Belirsizlik Altında Tercihler ve Beklenen Fayda Modelinin Yetersizlikleri

İktisatta belirsizlik altındaki tercihleri açıklayan hakim çerçeve Beklenen Fayda teorisidir. Yaygın olarak kullanılmasına rağmen, Beklenen Fayda teorisi sorunsuz değildir. Yapılan deneysel ve ampirik çalışmalar, gerçek hayatta bireylerin riskli alternatifler arasında yaptıkları tercihlerin Beklenen Fayda teorisinin aksiyomları ile çeliştiğini göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada deneysel çalışmalardan elde edilen bulgular ışığında, Beklenen Fayda teorisinin bireylerin belirsizlik altındaki tercihlerini açıklama konusundaki yetersizlikleri incelenmiştir.

Preferences Under Uncertainty and the Deficiencies of the Expected Utility Model

In economics, the prevailing framework to explain preferences under uncerta- inty is the Expected Utility theory. Despite its widespread use, the Expected Utility theory is not free from problems. Experimental and empirical works shows that, in real life, the choices of individuals among risky alternatives conflict with the axioms of the Expected Utility theory. This study, in the light of experimental studies, investigates the problems with the Expected Utility theory regarding the individuals’ preferences under risk.

___

  • Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ecole americaine. Econometrica, 21(4), 503-546.
  • Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoariae novae de mensura sortis. Commentarri Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, Tomus V, 175-192. Translated by Louise Sommer as ``Expositions of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk.’’ Econometrica. vol.22, no.1:.23-36, Jan. 1954.
  • Cox, J. C. and Sadiraj, V. (2002). Risk aversion and expected utility theory: Coherence for small- and large-stakes gambles. University of Arizona, Unpublished Working Paper.
  • Dekel, E. (1986). An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom. Journal of Economic Theory, 40(2), 304-318.
  • Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643-669.
  • Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York: Wiley.
  • Gül, F. (1991). A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica, 59(3), 667-86.
  • Herstein, I. N. and Milnor, J. (1953). An axiomatic approach to measurable utility. Econometrica, 21(2), 291-297.
  • Jehle, G. A. and Reny, P. J. (1998). Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-91.
  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (online Ed.). Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner and Marx; Houghton Mifflin Company. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from Library of Economics and Liberty, http://www.econlib.org/library/Knight/knRUP.html.
  • Laffont, J.-J. (1989). The Economics of Uncertainty and Information. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Lengwiler, Y. (2004). Microfoundations of Financial Economics: An Introduction to General Equilibrium Asset Pricing. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Preprint
  • Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and Decisions. New York: Wiley.
  • Machina, M. J. (1987). Choice under uncertainty: Problems solved and unsolved. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(1), 121-54.
  • Machina, M. J. (1982). Expected Utility Analysis Without the Independence Axiom. Econometrica, 50(2), 277-323.
  • Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D. and Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pratt, J. W., Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R. (1964). The foundations of decision under uncertainty: An elementary exposition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59(306), 353-375.
  • Prelec, D. and Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science, 37(7), 770-786.
  • Rabin, M. (2000a). Diminishing marginal utility of wealth cannot explain risk aversion. Working Paper E00-287, Economics Department, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
  • Rabin, M. (2000b). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica, 68(5), 1281-1292.
  • Rabin, M. and Thaler, R. H. (2001). Anomalies: Risk aversion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 219-232.
  • Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.
  • Shoemaker, P. J. H. (1982). The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations. Journal of Economic Literature, 20(2), 529-563.
  • Vickrey, W. (1945). Measuring marginal utility by reactions to risk. Econometrica, 13(4), 319-333.
  • von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Second Ed.). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.