Yetişkin gelişiminin anababalık rolleri açısından niteliksel olarak incelenmesi

Bu araştırmada, anne baba rollerinin kişilerin kendi gelişimlerini nasıl etkilediğine yönelik algıları, Erikson’nın yaşam boyu gelişim teorisinde ortaya attığı orta yaş dönemindeki üretkenliğe (bir sonraki kuşağı kurma ve yönlendirme ilgisi) karşı durağanlık evresi temel alınarak incelenmiştir. Erikson bu dönemin yetişkin yaşamında önemli bir role sahip olduğunu ve kişinin kendi çocuğuyla ilgilenmesinin bu gelişimsel işi başarmasında önemli bir role sahip olduğunu önermektedir. Bu doğrultuda, anababalık üretkenliği çerçevesinde; anababaların çocuk yetiştirme davranışları, anne babalığın kişilerin yaşantılarında meydana getirdiği değişimler ve gelişimlerin ne olduğu, anne babalığa yönelik rol algıları, anababalığın evlilik, iş, sosyal ilişkilerine ve kendi gelişimelerine olan etkisi, yaşamdan alınan doyum ve diğer alanlardaki doyumların (evlilik, iş, sağlık vb.) anababalık rolleriyle olan ilişkisi niteliksel olarak incelenmiştir. Bu çalışma için yaşları 37 ile 61 arasında değişen, en az 17 yaşında bir çocuğu olan, 13 anne ve 10 baba ile geriye dönük yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Sonuçta, araştırmaya katılan yetişkinlerin hemen hepsi, hayatlarındaki en önemli rolün anne baba olmaları olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Ancak, anneler, babalara kıyasla annelik rollerini çok daha güçlü algılamaktadırlar. Anababalar çocuk yetiştirmenin olgunlaşmalarına dramatik bir şekilde olmasa da büyük bir katkısının olduğunu ve yaşamlarına bir disiplin ve sorumluluk getirdiğini, anababalığın kendi gelişimlerinde önemli katkılarının olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Dolayısıyla, anne babalar bir sonraki kuşağı oluşturacak çocukları yetiştirip, gelişmelerine rehberlik ederken, aynı zamanda kendi kişilikleri ve gelişimleri de bu çocuk yetiştirme sürecinden etkilenmektedir. Bu çalışma algılanan anababalık rolleri, çocuk yetiştirme ile aktif olarak ilgilenme ve yetişkin gelişimi arasındaki bağlantıyı daha derinlemesine anlamaya çalışmıştır.

A Qualitative investigation of the adult development in terms of parental roles

Based on Erikson’s Theory, this study qualitatively examined the perceived effects of parental role on the adult development. Erikson proposed that “generativity” plays an important role in adult lives, and caring for one’s children is the ultimate expression of this particular developmental task. In this respect, within the framework of parental generativity, this study qualitatively examined parents’ child rearing behaviors, changes and developments in parents’ life, perception of parental roles, the effects of parenting on their marital, work and social relationships, general life satisfaction and satisfaction from other life domains (marital, work, health etc.). Qualitative examination attempted to record the midlife parent experiences in order to verify the existence of parental generativity themes. This study conducted through a retrospective semi-structured interview schedule with 13 mothers and 10 fathers aged 37 to 61. All parents had at least one child at the age of 17 or older. Overall, the results revealed that the most important theme of life for most of the midlife adults was parenthood. However, mothers’ role identities with respect to maternal role were much stronger than the fathers’. Moreover, parents expressed that although rearing and guiding a child may not lead to dramatic changes in their maturation but have a significant contribution by bringing discipline and responsibility to their life. Therefore, while parents caring and guiding their children who become the next generation, at the same time their personality also affected from this experience. The present study contributes further to understanding of the connections between the perception of parental role, parents’ active involvement in childrearing, and adult development.

___

  • Ambert, A. (1992). The effect of children on parents. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
  • Ambert, A. (1994). An international perspective on parenting: social change and social constructs. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 529-543.
  • An, J.S. ve Cooney, T.M. (2006). Psychological wellbeing in mid to late life: The role of generativity development and parent-child relationships across the lifespan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(5), 410-421.
  • Bailey, W. (1992). Psychological development in men: generativity and involvement with young c h i l d - ren. Psychological Reports, 71, 929- 930.
  • Belsky, J., Youngblood, L., Rovine, M., ve Volling, B.(1991). Patterns of marital change and parentchild interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 487-498.
  • Christiansen, S.L. ve Palkovitz, R. (2001). Why the “good provider” role still matters: Providing as a form of paternal involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 84-106.
  • Cowan, C. P. ve Cowan, P. A. (2000). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cummings, E.M., ve Davies, P.T. (2002). Effects of marital conflict on children:Recent advances and emerging themes in process-oriented research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 31-63.
  • Demo, D.H., ve Cox, M. J. (2000). Families with young children: A review of research in the 1 9 9 0 s . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 876-895.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton. (Original work published in 1950).
  • Hawkins, A. J., Christiansen, S. L., Sargent, P. K. ve Hill, J. E. (1993). Rethinking fathers i nv o l - vement in child care. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 531-549.
  • Heller, D., Watson, D. ve Ilies, R. (2004). The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin,130, 574-600.
  • Hortaçsu, N. (1995). Parents’ educational levels, parents’ beliefs, and child outcomes. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156(3), 373-383.
  • Hortaçsu, N. (1999). Transition to parenthood: The Turkish case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14(3), 325-343.
  • Huta, V. ve Zuroff, D.C. (2007). Examining mediators of the link between generativity and well- b e ing . Journal of Adult Development, 14, 47-52.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1980). Türkiye’de çocuğun değeri, gelişme ortamı ve alınması gereken önlemler. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 10, 26-31.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1997). Individualism and Collectivism. In JW. Berry, M.H. Segall, and Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Eds.), Hanbook of Cross-Cultural Pscyhology, vol 3, pg. 1-49. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2000). Kültürel Psikoloji: Kültür bağlamında insan ve aile. İstanbul: Evrim Yayınevi.
  • Kerpelman, J.L. ve Schvaneveldt (1999). Young adults’ anticipated identity importance of career, marital, and parental roles: Comparisons of men and women with different role balance orientations. Sex Roles, 41, 189-217.
  • Keyes, C.L.M. ve Ryff, C.D. (1998). Generativity in adult lives: Social structural contours and quality of life consequences. In D. P. McAdams and E. de St.Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and Adult Development: How and why we care for the next generation (pp. 227-263). Washington DC: American PsychologicalAssociation.
  • Kotre, J. (1996). Outliving the self: How we live on in future generations. New York: Norton (Original work published in 1984)
  • Langdridge, D., Connolly, K. ve Sheeran, P. (2000). Reasons for wanting a child: a network analytic study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 18(4), 321-338.
  • Langdridge, D., Sheeran, P. ve Connolly, K. (2005). Understanding the reason for parenthood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 23(2), 121-133.
  • LaRossa, R. ve LaRossa, M.M. (1981). Transition to parenthood: How infants change families. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Markus, H.R. ve Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
  • McAdams, D. P. ve de St Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003-1015.
  • McAdams, D. P., de St Aubin, E. ve Logan, R.L. (1993). Generativity among young, mid-life and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 221-230.
  • McAdams, D. P., Hart, H. ve Maruna, S. (1998). The anotomy of generativity. In D. P. McAdams and E. de St.Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and Adult Development: How and why we care for the next generation (pp.7-43). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  • McAdams, D.P., Ruetzel, K. ve Foley, J.M. (1986). Complexity and generativity at Midlife: Relations among social motives, ego development, and adults’ plans for The future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 800-807.
  • McKeering, H. ve Pakenham, K. I. (2000). Gender and generativity issues in parenting: Do fathers benefit more than mothers from involvement in child care activities? Sex Roles, 43, 459–480.
  • Miller-McLemore, B.J. (2004). Generativity and gender: The politics of care. In de St. Aubin, E., McAdams, D.P., ve Kim, T.C.(Eds), The generativity society: Caring for future g e n e r a t i o n s (Chapter 11). Retrieved October, 11, 2006 from the Psycbooks database.
  • Morfei, M.Z., Hooker, K., Carpenter, J., Mix, C., ve Blakeley, E. (2004). A agentic and communal generative behaviour in four areas of adult life: Implications for psyhological well-being. Journal of Adult Development, 11(1), 55-58.
  • Palkovitz, R. (1996). Parenting as a generator of adult development: Conceptual issues and its implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(4), 571-592.
  • Palkovitz, R. (2002). Involved fathering and men’s adult development: Provisional Balances. L a w - rence erlbaum associates: London.
  • Purewal, S. ve van den Akker, O. (2007). The sociocultural and biological meaning of p a - renthood. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 28(2), 79-86.
  • Renk, K., Roberts,R., Roddenberry, A., Luick, M., Hillhouse, S., Meehan, C., Olveros, A. ve Phares, V. (2003). Mothers, fathers, gender role, and time parents spend with their children. Sex Roles, 48 (7- 8), 305-315.
  • Rogers, S. J. ve White, L.K. (1998). Satisfaction with parenting: The role of marital happiness, f ami ly structure, and parents’ gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 293-308.
  • Rubin, H.D. (2001). The impact and meaning of childlessness: An interview study of childless women. Proquest Dissertations and Theses database (erişim tarihi 15 Ocak 2006). (http://proquest.umi. com/pqdwebdid=725977741&sid=1&Fmt=2&clie ntId=37478&RQT=309&VName=PQD).
  • Sameroff, A.J. ve Feil, L.A. (1985). Parental concepts of development. In I.E. Sigel(Ed.), Parental Belief Systems. The psychological consequences for children (pp. 83-105). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Sigel, I. ve McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V. (2002). Parents beliefs are cognitions: The Dynamic belief systems model. In Marc H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 3, pp. 485-508). Mahwah, New Jersey: LawranceErlbaum Associates.
  • Simons, R. L., Beaman, J., Conger, R. D. ve Chao, W. (1993). Childhood experience conceptions of parenting, and attitudes of spouse as determinants of parental behaviour. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 91-106.
  • Snarey, J. (1993). How fathers care for the next generation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Snarey, J., Son, L., Kuehne, V. S., Hauser, S., ve Valliant, G. (1987). The role of parenting in men’s psychological development. Developmental Psychology, 23, 593-603.
  • Strauss, A. ve Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M. ve Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism a n d collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on selfingroup relationsips. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323-338.
  • Umberson, D. ve Gove, W. R. (1989). Parenthood and psychological well-being: Theory, measurement and stage in the family life course. Journal of Family Issues, 10, 440-462.
  • Uskul, A.K., Hynie, M. ve Lalonde, R.N. (2004). Interdependence as a mediator between culture and interpersonal closeness for Euro-Canadians and Turks. Journal of Cross- cultural Psychology, 35(2), 174-191.
  • van Rooij F.B., van Balen, F. ve Hermanns, J.M.A. (2006). Migrants and the meaning of parenthood: Involuntary childless Turkish migrants in the Netherlands. Human Reproduction, 21(7), 1832-1838.
  • Willing, C. ve Stainton-Rogers, W. (2008). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. Los Angeles, London: SAGE.