Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Tasarım Temelli Öğrenmeye Yönelik Görüşleri

Bu araştırmada sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının tasarım temelli öğrenmeye yönelik görüşlerini incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 22 sınıf öğretmeni adayı oluşturmaktadır. Durum çalışma deseni olarak yürütülen bu çalışma 2016-2017 eğitim-öğretim yılı güz döneminde 6 haftada (haftada 2 saat) tamamlanmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen “Tasarım Temelli Öğrenme Görüşme Formu” kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler içerik analiz basamaklarına uygun olarak analiz edilmiştir. Tasarım temelli öğrenme uygulamaları sonucunda öğretmen adaylarının tasarım temelli öğrenme uygulamalarına ve mühendislik, mühendis ve tasarıma yönelik olarak düşüncelerinin olumlu yönde değiştiği tespit edilmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarının tasarım temelli öğrenme uygulamalarının derslerde kullanılmasının önemli olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Ayrıca öğrenciler tasarım temelli öğrenmenin yaratıcılık, hayal gücü, merak, özgüven, sorumluluk, empati gibi birçok özelliğinin geliştirdiğini ifade etmişlerdir. Elde edilen sonuçlar doğrultusunda önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Views towards Design-Based Learning

In this research, it was aimed to examine the views of pre-service primary teachers towards design-based learning. The study group of the study is composed of 22 pre-service primary teachers. This study, which is conducted as case study design, was completed in 6 weeks (2 hours per week) in fall semester of 2016-2017 academic year. "Design Based Learning Interview Form" developed by researcher was used as data collection tool. The obtained data were analyzed according to the content analysis steps. As a result of design-based learning practices, it has been determined that pre-service teachers had changed their opinions towards design-based learning practices and about engineering, engineers and design. They pointed out that it is important for the pre-service teachers to use design-based learning practices in their lessons. In addition, students expressed that design-based learners have developed many features such as creativity, imagination, curiosity, self-confidence, responsibility, empathy. Suggestions have been made in the direction of the obtained results.

PDF

___

Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465.
Bozkurt- Altan, E., Yamak, H., & Buluş- Kırıkkaya, E. (2016). Hizmetöncesi öğretmen eğitiminde FETEMM eğitimi Uygulamaları: Tasarım temelli fen eğitimi. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 212-232. Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M. ve Morgan, J. (Eds.). (2013). Project-based learning: an integrated
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd ed.). Rotterdam: Sense.
Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 791–820.
Cotabish, A., Dailey, D. Robinson, A. ve Hunghes, G., (2013). The effects of a STEM intervention on elementary students’ science knowledge and skills. School Science and Mathematics, 113(5), 215-226.
Cunningham, C. M., Lachapelle, C. ve Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2005). Assessing elementary school
students’ conceptions of engineering and technology. Retrieved from:http://engineering.nyu.edu/gk12/ampscbri/pdf/Assessing%20Elementary%20School%20Stude nts%20Conceptions%20of%20Engineering%20and%20Technology.pdf.
Dass, P.M. (2015). Teaching STEM effectively with the learning cycle approach. K- 12 STEM Education, 1(1), 5-12.
Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M.M., Schunn, C.D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22–39.
Eleffson, M.R., Brinker, R. A., Vernacchio, V. J., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Design-based learning for biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 292-298.
Eshach, H. (2006). Science literacy in primary schools and pre-schools. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S. ve Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60-73.
Felix, A. L. (2010). Design-based science for STEM student recruitment and teacher professional development.Retreved from: https://www.asee.org/documents/sections/middle-atlantic/fall-2010/01-Design-Based-Science-for-STEM-Student-Recruitment-and-Teache.pdf
Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110.
Fortus, D., Krajcik, J. S., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W. & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Design-based science and real-world problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855-879
Gómez Puente, S.M., van Eijck M., & Jochems W. (2011). Towards characterizing design based learning in engineering education: A review of the literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2), 137–149.
Gökbayrak, S., & Karışan, D. (2017). Altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin FETEMM temelli etkinlikler hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Alan Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3, 2-17.
Hacıoğlu, Y. (2017). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (STEM) eğitimi temelli etkinliklerin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel ve yaratıcı düşünme becerilerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Hacıoğlu, Y., Yamak, H. & Kavak, N. (2016). Mühendislik tasarım temelli fen eğitimi ile ilgili öğretmen görüşleri. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(3), 807-830.
Hacıoğlu, Y., Yamak, H, & Kavak, N. (2017). The Opinions of prospective science teachers regarding STEM Education: The engineering design based science education. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37 (2), 649-684. Retrieved from http://www.gefad.gazi.edu.tr/issue/30949/335366
Han, S., Capraro, R., ve Capraro, M. M. (2014). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113.
Hjalmarson, M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Moore, T. (2008). Designing model development sequences for engineering. In, J. Zawojewski, K. Bowman, & H. A. Diefes-Dux (Eds.), Mathematical modeling in engineering education: Designing experiences for all students. Roterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Householder, D. L., & Hailey, C. E. (2012). Incorporating engineering design challenges into STEM courses. NCETE Publications. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ncete_publications/166.
Hsu, M. C., Purzer, S. ve Cardella, M. E. (2011). Elementary teachers’ views about teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 31-39.
Irkıçatal, Z. (2016). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (FeTeMM) içerikli okul sonrası etkinliklerin öğrencilerin başarılarına ve FeTeMM algıları üzerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya.
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J. & Holbrook, J. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495.
Lambert, M., Diefes-Dux, H.A., Beck, M., Duncan, D., Oware, E., & Nemeth, R. (2007). What is engineering?: An exploration of P-6 grade teachers’ perspectives. In Proceedings of ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Milwaukee, WI.
Lartson, C. A. (2013). Effects of design-based science instruction on science problem solving competency among different groups of high-school traditional chemistry students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Colorado.
Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255-281.
Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y. & Schuun, C. D. (2008), Middle-School Science Through Design-Based Learning versus Scripted Inquiry: Better Overall Science Concept Learning and Equity Gap Reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 71–85. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00955.x
Mehalik, M.M. & Schunn, C., 2006. What constitutes good design? A review of empirical studies of design processes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22 (3), 519–532.
Meihholdt, C. & Murray, S. (1999). Why aren't there more women engineers? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(3), 239-263.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2017). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı: Ankara.
National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Academy of Engineering [NAE] & National Research Council [NRC] (2009). Engineering in K-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. Edt. Katehi, L., Pearson, G. & Feder, M. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation, (NSF). (2014). NSF approved STEM fields. Retrieved from: https://www.btaa.org/docs/default-source/diversity/nsf-approved-fields-of study.pdf?sfvrsn=1bc446f3_2.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Sherriff, B. Salman Parlakay, E. (2017). FETEMM (STEM) uygulamalarinin besinci sinif ogrencilerinin sorgulayici ogrenmelerine, motivasyonlarina ve 'canlilar dunyasini gezelim ve taniyalim' unitesindeki akademik basarilarina etkisi. Yayinlanmamis Yuksek Lisans Tezi. Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay.
Sherriff, B.L. ve Binkley, L. (1997). The irreconcilable images of women, science, and engineering: A Manitoban program that is shattering the stereotypes. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 3, 21-36.
Silk, E. M., Schunn, C. D., & Strand, C. M. (2007). The impact of an engineering design curriculum on science reasoning in an urban setting. In: Proceedings of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. New Orleans, LA, USA. 15-17.
Wendell, K., & Lee, H.-S. (2010). Elementary students’ learning of materials science practices through instruction based on engineering design tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology: Online First.
Yıldırım, B. (2016). 7. Sınıf fen bilimleri dersine entegre edilmiş fen teknoloji mühendislik matematik (STEM) uygulamaları ve tam öğrenmenin etkilerinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Yıldırım, B., & Altun, Y. (2015). STEM eğitim ve mühendislik uygulamalarının fen bilgisi laboratuar dersindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(2).
Yıldırım, B. & Selvi M. (2017). STEM uygulamaları ve tam öğrenmenın etkileri üzerine deneysel bir çalışma. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 13 (2), 183-210.
Yıldırım, B. & Türk, C. (2018). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının STEM eğitimine yönelik görüşleri: uygulamalı bir çalışma. Trakya Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 195-213.
Yıldırım, P. (2017b). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (STEM) entegrasyonuna ilişkin nitel bir çalışma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (35), 31-55.