Tarihsel Bakış Açısı Edinme Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması ve Tarih ve Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmen Adaylarının Tarihsel Bakış Açısı Edinme Becerilerinin İncelenmesi
Bu araştırmanın amacı tarihsel bakış açısı edinme ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlayarak tarih vesosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının tarihsel bakış açısı edinme becerilerini incelemektir. Kesitseltarama modeline göre desenlenen araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2017-2018 öğretim yılında Gazi,Necmettin Erbakan ve Uşak üniversitelerinin çeşitli pogramlarında öğrenim gören ve tesadüfiörnekleme yöntemiyle seçilmiş 386 tarih ve sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır.Tarihsel bakış açısı edinme ölçeğinin Türkçe sürümünün yapı geçerliliği belirlemek içindoğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde betimsel istatistikler, t-testi, BrownForsytheve Welch istatistikleri ve tek yönlü varyans analizinden faydalanılmıştır. Araştırmabulguları tarihsel bakış açısı edinme ölçeğinin Türkçe sürümünün orijinal ölçeğin yapısıylauyumlu bir şekilde geçerli ve güvenilir bir yapıda olduğunu göstermiştir. Yapılan incelemelerayrıca bazı değişkenler açısından gruplar arasında çeşitli farklılıklar olsa da tarih ve sosyal bilgileröğretmen adaylarının tarihsel bakış açısı edinme becerlerinin yeterli düzeyde olduğunugöstermiştir. Çalışmanın son kısmında bu sonuçlardan hareketle tarihsel bakış açısı edinmebecerilerinin ölçülmesinin Türkiye bağlamındaki yer ve önemi tartışılmıştır.
Adapting Historical Perspective Taking Instrument into Turkish and Investigating History and Social Studies Student Teachers’ Historical Perspective Taking Skills
This study aims to adapt historical perspective taking (HPT) instrument into Turkish and then to examine history and social studies student teachers’ HPT skills. Adapting a cross-sectional survey model the current study employs 386 history and social studies student teacher attending to related educational programmes at Gazi, Necmettin Erbakan and Uşak universities in the spring term of 2017-2018 academic year. The study sample was chosen in accordance with random sampling technique. In order to test the structural validity of the HPT Instrument confimatory factor analyses were conducted. Besides, descriptive statistics, t-tests, Brown-Forsythe ve Welch Statistics and One-way Anova were conducted. The research findings reveal that the Turkish version of the HPT instrument is valid and reliable which has a coherent and compatible structure with its original version. The findings also indicate that although there are some differences amongst the groups in regard with several variables, students teachers have sufficient HPT skills. Bearing on this result, the current study discusses the place and importance of measuring HPT skills within the Turkish context.
___
- Achinstein, B., & Fogo, B. (2015). Mentoring novices’ teaching of historical reasoning:
Opportunities for pedagogical content knowledge development through mentorfacilitated
practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 45–58.
doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.002.
- Ashby, R., & Lee, P. (1987). Children's concepts of empathy and understanding in history. In
C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 62−88). London: The
Falmer Press.
- Bain, R., & Mirel, J. (2006). Setting up camp at the great instructional divide educating
beginning history teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 212–219.
doi:10.1177/0022487105285892.
- Barton, K. C. (2012). Agency, choice and historical action: How history teaching can help
students think about democratic decision making. Citizenship Teaching &
Learning, 7, 131–142. doi:10.1386/ctl.7.2.131_1.
- Barton, K. C. (2008). Research on students’ ideas about history. In L. S. Levstik & C. A.
Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 239–258).
New York, NY: Routledge.
- Barton, K. C. (1996). Narrative simplifications in elementary students' historical thinking.
Advances in Research on Teaching, 6, 51−83.
- Barton, K., & Levstik, L. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
- Bermúdez, A., & Jaramillo, R. (2001). Development of historical explanation in children,
adolescents and adults. In A. Dickinson, P. Gordon, & P. Lee (Eds.), Raising
standards in history education, vol. 3. (pp. 146−167). London: Woburn Press.
- Berti, A. E., Baldin, I., & Toneatti, L. (2009). Empathy in history. Understanding a past
institution (ordeal) in children and young adults when description and rationale are
provided. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(4), 278–288.
- Beyer, B. K. (2008). How to teach thinking skills in social studies and history. The Social
Studies, 99, 196–201. doi:10.3200/TSSS.99.5.196-201.
- Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of
theory of mind. Cognition, 77, 25–31. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00096-2.
- Breakstone, J. (2014). Try, try, try again: The process of designing new history assessments.
Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 453–485.
doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.965860.
- Brooks, S. (2011). Historical empathy as perspective recognition and care in one secondary
social studies classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39, 166–202.
doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473452
- Brophy, J., & VanSledright, B. (1997). Teaching and learning history in elementary schools.
New York: Teachers College Press.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni,
SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (15. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel
Araştırma Yöntemleri. (17. Baskı). Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.
- Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. (3. Baskı). Ankara:
Pegem Akademi.
- Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika.
16, 297-334.
- Cronbach, L. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391-418.
- Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests.
Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
- Cunningham, D. L. (2009). An empirical framework for understanding how teachers
conceptualize and cultivate historical empathy in students. Journal of Curriculum
Studies, 41, 679–709. doi:10.1080/00220270902947376.
- Çelik, H. E. ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi temel kavramlar uygulamalar
programlama. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
- Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve
LISREL uygulamaları. (Üçüncü baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
- Davis Jr, O. L., Yeager, E. A., & Foster, S. J. (Ed) (2001). Historical Empathy and
Perspective Taking in the Social Studies. Lanham, Maryland, USA: Rowman &
Littlefield Publisher Inc.
- Dawson, I. (2009). What time does that tune start? From thinking about “sense of period” to
modelling history at key stage 3. Teaching History, 135, 50–57.
- De Keyser, R., & Vandepitte, P. (Eds.). (1998). Historical formation. Design of vision.
Brussels, Belgium: Flemish Board for Catholic Secondary Education.
- Den Heyer, K. (2003). Between every “now” and “then”: A role for the study of historical
agency in history and citizenship education. Theory & Research in Social
Education, 31, 411–434. doi:10.1080/00933104.2003.10473232
- Dilek, D. (2007). Tarih derslerinde öğrenme ve düşünce gelişimi. (3. Basım). Ankara: Nobel
Kitap.
- Endacott, J. L., & Brooks, S. (2013). An updated theoretical and practical model for
promoting historical empathy. Social Studies Research & Practice, 8, 41–58.
- Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. (3 Edition). London: Sage Publications.
- Fordham, M. (2013). O brave new world, without those levels in’t: where now for key stage 3
assessment in history? Teaching history. The Historical Association Curriculum
Supplement, 153(1), 16–23.
- Foster, S., & Yeager, E. A. (2001). The role of empathy in the development of historical
understanding. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy
and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 13–21). Oxford: Rowman and
Littlefield.
- Foster, S., Ashby, R., & Lee, P. (2008). Usable historical pasts: A study of students’
frameworks of the past. Swindon: ESRC.
- Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2005). How to design and evaluate in education. (6.
Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Grant, S., & Gradwell, J. (2010). Teaching with big ideas: Cases of ambitious teaching.
Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Hambleton, R.K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be
avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied
Testing Technology, 1(1), 1-30.
- Hartmann, U., & Hasselhorn, M. (2008). Historical perspective taking: A standardized
measure for an aspect of students’ historical thinking. Learning and Individual
Differences, 18(2), 264–270.
- Havekes, H., Coppen, P. A., Luttenberg, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2012). Knowing and doing
history: A conceptual framework and pedagogy for teaching historical
contextualisation. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and
Research, 11.
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure
analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation
modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
- Huijgen, T., Grift, W., van Boxtel, C., & Holthuis, P. (2018): Promoting historical
contextualization: the development and testing of a pedagogy. Journal of
Curriculum Studies, DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2018.1435724
- Huijgen, T., Van Boxtel, C., Van de Grift, W., & Holthuis, P. (2014). Testing elementary and
secondary school students’ ability to perform historical perspective taking: The
constructing of valid and reliable measure instruments. European Journal of
Psychology of Education, 29, 653–672. doi:10.1007/s10212-014-0219-4
- Huijgen, T., Van Boxtel, C., Van de Grift, W., & Holthuis, P. (2017). Toward historical
perspective taking: Students’ reasoning when contextualizing the actions of people
in the Past. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45, 110–144.
doi:10.1080/00933104.2016.1208597
- Karabağ, G. (2015). Kuramdan uygulamaya tarihsel empati. Y., Kabapınar (Ed.), Empatiyle
gelişmek empatiyi geliştirmek: Çocuk ve empati içinde (ss. 508-564). Ankara:
Pegem Akademi.
- Kayış, A. (2010). Güvenilirlik analizi. Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli
istatistik teknikleri içinde (ss. 404-421). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
- Kitson, A., Husbands, C., & Steward, S. (2011). Teaching and learning history 11–18:
Understanding the past. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3. edition). New
York/London: The Guilford Press.
- Kohlmeier, J. (2006). “Couldn’t she just leave?”: The relationship between consistently using
class discussions and the development of historical empathy in a 9th grade world
history course. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34, 34–57.
doi:10.1080/00933104.2006.10473297.
- Lee, P. (2005). Putting principles into practice. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.),
How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 31–
78). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Lee, P. (1978). Explanation and understanding. In A. K. Dickinson & P. J. Lee (Eds.), History
teaching and historical understanding (pp. 72–93). London, UK: Heinemann
Educational Books.
- Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2001). Empathy, perspective taking, and rational understanding. In O.
L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective
taking in the social studies (pp. 21–50). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Levstik, L. S. (2001). Crossing the empty spaces: New Zealand adolescents’ understanding of
perspective-taking and historical significance. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J.
Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp.
69–96). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Nilsen, A. P. (2016) Navigating Windows Into Past Human Minds: A framework of shifting
selves in historical perspective taking, Journal of The Learning Sciences, 25, 3,
372-410, DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2016.1160830.
- Peck, C., & Seixas, P. (2008). Benchmarks of historical thinking: First steps. Canadian
Journal of Education, 31, 1015–1038.
- Pendry, A., & Husbands, C. (2000). Research and practice in history teacher education.
Cambridge Journal of Education, 30, 321–334. doi:10.1080/03797720600625275.
- Perfetti, C., Britt, M., & Georgi, M. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in
history. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
- Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical
topics. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365–395. doi:10.1080/07370008
.1993.9649030.
- Reich, G. A. (2009). Testing historical knowledge: Standards, multiple-choice questions and
student reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 37, 325–360.
doi:10.1080/00933104.2009.10473401
- Reisman, A., & Wineburg, S. S. (2008). Teaching the skill of contextualizing in history. The
Social Studies, 99, 202–207. doi:10.3200/tsss.99.5.202-207.
- Riley, K. (1998). Historical empathy and the Holocaust: Theory into practice. International
Journal of Social Education, 13(1), 32–42.
- Rothstein, R. (2004). We are not ready to assess history performance. The Journal of
American History, 90, 1381–1391. doi:10.2307/3660358
- Rüsen, J. (2004). How to overcome ethnocentrism: Approaches to a culture of recognition by
history in the twenty first century. History and Theory, 43, 118–129.
doi:10.1111/j.1468-2303.2004.00301.x
- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation
modeling. New York: Routledge.
- Seixas, P. (2015). Translation and its discontents: Key concepts in English and German
history education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48, 427–439.
doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1101618
- Seixas, P. (1996). Conceptualizing the growth of historical understanding. In D. Olsen, & N.
Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development: New models of
learning, teaching and schooling (pp. 765−783). Oxford UK: Blackwell.
- Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six historical thinking concepts. Toronto, ON:
Nelson Education.
- Seixas, P., & Peck, C. (2004). Teaching historical thinking. In A. Sears & I. Wright (Eds.),
Challenges and prospects for Canadian social studies (pp. 109–117). Vancouver,
BC: Pacific Educational Press.
- Shemilt, D. (1983). The devil’s locomotive. History and Theory, 22, 1–18.
doi:10.2307/2505213
- Shemilt, D. (2009). Drinking an ocean and pissing a cupful: How adolescents make sense of
history. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 141–209). Charlotte,
NC: Information Age Publishing.
- Smith, E. E., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2006). Cognitive psychology: Mind and brain. Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson
Education, Inc.
- Van Boxtel, C., & Van Drie, J. (2013). Historical reasoning in the classroom: What does it
look like and how can we enhance it?. Teaching History, 150, 44.
- Van Boxtel, C., & Van Drie, J. (2012). “That’s in the time of the Romans!” Knowledge and
strategies students use to contextualize historical images and documents. Cognition
and Instruction, 30, 113–145. doi:10.1080/07370008.2012.661813
- Van Boxtel, C., & Van Drie, J. (2004). Historical reasoning: a comparison of how experts and
novices contextualize historical sources. International Journal of Historical
Learning, Teaching and Research, 4(2), 89–97.
- Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: towards a framework for
analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review,
20(2), 87–110.
- VanSledright, B. (2013). Assessing historical thinking and understanding. Innovative designs
for new standards. New York: Taylor & Francis
- VanSledright, B. A. (2011). The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices,
theories, and policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
- VanSledright, B. A. (2001). From empathic regard to self-understanding: Im/Positionality,
empathy, and historical contextualization. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager Jr., & S. J.
Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp.
51−68). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- VanSledright, B., & Afflerbach, P. (2000). Reconstructing Andrew Jackson: prospective
elementary teachers’ readings of revisionist history texts. Theory and Research in
Social Education, 28(3), 411–444.
- Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theoryof- mind
development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.
doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00304
- Wilschut, A. (2012). Images of time: The role of a historical consciousness of time in learning
history. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Charting the future of
teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Wineburg, S. S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the
interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319–346.
doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
- Wooden, J. (2008). ‘I had always heard Lincoln was a good person, but’. A study of sixth
graders’ reading of Lincoln’s views on Black–White relations. The Social Studies,
99(1), 23–31.
- Yılmaz, K. ve Koca, F. (2012). Tarihsel empati üzerine nitel bir araştırma: tarih
öğretmenlerinin algı, görüş ve deneyimlerinin incelenmesi. Gaziantep University
Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 855-879.