Uluslararası Afet Müdahale Hukukuna Doğru Türk Afet Yönetim Sistemi

Afetler, çoğu zaman özellikle de gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ulusal hükümetlerin afet müdahalesinin kapasitesini aşmaktadır. Bu durumda uluslararası müdahale kaçınılmaz olmaktadır. Uluslararası afet müdahalelerinde çok sayıda yardım örgütünün aynı anda afet bölgesine gelmesi nedeniyle başta koordinasyon olmak üzere çeşitli sorunlar yaşanmaktadır. Afete müdahalenin en önemli unsuru hız ve etkinliktir. Bu amaçlara ulaşmak ve koordinasyon sorunları başta olmak üzere uluslararası afet müdahalelerinde ortaya çıkan engellerin kaldırılması amacıyla çeşitli çalışmalar yapılmaktadır. Bunlardan biri, tüm uluslararası afet müdahalelerinde geçerli tek bir kurallar, düzenlemeler bütünü oluşturmaktır. Uluslararası Kızılay-Kızılhaç Federasyonu öncülüğünde başlatılan IDRL Projesi bu amaçla yapılan en önemli çalışmalardan biridir. Bu makalenin amacı uluslararası afet müdahalesinde ortaya çıkan sorunları, IDRL’in gerekliliğini ortaya çıkaran unsurları incelemek ve ülkemizde afet yönetim sisteminin bunlar karşısındaki durumunu ortaya koymaktır.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Türkiye

Turkey's Disaster Management System Towards International Disaster Response Law

Today, disasters mostly go beyond the national disaster response capability of national governments, particularly of those of developing countries. Hence, international disaster response becomes inevitable. The abundance of international disaster response teams and NGO’s in times of disaster leads to numerous problems, mainly those related to coordination. The main prerequisites for disaster response are speed and efficiency. Various studies are carried out in order to achieve these goals and eliminate obstacles to international disaster responses. One of these studies is the IDRL Project, which has been initiated by the International Red Cross and Crescent Federation. The IDRL Project aims to establish a unique and complete system for international disaster response. This study attempts to identify the problems relating to international disaster response as well as the factors that render the IDRL project necessary. Moreover, Turkey’s current disaster response capability will be scrutinized in the light of international disaster response.
Keywords:

Turkey,

___

  • Agreement Among The Governments Of The Participating States Of The Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) On Collaboration In Emergency Assistance And Emergency Response To Natural And Man Made Disaster (1998) http://bsec-organization.org/temp/asistance.htm (25.06.2006)
  • Agreement Establishing the Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (1996) http://www.iss.co.za/af/RegOrg/unity_to_union/ pdfs/igad/AgreementEstab.pdf (25.06.2006)
  • Council of Europe Regulation No 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 Concerning Human Aid www.slovakaid.mfa.sk/en/index.php/filemanager/ download/41/Council%20Regulation%201257_96.pdf (25.06.2006)
  • Darcy, James (2004), “Locating Responsibility: The Sphere Humanitarian Charter and its Rationale”, Disasters, 28 (2): 112- 123.
  • Dufour, Charlotte, V. Geoffney, H. Maury; F. Grüneward (2004), “Rights, Standards and Quality in Humanitarian Space: Is Sphere Right Tool?”, Disasters, 28 (2): 124-141.
  • Ergünay, Oktay (1999), “Afet Yönetimi Nedir? Nasıl Olmalıdır?”, Türk Psikoloji Bülteni-Deprem Özel Sayısı, V, 14. http:www.psikolog.org.tr/bulten/14/14.Afet_htm
  • EU Council Decision of 23 October 2001 Establishing a Community Mechanism to Facilitate Reinforced Cooperation in Civil Protection Assistance Interventions, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/civil/prote/ cplegis/301d0792_en.htm (25.06.2006)
  • Framework Convention on Civil Defense Assistance (2000), http://www.icdo.org/pdf/org/act-coop-frame-work-convention-en.pdf (25.06.2006)
  • Gostelow, Lola (1999), “The Sphere Project: The Implications of Making Humanitarian Principles and Codes Work”, Disasters, 23 (4): 316-325.
  • Hilhorst, Dorothea (2002), “Being Good at Doing Good: Quality and Accountability of Humanitarian NGO’s”, Disasters, 2002, 26 (3): 193-212.
  • International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent (2000) “Towards an International Disaster Response Law”, World Disaster Report 2000.
  • Katoch, Arjun (2006), “The Responders Cauldron: The Uniqueness of International Disaster Response”, Journal of International Affairs, spring, 2006: 59, 2: 153-172.
  • Kreimer, Alcira (1990), Lessons Learned From Emerging Leading, The World Bank Environmental Department Divisional Working Paper No: 1990: 15.
  • Kent, Randolph C. (2004), “The United Nations Humanitarian Pillar: Refocusing the UN’s Disaster and Emergency Roles and Responsibilities”, Disaster, 28 (2): 216-233.
  • Lisler, Susan (2001), “Scaling-up Emergencies: British NGOs after Hurricane Mitch”, Disaster, 25 (1): 36-47.
  • “Nükleer Kaza ve Radyolojik Tehlike Durumunda Acil Yardım Sözleşmesi”, http://www.msb.gov.tr/asad/AskeriMevzuat/Uluslarras%C4% B1%20Antla%C5%9Fmalar/Silahl%C4%B1%20%C3%87at%C4% B1%C5%9Fma%20Hukuku/SCH16.htm(07.06.2006)
  • Mitchell, John, Deborah Doane (1999), “An Ombudsman for Humanitarian Assistance?”, Disasters, 23 (2): 115-124.
  • O Donnell, Max. R, Dimitri Bacos, Michael L. Bennish (2002), “Nutritional Response to the 1998 Bangladesh Flood Disasters: Sphere Minimum Standards in Disaster Response”, Disasters, 26 (3): 229-241.
  • Öztarhan, Meral (2004), Olağanüstü Hal Haberleşmesi, Ülke İhtiyaçları ve Tampere Sözleşmesi”, (Uzmanlık Tezi), Telekomünikasyon Kurumu, http://www.ifrc.org/docs/pubs/disasters/WDR2000.pdf (29.05.2006)
  • Perry Ronald W, M. K. Lindell (2003) “Preparedness for Emergency Response Guidelines for the Emergency planning Process”, Disasters, 27 (4) 3336-350.
  • Slim, Hugo (1997), “Doing The Right Thing: Relief Emergencies Moral Dilemmas and Moral Responsibility in Political Emergencies and War”, Disaster, 21 (3): 244-257.
  • “Sphere Handbook”, http://www.sphereproject.org/content/view/ 27/84/lang,English/ (02.02.2006)
  • Stephenson, Max. (2005), “Making Humanitarian Relief Networks More Effective Operational Coordination, Trust and Sense Making”, Disasters, 29 (4): 337- 350.
  • Strengthening the Effectiveness and Coordination of International Urban Search and Rescue Assistance UN General Assembly Resolution 57/ 150 (2002), http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/hlp.nsf/db900ByKey/ GA57153?OpenDocument (25.06.2006)
  • “Uluslararası Sivil Havacılık Sözleşmesi”, http://www.dhmi.gov.tr/ dosyalar/baskanliklar/Ozelguvenlik/Mevzuatlar.asp (07.06.2006)
  • Walker, Peter (2005) “Creaking the Code: The Genesis, Use and Future of the Code of Conduct”, Disasters, 29 (4), 323-336.
  • Walker, Peter, Susan Purdin (2004), “Birthing SPHERE”, Disasters, 2004 28 (2): 100-111.
  • Waugh William L., Gregory Streib (2006), “Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management”, Public Administration Review, Dec. 2006, Special Issue.
  • Wu, Ying Jie, Michael K. Lindell (2004), “Housing Reconstruction after Two Major Earthquakes: The 1994 Northridge Earthquake in United States and the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake In Taiwan”, Disasters, XXVIII, 1: 63-81.
  • Young, Helen, Paul Harvey (2004) “The Sphere Project: The Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response: Introduction”, Disasters, 2004, 28 (2): 99-99.
  • Young, Helen, Anna Taylor, Sally-Anna Way, Jennifer Leaning (2004) “Linking Rights and Standards: The Process of Developing “Right-Based” Minimum Standards on Food Security, Nutrition and Food Aid”, Disasters, 2004, 28 (2): 142-159.