The Effect of Parent and Sibling Education Program on Attitudes and Behaviours towards Children with Disabilities

Bu araştırma Aile Eğitim Programı (AEP) ve Kardeş Eğitim Programı nın (KEP) 10-14 yaş aralığındaki normal kardeşlerin engelli kardeşine yönelik tutum ve davranışlarına etkisini incelemek amacıylayapılmıştır. Araştırma çok denekli-çok faktörlü deneysel desen kullanılarak öntest-sontest kontrol grupludesen üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Çalışma grubunu, Konya merkez ilçelerinde zihin engelli kardeşi bulunan10-14 yaş aralığındaki 30 ilköğretim okulu öğrencisi ile 10 ebeveyn oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracıolarak normal çocuklar için; Özürlü Kardeşe Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği ve Schaff er Kardeş Davranışı Değerlendirme Ölçeği-Kardeş Formu kullanılırken anneler için Schaff er Kardeş Davranışı DeğerlendirmeÖlçeği-Anne Formu kullanılmıştır. Mann Whitney U-Testi, Kruskal Wallis Testi (H testi) ve Wilcoxonİşaretli Sıralar Testinden yararlanılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre deney gruplarındaki kardeşlerin tutum ve davranışlarında artış olmuştur. Çocuklar ve ebeveynler, AEPte yer alan normal çocukların engelli kardeşlerine yönelik genel davranış düzeylerini benzer şekilde değerlendirmektedirler.

Aile ve Kardeş Eğitimi Programı nın Engelli Çocuğa Yönelik Tutum ve Davranışlara Etkisi

This research was carried out in order to examine the effect of The Parent Education Program(PEP) and The Sibling Education Program (SEP) which is given to siblings without disabilities and theirparents on the attitudes and behaviours of 10-14 year old siblings without disabilities towards theirsiblings with disabilities. The Multi subject-multi factor experimental pattern, which is one of experimen- tal models, was applied in this research. The pre-test post-test control group pattern was conducted in thiscontext. The study group consisted of 30 primary school students (experiment-1, experiment-2, and ex- periment 3) from the central counties of Konya who were 10-14 years old and had a sibling with disabi- lities and 10 parents (parents of children in experiment-2). The data collecting tools for normal childrenwere: The Attitude towards Disabled Sibling Scale , The Schaff er Sibling Behaviour Rating Scale- Sibling Form , and data about mothers was collected through, The Schaff er Sibling Behaviour RatingScale-Mother Form . Mann Whitney U-Test, Kruskal Wallis Test (H test) and Wilcoxon Signed RanksTest were used to determine. According to the result, the siblings in the experimental groups display ahigh increase at their attitudes and behaviours. Children and parents evaluate the general behaviour levelsof typically developing children participating in PEP in a similar way.

___

  • Ahmetoğlu, E. (2004). The Evaluation of the Percep tion of Mentally Retarted Children ’s Sibling- Relationship According to their Mothers and Siblings. Unpublished PhD. Thesis. Ankara University, Institute of Science, Ankara.
  • Anonymous. (2007). “Advocating for Your Child with a Disability Makes a Difference”. The Excep tional Parent, Mar. 37(3), 66-67.
  • Beh-Pajooh, A. (1991). “The Effect of Social Contact on College Students’ Attitudes Toward Severly Handicapped Students and their Educational Integration”. Journal of Mental Def iciency Research, 35, 338-352
  • Benderix, Y., & Sivberg, B. (2007). “Siblings’ Experiences of Having a Brother or Sister with Autism and Mental Retardation: A Case Study of 14 Siblings from Five Families”. International Pediatric Nursing. 22 (5), 410-418.
  • Burke, P., & Montgomery, S. (2001). “Brothers and Sisters: Supporting the Siblings of Children With Disabilities”. Practice, 13 (1), 27-38.
  • Burke, P. (2009). “Brothers and Sisters of Disabled Children: The Experience of Disability by Association”. British Journal of Social Work, 1-19.
  • Civelek, A. H. (1990). The Eff ects of Inf orming the Normal Children about The Social Accep tance of Mentally Retarded Children who can be Educated and the Integration of the two groups in Physical Education and Painting Classes. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara.
  • Demirel, O. (2006). Curriculum Develop ment in Education, Ninth Edition. Ankara: Pegem press.
  • “Guide to Effective Programs for Children and Youth”- Untitled Program for Siblings of Children with Disabilities, www.childtrends.org. Accessed: March 2010.
  • Fiedler, C. R., & Simpson, R. L. (1987). “Modifying Attitudes of Nonhandicapped High School Students Toward Handicapped Peers”. Excep tional Children, 53, 342-349.
  • Handlers, A., & Austin, K. (1980). “Improving Attitudes of High School Students Toward their Handi- capped Peers”. Excep tional Children, 47 (3).
  • Hannah, M. E., & Midlarsky, E. (2005). “Helping by Siblings of Children with Mental Retardation”. American Association on Mental Retardation, 110 (2), 87-99.
  • Howe, N., Karos, L. K., & Aquan-Assee, J. (2010). “Sibling Relationship Quality in Early Adolescence: Child and Maternal Perceptions and Daily Interactions”. Inf ant and Child Develop ment (Published online in Wiley InterScience).
  • Krauss, M. W., Seltzer, M. M., Gordon, R., & Freidman, D. H. (1996). “Binding Ties: The roles of Adult Siblings of Persons with Mental Retardation”. Mental Retardation, 34 (2), 83-93.
  • Kucuker, S. (1997). The Eff ects of Inf ormational Psychological Counseling Program on Siblings of Mentally Retarded Children ’s Knowledge Level Regarding being Disable and the Attitudes Towards their Disabled Siblings. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, Ankara University, School of Social Sciences, Ankara.
  • Lyons-Sjostrom, K. A. (2003). “Adjustment in Siblings of Children with Disabilities”. Degree of Doctor Thesis. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology.
  • McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V. (1993). “Sibling Interactions and Children’s Communicative Competency”. App lied Develop mental Psychology, 14 (3), 365-383.
  • McHale S., Sloan J., & Simeonsson R. J. (1986) “Sibling Relationships of Children with Autistic, Mentally Retarded, and nonhandicapped Brothers and Sisters”. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 16 (4), 399-415.
  • Meyer, D. J. (1997). Views f rom Our Shoes. United States of America: Woodbine House.
  • Meyer, D. J., & Vadasy, P. F. (2006). Sibshops – Workshops f or Siblings of Children with Sp ecial Needs. United States of America: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
  • Moore, L. M., Howard, V. F., & McLaughlin, T. F. (2002). “Siblings of Children with Disabilities: A Review and Analysis”. International Journal of Sp ecial Education, 17 (1), 49-63.
  • Noller, P. & Northfield, K. (2000). “Young Adult Sibling Relationships and Individual Adjustment”. Eds.
  • D. Ngaire, M. Innesand, & I. Walker, Australian Journal of Psychology . 5th Annual Meeting of the Society of Australasian Social Psychologists. Fremantle, (14), 27-30, April 2000.
  • Pearson, J. E., & Sternberg, A. (1986). “A Mutual Help Project for Families of Handicapped Children”. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65 (4), 213-216.
  • Powell, T. H., & Gallagher, P. A. (1993). Brother and Sisters: A Sp ecial Part of Excep tional Families. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company.
  • Pruchno, R. A., Patrick, J. H., & Butant, C. J. (1996). “Aging Women and their Children with Chronic Disabilities”. Family Relations, 45, 318-326.
  • Rimmerman, A. (2001). “Involvement with Role Perceptions Towards Adult Sibling with and without Mental Retardation”. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67 (2).
  • Schaefer, E. S., & Edgerton, M.E. (1979). Marital Autonomy and Relatedness Inventory . Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Stoneman, Z., Brody, G. H., Davis, C. H., & Crapps, J. M. (1989). “Role Relations Between Children Who Are Mentally Retarded and their Older Siblings: Observations in Three in-home Contexts”. Research in Develop mnetal Disabilities, 10 (1), 61-76.