Yaratıcı Yazma ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet

Bu çalışma, yaratıcı yazma sürecinde öğrencilerin toplumsal cinsiyet algılarını ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Böylelikle öğrencilerin yazılarının toplumsal cinsiyet ile olan ilişkisi ortaya çıkartılmaya çalışılacaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, nitel bir araştırma deseni kullanılarak araştırmacı tarafından verilen karakterler aracılığıyla öğrencilerin yazılarındaki toplumsal cinsiyet algıları incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın katılımcılarını uygun örnekleme yoluyla seçilmiş olan ve Amasya ilinde üniversite, ortaöğretim ve ilköğretim sürecinde eğitimlerini sürdürmekte olan 57 öğrenci ile 5 yetişkin oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın farklı yaş ve düzeylerdeki katılımcılarla yürütülmesinin nedeni ise, her yaş ve düzeyde yaratıcı yazma ile ortaya çıkabilecek toplumsal cinsiyet algılarını ortaya çıkartıp gruplar arasında karşılaştırma yapabilmektir. Bu çalışmada, tek sorudan oluşan bir anket aracılığıyla katılımcılardan içerisinde prens, prenses, cadı ve ejderhanın olduğu bir masal yazmaları istenmiştir. Daha sonra, katılımcıların prens, prenses, cadı ve ejderhayı nasıl betimlendiğine ilişkin yazdıkları masallara içerik analizi uygulanmıştır. İçerik analizinde ortaya çıkan izlekler (tema) sınıflandırılmış ve daha sonra bu sınıflandırmalar frekans ve yüzdeler aracılığıyla rapor edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışmada, farklı yaş ve cinsiyette bulunan öğrenci ve yetişkinlerin yaratıcı yazılarında verilen karakterlere yönelik yansıttıkları toplumsal cinsiyet anlayışlarının birbirlerine benzer oldukları ortaya çıkartılmıştır

Creative Writing and Social Gender

The study aimed to reveal learners’ gender perceptions in the process of creative writing. This way, revealing the relationship between the students’ writings and social gender was intended to be identified. In accord with this aim, using a qualitative research design, through the characters provided by the researcher, the perceptions of social gender in the participants’ writings were analyzed. The participants, chosen by convenience sampling, were 57 students, who were studying at university, secondary and primary schools in Amasya and 5 adults. The reason why the research was conducted with the participants who were at different age and education levels was that it would be possible to make comparisons of the perceptions of gender which might appear by creative writing at every age and developmental level. Through a given one-item questionnaire, the participants were asked to write a tale which consisted of a prince, a princess, a witch, and a dragon. Afterwards, content analysis was used on those tales to find out how the participants described the prince, princess, witch, and the dragon. The themes that emerged were classified first, and their frequencies and percentages were reported. The results showed that the gender perceptions of the students and the adults, who were at different age levels, for the given characters in their creative writings were similar

PDF

___

Adıgüzel, Ö. (2010). Eğitimde Yaratıcı drama. Ankara: Naturel Yayıncılık.
Applebee, A. N. (2001). Alternative models of writing development. Roselmina Indrisano and James R. Squire (Eds.), Perspectives on writing research, theory, and practice. (pp. 90-112). USA: International Reading Association.
Arthur, B. & Zell, N. A. (1996). Strategy for teaching creative writing skills to emotionally disturbed students, Preventing School Failure, 34(4), 26-31.
Beasley, C. (2005) Gender and sexuality: critical theories, critical thinkers. London: Sage.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354- 364.
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2006). A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice. Kail, R. V. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 34) (pp. 39–89). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
Brookes, I., Marshall, M. (2004). Good writing guide. New York: Harap Publishers.
Buxton, A. E. (2011). Gender differences and writing development in kindergarteners. Master Dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
Cameron, D. (1999). Performing gender identity: Young men's talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 443-458). London: Routledge.
Clark, E. (1995). Popular Culture Images of gender as reflected through young children's story. Annual Joint Meetings of the Popular Culture. Eric Document: 388 966
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Araştırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları. Ankara: Eğiten-Kitap.
Croft, A., Schmader, T., Block, K., & Baron, A. S. (2013). Actions speak loader than words: Parental beliefs, biases, and behaviors predict children’s stereotypic preferences. Unpublished manuscript. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.
Çer, E. (2016). Preparing for books children from birth to six: The approach of appropriateness for the child. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6), 78-99.
Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Demir, T. (2012). Türkçe eğitiminde yaratıcı yazma becerisini geliştirme ve küçürek öykü. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(19), 343-357.
Fabes, R. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1996). Meta-analyses of age and sex differences in children’s and adolescents’ prosocial behaviour. W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Arizona: Wiley.
Fleming, S. (1995). Whose stories are validated? Language Arts, 72(8), 590-596.
Göktürk, A. (1997). Sözün ötesi. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Graham, S., Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high school. Washington: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Gray-Schlegel, M., & Gray-Schlegel, T. (1995). An investigation of gender stereotypes as revealed through children's creative writing. Reading Research and Instruction, 35(2), 160-170.
Güleryüz, H. (2006). Yaratıcı çocuk edebiyatı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
Hellinger, M., Bufimann, H. (2015). The linguistic representation of woman and men. M. Hellinger and H. Motschenbacher (Eds.), Gender and languages (pp. 1-27). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.
İpşiroğlu, Z. (2006). Yaratıcı yazma. İstanbul: Morpa Kültür Yayınları.
Kamler, B. (1993). The construction of gender in process writing classrooms. P. Gilbert (Ed.), Gender stories and the language classroom, (pp. 41-54). Victoria: Deakin University.
Kanaris, A. (1999). Gendered journeys: Children's writing and the construction of gender. Language and Education, 13(4), 254-268.
Kavcar, C., Oğuzkan, F., & Hasırcı, S. (2016). Türkçe öğretimi, Türkçe ve sınıf öğretmenleri için. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Kinzie, M (1999). A poet's guide to writing poetry. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Leaper, C. (1994). Exploring the consequences of gender segregation on social relationships. Leaper, C. (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: causes and consequences (pp. 67–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Leaper, C., & Smith, T. E. (2004). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children's language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Developmental psychology, 40(6), 993.
Llosa, M. V. (2012). Genç bir romancıya mektuplar. (Çev.: Emrah İnce). İstanbul: Can Yayınları.
Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American psychologist, 45(4), 513.
Macionis, J. J. (2015). Sociology. USA: Pearson Higher.
Maltepe, S. (2006). Yaratıcı yazma yaklaşımı açısından Türkçe derslerindeki yazma süreçlerinin ve ürünlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2004). Children’s search for gender cues: cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 67–70.
Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L., Updegraff, K., Miller, C., Gaertner, B., Kochel, K., & Foster, S.(2012). The Sanford Harmony Program: Program description and preliminary findings. Invited address presented at the Gender Development Research Conference, San Francisco.
Mayesky, M. (1995). Creative activities for young children. USA: Delmar Publishers.
McAuliffe, S. (1994). Toward understanding one another: Second graders' use of gendered language and story styles. The Reading Teacher, 47(4), 302-310.
McCabe, J., Fairchild, E., Grauerholz, L., Pescosolido, B. A., & Tope, D. (2011). Gender in twentieth-century children’s books: Patterns of disparity in titles and central characters. Gender & society, 25(2), 197-226.
McVey, D. (2008). Why all writing is creative writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 289-294.
Mehta, C. M., & Strough, J. (2010). Gender segregation and gender-typing in adolescence. Sex Roles, 63, 251– 263.
Millard, E. (1997). Differently literate: Gender identity and the construction of the developing reader. Gender and Education, 9(1), 31-48.
Morley, D. (2007). The Cambridge introduction to creative writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Myers, D. G. (1993). The rise of creative writing. Journal of the History of Ideas, 54(2), 277-297.
Nickerson, R. S., Perkins, D. N., & Smith, E. E. (1985). The teaching of thinking. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Oral, G. (2003). Yine yazı yazıyoruz. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
Özdemir, E., Binyazar, A. (1979). Yazmak sanatı, kompozisyon. Ankara: Varlık Yayınevi.
Peterson, S. (2001). Gender identities and self-expression in classroom narrative writing. Language Arts, 78(5), 451-457.
Ramet, A. (2007). Creative writing: How to unlock your imagination, develop your writing skills and get published. UK: How to Books Ltd.
Russell, A., Hart, C. H., Robinson, C. C., & Olsen, S. F. (2003). Children’s sociable and aggressive behaviour with peers: a comparison of the United States and Australia, and contributions of temperament and parenting style. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 27, 74–86.
Sampson, F. (2004). Creative writing in health and social care. London: Jessica Kingsley.
San, İ. (2008). Sanat ve eğitim, yaratıcılık, temel sanat kuramları, sanat eleştirisi yaklaşımları. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi.
Serbin, L. A., Moller, L. C., Gulko, J., Powlishta, K. K., & Colburne, K. A. (1994). The emergence of gender segregation in toddler playgroups. Leaper, C. (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: causes and consequences. New directions for child development, No. 65 (pp. 7–17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sever, S. (2004). Türkçe öğretimi ve tam öğrenme. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Sharp, C. (2004). Developing Young children’s creativity: What can we learn from research? Topic, 32, 1-12.
Sharples, M. (1999). How we write: Writing as creative desing. London: Routledge
Shuman, R.B. (1995). Gender differences. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 86.
Spear, M.G. (1989). Differences between the written work of boys of girls. British Educational Research Journal, 15, 271-277.
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: the psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34) (pp. 379–440). New York: Academic Press.
Striker, S. (2005). Çocuklarda sanat eğitimi. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınevi.
Stuart, M. (2005). What price inclusion? G. Layer (Ed.), Closing the equity gap: The impact of widening participation strategies in the UK and the USA (p. 166). Leicester: NIACE.
Susar Kırmızı, F., & Beydemir, A. (2012). İlköğretim 5. sınıf Türkçe dersinde yaratıcı yazma yaklaşımının yazmaya yönelik tutumlara etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 319-337.
Temizkan, M. (2010). Türkçe öğretiminde yaratıcı yazma becerilerinin geliştirilmesi. TÜBAR, XXVII, 621-643.
Tepper, C. A., & Cassidy, K. W. (1999). Gender differences in emotional language in children’s picture books. Sex Roles, 40(3-4), 265–280.
Thomson, L. (2013). Learning to teach creative writing. Changing English, 20(1), 45-52.
Trepanier, M. L., & Romatowski, J. A. (1985). Atttibutes and roles assigned to characters in children's writing: Sex differences and sex-role perceptions. Sex Roles, 13(5/6), 263-271.
Trepanier-Street M. L., Romatowski, J. A., & McNair, S. (2009). Children's written responses to stereotypical and non-stereotypical story starters. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 5(1), 60-72.
Trepanier-Street, M., & Romatowski, J. A. (1991). Achieving sex equity goals: Implications from creative writing research. Educational Horizons, 70(1), 34-40.
Tuck, D. L., Andree, B. V., & Bell, M. I. (1985). Analysis of sex stereotyping in characters created by young authors. The Journal of Educational Research, 78(4), 248-253.
Tyre, P. (2008). The trouble with boys: A surprising report card on our sons, their problems at school, and what parents and educators must do. New York: Crown Publishers.
Üstündağ, T. (2002). Yaratıcılığa yolculuk. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
Vass, E., Littleton, K., Miell, D., Jones, A. (2008). The discourse of collaborative creative writing: Peer collaboration as a context for mutual inspiration. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3), 192–202.
White, J. (1990). On literacy and gender. F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy for a changing world. (pp. 143 -166). Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Winstead, B. A., Derlega, V. J., & Unger, R. K. (1999). Sex and gender. V. J. Derlega, B. A. Winstead, & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Personality: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 257–281). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Woolf, F., & Belloni, J. (2005). Reflect and Review: The Arts and Creativity in Early Years. England: Arts Council.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. Yıldırım, R. (2003). Yaratıcılık ve yenilik. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.