Lise Öğrenci ve Öğretmenlerinin Kahoot Kullanımına İlişkin Görüşleri

Özet: Bu araştırmada lise öğrenci ve öğretmenlerinin kahoot uygulaması ile ilgili görüşlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada karma yöntem araştırmalarından açımlayıcı sıralı desen tercih edilmiştir. Öncelikle nicel verilere ulaşılmış, nicel veriler doğrultusunda nitel veriler elde edilmiştir. Araştırmanın nicel kısmına 201 öğrenci, nitel kısmına ise 24 öğrenci ile 3 öğretmen katılmıştır. Nicel verileri toplamak amacıyla anket, nitel verileri toplamak amacıyla öğretmen ve öğrencilere yönelik ayrı ayrı yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda lise öğrencilerinin kahoot’u çok sevdikleri ve eğlenceli buldukları, cevapların sonucunu hemen görmekten mutlu oldukları, kahoot uygulamasının soru ve cevapları hatırlamada katkısı olduğu, ancak cevapları arkadaşlarının görmesinden kısmen rahatsız oldukları ve ders çalışmalarını destekleyen bir uygulama olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Araştırmada ayrıca öğretmenlerin kahoot’u eğitim ortamı açısından verimli ve etkili buldukları ancak ön hazırlıkların zaman alıcı olduğu, ayrıntılı raporlama sürecini etkili kullanmadıkları tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlardan hareketle kahoot ile ilgili araştırmaların deneysel ve nitel çalışmalarla desteklenmesi önerilmektedir.

Opinions of High School Students and Teachers on Kahoot Use

Opinions of High School Students and Teachers on Kahoot Use Abstract: This study aims to reveal high school students’ and teachers’ views about using Kahoot. Explanatory sequential design, which is one of the mixed research methods, was used for the research. Quantitative data were obtained first, and then qualitative data were collected. 201 students participated in the quantitative part of the study; 24 students and 3 teachers participated in the qualitative part. A questionnaire was developed by the researcher to collect quantitative data, and semi-structured interview form was created for students and teachers separately in order to obtain qualitative data. Analyzes revealed that students loved Kahoot, this application enabled students to remember questions and answers. According to the results, however, students were disturbed to a certain degree when their answers were seen by their friends, and they stated that this application did not support when they studied their lessons. The study also showed while teachers found Kahoot productive and effective in educational environment, they stated that preliminary preparations were time consuming. It was found that teachers did not use detailed reporting process effectively. In line with these results, it is suggested that research on Kahoot be supported by further experimental and qualitative studies.

PDF

___

Bawden , D.,Robinson, L., Anderson, T.,Bates, J., Rutkauskiene U. & Vilar P. (2007). Towards curriculum2.0: library/information for Web 2.0 world. Library and information research. 99, 14–25.
Bezglasnaya, E. Gorbatov, S. (2015). Improvement of educational process based on use of new information and pedagogical technologies. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 3-8.
Bransford, J. D., Brown A. L. & Cocking,R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. (s. 3-23). Washington D.C. National Academy Press.
Bruff, D. (2009). Teaching With Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments. (1st ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Byrne, R. (2013). Free technology for teachers: Kahoot! - create quizzes and surveys your students can answer on any device.
https://www.freetech4teachers.com/2018/08/kahoot-adds-new-features-for-teachers.htm
Chien-Hung, L., Yu-Chang, L., Bin-Shyan, J., & Yen-Teh, H. (2014). Adding social elements to gamebased learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(3), 12-15. doi:10.3991/ijet.v9i3.3294
Chng, L., & Gurvitch, R. (2018). Using Plickers as an assessment tool in health and physical education settings. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89(2), 19-25.
Chou, C.C. (2017). An analysis of the 3d video and interactive response approach effects on the science remedial teaching for fourth grade underachieving students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(4), 1059-1073.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Araştırma deseni (Çev Edt: Demir, S. B.). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
Cross, J. (2014). Introduction to Kahoot for your classroom assessments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYfoRRtLXys
Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal ofInstructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 49-52.
Eddy, P. L., & Bracken, D. (2008). Lights, camera, action! The role of movies and video in the classroom. Journal of Faculty Development, 22(2), 125–134.
Elmas, R. & Geban, Ö. (2012). 21. yüzyıl öğretmenleri için Web 2.0 araçları. http://www.egitimdebilisimteknolojileri.com/21-yuzyil-ogretmenleri-icin-web-2-0- araclari.html
Graham, K. (2015). TechMatters: getting into Kahoot!(s): Exploring a game-based learning system to enhance student learning. LOEX Quarterly, 42(3), 6-7.
Gürışık, A. & Demirkan, Ö. (2018). Opınıons of hıgh school students about plıckers: one of the onlıne formatıve assessment tools. International Journal Of Scientific Research And Innovative Technology, 6(1), 11-25.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. Paper presented at 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii, USA.
Hart, J. (2018). Toptoolsforlearning 2018 https://www.toptools4learning.com/ Icard, S. B. (2014). Educational technology best practices. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 11(3), 37-41. Retrieved from http://itdl.org/Journal/Mar_14/Mar14.pdf#page=41
Kapuler, D. (2014). Top 100 Sites and Apps of 2014. 04.01.2019 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır. http://www.techlearning.com/contests/0007/100-web-toolsapps-of2014/68928adresinden alınmıştır.
Kim, B. & Reeves, T.C. (2007). reframing research on learning with technology: In search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 35(3), 207-256.
Koile, K. & Singer, D.A. (2006). Improving learning in CS1 via tabletpc-based in-class assessment. In Proceedings of ICER, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2th ed.). CA: Sage
Omar, N. N., (2017). The Efffectıveness of Kahoot applıcatıon towards students’ good feedback practıce. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 2551-2562.
Özçelik, D. A. (2010). Eğitim programları ve öğretim. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Plump, C. M. & LaRosa, J. (2017). Using Kahoot! In the classroom to create engagement and active learning: A game based technology solution for elearning novices. Management Teaching Review, 2(2), 151-158.
Rogers, J. W. & Cox, J. R. (2008). Integrating a single tablet PC in chemistry,engineering, and courses. Journal of College Science Teaching,37(3), 34939.
Richards, J. (2010). Competence and performance in language teaching. RELC Journal, 41(2), 101-122. Stacey, K. & Wiliam, D. (2013). Technology and assessment in mathematics. İçinde M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (s. 721–751). New York, NY: Springer.
Susilowati, E. (2017). The effectıveness of kahoot In supportıng grammar class on class a year ı students academıc year 2016/2017 of dıploma ııı of nursıng Ngudı Waluyo Unıversıty. 2th Unnes–Teflın National Seminar 136-139.
Taş, S. (2002). Türk dili ve edebiyatı dersi açısından test tekniği. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3 (3) :81-86.
Thomas, C. (2014). Kahoot: Game-like student-response tool can spark competition [Review of the video game Kahoot, produced by the Common Sense Graphite, 2012].
Tonta, Y. (2009). Dijital yerliler, sosyal ağlar ve kütüphanelerin geleceği. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 23, (4), 742-768.
Türnüklü, A. (2007). Liselerde öğrenci çatışmaları, nedenleri, çözüm stratejileri ve taktikleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 49, 129-166.
Üstüner, A. & Şengül, M. (2004).Çoktan Seçmeli test tekniğinin türkçe öğretimine olumsuz etkileri. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14, (2), 197-208,
Wang, A. I., & Lieberoth, A. (2016). The effect of points and audio on concentration, engagement, enjoyment, learning, motivation, and classroom dynamics using Kahoot! In European Conference on Games Based Learning (p. 738). Academic Conferences International Limited.
Yılmaz, B. (2017). Dijital değerlendirme araçlarının ortaokul öğrencilerinin derse bağlılıklarına etkisi: İki farklı okulda durum. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (3), 1606-1620.
Yılmaz, M. B., & Orhan, F. (2011). Investigating academic use of web2.0 tools by instructors and faculty members at educational faculties in terms of different variables. Paper presented at theInternational Educational Technology Conference,Istanbul, Turkey.
Yıldırım, İ., & Demir, S. (2014). Oyunlaştırma ve eğitim. International Journal of HumanSciences, 11(1), 655-670. doi: 10.14687/ijhs.v11i1.2765
Zarzycka-Piskorz, E. (2016). Kahoot it or not? Can games be motivating in learning grammar? Teaching English with Technology, 16(3), 17-36.
Zengin, Y., Bars, M. & Şimşek, Ö. (2017). Matematik öğretiminin biçimlendirici değerlendirme sürecinde Kahoot! ve Plickers uygulamalarının incelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 18(2), 602-626.