Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi

Bu çalışma Türkiye’de son yıllarda yükseköğretimin yaygınlaşmasının toplumsal tabakalaşmaya dayalı sosyo-ekonomik eşitsizlikler üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. TÜİK Hanehalkı İşgücü Anketi ve Yetişkin Eğitimi Araştırması verileri kullanılarak yapılan analizlerde ebeveyn mesleki statüsü, birey eğitim düzeyi ve birey mesleki statüsü üçgenindeki ilişkiler ele alınmış, yükseköğretimin yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte ebeveyn mesleki statüsü ile birey mesleki statüsü arasındaki ilişkilerin zayıfladığı görülmüştür. Ancak, ebeveyn mesleki statüsünün bireyin eğitim düzeyi üzerinde hâlâ yüksek bir etkisinin olduğu, dolayısıyla toplumsal tabakalaşmanın yeniden üretiminin eğitime eşit erişimin sağlanması yoluyla değil, bir bileşik etki ile azaldığı bulunmuştur. Bu azalma uluslararası literatürde olduğu gibi, üniversite düzeyinde eğitim alan bireylerin mesleki statülerinin ebeveynlerinin mesleki statüsünden daha az etkilenmesi ve Türkiye’de yükseköğretim düzeyinde eğitim alanların oranının hızla artmasıyla mümkün olmuştur. Lojistik regresyon analizi, üniversite derecesine erişim konusunda cinsiyet, ebeveyn mesleki statüsü, anne ve baba eğitim düzeyi ve kuşak değişkenlerinin hâlâ önemli ölçüde etkin olduğunu göstermektedir. Ebeveyn ve çocukların eğitim ve meslek düzeylerine ilişkin daha detaylı bilgiler içeren verilerle yapılacak analizler toplumsal eşitsizliklerin lisansüstü dereceler veya eğitimin niteliği üzerinden yeniden üretilip üretilmediğini gösterebilecektir.

The Effects of Expansion of Higher Education on Social Stratification in Turkey

This study investigates the effects of expansion of Turkish higher education in recent years on socio-economic inequalities based on social stratification. The analyses based on the data from TURKSTAT Household Labor Force Survey and Adult Education Research focus on the relationships between parental social status, education level of the individual and occupational status of the individual. It is found that as higher education expanded, the relationship between occupational status of the parents and occupational status of the individual have been weakened. However, it is also observed that the effect of parental occupational status on the educational level of the individual is still high, and thus the reproduction of social stratification is not weakened through equal access to education but via a compositional effect. As in the international literature, this weakening relationship is a result of the fact that the occupational status of the individuals with higher education is affected less from the occupational status of their parents. With recent expansion in higher education in Turkey, the number of individuals with a university degree has increased rapidly. Logistic regression analysis reveals that gender, parental occupational status, mother education level, father education level and cohort variables still have significant effects on the attainment of a university degree. Further analyses with data containing detailed information about parental and individual educational level and occupational status would show whether the social inequalities are perpetuated via advanced degrees or the quality of education.

PDF

___

Ballarino, G., Bernardi, F., Requena, M., & Schadee, H. (2009). Persistent Inequalities? Expansion of Education and Class Inequality in Italy and Spain. European Sociological Review, 25(1), 123-138. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn031
Bar-Haim, E., & Shavit, Y. (2013). Expansion and inequality of educational opportunity: A comparative study. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 31(1), 22-31. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.10.001
Bell, D. (1972). On meritocracy and equality. National Affairs, 29, 29-68. Retrieved from http://www.nationalaffairs.com/ public_interest/detail/on-meritocracy-and-equality
Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Bol, T. (2015). Has education become more positional? Educational expansion and labour market outcomes, 1985-2007. Acta Sociologica, 58(2), 105-120. http://doi. org/10.1177/0001699315570918
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. (R. Nice, Trans.). London: Sage.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Breen, R. (2010). Educational expansion and social mobility in the 20th century. Social Forces, 89(2), 365-388. http://doi. org/10.1353/sof.2010.0076
Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 223-243. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. soc.31.041304.122232
Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2007). Explaining change in social fluidity: Educational equalization and educational expansion in twentieth‐century Sweden. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1775-1810. http://doi.org/10.1086/508790
Breen, R., & Luijkx, R. (2004). Conclusion. In R. Breen (Ed.), Social mobility in Europe (pp. 383–410). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2009). Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment: Evidence from eight European countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(5), 1475-1521. http://doi.org/10.1086/595951
Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2010). Long-term trends in educational inequality in Europe: Class inequalities and gender differences. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 31-48. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp001
Bukodi, E., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2015). Educational attainment - relative or absolute - as a mediator of intergenerational class mobility in Britain. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43(1), 1-11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.01.003
Collins, R. (1979). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. New York and London: Academic Press.
Dinçer, M. A., & Uysal, G. (2010). The determinants of student achievement in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(6), 592-598.
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21(1), 1-56.
Hannum, E., & Buchmann, C. (2005). Global educational expansion and socio-economic development: An assessment of findings from the social sciences. World Development, 33(3), 333-354. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.001
Holsinger, D. B. (1975). Education and the occupational attainment process in Brazil. Comparative Education Review, 19(2), 267- 275.
Hout, M. (1988). More universalism , less structural mobility : The American occupational structure in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 93(6), 1358-1400.
Hout, M., & Dohan, M. P. (1996). Two paths to educational opportunity: Class and educational selection in Sweden and the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Hout, M., Raftery, A. E., & Bell, E. O. (1993). Making the grade: Educational stratification in the United States, 1925–1989. In Y. Shavit & H.-P. Blossfeld (Eds.). Persistent ınequality. Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries (pp. 25-49). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Jennrich, R. (1970). An asymptotic chi2 test for the equality of two correlation matrices. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(330), 904-912.
Kılıç, Y. (2014). Türkiye’de eğitimsel eşitsizlik ve toplumsal tabakalaşma. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 243- 263. http://doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2014.42.14
Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained ınequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642-1690.
Mare, R. D. (1981). Change and stability in educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 46(1), 72-87. http://doi.org/10.2307/2095027
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Education at a Glance 2016: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/ education/skills-beyond-school/education-at-a-glance-2016- indicators.htm
Özdemir, C. (2016). Equity in the Turkish education system: A multilevel analysis of social background influences on the mathematics performance of 15-year-old students. European Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 179-213. http://doi. org/10.1177/1474904115627159
Parsons, T. (1959). The school class as a social system: some of its functions in American society. Harvard Educational Review, 29(4), 297-318.
Pfeffer, F. T. (2008). Persistent ınequality in educational attainment and its institutional context. European Sociological Review, 24(5), 543-565. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn026
Raftery, A. E., & Hout, M. (1993). Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921-75. Sociology of Education, 66(1), 41-62. http://doi. org/10.2307/2112784
Reimer, D., & Pollak, R. (2010). Educational expansion and its consequences for vertical and horizontal inequalities in access to higher education in West Germany. European Sociological Review, 26(4), 415-430. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp029
Rotman, A., Shavit, Y., & Shalev, M. (2015). Nominal and Positional Perspectives on Educational Stratification in Israel. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43(in press), 17-24. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.001
Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (1993). Persisting barriers: Changes in educational opportunities in thirteen countries. Boulder: Westview Press.
Smith, H. L., & Cheung, P. P. (1986). Trends in the effects of family background on educational attainment in the Philippines. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1387-1408. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1086/228426
StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software: Release 12th College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Torche, F. (2011). Is a college degree still the great equalizer? Intergenerational mobility across levels of schooling in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117(3), 763-807. http://doi.org/10.1086/661904
Treiman, D. J. (1970). Industrialization and social stratification. Sociological Inquiry, 40(2), 207-234. http://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1475-682X.1970.tb01009.x
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). (2017). İşgücü istatistikleri, Ekim 2016. Ankara: TÜİK Haber Bülteni, Sayı: 24623, Tarih: 16 Ocak 2017 Retrieved from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri. do?id=24623
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). (2013). Yetişkin eğitimi, 2012. Ankara: TÜİK Haber Bülteni, Sayı: 15865, Tarih: 31 Temmuz 2013. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=15865
Vallet, L. A. (2004). Change in intergenerational class mobility in France from the 1970s to the 1990s and its explanation: An analysis following the CASMIN approach. Social Mobility in Europe, 1-37. http://doi.org/10.1093/0199258457.003.0005
Van de Werfhorst, H. G., Tam, T., Shavit, Y., & Park, H. (2018). A positional model of intergenerational educational mobility: Crucial tests based on 35 societies. https://doi.org/10.17605/ OSF.IO/7Q8NA
Wright, E. O. (2014). Sınıf analizine yaklaşımlar. (V. S. Öğütle, Trans.). Ankara: NotaBene Yayınları.
Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2017). Yükseköğretim bilgi yönetim sistemi. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr

ISSN: 2146-5959
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2011
Yayıncı: Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi (Önceden Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi)