaların mortalite oranlarının belirlenmesinde Scorten Skalası kullanıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama yaş 35±5,7 yıldı. Erkek hastaların kadınlara oranı 5:7 idi ve ortalama APACHE II skoru 15,4±3,2 idi. Epidermal ayrılma vücut yüzey alanının %75’inden fazla, median hasta yatış süresi 17±1,2 gündü. Bir hastada parasetamol ve etodolak, 3 hastada fenitoin alım öyküsü bulunmaktaydı. TEN semptomları bir başka hastada antitüberküloz tedavisi sonucunda, 4 hastada da sultamisilin tedavisini takiben ortaya çıktı. Diğer hastaların etyolojisi bilinmiyordu. Median mekanik ventilasyon destek süresi 3,2±0,7 gündü. Mortalite oranı %16,6 (2/12) idi. Sonuç: TEN hastaları yüksek mortalite riskinden dolayı değişik yaklaşımlar ve tedavi stratejileri gerektirirler. Sorumlu ilacın erken dönemde belirlenerek kesilmesinin ve bir yanık merkezinde özel destekleyici tedavi ortamının oluşturulmasının toksik epidermal nekroliziste mortalite oranını düşüreceği kanısına varılmıştır.

PATIENTS WITH TOXIC EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT OF REGIONAL BURN CENTER

Objective: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a potentially life-threatening rare disorder, resulting in possible sepsis and death. The aim of this study is to determine the mortality rate, associated comorbidities, the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of 12 TEN patients hospitalized in our burn unit. Method: Twelve patients diagnosed with TEN and admitted to the burn intensive care unit were included in the study. Age, gender, medication, percentage and depth of skin burn damage, APACHE II scores, surgical interventions, hospitalization time, the duration of mechanical ventilation, complications, mortality and morbidity rates of patients were documented in a retrospective manner. The Scorten Scale was utilized to determine the mortality rate of the patients. Results: Mean age was 35±5.7 years. The ratio of males to females was 5:7 and the average APACHE II score was 15.4±3.2. Epidermal detachment was greater than 75% of the body surface area with a mean hospitalization time of 17±1.2 days. One patient had a history of paracetamol and etodolac, 3 had phenytoin medication. TEN symptoms were seen as a result of anti-tuberculosis treatment in another patient and appeared in four patients after treatment with sultamicilin. Other patients had an unknown etiology. Mean duration of mechanical ventilation support was 3.2±0.7 days. The mortality rate was 16.6% (2/12). Conclusion: Due to the high risk of mortality, patients with TEN may require different approaches and management strategies. We concluded that early identification and interception of the responsible drug and the provision of a specialized supportive care in a burn unit may reduce the mortality rate for toxic epidermal necrolysis.

___

  • Lyell A. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: an eruption resembling scalding of the skin. Br J Dermatol 1956; 68: 355-361.
  • Paquet P, Delvenne P, Pierard GE. Drug interactions with normal and TEN epidermal keratinocytes. Curr Drug Saf 2012; 7: 352-356.
  • Bastuji-Garin S, Rzany B, Stern RS, Shear NH, Naldi L, Roujeau JC. Clinical classification of cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and erythema multiforme. Arch Dermatol 1993; 129: 92-96.
  • Mame Thierno D, On S, Thierno Ndiaye S, Ndiaye B. Lyell syndrome in Senegal: responsibility of thiacetazone. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2001; 128: 1305-1307.
  • Pereira FA, Mudgil AV, Rosmarin DM. Toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56: 181-200.
  • Shiba M, Kido K, Umezawa K, et al. Erythematous and bullous rash strongly indicating toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with the use of intravenous ritodrine hydrochloride. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010; 36: 676-680.
  • Schwartz RA, McDonough PH, Lee BW. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: Part II. Prognosis, sequelae, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 69:187.e1-16.
  • Magina S, Lisboa C, Leal V, Palmares J, Mesquita-Guimarães J. Dermatological and ophthalmological sequels in toxic epidermal necrolysis. Dermatology 2003; 207: 33-36.
  • Borchers AT, Lee JL, Naguwa SM, Cheema GS, Gershwin ME. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Autoimmun Rev 2008; 7: 598-605.
  • Abe R. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome: soluble Fas ligand involvement in the pathomechanisms of these diseases. J Dermatol Sci 2008; 52: 151-159.
  • Endorf FW, Cancio LC, Gibran NS. Toxic epidermal necrolysis clinical guidelines. J Burn Care Res 2008; 29: 706-712.
  • Mc Gee T, Munster A. Toxic epidermal necrolysis syndrome mortality rate reduced with early referral to regional burn center. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102; 1018-1022.
  • Hsu M, Jayaram A, Verner R, Lin A, Bouchard C. Indications and outcomes of amniotic membrane transplantation in the management of acute stevens-johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a case-control study. Cornea 2012; 31: 1394-1402.
  • Bastuji-Garin S, Fouchard N, Bertocchi M, Roujeau JC, Revuz J, Wolkenstein P. SCORTEN: a severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Invest Dermatol 2000; 115: 149-153.
  • Abood GJ, Nickoloff BJ, Gamelli RL. Treatment strategies in toxic epidermal necrolysis syndrome: where are we at? J Burn Care Res 2008; 29: 269-276.
  • Garcia-Doval I, LeCleach L, Bocquet H, Otero XL, Roujeau JC. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome: does early withdrawal of causative drugs decrease the risk of death? Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 323-327.
  • Struck MF, Hilbert P, Mockenhaupt M, Reichelt B, Steen M. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions: emergency approach to non-burn epidermolytic syndromes. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 22-32.
  • Dillon CK, Lloyd MS, Dzeiwulski P. Accurate debridement of toxic epidermal necrolysis using Versajet. Burns 2010; 36: 581-584.
  • Pereira FA, Mudgil AV, Rosmarin DM. Toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56: 181-200.
  • Aires DJ, Fraga G, Korentager R, Richie CP, Aggarwal S, Wick J. Early treatment with nonsucrose intravenous immunoglobulin in a burn unit reduces toxic epidermal necrolysis mortality. J Drugs Dermatol 2013; 12: 679-684.
  • Jagadeesan S, Sobhanakumari K, Sadanandan SM, et al. Low dose intravenous immunoglobulins and steroids in toxic epidermal necrolysis: a prospective comparative open-labelled study of 36 cases. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2013; 79: 506-511.
  • Narita YM1, Hirahara K, Mizukawa Y, Kano Y, Shiohara T. Efficacy of plasmapheresis for the treatment of severe toxic epidermal necrolysis: Is cytokine expression analysis useful in predicting its therapeutic efficacy? J Dermatol 2011; 38: 236-245.
  • Harr T, French LE. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2010; 5: 39.
  • Ferrell PB Jr, McLeod HL. Carbamazepine, HLA-B*1502 and risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: US FDA recommendations. Pharmacogenomics 2008; 9: 15431546.
  • Chung WH, Hung SI, Hong HS, et al. Medical genetics: a marker for Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nature 2004; 428: 486.
Anestezi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0578
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1993
  • Yayıncı: Betül Kartal
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

SÜNNET OLAN ÇOCUKLARDA ROPİVAKAİN İLE PENİL BLOK VE KAUDAL BLOĞUN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

ÇİĞDEM YILDIRIM GÜÇLÜ, BAŞAK CEYDA MEÇO, Ali Abbas YILMAZ, Zekeriyya ALANOĞLU, NESLİHAN ALKIŞ

SAĞLIK PROFESYONELLERİNİN BİTKİSEL İLAÇ KULLANAN HASTALARA YAKLAŞIMI

Vildan TAŞPINAR, Nihal GÖKBULUT ÖZASLAN, GÜVEN ÖZKAYA, Nursel KARAKELLE, Derya TÜRKASLAN, Nurcan YAVUZ, Beyazıt DİKMEN, Nermin GÖĞÜŞ

FEMUR FRAKTÜRLÜ SOL VENTRİKÜL DESTEK CİHAZLI HASTADA ANESTEZİ YÖNETİMİ

Nezih SERTÖZ, Cengiz ŞAHUTOĞLU, Esin BAŞ, Semra KARAMAN, Fatma Zekiye AŞKAR

PROPOFOL VE DEKSMEDETOMİDİN İLE SEDASYON VE SİSTEMİK İNFLAMATUAR YANIT SENDROMU

Jülide ERGİL, İbrahim ÖZTÜRK, Murat SAYIN

TOTAL DİZ PROTEZİNDE PREEMPTİF DEKSKETOPROFEN TROMETAMOL VEYA PARASETAMOL/TRAMADOL KOMBİNASYONUN POSTOPERATİF ANALJEZİYE ETKİSİ

Gözde Bumin AYDIN, Reyhan POLAT, Emine ARIK, Jülide ERGİL, Birol TUNÇ, İbrahim ÖZTÜRK

TİMPANOPLASTİ OPERASYONLARINDA HİPOTANSİF ANESTEZİ: DEKSMEDETOMİDİN VE MAGNEZYUM SÜLFATIN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

MENŞURE KAYA, Yeliz İrem TUNÇEL, SÜHEYLA ÜNVER, Nihal KADIOĞULLARI, Deniz OĞUZ

MULTİTRAVMA SONRASI RABDOMİYOLİZ GELİŞEN OLGUDA AKUT BÖBREK YETMEZLİĞİ

İSKENDER KARA, Hamit KÜÇÜK, Lale KARABIYIK, İsmail KATI

PALYATİF BAKIMDA AĞRI TEDAVİSİ VE SORUNLAR

AYSUN ANKAY YILBAŞ, Nalan ÇELEBİ

KRANİYOTOMİLERDE ESMOLOL VE REMİFENTANİLİN HEMODİNAMİK ETKİLERİNİN VE DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Dilek YAZICIOĞLU, Ercan SÖNMEZ, İbrahim ÖZTÜRK, Taylan AKKAYA, Haluk GÜMÜŞ, Murat SAYIN

BÖLGE YANIK MERKEZİ YOĞUN BAKIM ÜNİTESİ’NDE TOKSİK EPİDERMAL NEKROLİZİS’Lİ HASTALAR

Tamer KUZUCUOĞLU, Ayten SARAÇOĞLU, Sezer YAKUPOĞLU, Tuncay ERHAN, Burak ERSOY, Recep DEMİRHAN