WaveOne ve WaveOne Gold ile şekillendirilmiş kanallarda sisteme özel guta-perka konların uyumunun karşılaştırılması

Giriş ve Amaç: Tek kon guta-perkanın kanal preparasyonu ile iyi uyum göstermesi, kök kanal dolgusunun tıkama etkinliği açısından büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, WaveOne (WO) ve WaveOne Gold (WOG) ile şekillendirilen ve bu sistemlere özel üretilmiş guta-perka (GP) kullanılarak doldurulan kanallardaki guta-perka (GP) oranlarının belirlenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Otuz adet çekilmiş tek köklü insan dişi kullanıldı. Diş kronları elmas frezlerle uzaklaştırıldı ve kök kanal boyları belirlendi. On beş dişin preparasyonu WO Primary eğe ile yapılıp, WO Primary tek konlarla dolduruldu. Kalan 15 dişin preparasyonu için WOG Primary eğe, doldurulması içinse WOG Primary tek konlar kullanıldı. Kökler apekse 3, 5, 8 mm mesafelerden kesildi ve büyütme altında fotoğraflandı. GP ile doldurulmuş alanların yüzdesi, Imaje J programında hesaplandı. İstatistiksel analizler için bağımsız t testi ve Mann-Whitney U testleri kullanıldı. Bulgular: İki grup arasında, 8 mm seviyesinde anlamlı fark bulundu (p0,05). Sonuç: Bu çalışma koşullarında WOG kökün koronal üçlü seviyesinde WO'a göre daha iyi tıkama sağlamıştır.

Comparison of the fitness of matching single gutta-percha cones in canals prepared with WaveOne and WaveOne Gold Systems

Aim: The fitness of single cone gutta-percha to canal preparation is of great importance in obturation quality of root canal filling. The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of gutta-percha-filled areas in canals prepared by WaveOne (WO) and WaveOne Gold (WOG) instruments and obturated with their matching single cones. Material and Methods: Thirty extracted single-rooted human teeth were used. The crowns were removed using diamond burs and working lengths were established. Fifteen roots were prepared using WO Primary and obturated with WO Primary single cones. The remaining 15 roots were prepared using WOG Primary instrument and obturated with WOG Primary single cones. The roots were sectioned at 3, 5 and 8 mm from the apex and photographed under magnification. The percentages of gutta-percha-filled areas were calculated using Image J software. Independent t test and Mann Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between two groups at 8 mm levels (p

PDF

___

1. Kazemi RB, Safavi KE, Spangberg LSW. Dimensional changes of endodontic sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 766-771.
2. Schafer E, Köster M, Bürklein S. Percentage of gutta-percha-filled areas in canals instrumented with Nickel-Titanium Systems and obturated with matching single cones. J Endod 2013; 39: 924-928.
3. Kontakiotis EG, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Effect of sealer thickness on long-term sealing ability: a 2-year follow-up study. Int Endod J 1997; 30: 307-312.
4. Jarrett IS, Marx D, Covey D, et al. Percentage of canals filled in apical crosssections: an in vitro study of seven obturated techniques. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 392–398.
5. De-Deus GA, Martins F, Gurgel-Filho ED, Lima ACMR, Maniglia CF, et al. Analysis of the film thickness of a root canal sealer following three obturation techniques. Braz Oral R 2003; 17: 119-125.
6. Gordon MP, Love RM, Chandler NP. An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 87-96.
7. Romania C, Beltes P, Boutsioukis C, Dandakia C. Ex-vivo area-metric analysis of root canal obturation using gutta-percha cones of different taper. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 491–498.
8. Amaral P, Forner L, Llena C. Smear layer removal in canals shaped with recipro- cating rotary systems. J Clin Exp Dent 2013; 5: 227–230.
9. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS. Canal shaping with WaveOne Primary recip- rocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study. J Endod 2012; 38: 505–509.
10. Karataş E, Ersoy İ, Gündüz HA, Uygun AD, Kol E, et al. Influence of instruments used in root canal preparation on amount of apically extruded debris. Artificial Organs 2016; 40: 774-777.
11. Pedulla E, Genovesi F, Rapisarda S, La Rosa GRM, Grande NM, et al. Effects of 6 single-file systems on dentinal crack formation. JOE 2017; 43: 456-461.
12. Özyürek T. Cyclic fatique resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium instruments. JOE 2016; 42: 1536-1539.
13. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995; 28: 12-18.
14. Kazemi RB, Safavi KE, Spangberg LSW. Dimensional changes of endodontic sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 766-771.
15. Schafer E, Zandbiglari T. Solubility of root canal sealers in water and artificial saliva. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 660-669.
16. Schilder H. Filling root canal in three dimensions. J Endod 1967; 32: 281-290.
17. Spangberg L. Instruments, materials and devices. In: Pathways of the pulp, 8nd Ed., Cohen s, Burns RC, St Louis, USA, Mosby; 2002. p. 571-572.
18. Wilson BL, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of spreader penetration during lateral compaction of .04 and .02 tapered gutta-percha. J Endod 2003; 29: 828-831.
19. Romania C, Beltes P, Boutsioukis C, Dandakis C. Ex-vivo area-metric analysis of root canal obturation using gutta-percha cones of different taper. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 491-498.
20. Gülşahı K, Çehreli ZC, Onay EO, Taşman-Dağlı F, Üngör M. Comparison of the area of resin-based sealer and voids in roots obturated with Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod 2007; 33: 1338-1341.
21. Wu MK, Kastakova A, Wesselink PR. Quality of cold and warm gutta-percha fillings in oval canals in mandibular premolars. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 485-491.
22. Nica LM, Didilescu A, Rusu D. Photomicrographic evaluation of the apical seal- ing capacity of three types of gutta-percha master cones: an in vitro study. Odontology 2012; 100: 54-60.
23. Neuhaus KW, Schick A, Lussi A. Apical filling charasteristics of carrier-based techniques vs. single cone technique in curved root canals. Clin Oral Invest 2016; 20: 1631-1637.
24. Wu MK, Van Der Sluis LWM, Wesselink PR. A preliminary study of the percentage of gutta-percha-filled area in the apical canal filled with vertically compacted warm gutta-percha. International Endodontic Journal 2002; 35: 527-535.
25. De-Deus G, Gurgel-Filho ED, Magalhaes KM, Coutinho-Filho T. A laboratory analysis of gutta-percha-filled area obtained using thermafil, system B and lateral condensation. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 378-383.
26. Smith RS, Weller NR, Loushine RJ, Kimbrough WF. Effect of varying the depth of heat application on the adaptability of gutta-percha during warm vertical compaction. Journal of Endodontics 2000; 26: 668–672.
27. American Association of Endodontists. Glossary of Endodontic Terms. 7th ed. Chicago, USA, AAE; 2003. p. 9.