Side P Tapınağı'nda yeni araştırmalar, yeni bulgular ve yeni yorumlar

New research, new finds and new interpretations at Temple Pin Side

In the summer of 2013 and 2014 new research began at Side s Temple P, which rises on asemi circular podium and ends with a rectangular shape. This renewed architectural researchon the building extends the findings of earlier studies on the temple, which was published forthe first time by Lanckoroński in 1890. In 1947 it was excavated by Mansel, and a new restitu-tion was proposed by Gliwitzky in 2010. Current researches concentrated particularly on thestone compatible and precise architectural drawings of in situ and dislodged blocks, usinghistorical building research methods. Through these methods new information was obtainedabout the building phases of the lower floor, the architecture of the elements of the monumen-tal entrance, and the dedicatee(s) of the temple.The first research on Temple P was conducted by Lanckoroński and his team, who markedthe temple as P in his map of Side in 1890. In his very brief description Petersen mentions atympanum belonging to Temple P in Side and recalls a similar architectural element that hehad seen in Kremna before coming to Side and describes a figure on it . This description wasinterpreted by Mansel, who carried out excavations in Side 57 years after its discovery, as if itbelonged to the tympanum and the Side figure with the hypothesis that the one in Side wasworn but the other well preserved . Thus it was taken as evidence to identify the temple sdedication to Men. Actually Lanckoroński s publication states that the dedication of the templeto Men was a possibility; nevertheless, he named the temple as P.Mansel mentioned the dedication to Men cautiously in his early publications but sup-ported this hypothesis more determinedly in his final publication. Without checking the reliefon the tympanum, he claimed that a figure on a Gallienus coin of Side depicted Men, thusTemple P should be dedicated to Men, although many researchers objected to this identifica-tion. However, nothing contrary has not been proven yet. Descriptions of this temple usuallystart with an unusual plan type , and then it is either placed under a separate category orignored totally in typological studies. Thus, more than 120 years after its discovery, there stillis no systematic study, documentation or publication of Temple P. Researchers underline theinefficacy of Mansel s data and the deficiency of its presentation.In this context it can be stated that the frame of the researches has been constrained by thelack of satisfactory information on Roman temple architecture. Indeed, is it not more interesting to study non-typical examples, to see how much the rules were transcended or to investigate the reasons for producing unusual solutions for the sake of research, rather than studyingexamples not stretching the rules? Thus, our architectural study on Temple P started with theseconcerns in mind and relied on the chance and possibility to turn to the building itself at firstindependent of the building s function and the time period to which it belongs.In the first stage of this new research the focus was on the building itself as the main reference. Dislodged architectural blocks scattered around the monumental entrance before thesemicircular cella rising on a podium were examined. Recording through drawing was realizedusing a computer-supported relevé method. Relevés of technical joints like clamps, dowels etc.as well as areas with finely dressed stone surfaces were prepared on 1:10 scale based on geo-desic measurements. A standard description technique was developed that was suitable for thedeformation of the stone. On the other hand, on the lower floor where no technical joints ex-isted in masonry, relevés of 1:20 were prepared by hand. Dislodged architectural blocks weredrawn to a 1:10 scale containing all the data necessary for research on historical buildings, andtheir photographs were taken for documentation.Documents hand-drawn on site were scanned and digitised using the capabilities of theCAD program in order to prepare the basis for restitution. Ceiling coffers were researched byputting together drawings on a 1:10 scale using a computer.On-site research on the tympanum has shown that the bust in its middle is not a male withconical headgear , as thought by former researchers, but rather a female in high relief. Thisfemale is flanked with a stylized ear of wheat on the right and a stylized opium capsule on theleft. Heavily worn traces on the stone can still be discerned in certain sunlight revealing theearlobes, a triangular pit under the chin, her throat, and her hair in curls. So this is a goddessfigure flanked with her attributes; thus, she should be identified as Demeter.From the point of architecture, the presence of two such façade elements of equal size in-dicates a symmetrical façade. This situation brings a question with itself: So to whom was thesecond tympanum dedicated? In this context the future questions to be investigated are: Didthe temple house another cult of mystery together with that of Demeter? So was the secondtympanum dedicated to another deity, or did it refer to another quality of Demeter such asThesmophoros or Karpophoros? Was there a depiction of Kore (Persephone) in a mother-daughter context or of Hades?The basement concealed in the podium of Temple P may have served the cult of Demeterand/or another cult of mystery referring to Hades and Persephone, death and life. In the ritesof Demeter the basement may have served for the enactment of the abduction of Persephoneby Hades, the god of underworld, or her return. The shape of the hidden and introvertedrooms downstairs, unconnected with the outside except for the holes in the ceiling openinginto the cella, should be related to the worship manner of the mystic cult. The three roomsmay be symbolically referring t

PDF

___

Akurgal 1986 E. Akurgal, Civilitations et sites antiques de Turquie (1986).
Alanyalı 2003 H. S. Alanyalı, Dionysos Frizi ve Kaset Kabartmaları Çalışmaları, KST 24.2 (2003) 267-282.
Alanyalı 2011 H. S. Alanyalı, Sidenin Roma Dönemi Panteonu, Anadolu/Anatolia 37, 2011, 75- 92.
Anabolu 1970a M. U. Anabolu, Küçük Asyada Bulunan Roma İmparatorluk Çağı Tapınakları (1970)
Anabolu 1970b M. U. Anabolu, 1970b, Batı Anadoluda Bulunan Yiv (Oluk) li Frizli Yapılar, ASanat, online: http://www.dlir.org/archive/archive/files/arkeoloji_sanat_tarihi_ dergisi_v-6_p1-3_7ebb690edc.pdf: 1-3, (14.09.2013)
Anabolu 1988 M. U. Anabolu, 1988, Batı Anadoluda bulunan Demeter ve Khitonien Tanrılar, Tapınakları, Asanat VI, 1988, 121-139, online: http://www.envanter.gov.tr/files/ belge/A6ASR_0196.pdf, (14.10.2013).
Atlan 1967 S. Atlan, Untersuchungen über die sidetischen Münzen des V. und IV. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. TTK (1967).
Atvur Atvur 1986 O. Atvur Ü. Atvur, Side. A Guide to the Ancient City and Museum (1986).
Baldıran Gider 2008 A. Baldıran Z. Gider, Mimari Bloklar Işığında Isauria Bölgesinin Mimari Uygu- lamaları, online: http://www.sosyalbil.selcuk.edu.tr/sos_mak/articles/2008/20/ ABALDIRAN-ZGIDER.PDF:109-134 (18.09.2013)
Başaran 1995 C. Başaran, Roma Çağı lotus-palmet örgesi (1995). Bean 1968 G. E. Bean, Turkeys Southern Shore (1968).
Bean 1970 G. E. Bean, Kleinasien II. Die Türkische Südküste von Antalya bis Alanya. Studienreiseführer zu den klassischen Stätten: Kunstführer zu den klassischen Städten2 (1970).
Bean 1976 G . E. Bean, Side, R. Stillwell (ed.). The Princeton Encyclopedia of Classical Sites (1976).
Boëthius 1978 A. Boëthius, Architecture in Italy before the Roman Empire, bk.: A. Boëthius J. B. Ward-Perkins, Etruscan and Roman Architecture 2 (1978).
Burrell 2004 B. Burrell, Neokoroi. Greek cities and Roman empire (2004).
Burkert 1994 W.Burkert, Antike Mysterien, Funktionen und Gehalt3 (1994).
Burkert 2009 W. Burkert, Kleine Schriften I, Homerica 2 (2009).
Buxton 2005 R. Buxton, Das große Buch der griechischen Mythologie. Çev. B. Thomas (2005).
Büyükgün 2006 B. Büyükgün, Men Kültüyle ilgili Eskişehir, Afyon, Kütahya ve Pamukkale Arkeoloji Müzelerinde Bulunan Bazı Taş Eserler (Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi 2006).
Dörtlük 1991 K. Dörtlük, Lykien, Pisidien, Pamphylien, Antike Städteführer, Antalya 3 (1991).
Drexler 1897 W. Drexler, Men, Ausführliches Lexikon der griechischen und r ömischen Mythologie, W. H. Roscher (ed.), ML II, 2, 1897, 2687-2770.
Erhat 1996 A. Erhat, Mitoloji Sözlüğü6 (1996).
Fiechter 1906 E. R. Fiechter, Der Ionischer Tempel am Ponte Rotto in Rom. S. Maria Egiziaca, Mitteilungen des kaiserlich deutschen archäologischen Instituts. Band 21. 1906, 220-279.
Giebel 2000 M. Giebel, Das Geheimnis der Mysterien. Antike Kulte in Griechenland, Rom und Ägypten (2000).
Gliwitzky 2010 Ch. Gliwitzky, Späte Blüte in Side und Perge. Die pamphylische Bauornamentik des 3. Jahrhunderts n. Chr. (2010).
Gruben 1986 G. Gruben, Die Tempel der Griechen4 (1986).
Hesberg 2005 H. von Hesberg, Römische Baukunst (2005).
Hierzenberger 2003 G. Hierzenberger, Der Glaube der Alten Griechen und Römer (2003).
Huber 1965 L. Huber, Mytos zu Demeter, Lexion der Alten Welt, 1965, 709-710.
İnan 1951 J. İnan, Heykeltraşlık eserleri. Skulpturen, bk.: Mansel v.d. (1951) 27-45.
İnan 1965 J. İnan, Antalya bölgesi Roma devri portreleri. Römische Porträts aus dem Gebiet von Antalya, TTK 5, 21, Antalya bölgesinde araştırmalar 6. Untersuchungen in der Gegend von Antalya 6 (1965).
İnan Rosenbaum 1966 J. İnan E. Rosenbaum, Roman and Early Byzantine Portrait Sculpture in Asia Minor (1966).
İnan 1975 J. İnan, Roman Sculpture in Side, TTK 5, 30a, Antalya bölgesinde araştırmalar 8. Researches in the Region of Antalya 8 (1975).
Kaderli 2009 L. Kaderli, Side Apollon, Athena Tapınakları Kutsal Alanı ve Bizans Bazilikaları, Koruma Yaklaşımı ve Tarihi Çevre Değerlendirilmesi (Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi 2009).
Karademir 2009 H. Karademir, Anadoluda Dairesel Planlı Tapınaklar (Akdeniz Üniversitesi Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi 2009).
Kerényi 1998 K. Kerényi, Dionysos. Urbild des unzerstörbaren Lebens2 (1998).
Kerényi 2001a K. Kerényi, Die Mytologie der Griechen. Die Heroen-Geschichten19 Band II (2001).
Kerényi 2001b K. Kerényi, Die Mytologie der Griechen. Die Götter- und Menschenheitgeschichten22 Band II. (2001).
Klose 1999 D. O. A. Klose, Türkei, bk.: K. Brodersen (ed.), Antike Stätten an Mittelmeer, Metzler Lexion (1999) 435-644, özellikle 611-616 (Side).
Lanckoroń ski 1890 K. G. Lanckoroń ski (ed.), Städte Pamphyliens und Pisidiens I (1890).
Lesky 1997 A. Lesky, Men, Reallexion 29, Halbband, XVI, 1 2, 1997, 689-697.
Lindner 1994 R. Lindner, Mythos und Identität: Studien zur Selbstdarstellung kleinasiatischer Städte in der römischen Kaiserzeit (1994).
Lücke Lücke 2007 H.-K. Lücke S. Lücke, Die Götter der Griechen und Römer (2007).
Machatschek Schwarz 1981 A. Machatschek M. Schwarz, Bauforschungen in Selge, 9. Ergbd.TAM (1981).
Mader 2005 G. Th. Mader, Angewandte Bauforschung als Planungshilfe bei der Denkmal- instandsetzung, bk.: Angewandte Bauforschung 1-19 (2005).
Mansel v.d. 1951 A. M. Mansel E. Bosch J. İnan, 1947 Senesi Side Kazılarına dair önrapor - Vorläufiger Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Side im Jahre 1947, TTK. (1951).
Mansel 1958 A. M. Mansel, Bericht über Ausgrabungen und Untersuchungen in Pamphylien in den Jahren 1946-1955, AA 71, 1956, 1958, 34-120.
Mansel 1963 A. M. Mansel, Die Ruinen von Side (1963).
Mansel 1965 A. M. Mansel, Side, RE Suppl. X (1965) 879-918.
Mansel 1978 A. M. Mansel, Side, 1947-1966 Yılları Kazıları ve Araştırmalarının Sonuçları TTK (1978).
Martini 2001 W. Martini, Side, DNP 11, 2001, 518.
Mellink 1959 M. J. Mellink, Archaeology in Asia Minor, AJA 59, 1955, 231-240.
Müller 1989 W. Müller, Wege der Forschung, bk.: W. Müller, Architekten. In der Welt der Antike (1989).
Nollé 1983 J. Nollé, Zum Landbau von Side, EA 1, 1983,119-129.
Nollé 1986 J. Nollé, Pamphylische Studien, Chiron 16, 1986, 199-212.
Nollé 1990 J. Nollé, Side. Zur Geschichte einer kleinasiatischen Stadt in der römischen Kaiserzeit im Spiegel ihrer Münzen, AW 21, 1990, 244-265.
Nollé 1993 J. Nollé, Side im Altertum. Geschichte und Zeugnisse, Band I, IK 43 (1993).
Nollé 2001 J. Nollé, Side im Altertum. Geschichte und Zeugnisse, Band II, IK 44 (2001).
Pleket Stroud 1989 H. W. Pleket R. S. Stroud, SEG Band 36 (1986) 1989, 370 No. 1209.
Pohl 2002 D. Pohl, Kaiserzeitliche Tempel in Kleinasien unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der hellenistischen Vorbilder, AMS 43 (2002).
Price 1986 S. R. F. Price, Rituals and Power. The Roman imperial cult in Asia Minor3 (1986).
Raming 1999 E. Raming, Bogen und Gebälk. Untersuchungen zum syrischen Bogen und verwan- dten Erscheinungsformen in der antiken Architektur (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi 1999).
Robert 1969 L. Robert, Etudes dépigraphie: XXII, Épigramme de Colophon, OMS II 1969, 1135.
Robert 1989 L. Robert, Inscriptions grecques de Sidè en Pamphylie (epoque imperiale et bas- empire), OMS V 1989, 155-193.
Roloff 1965 K.-H. Roloff, Demeter, Lexion der Alten Welt, 1965, 708-709.
Rosenberg 2006 D. Rosenberg, Dünya Mitolojisi-Büyük Destan ve Söylenceler Antolojisi. K. Akten E. Cengiz (çev.) (2006).
Schipporeit 2013 S. Th. Schipporeit, Kulte und Heiligtümer der Demeter und Kore in Ionien, F. Pirson M. Bachmann (eds.), Byzas 16 (2013).
Schirmer 1995 W. Schirmer, Das Bauwerk als Quelle, bk.: architectura, XXIV, 1994 1/2 (1995), online; http://www.koldewey-gesellschaft.de/de/bauf/bauforschung.html, (05.01.2014, 20.00)
Schirmer 1987 W. Schirmer, Bauforschung an den Instituten für Baugeschichte der Technischen Hochschulen, Akten Koll., Bauforschung und Denkmalpflege, 1987, 25-29.
Simon 1980 E. Simon, Die Götter der Griechen2 (1980).
Simon 1990 E. Simon, Die Götter der Römer (1990).
Sommer 2006 M. Sommer, Der römische Orient. Zwischen Mittelmeer und Tigris (2006).
Tancke 1989 K. Tancke, Figuralkassetten griechischer und römischen Steindecken (1989).
Thomas 2007 E. Thomas, Monumentality and the Roman Empire. Architecture in the Antonine Age (2007).
Türkmen 2007 M. Türkmen, Pamphylia ve Kilikiada Severuslar Dönemi Mimari Bezemesi (İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi 2007).
Uncu 2012 E. Uncu, Demeter Kültünde Mezopotamyalı ve Anadolulu Unsurlar/The Mesopotamian and Anatolian Components in Demeter Cults, History Studies International Journal of History 4 (1), 2012, 529-545.
Vandeput 1997 L . Vandeput, The Architectural Decoration in Roman Asia Minor. Sagalassos: a Case Study. M. Waelkens (ed.), Studies in Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology I (1997).
Vermaseren 1966 M. J. Vermaseren, The Legend of Attis in Greek and Roman Art, EPRO 9, 1966.
Vitruvius 1981 P. M. Vitruvius, De architectura libri decem - Vitruv, Zehn Bücher über Architektur3, C. Fensterbusch (çev.) (1981).
Wagner 1988 J. Wagner, Türkei. Die Südküste von Kaunos bis Issos 2 (1988).
Ward-Perkins 1978 J. B. Ward-Perkins, The Architecture of the Roman Provinces, bk.: A. Boëthius J. B. Ward-Perkins, Etruscan and Roman Architecture 2, N. Pevsner J. Nairn (ed.) (1978).
Ward-Perkins 1990 J. B. Ward-Perkins, Roman Imperial Architecture 7 (1990).
Wegner 1978-80 M. Wegner, Soffitten von Ephesos und Asia Minor, Öjh 52, 1978-80, 91-107.
Wegner 1989 M. Wegner, Bauschmuk von Side, bk.: N. Başgelen M. Lugal (ed.), Jale İnan Armağanı. ASanat (1989) 161-167.
Wiebke 2010 F. Wiebke, Den Göttern so nah. Architektur und Topographie griechischer Orakelheiligtümer (2010).

ISSN: 1301-2746
Yayın Aralığı: Yıllık
Başlangıç: 1996
Yayıncı: Koç Üniversitesi AKMED (Suna & İnan Kıraç Akdeniz Medeniyetleri Araştırma Merkezi)