Bir Türk popülasyonunda bifid mandibular kondilin Konik Işınlı Bilgisayar Tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Bu çalışmada bifid mandibular kondil (BMC) prevalansının konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (CBCT) kullanılarak araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya 350 adet tedavi edilmemiş hastanın (Yaşları 18 ile 65 arasında değişen 178 erkek, 172 kadın) CBCT görüntüleri dahil edildi. BMC' nin varlığı veya yokluğu, cinsiyet ve bulunduğu taraf göz önünde bulundurularak aksiyel, sagittal ve koronal pdüzlemlerde değerlendirildi. Bulgular: BMC' ler 350 hastanın 9'unda (% 2,57) görüldü; bunların 3'ü erkelerde ve 6'sı kadınlarda idi. Cinsiyete bakılmaksızın, sağ tarafın daha fazla etkilendiği (% 1,42) tespit edildi. Kadın hastalarda erkeklere göre (% 0,85) daha yüksek prevalans (% 1,71) görüldü. Sonuç(lar): BMC, çalışılan Türk popülasyonunun% 2,57' sinde görülmüş olup kadınlarda ve sağ tarafta daha sık saptanmıştır.

Cone Beam Computed Tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular condyle in a Turkish population

Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalenceof bifid mandibular condyle (BMC), by using cone-beam computedtomography (CBCT).Material and Methods: The CBCT images of 350 untreatedpatients (178 male, 172 female ranging in age between 18and 65) were included in this study. The presence or absenceof BMC was assessed in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes byconsidering gender and side.Results: BMCs were observed in 9 out of 350 patients (2.57%),of which, 3 were in males and 6 in females. Regardless of gender,the right side was more affected (1.42%). Female patientsshowed higher prevalence (1.71%) than the male patients(0.85%).Conclusions: BMC was observed in 2.57% of studied Turkishpopulation and was detected more frequently in females andon the right side.

PDF

___

1. Hrdlièka A. Lower jaw: double condyles. Am J Phys Anthropol 1941; 28: 75-89.
2. Reddy SS, Sharma P, Rakesh N, Yashoda Devi BK, Shwetha V, et. al. Cleft in two parts assessment of bifid mandibular condyle using CBCT. Int J Curr Res 2017; 9: 54761-54765.
3. Miloglu O, Yalcin E, Buyukkurt MC, Yilmaz AB, Harorli A. The frequency of bifid mandibular condyle in a Turkish patient population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 42- 46.
4. Loh FC, Yeo JF. Bifid mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69: 24-27.
5. Antoniades K, Hadjipetrou L, Antoniades V, Paraskevopoulos K. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 97: 535- 538.
6. Antoniades K, Karakasis D, Elephtheriades J. Bifid mandibular condyle resulting from a sagittal fracture of the condylar head. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 31: 124- 126.
7. Quayle AA, Adams JE. Supplemental mandibular condyle. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 24: 349-356.
8. Shriki J, Lev R, Wong BF, Sundine MJ, Hasso AN. Bifid mandibular condyle: CT and MR imaging appearance in two patients: case report and review of the literature. 2005; 26: 1865-1868.
9. Cho BH, Jung YH. Nontraumatic bifid mandibular condyles in asymptomatic and symptomatic temporomandibular joint subjects. Imaging Sci Dent 2013; 43: 25- 30.
10. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. St. Louis, Mosby; 2014. p. 504.
11. Neves FS, Ramírez-Sotelo LR, Roque-Torres G, Barbosa GLR, Haiter-Neto F, et al. Detection of bifid mandibular condyle by panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Braz J Oral Sci 2013; 12: 16-19.
12. Gunduz K, Buyuk C, Egrioglu E. Evaluation of the prevalence of bifid mandibular condyle detected on cone beam computed tomography images in a Turkish population. Int J Morphol 2015; 33: 43-47.
13. Daniels JS, Ali I. Post-traumatic bifid condyle associated with temporomandibular joint ankylosis: report of a case and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 682-688.
14. Rehman TA, Gibikote S, Ilango N, Thaj J, Sarawagi R, et al. Bifid mandibular condyle with associated temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a computed tomography study of the patterns and morphological variations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 239-244.
15. Sales MA, Oliveira JX, Cavalcanti MG. Computed tomography imaging findings of simultaneous bifid mandibular condyle and temporomandibular joint ankylosis: case report. Braz Dent J 2007; 18: 74-77.
16. Sahman H, Sekerci AE, Ertas ET, Etoz M, Sisman Y. Prevalence of bifid mandibular condyle in a Turkish population. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 433-437.
17. Shaber EP. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyles. Cranio 1987; 5: 191-195.
18. McCormick SU, McCormick SA, Graves RW, Pifer RG. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyles. Report of three cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989; 68: 555-557.
19. Stefanou EP, Fanourakis IG, Vlastos K, Katerelou J. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyles. Report of four cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 186-188.
20. Artvinli LB, Kansu O. Trifid mandibular condyle: A case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95: 251-254.
21. Alpaslan S, Ozbek M, Hersek N, Kanli A, Avcu N, et al. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyle. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 274-277.
22. Menezes AV, de Moraes Ramos FM, de Vasconcelos-Filho JO, Kurita LM, de Almeida SM, et al. The prevalence of bifid mandibular condyle detected in a Brazilian population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 220-223.
23. Caglayan F, Tozoglu U. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial region detected by cone beam CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 2012; 18: 159-163.
24. Khojastepour L, Kolahi S, Panahi N, Haghnegahdar A. Cone beam computed tomographic assessment of bifid mandibular condyle. J Dent (Tehran). 2015; 12: 868-873.