Geç Antik Çağ'da Doğu Akdeniz'deki ekonomik gelişmenin nedenleri: İpek yolu ve Baharat yolu'nun rolü, LR1 amphoraları ve Kilikia'daki diğer kanıtlar

Why did the economy Flourish in the East Mediterranean during late antiquity? roles of the silk route and spice route, LR1 amphorae, and other evidence from cilicia

One question about the history of the East Mediterranean that still needs to be answeredconcerns the reasons underlying the economic vivacity observed during the Roman Imperialperiod and Late Antiquity. Clear answers have not yet been proposed for the noteworthydevelopments along the littoral of Anatolia, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine. Some scholarsunderline the fact that the presence of Roman legions caused an increase in the volume ofproduction, thus giving significant stimulation to the economy. However, military campaignsdid not lead to the same level of development in every region.In Cilicia, developments observed from the late 4th to the early 7th centuries A.D. indicatesignificant economic vivacity and encompass important clues that may cast light onto thisquery. New settlements founded on the coastline of the region, the enormous increase in thenumber of agricultural farmsteads and rural settlements, and the increasing number of churchesbuilt can be listed as solid evidence for this economic vivacity. Beside these developments, theproduction of LR1 amphorae of Cilician origin, which are encountered almost at every point ofthe ancient world and date to the same time period, boomed.This outlook brings forth new questions. For instance, what is the reason for the increasein the production of amphorae, rural agricultural production and architectural developments?What is the commercial outlook in the region during the Early Byzantine period? Furthermore,how and through whom did the LR1 amphorae spread across such a wide geography?These positive developments observed in Cilicia are indeed an extension of developmentsacross the entire empire. Particularly in the centuries following the foundation ofConstantinopolis, trade volume increased overall across the empire, and the new capitalbecame a gigantic metropolis where all sorts of goods were marketed. In addition, regionsof the Balkans, Italy, South Spain and North Africa, formerly lost, were recaptured andreincorporated into the Byzantine Empire during the reign of Justinian.This vital period also witnessed a revival in the economy. A variety of goods from all overthe empire, and particularly the Far East, were sought after much more than before, especiallyto supply the demands of the armies and the populous capital Constantinopolis.Usually the Far East and the Mediterranean are perceived as geographies unrelated to eachother; however, there was an established connection between them dependent on trade. Thiscommerce via the Silk Route stands as one of the foremost reasons underlying the high level ofeconomic vivacity attested in the East Mediterranean and even in the entire empire during the5 th and 6th centuries.Among the goods brought from China and India were, above all, silk favored by thearistocracy, spices, cloves, pepper, musk, various aromas and precious gems as well as exoticproducts like the Chinese porcelain discovered in the 6th century. Silk particularly became astatus symbol starting in the Roman period and was acquired at very high prices.The land part of the Silk Route reached the Mediterranean and set off at sea from Antioch.The other important harbors were Tyre and Berytos. Another branch of the Silk Route followedthe sea starting from India and went around the Arabian Peninsula into the Red Sea. Themerchandise was unloaded at the harbor of Berenike from where it was transported toAlexandria via caravans or the Nile.The presence of Alexandria is a detail that will clarify the commercial activity in the EastMediterranean. Alexandria is the port city where the Spice Route coming from the Far Eastreached the Mediterranean. Following the foundation of Constantinopolis, the new capital wasthe main target market not only for the silk trade but also the spice trade because spices, justlike silk, were in high demand both at Rome and at Byzantium.This commercial outlook is an indicator that the East Mediterranean transformed into anenormous economic market. Trade centered on the littoral of Egypt, Syria and Phoenicia pavedthe way for the emergence of the most sensitive, the most important and the most intensivetrade route of Byzantium.In this period, except Antioch, Tyre and Berytos in the East Mediterranean, coastalsettlements on the way to wealthy metropolises like Tarsus, Anazarbos and Aegeai(Yumurtalık) in Cilicia were accorded a great opportunity. The harbors along the long coastlineof Cilicia especially became stops for the merchantmen going to the above-mentioned largemetropolises. Rural settlements in the hinterland of the Cilician harbors started to export theirproducts from these harbors. By selling them to these merchantmen, local products began tospread over a wide geographical area. LR1 amphorae are indeed an important evidence for thesituation.Merchants traveling across the entire ancient world for the trade of silk, cereals, preciousgems, porcelain and spices would have stopped at the Cilician harbors and bought the localproducts on their way to or from Syria and Phoenicia. This fortuitous route - one of the most(perhaps the most) important trade routes of the empire - created intensive trade circulationon the Cilician harbors along this route. It is also plausible to think that the ships on their wayto Antioch where the Silk Route reached the Mediterranean stopped at the Cilician harborsfor their own needs. Thus, the maritime merchants got acquainted with the local products ofCilicia, which boosted the production of wine, olive oil or other industrial products as well astheir imports.The foundation of Constantinopolis following the political crisis of the 3rd century can beconsidered the phase when the commercial contacts with the Far East started to intensify. Thatthe trade with the Far East was related to the coastal settlements of the East Mediterraneancan be proposed as

___

  • Alkaç 2012 E. Alkaç, “Korykos (Kilikia) Yüzey Araştırmalarında Bulunan LR1 Amphoraları”, Olba XX, 323-344.
  • Aşkın 2010 E. Aşkın, “Antik Çağda Korykos’taki Zeytinyağı ve Şarap Üretimine Yönelik Yapılanmalar ve Bunların Yerleşim Düzenlemesi İçerisindeki Yeri”, Antik Çağda Anadolu’da Zeytinyağı ve Şarap Üretimi (Olive Oil and Wine Production in Anatolia During Antiquity); Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildirileri, 06-08 Kasım 2008, Mersin (2010) 33-52.
  • Aydınoğlu 2009 Ü. Aydınoğlu, Dağlık Kilikia Bölgesinde Antik Çağda Zeytinyağı ve Şarap Üretimi: Üretimin Arkeolojik Kanıtları (2009).
  • Bailey 1988 D. M. Bailey, A Catalogue of the Lamps in the British Museum, Vol. 3 (1988).
  • Bosch 1931 C. Bosch, “Kleinasiatische Münzen der römischen Kaiserzeit”, AA 46, 422-455.
  • Cameron 1993 W. A. Cameron, The Mediterranean World in Late Antiquity: AD 395-700 (1993).
  • Cameron 2006 W. A. Cameron, The Byzantines (2006).
  • Casson 2008 L. Casson, Antik Çağda Seyahat (Travel in the Ancient World. N. Özsoy (çev.) (1974).
  • Ceylan 2009 B. Ceylan, “Kilikia’da Geç Antik Dönem Kırsal Yerleşimleri: Kanytellis Örneği”, Olba XVII, 2009, 45-61.
  • Crawford 1975 M. Crawford, “Finance, Coinage and Money from the Severans to Constantine”, ANRW II.2 (1975) 560-593.
  • Durukan 2015 M. Durukan, Mersin’den Tarsus’a Kilikia Kıyılarındaki Kayıp Kentler (Zephyrion, Ingira, Aulai, Ankhiale, Kyinda-Kundi, Sizzu) (Yayın aşamasında).
  • Elton 2003 H. Elton, “The Economy of Cilicia in Late Antiquity”, Olba VIII, 2003, 173-181.
  • Empereur – Picon 1989 J. Y. Empereur – M. Picon, “Les régions de production d’amphores impériales en Méditerranée Orientale”, Anfore Romane e Storia Economica: Un Decenio Di Richerce, Collection De L’Ecole Française De Rome, 114, 224-248.
  • Evans 2000 J. A. S. Evans, The Age of Justinian: The Circumstances of Imperial Power (2000).
  • Ferrazzoli – Ricci 2009 A. F. Ferrazzoli – M. Ricci, “Cilician Ceramic Production from Roman to Byzantine Age. New Data From Elaiussa Sebaste”, Olba XVII, 2009, 33-44.
  • Gibbon 1994 E. Gibbon, Roma İmparatorluğu’nun Gerileyiş ve Çöküş Tarihi. IV. Byzans. A. Baltacıgil (çev.) (1994).
  • Gregory 2005 T. E. Gregory, A History of Byzantium (2005).
  • Gren 1941 E. Gren, Kleinasien und der Ostbalkan in der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung der römischen Kaiserzeit (1941).
  • Hall 2004 L. J. Hall, Roman Berytus: Beirut in Late Antiquity (2004).
  • Hartmann 1982 F. Hartmann, Herrscherwechsel und Reichskrise (1982).
  • Hekster 2008 O. Hekster, Rome and its Empire AD 193-284 (2008).
  • Hild - Hellenkemper 1990 F. Hild, H. Hellenkemper, Kilikien und Isaurien (1990).
  • Hill 1996 S. Hill, The Early Byzantine Churches of Cilicia and Isauria (1996).
  • Iacomi 2010 V. Iacomi, “Some Notes on Late Antique Oil and Wine Production in Rough Cilicia (Isauria) on the Light of Epigraphic Sources: Funerary Inscriptions from Korykos, LR1 Amphorae Production in Elaiussa Sebaste and the Abydos Tariff”, Antik Çağda Anadolu’da Zeytinyağı ve Şarap Üretimi (Olive Oil and Wine Production in Anatolia During Antiquity); Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildirileri, 06-08 Kasım 2008, Mersin (2010) 19-32
  • Kaplan 2011 D. Kaplan, “Doğu Dağlık Kilikia’da Roma İmparatorluk Döneminde İmar Hareketliliğinin ve Üretim Artışının Nedenleri (Scrutinizing the Increased Construction and Production Activities in Eastern Rough Cilicia During to Roman Imperial Period)”, Tüba-Ar 14, 2011, 107-120.
  • Levtchenko 1999 M. V. Levtchenko, Kuruluşundan Yıkılışına Kadar Bizans Tarihi. M. Selen (çev.) (1999).
  • Liebeschuetz 1972 J. H. W. G. Liebeschuetz, Antioch: City and Imperial Administration in the Later Roman Empire (1972).
  • Lopez 1945 R. S. Lopez, “Silk Industry in the Byzantine Empire”, Speculum 20.1, 1945, 1-42.
  • McLaughlin 2010 R. McLaughlin, Rome and Distant East, Trade Routes to the Ancient Lands of Arabia, India and China (2010).
  • MacKay 1968 T. S. MacKay, Olba in Rough Cilicia (1968).
  • MacMullen 1976 R. MacMullen, Roman Government’s Response to Crisis A.D. 235-337 (1976).
  • Mietke 2009 G. Mietke, “Monumentalisierung christlicher Heiliger in Kilikien in frühbyzanti- nischer Zeit”, Olba XVII, 2009, 117-140.
  • Mitchell 1983 S. Mitchell, “The Balkans, Anatolia, and Roman armies Asia Minor”, S. Mitchell (yay.) Armies and Frontiers in Roman and Byzantine Anatolia (Proceedings of a colloquium held at University College) BAR International Series 156 (1983) 131-150.
  • Morrison – Sodini 2002 C. Morrisson – J. P. Sodini, “The Sixth-Century Economy”, bk.: A. E. Laiou (ed.), The Economic History of Byzantium: From the Seventh through the Fifteenth Century (2002) 171-220.
  • Ostrogorsky 1991 G. Ostrogorsky, Bizans Devleti Tarihi. F. Işıltan (çev.) (1991).
  • Patrich 2011 J. Patrich, Studies in the Archaeology and History of Caesarea Maritima: Caput Judaeae, Metropolis Palaestinae (2011).
  • Pieri 2005 D. Pieri, Le commerce du vin Oriental, A l’epoque Byzantine (Ve-VIIe siècles), Le temoignage des amphores en Gaule, Institute français du Proche-Orient (2005).
  • Plinius NH Pliny the Elder, Naturalis Historia (The Natural History), Loeb Classical Library. H. Rackham (çev.), (1945).
  • Potter 2004 D. S. Potter, The Roman Empire at Bay: Ad 180-395 (2004).
  • Reynolds 1993 P. Reynolds, Settlement and Territory in the Vinalopó Valley (Alicante, Spain), AD 400-700 (1993).
  • Rees 2004 R. Rees, Diocletian and the Tetrarchy: Debates and Documents in Ancient History (2004).
  • Rosengarten 1969 F. Jr. Rosengarten, The Book of Spices (1969).
  • Seidler 1997 G. L. Seidler, Bizans Siyasal Düşüncesi. M. Tunçay (çev.) (1997).
  • Şenol 2008 A. K. Şenol, “Cilician commercial relations with Egypt due to the new evidence of amphora finds”, Olba XVI, 2008, 109-131.
  • Şenol 2009 A. K. Şenol, AETAM’da (Arslan Eyce Taşucu Amphora Müzesi) Bulunan Ticari Amphoralar ve Akdeniz’de Ticaret İzleri (2009).
  • Şenol – Şenol 2003 G. Şenol – A. K. Şenol, “Commercial Ties of Cilicia by Means of Hellenistic and Roman Amphorae”, Olba VII, 2003, 119-143.
  • Trombley 1987 F. R. Trombley, “Korykos in Cilicia Trachis: The Economy of a Small Coastal City in the Late Antiquity (Saec. V-VI)- A Precis”, The Ancient History Bulletin 1/1, 1987, 19.
  • Trombley 2004 F. R. Trombley, “Epigraphic Data on Village Culture and Social Institutions: An Interregional Comparison (Syria, Phoenice Libanensis and Arabia), Recent Research on the Late Antique Countryside (W. Bowden – L. Lavan – C. Machado (eds.) (2004) 73-101.
  • Uhlig 2000 H. Uhlig, İpek Yolu. Çin ve Roma Arasında Eski Dünya Kültürü. A. Kırımlı (çev.) (2000).
  • Ward-Perkins 2001 B. Ward-Perkins, – S. Kingsley – M. Decker (ed.), “Specialisation, Trade and Prosperity: An Overview of the Economy of the Late Antique Eastern Mediterranean”, Economy and Exchange in the East Mediterranean During Late Antiquity (2001) 166-178.
  • Wierschowski 1984 L. Wierschowski, Heer und Wirtschaft. Das römische Heer der Prinzipatszeit als Wirtschaftsfaktor (1984).
  • Williams – Taylor 1975 H. Williams – P. Taylor, “A Byzantine Lamp Hoard from Anamur (Cilicia)”, AnatSt 25, 1975, 77-84.