___

• Adas, Michael (1989), Machines as the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
• Agathangelou, Anna (2014), “Wither Anarchy? Harvesting the Global Biotech Body, Indian Markets and Biomedical Technologies”, Mayer, Maximilian, Mariana Carpes ve Ruth Knoblich (Der.), The Global Politics of Science and Technology: Concepts from International Relations and Other Disciplines, Cilt 1 (Berlin: Springer): 179-204.
• Barder, Alexander (2016), “Barbed Wire”, Salter, Mark (Der.) Making Things International 2: Catalysts and Reactions (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press): 32-48.
• Barry, Andrew ve Georgina Born (2013), Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and the Natural Sciences (London, New York: Routledge).
• Baylis, John, Steve Smith ve Patricia Owens (Der.) (2019), The Globalization of World Politics (Oxford: OUP).
• Beeson ve Bisley (Der.) (2017), Issues in 21st Century World Politics (Londra: Macmillan International).
• Berger, Peter ve Thomas Luckmann (1967), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Londra: Penguin).
• Bijker, Wiebe (2010), “How is Technology made?—That is the Question!”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34: 63-76.
• Bijker, Wiebe E. (1995), Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change (Cambridge, Londra: MIT).
• Bousquet, Antoine (2018), “A revolution in military affairs: Changing Technologies and Changing Practices of Warfare”, McCarthy, Daniel R. (Der.), Technology and World Politics (New York, Londra: Routledge): 165-181.
• Bousquet, Antoine, Jairus Grove ve Nisha Shah (2017) “Becoming Weapon: An Opening Call to Arms”, Critical Studies on Security, 17 (1): 1-8.
• Branch, Jordan (2001), “Mapping the Sovereign State: Technology, Authority, and Systemic Change”, International Organization, 65 (1): 1-36.
• Brodie, Bernard (Der.) (1946), The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company).
• Bucchi, Massimiano (2004), Science in Society: An Introduction to Social Studies of Science (Londra, New York: Routledge).
• Buzan Barry (1987), An Introduction to Strategic Studies: Military Technology and International Relations (Londra: Palgrave Macmillan).
• Carr, Edward H. (1939), Twenty Years Crisis: 1919-1939 (Londra: Macmillan Press).
• Cebrowski, Arthur ve John Gartska (1998), “Network Centric Warfare: Its Origin and Future”, Proceedings, 124 (1): 28-35.
• Colás, Alejandro (2018), “Infrastructures of the Global Economy: The Shipping Container as a Political Artefact”, McCarthy, Daniel R. (Der.), Technology and World Politics (New York, Londra: Routledge): 146-164.
• Connolly, Micheal (2010), A World of Becoming (Durham: Duke University Press).
• Connolly, William (2002), Neuropolitics. Thinking, Culture, Speed (Minneapolis: Universiy of Minnesota Press).
• Coole, Diane (2013), “Agentic Capacities and Capacious Historical Materialism: Thinking with New Materialisms in the Political Sciences”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41 (3): 451–469
• Cowen, Deborah (2014), The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
• Cudworth, Erika ve Stephen Hobden (2011), Posthuman International Relations: Complexity, Ecologism and Global Politics (Londra, New York: Zed Books).
• Dalby, Simon (2014), “What happens if we don’t take nature for granted?”, Edkins, Jenny ve Maja Zehfuss (Der.), Global Politics: A New Introduction (Londra, New York: Routledge): 39-60.
• DeLanda, Manuel (2006), A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity (Londra, New York: Continumm).
• Drezner, Daniel (2019), “Technological Change and International Relations”, International Relations, 33 (2): 286-303.
• Edward, Mark (2016) “From Actor Network Theory to Modes of Existence: Latour’s Ontologies”, Global Discourse, 6 (1-2): 1-7.
• Feenberg, Andrew (2002), Transforming Technology. A Critical Theory Revisited (Oxford: OUP).
• Fritsch, Stefan (2011), “Technology and Global Affairs”, International Studies Perspectives, 12 (1): 27-45.
• Gartzke, Erik (2019) “Blood and Robots: How remotely piloted vehicles and related technologies affect the politics of violence”, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 1-31.
• Gilpin, Robert (1981), War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge UP).
• Grove, Jairus (2019), War and Geopolitics at the End of the World (Durham: Duke UP).
• Harding, Sandra (2009), “Postcolonial and feminist philosophies of science and technology: convergences and dissonances”, Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 12 (4): 401-421.
• Harding, Sandra (1998), Is Science Multicultural? (Bloomington: Indiana UP).
• Heins, Matthew (2016), The Globalization of American Infrastructure the Shipping Container and Freight Transportation (NewYork, Londra: Routledge).
• Held, David, Anthony G. McGrew, David Goldblatt ve Jonathan Perraton (1999), Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture (Standford: Stanford UP).
• Herera, Geoffrey L. (2006), Technology and International Transformation: The Railriad, the Atom Bomb, and the Politics of Technological Change (Albay: SUNY Press).
• Herz, John (1959), International Politics in the Atomic Age (New York: Columbia UP).
• Herz, John (1950), “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma”, World Politics, 2 (2): 157-180.
• Holsti, Kalevi (2004), Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge UP).
• Jackson, Patrick T. (2011), The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics (New York, Londra: Routledge).
• Jasanoff, Sheila (2013), “Fields and Follows: A Political History of STS”, Andrew Barry ve Giorgina Born (Der.) Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and the Natural Sciences (New York, Londra: Routledge): 99-118.
• Jasanoff, Sheila, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, Trevor Pinch (Der.) (1995), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Londra: Sage).
• Kaltofen, Carolin, Madeline Carr ve Michele Acuto (Der.) (2019), Technologies of International Continuity and Change (Switzerland: Palgrave).
• Katz, Erik (2005), “On the neutrality of technology: The Holocaust death camps as a counter-example”, Journal of Genocide Research, 3: 409-421.
• Kennedy, Paul (1987), The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (New York: Random House).
• Keohane, Robert ve Joseph Nye (1977), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little Brown and Company).
• Nye, Joseph S. ve Robert O. Keohane (1971), “Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction”, International Organization, 25 (3): 329-349.
• Kurki, Milja (2008), Causation in International Relations Reclaiming Causal Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge UP).
• Latour, Bruno (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford: Oxford UP).
• Latour, Bruno ve Steven Woolgar (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
• Law, John (1991), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination (Londra, NewYork: Routledge).
• Hoijtink, Marijn ve Matthias Leese (Der.) (2019), Technology and Agency in International Relations (London, New York: Routledge).
• Levinson, Marc (2006), The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger (Princeton: Princeton UP).
• Lynn-Jones, Sean M. (1995), “Offense-Defense Theory and Its Critics”, Security Studies, 4 (4): 660-691.
• Manjikian, Mary (2018) “Becoming Unmanned”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 16 (1): 48-65.
• Mayer, Maximilian, Mariana Carpes ve Ruth Knoblich (2014), “The Global Politics of Science and Technology: An Introduction”, Mayer, Maximilian, Mariana Carpes ve Ruth Knoblich (Der.), The Global Politics of Science and Technology: Concepts from International Relations and Other Disciplines, Cilt 1 (Berlin: Springer): 1-38.
• McCarthy, Daniel R. (2018), “Introduction: Technology in World Politics”, McCarthy, Daniel (Der.), Technology and World Politics: An Introduction (New York, Londra: Routledge): 1-22.
• McCarthy, Daniel R. (2015), Power, Information Technology, and International Relations Theory: The Power and Politics of US Foreign Policy and the Internet (New York: Palgrave).
• Mitchell, Timothy (2002), Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press).
• Morgenthau, Hans J. (1978), Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Knopf.)
• Morgenthau, Hans J. (1961), “Death in the Nuclear Age”, Commentary, 32 (3): 1–4.
• Morgenthau, Hans J. (1949) Scientific Man vs. Power Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
• Ogburn, Willian F. (Der.) (1949), Technology and International Relations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
• Osiander, Andres (1998), “Re-reading Early Twentieth Century IR: Idealism Revisited”, International Studies Quareterly, 42 (3): 409-432.
• Niebuhr, Reinhold (1932), Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics (New York: Charles Scribners Sons).
• Peoples, Columba (2019), “Life in the Nuclear Age: Classical realism, Critical Theory and the Technopolitics of the Nuclear Condition”, Journal of International Political Theory, 15 (3): 279–296.
• Peoples, Columba (2009), “Technology, Philosophy and International Relations”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22 (4): 559-561.
• Pinch, Trevor J. ve Wiebe Bijker (1984), “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other”, Social Studies of Science, 14 (3): 399-44.
• Rappert, Brian, Brian Balmer, John Stone (2008), “Science, technology, and the Military: Priorities, Preoccupations, and Possibilities”, Hackett, Edward J., Olga Amsterdamska, Judy Wajcman ve Michael Lynch (Der.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Cambridge, London: MIT): 719-740.
• Reid, Julian (2009), “Politicizing Connectivity: Beyond the Biopolitics of Information Technology in International Relations”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22 (4): 607-623.
• Reus-Smit, Christian (1999), The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton: Princeton UP).
• Rosecrance, Richard (1986), The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World (New York: Basic Books).
• Rosenau, James N. ve J.P. Singh (Der.) (2002), Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance (Albany: SUNY Press).
• Rosenau, James (1990), Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity (Princeton: Princeton UP).
• Ruggie, John G. (1975), “International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends”, International Organization, 29 (3): 557-583.
• Russell, Greg (1991), “Science, Technology, and Death in the Nuclear Age: Hans J. Morgenthau on Nuclear Ethics”, Ethics & International Affairs, 5: 115-134.
• Salter, Mark (2007), “Governmentalities of an Airport: Heterotopia and Confession”, International Political Sociology, 1 (1): 49–66.
• Saxon, Dan (2013) (Der.), International Humanitarian Law and the Changing Technology of War (Boston: Martinus-Nijhoff).
• Scheuerman, William (2009), “Realism and the Critique of Technology”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 14: 564-584.
• Schweller, Randal (2014), Maxwell's Demon and the Golden Apple: Global Discord in the New Millennium (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press).
• Shaw, Martin (2000), Theory of the Global State Globality as an Unfinished Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge UP).
• Singer, Peter (2009), Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century (New York: Penguin).
• Sismondo, Sergio (2010), An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies (Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell).
• Sismondo, Sergio (2008), “Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Program, Hackett, Edward J., Olga Amsterdamska, Judy Wajcman ve Michael Lynch (Der.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Cambridge, London: MIT): 13-32.
• Srnicek, Nick (2018), “New Materialism and Poshumanism: Bodies, Brains, and complex causality”, McCarthy, Daniel R. (Der.), Technology and World Politics (New York, Londra: Routledge): 84-100.
• Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (1993), The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology and International Politics (New Jersey: Princeton UP).
• Strange, Susan (1991), “Big Business and the State”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 20 (2): 245-250
• Wagner, Markus (2014), “The Dehumanization of International Humanitarian Law: Legal, Ethical, and Political Implications of Autonomous Weapon Systems”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 47: 1371-1424.
• Walters, William (2002), “The Power of Inscription: Beyond Social Construction and Deconstruction in European Integration Studies”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 3 (1): 83-108.
• Waltz, Kenneth (1979), Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
• Weiss, Charles (2005), “Science, Technology and International Relations”, Technology in Society, 27: 295-313.
• Wendt, Alexander (1999), Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge UP).
• White, Brian, Richard Little ve Michael Smith (Der.) (2005), Issues in World Politics (Londra: Macmillan).
• Wæver, Ole ve Linda Monsees (2019), “Theory is Technology; Technology is Theory”, Kaltofen, Carolin, Madeline Carr ve Michele Acuto (Der.), Technologies of International Continuity and Change (Switzerland: Palgrave): 13-24.
• Wilcox, Lauren (2017), “Embodying Algorithmic War: Gender, Race, and the Posthuman in Drone Warfare”, Security Dialogue, 48 (1): 11-28.
• Winner, Langdon (1980), “Do Artifacts Have Politics?”, Daedalus, 109 (1): 121-36.
• Woolgar, Steve ve Keith Grint (1995), “On Some Failures of Nerve in Constructivist and Feminist analyses of Technology”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 20 (3): 281-310.
• Yoo, John (2017), “Embracing the Machines: Rationalist War and New Weapons Technologies”, California Law Review, 105 (2): 443-500.
• Zimmern, Alfred (1928), “The Prospects for Democracy”, International Affairs, 7 (3): 153-191.