Kurucu İktidara Dayalı Bir Demokrasinin İmkânı: Siyasal Bir Yaklaşım

Özet: Bu makale, genellikle anayasa tekniği açısından ele alınan kurucu iktidar soru- nuna siyasal bir boyut kazandırmayı amaçlıyor. Kurucu iktidarı, metodolojik ön kabul- lere ya da soyut demokratik ilkelerin temsiline indirgeyen yaklaşımların de-ontolojik ya da apolitik bir nitelik taşıdığını öne sürüyor. Başka bir deyişle, bu yaklaşımların kurucu iktidar kavramını yeni siyasi formlar yaratma kapasitesi anlamında modern içeriğinden yalıtan apolojetik tutumlar olduğunun üzerinde duruyor. Sonuç olarak makale, kurucu iktidarın modern anlamından yoksun bir anayasacılık anlayışının zayıf bir demokrasi fikriyle sonuçlanabileceğine dikkat çekiyor.

The Possibility of a Democracy Based on the Constituent Power: A Political Approach

Abstract: The article aims to bring a political dimension to the problem of constituent power, which is usually discussed in terms of constitution techniques. It argues that some approaches reducing the problem of constituent power to the methodological pre- commitments or the articulations of abstract democratic principals presuppose de- ontological and apolitical premise. In other words, it focuses on the apologetic attitudes of these approaches isolating the modern content of constituent power if we consider its meaning as the creation of new political forms. In conclusion, the article points to the fact that any understanding of constituent power, which ignores its modern particulari- ty, may result in a poor understanding of democracy

___

Arato, Andrew (1994), “Dilemmas Arising From the Power to Create Constitutions in Eastern Europe”, Constitutionalism. Identity, Difference and Legitimacy, Rosenfeld, Michel (Ed.) Duke University Press, Durham-London. pp. 165-197.
Arato, Andrew (2012), “Demokratik Anayasa Yapımı ve Türkiye'deki Sürecin Devamlılığını Sağlamak”, Göztepe, Ece-Aykut Çelebi (Ed.), Demokratik Anayasa, Metis, İstanbul, ss. 27-45.
Arendt, Hannah (2012), Devrim Üzerine, (Çev. Onur Eylül Kara), İletişim, İstanbul.
Balibar, Etienne (2009), “Ideas of Europe: Civilization and Constitution”, European Journal of Philosophy & Public Debate, Vol: 1, Issue: 1, pp. 1-17.
Barshack, Lior (2006), “Constituent Power as Body: Outline of a Constitutional Theology”, The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol.: 56, No.: 3, Summer, pp. 185-222.
Beaud, Olivier (2011), “Anayasa ve Anayasacılık”, Siyaset Felsefesi Sözlüğü, (Çev. İsmail Yerguz), İletişim, İstanbul, 2011, Raynaud P. - Stephane Rials (Ed.), ss. 63-74.
Benjamin, Walter (2005), “Şiddetin Eleştirisi”, Benjamin, Dellaloğlu, Besim (Ed.), (Çev. Efe Çakmak), Say Yayınları, İstanbul, ss. 101-125.
Blumenberg, Hans (1983), The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, (Trans.: Robert M. Wallace), The MIT Press.
Gözler, Kemal (1998), Kurucu İktidar, Ekin Kitapevi, Bursa.
Gözler, Kemal (2012), “Asli ve Tali Kurucu İktidar Ayrımı: TBMM Yeni Bir Anayasa Yapabilir mi?”, Göztepe, Ece- Aykut Çelebi (Ed.), Demokratik Anayasa, Metis, İstanbul, ss. 45-62.
Göztepe, Ece (2012), “Anayasa Yargısının Meşruluğu”, Göztepe, Ece- Aykut Çelebi (Ed.), Demokratik Anayasa, Metis, İstanbul, ss. 387-418.
Carrozza, Paolo (2008), “Constitutionalism's Post-Modern Opening”, The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constituent Form, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 169-189.
Christodoulidis, Emilios (2008), “Against Substitution: The Constitutional Thinking of Dissensus”, The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constituent Form, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 189-211.
Colön-Rios, Joel I. (2008), The Legitimacy of the Juridical: Constitutionalism, Democracy and Constituent Power, Phd Thesis, Law School, York University, Toronto.
Cristi, Renato (2011), “Schmitt on Constituent Power and the Monarchical Principle”, Constellations, Vol.: 18, No: 3., pp. 352-364.
Çelebi, Aykut (2002), “Demokratik bir anayasanın siyasal yapıtaşları: Halk egemenliği ve siyasal temsilin demokratikleştirilmesi”, Toplum ve Bilim, Sayı 124, Temmuz, ss. 36-61.
Çelebi, Aykut (2012), “Doğrudan Demokrasi ya da Temsili Hükümet Modelinin Demokratikleştirilmesi Üzerine”, Göztepe, Ece- Çelebi Aykut (Ed.), Demokratik Anayasa, Metis, İstanbul, ss. 367-399.
Dyzenhaus, David (2008), “The Politics of the Question of Constituent Power”, Loughlin, Martin- Hans Lindahl (Ed.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constituent Form, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 129-147.
Dworkin, Ronald (1990), “Equality, Democracy, and the Constitution: We the People in Court”, Alberta, Law Review. v. 28, pp. 324-346.
Elster, John (1994), “Constitutional Bootstrapping in Philadelphia and Paris”, Constitutionalism. Identity, Difference and Legitimacy, Rosenfeld, Michel (Ed.) Duke University Press, Durham-London, pp. 57-85.
Frank, Jason (2007), Unauthorized Propositions The Federalist Papers and Constituent Power, Diacritics, Vol.: 37, No.:2-3, Summer-Fall, pp. 103-120.
Hardt, Michael- Negri, Antonio (2012), Duyuru, (Çev. Abdullah Yılmaz), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
Holmes, Stephen (1993), “Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy”, Constitutionalism and Democracy, Elster, Jon- Rune Slagstad (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 195-241.
Jefferson, Thomas (2012), Bağımsızlık Bildirgesi, (Çev. Gülden Kurt), Doruk, İstanbul.
Kalyvas, Andreas (2005), “Popular Sovereignty, Democracy and the Constituent Power”, Constellations, Vol.: 12, No: 2, pp. 223-244.
Kalyvas, Andreas (2008), Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt, Cambridge University Press.
Khalfa, Pierre (2012), “Fransızların ‘Hayır’ı Neoliberalizme Karşı Kazanılan Bir Zafer”, Kimin Avrupası? Halkın Avrupası ile Şirketlerin Avrupası Arasında, (Çev.: Deniz Banoğlu), Metis, İstanbul, ss. 32-38.
Koselleck, Reinhart (2009), Kavramlar Tarihi: Politik ve Sosyal Dilin Semantiği ve Pragmatiği Üzerine Araştırmalar, (Çev. Atilla Dirim), İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
Lindahl, Hans (2007), “The Paradox of Constituent Power: The Ambiguous SelfConstitution of the European Union”, Ratio Juris, Vol: 20, No: 4, December, pp. 485- 505.
Lindahl, Hans (2008), “Constituent Power and Reflexive Identity: Towards an Ontology of Collective Selfhood”, Loughlin, Martin- Lindahl Hans (Ed.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constituent Form, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 9-27.
Madison, James (2003), “The Method of Guarding Against the Enroachments of any One Department of Government by Appealing to the People through a Convention”, The Fedaralist Papers, Hamilton, Alexander- Madison, James- Jay, John (2003), Signet Classics, ss. 310- 314.
Nickel, Rainer (2008), “Private and Public Autonomy Revisited: Habermas' Concept of Co-originality in Times of Globalization and the Militant Security State”, Loughlin, Martin- Lindahl Hans (Ed.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constituent Form, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 147-169.
Oberndorfer, Lukas (2012), “Kurumlar, Anayasa ve Demokrasi Demos Neredesin?”, Kimin Avrupası? Halkın Avrupası ile Şirketlerin Avrupası Arasında, (Çev.: Deniz Banoğlu), Metis, İstanbul, ss. 38-54.
Oklopcic, Zoran (2012), “Constitutional (Re)Vision: Sovereign Peoples, New Constituent Powers, and the Formation of Constitutional Orders in the Balkans”, Constellations, Volume: 19, No: 1, pp. 81-101.
Paine, Thomas (1985), İnsan Hakları, (Çev. Hüseyin Sarıca), Belge Yayınları, İstanbul.
Preuss, Ulrich K. (1994), “Constitutional Powermaking For the New Polity: Some Deliberations on the Relations Between Constituent Power and the Constitution”, Constitutionalism. Identity, Difference and Legitimacy, Rosenfeld, Michel (Ed.), Duke University Press, Durham-London, pp. 143-165.
Preuss, Ulrich K. (1995), Constitutional Revolution: The Link between Constitutionalism and Progress, (Trans.: Deborah Lucas Schneider), Prometheus Books.
Rancière, Jacques (2006), Uyuşmazlık, (Çev. Hakkı Hünler), Aralık Yayınları, İzmir.
Rasch, William (2004), Sovereignty and its Discontents: On the Primacy of Conflict and the Structure of the Political, Birkbeck Law Press, London.
Richards, David A.J. (1994), “Revolution and Constitutionalism in America”, Constitutionalism. Identity, Difference and Legitimacy, Rosenfeld, Michel (Ed.) Duke University Press, Durham-London, pp. 85-143.
Rosenfeld, Michel (1994), “Modern Constitutionalism as Interplay Between Identity and Diversity”, Constitutionalism. Identity, Difference and Legitimacy, Rosenfeld, Michel (Ed.) Duke University Press, Durham-London, pp. 3-39.
Schmitt, Carl (2008), Constitutional Theory, (Trans.: Jeffrey Seitzer), Duke University Press.
Sieyes, Emmanuel (2005), Üçüncü Sınıf Nedir? (Çev. İsmet Birkan), İmge, Ankara.
Weber, Max (2005), Sosyoloji Yazıları, (Çev.: Taha Pala), İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
Wood, E. M. (2008), “Demos’a Karşı ‘Biz Halk Olarak’: Antikten Moderne Yurttaşlık Anlayışı”, Kapitalizm Demokrasiye Karşı, (Çev. Şahin Artan), Yordam, İstanbul, ss. 238-275.
Wolin, Sheldon (1999), “Elle Tutulmaz Demokrasi”, Demokrasi ve Farklılık, Benhabip, Seyla (Ed.), (Çev.: Zeynep Gürata-Cem Gürsel), Dünya Yerel Yönetim ve Demokrasi Akademisi, İstanbul, ss. 51-70.