Siyaset biliminin siyaseti
Siyaset bilimi, siyasetin incelenen nesne olarak konumlandırılarak, somutlaştırıldığı bir bilimleşme sürecinin bilim siyasetini yansıtır. Bilimleştirilerek konumlandırılan siyaset, kapitalist-modern toplumda, siyasal olanın siyasal alanda sınırlandırılmasıyla yapılandırılmış ve bu, bilimleşme süreciyle aynı tarihsellik kapsamında oluşmuştur. Siyasal olanın, siyasal alan kapsamında sınırlandırılması ve buna bağlı olarak dönüştürülmesi, siyasetin formel bir konumlanış temelinde yapılandırıldığını göstermektedir. Formel bir ilişki olarak siyaset, siyasal olandan farklılaştırılarak, farklı tarihsel dönemlerde farklı form görünümleri elde etmiştir. Formlardaki farklılaşma, siyaset biliminin oluşma ve gelişmesinde etkili olmuş, özellikle de davranışsal akım ile birlikte, formda niteliksel bir farklılaşma olmadan, incelenen nesne olarak siyaset somutlaştırılarak sınırları belirginleştirilmiştir. Bu sürecin temel karakteristiği, bilimsel meşruluk tartışmalarının ötesinde, siyasal kuramın bilim etiketi dışına itilmesi olmuştur. Yeni formalizm örneği olarak yorumcu yaklaşımlarla yeniden siyasal kuramın bilim etiketine dayanmaksızın meşrulaşma arayışı ise, sürecin formel içeriğinin sürekliliğinin korunduğunu göstermektedir. Siyaset bilimi, siyasal olanın siyaset olarak tanımlanıp, sınırlandırıldığı bir siyasallığın bilimleşme siyaseti olarak yine bu siyasalla yapısal- içsel bir konumlandırmanın unsuru olarak belirginleşmektedir.
The political, political science
Political science reflects a scientification process, where politics is positioned and concretized as an object of examination. In the capitalist modern society, the scientified and thus, concretized politics has been structured by restricting the political one in the political sphere, and this has occurred within the scope of same historicity with the scientification process. The restriction and thus the transformation of the political one in the political scope denotes that the politics is structured based on a formal positioning. The politics, as a formal relationship, has been differentiated from the political one and has appeared in different forms in different historical periods. The differentiation in forms has been influential in the emergence and development of the political science, formation and development of political science, and the politics, as an object of investigation, has been concretized and its boundaries have been made clear particularly with behavioralism, without being any qualitative formal difference. The basic characteristic of this process, beyond the debates on scientific legitimacy, is that the political theory has been excluded from the label of science. The political theory's search for legitimacy via interpretive approaches as an example of new formalism without being based on the label of science indicates that the continuity of the formal content of the process is still preserved.The political science, as the scientification policy of a policization, where the political one is defined and limited as politics, becomes apparent as the element of a structural-internal positioning again with this politic.
___
- Adcock, Robert - Bevir, Mark (2005), "The History of Political Science", Political Studies Review, Vol. 3, s.1-16.
- Almond, Gabriel (1996), "Political Science: The History of the Discipline", A New Handbook of Political Science, Ed. Robert E. Goodin - Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Ball, Terence (2007), "Political Theory and Political Science: Can This Marriage Be Saved?", Theoria, August (doi: 10.3167/th.2007.5411302).
- Bauman, Zygmunt (2000), Siyaset Arayışı, (Çev. T. Birkan), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
- Bealey, Frank - Chapman, Richard A. - Sheehan, Michael (1999), Elements in Political Science, Edinburg University Press, Edinburg.
- Beck, Ulrich (1999), Siyasallığın İcadı, (Çev. N. Ülner), İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
- Bellamy, Richard (1993), "The Demise and Rise of Political Theory", Theories and Concepts of Politics, Ed. Richard Bellamy, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
- Berndtson, Erkki (2009), "Schools of Political Science and the Formation of Discipline", Preparedfor Presentation at the XXI st World Congress of the International Political Science Association, 12-16 July, Santiago de Chile.
- Bevir, Mark - Rhodes, Rod A. W. (2002), "Interpretive Theory", Theory and Methods in Political Science, Ed. David Marsh ve Gerry Stoker, Palgrave-Macmillan, New York.
- Carver, Terrell (1997), "Identity and Narrative in Prime-time Politics: The Hill-Thomas Hearings", Interpreting the Political New Methodologies, Ed. Terrell Carver ve Matti Hyvarinen, Routledge, London.
- Çitçi, Oya (2008), "Yeni Siyaset: Neoliberalizm ve Post-Modernizmin Siyasal Projesi", Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt. 1, Sayı: 2, Ekim, s. 1-32.
- Dillon, Conley H. - Leiden, Carl - Stewart, Paul D. (1958), Introduction to Political Science, D. Van Nostrand, Princeton.
- Dryzek, John S. (1986), "The Progress of Political Science", The Journal of Politics, Vol.,48, s.301-320.
- Dryzek, John S. - Leonard, Stephen (1988), "History and Discipline in Political Science", The American Political Science Review, Vol. 82, No: 4, December, s.1245-1260.
- Ethridge, Marcus E. - Handelman, Howard (2004), Politics in a Changing World, Thomson-Wadsworth, California.
- Ford, Henry Jones (1905), "The Scope of Political Science", Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, Vol. 2, Second Annual Meeting, s. 198-206.
- Giddens, Anthony (2002), Sağ ve Solun Ötesinde-Radikal Politikaların Geleceği-, (Çev. M. Sözen ve S. Yücesoy), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
- Godwin, Kenneth R. - Wahlke, John C. (1997), Introduction to Political Science Reasons, Reflection and Analysis, Harcourt Brace College, Orlando.
- Goodin, Robert E. - Klingemann, Hans Dieter (1996), "Political Science: The Discipline", A New Handbook of Political Science, Ed. Robert E. Goodin ve Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Haas, Michael (1970), "The Rise of a Science of Politics", Approaches to the Study of Political Science, Ed. Michael Haas, Henry S. Kariel, Chandler Publishing, Scranton.
- Heywood, Andrew (2004), Political Theory, Palgrave-Macmillan, New York.
- Holloway, John (2003), İktidar Olmadan Dünyayı Değiştirmek, (Çev. P. Siral), İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
- Jacobsen, G.A. - Lipman, M. H. (1965), Political Science, Barnes-Noble Books, New York.
- Jacobsohn, John A. (1998), An Introduction to Political Science, West/Wadsworth, London.
- Johnson, Janet Buttolph - Reynolds, H.T. (2005), Political Science Research Methods, CQ Press, Washington.
- Lasswell, Harold D. (2006), The Future of Political Science, Aidine Transaction New Brunswick, Second Printing (Original published 1963, Prentice-Hall).
- Leca, Jean (2010), "Political Philosophy in Political Science: Sixty Years On", International Political Science Review,Woi. 31, No:5, November, s.525-538.
- Leca, Jean (2011), "Political Philosophy in Political Science: Sixty Years On Part II: Current Features of Contemporary Political Philosphy", International Political Science Review, Vol.32, No:l, s.95-113.
- Lipson, Leslie (1981), The Great Issues of Politics, Prentice-Hall, London.
- MacKenzie, Iain (2009), Politics-Key Concepts in Philosohy-, Continuum, London.
- Magstadt, Thomas M. (2006), Understanding Politics, Thomson-Wadsworth, California.
- Marsh, David (2002), "Marxism", Theory and Methods in Political Science, Ed. David Marsh ve Gerry Stoker, Palgrave-Macmillan, New York.
- Marsh, David - Savigny, Heather (2004), "Political Science as a Broad Church: The Search for a Pluralist Discipline", Politics, Vol. 24, No:3, s.155-168.
- Marsh, David - Furlong, Paul (2002), "A Skin, Not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science", Theory and Methods in Political Science, Ed. David Marsh ve Gerry Stoker, Palgrave-Macmillan, New York.
- McAuley, James (2003), An Introduction to Politics, State and Society, Sage, London.
- McKinnon, Catriona (2008), Issues in Political Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Mouffe, Chantal (2008), Siyasetin Dönüşü, (Çev. F. Bakırcı ve A. Çolak), Epos Yayınları, Ankara.
- Parsons, Craig (2007), How to Map Arguments in Political Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Parsons, Malcolm B. (1968), "Perspectives in the Study of Politics", Perspectives in the Study of Politics, Ed. Malcolm B. Parsons, Rand McNally, Chicago.
- Sanders, David (2002), "Behaviouralism", Theory and Methods in Political Science, Ed. David Marsh ve Gerry Stoker, Palgrave-Macmillan, New York.
- Schmitt, Carl (2006), Siyasal Kavramı, (Çev. E. Göztepe), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
- Shapiro, lan (2002), "Problems, Methods and Theories in the Study of Politics or What's Wrong with Political Science and What to do about it", Political Theory, Vol. 30, No: 4, August, s.596-619.
- Steffensmeier, Janet M. Box - Brady, Henry E. - Collier, David (2008), "Political Science Methodology", Political Methodology, Ed. Janet M. Box Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady ve David Collier, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Stoker, Gerry - David Marsh (2002), "Introduction", Theory and Methods in Political Science, Ed. David Marsh ve Gerry Stoker, Palgrave-Macmillan, New York.
- Üstüner, Fahriye (2007), "Radikal Demokrasi ¡Liberalism mi, Demokrasi mi? Evet, Lütfen!", ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt.34, Aralık, s.313-336.
- Ward, Hugh (2002), "Rational Choice", Theory and Methods in Political Science, Ed. David Marsh ve Gerry Stoker, Palgrave-Macmillan, New York.
- ISSN: 1300-1795
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
- Başlangıç: 1968
- Yayıncı: -