___

1. Krebs HI, Ferraro M, Buerger SP, Newbery MJ, Makiyama A, Sandmann M, et al. Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004;1:5.

2. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Van der Loos HFM, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Yap R. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: a follow-up study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:631-42.

3. Loureiro R, Amirabdollahian F, Topping M, Driessen, B, Harwin, W. Upper limb mediated stroke therapy - GEN- TLE/s approach. Autonomous Robots 2003;15:35-51.

4. Nef T. ARMin Multimodal robot for the movement therapy of the upper extremities. PhD dissertation. Zurich; ETH; 2007.

5. Nef T, Mihelj M, Kiefer G, Perndl C, Müller R, Riener, R. ARMin - Exoskeleton for arm therapy in stroke patients. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2007 June 13-15; Noordwijk, the Netherlands. p. 68-74.

6. Nef T, Mihelj M, Riener R. ARMin: a robot for patient- cooperative arm therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007;45: 887-900.

7. Nef T, Guidali M, Riener R. ARMin III - arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation. Appl Bionics Biomech 2009;6:127-42.

8. Housman SJ, Le V, Rahman T, Sanchez RJ Jr, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Arm-training with T-WREX after chronic stroke: preliminary results of a randomized con- trolled trial. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2007 June 13-15; Noordwijk, the Netherlands. p. 562-8.

9. Sanchez RJ Jr, Wolbrecht E, Smith R, Liu J, Rao S, Cramer S, et al. A pneumatic robot for re-training arm movement after stroke: rationale and mechanical design. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2005 June 28-July 1; Chicago, USA. p. 500-4.

10. Frisoli A, Borelli L, Montagner A, Marcheschi S, Procopio C, Salsedo F, et al. Arm rehabilitation with a robotic exoskeleleton in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2007 June 13-15; Noordwijk, the Netherlands. p. 631-42.

11. Kousidou S, Tsagarakis NG, Smith C, Caldwell DG. Task- orientated biofeedback system for the rehabilitation of the upper limb. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2007 June 13-15; Noordwijk, the Netherlands. p. 376-84.

12. Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative train- ing on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 1999;54:443-6.

13. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein OTR L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot- aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000;54:1938-44.

14. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol 2001;14:745-52.

15. Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:171-84.

16. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111-21.

17. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation: translating research into practice. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004;11:11-9.

18. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hogan N. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recov- ery in chronic stroke. Arc Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:477- 82.

19. Staubli P, Nef T, Klamroth-Marganska V, Riener R. Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009;6:46.

20. Sanchez RC, Liu J, Rao S, Shah P, Smith R, Rahman T, et al. Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2006;14:378-89.

21. Lephart SM, Riemann BL, Fu FH. Introduction to the sen- sorimotor system. In: Scott ML, Freddie HF, editors. Proprioception and neuromuscular control in joint stability. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2000. p. 27-9.

22. Casadio M, Morasso P, Sanguineti V, Giannoni P. Minimally assistive robot training for proprioception enhancement. Exp Brain Res 2009;194:219-31.

23. Tyson S, Hanley M, Chillala J, Selley AB, Tallis RC. Sensory loss in hospital-admitted people with stroke: charac- teristics, associated factors and relationship with function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:166-72.

24. Ozkul F, Barkana DE, Demirbas SB, Inal S. Evaluation of proprioceptive sense of the elbow joint with RehabRoby. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2011 June 29-July 1; Zurich, Switzerland. p. 1-6.

25. Ozkul F, Barkana DE. Design and control of an upper limb exoskeleton robot RehabRoby. In: Proceedings of 12th Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems; 2011 August 31-September 2; Sheffield, UK. p. 125-36.

26. Magermans DJ, Chadwick EK, Veeger HE, Van der Helm FC. Requirements for upper extremity motions during activ- ities of daily living. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005;20: 591-9.

27. Morrey BF, Askew LJ, Chao EY. A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:872-7.

28. Sardelli M, Tashjian RZ, MacWilliams BA. Functional elbow range of motion for contemporary tasks. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:471-7.

29. Goble, DJ. Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint posi- tion matching: from basic science to general practice. Phys Ther 2010;90:1174-84.

30. Borg G. Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1998. p. 29-38.

31. Dittner AJ, Wessely SC, Brown RG. The assessment of fatigue: a practical guide for clinicians and researchers. J Psychosom Res 2004;56:157-70.

32. Vasen AP, Lacey SH, Keith MW, Shaffer JW. Functional range of motion of the elbow. J Hand Surg Am 1995;20:288- 92.

33. Winnick JP, Lavay BW. Perceptual-motor development. In: Winnick JP, editor. Adapted physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2005. p. 359-72.

34. Bagesteiro LB, Sarlegna FR, Sainburg RL. Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of move- ment distance. Exp Brain Res 2006;171:358-70.

35. Walsh LD, Hesse CW, Morgan DL, Proske U. Human forearm position sense after fatigue of elbow flexor muscles. J Physiol 2004;558:705-15.

36. Cruise H, Dean I, Heuer H, Schmidt RA. Utilization of sen- sory information for motor control. In: Neumann O, Printz W, editors. Relationship between perception and action. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990. p. 43-79.

37. Brown LE, Rosenbaum DA, Sainburg RL. Limb position drift: implications for control of posture and movement. J Neurophysiol 2003;90:3105-18.

38. Yilmaz B, Yasar E, Taskaynatan MA, Göktepe AS, Tugcu I, Yazicioglu K, et al. Relationship between lumbar muscle strength and proprioception after fatigue in men with chron- ic low back pain. Turkish Journal of Rheumatology 2010; 25:68-71.

39. McGraw B, McClenaghan BA, Williams HG, Dickerson J, Ward DS. Gait and postural stability in obese and nonobese prepubertal boys. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:484-9.

40. Greve J, Alonso A, Bordini AC, Camanho GL. Correlation between body mass index and postural balance. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2007;62:717-20.