Şule DEMİREL DİNGEÇ, Şule GÜÇYETER, Nilgun KİRİŞÇİ

Özel Yetenekliler Eğitimi Alanındaki Lisansüstü Öğrencilerin Hilda Taba Stratejilerine Yönelik Görüşleri

Türkiye’de yükseköğretim özel yeteneklilerin eğitimi alanında uzman yetiştirmede önemli bir yere sahiptir. Bu çalışmada özel yeteneklilerin eğitimi tezli yüksek lisans programında yer alan Analitik Düşünce Modelleri dersi kapsamında ele alınan Hilda Taba stratejilerine yönelik öğrenci görüşlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. 2021-2022 eğitim öğretim yılı bahar döneminde gerçekleştirilen bu dersi 6 yüksek lisans öğrencisi almış ve çalışmaya tüm öğrenciler dâhil olmuştur. Katılımcılar alanda çalışacak öğretmen ve uzman adayları oldukları için stratejilere yönelik görüşleri önemlidir. Derste kavram gelişimi, veri yorumu, genellemelerin uygulanması ve çatışma çözümü olmak üzere dört Hilda Taba stratejisine yer verilmiştir. Yüksek lisans öğrencileri bu stratejileri birden fazla uygulama yaparak öğrenmişler ayrıca özgün strateji planları hazırlamışlardır. Ders sonunda öğrenciler, görüş formundaki açık uçlu sorulara cevap vererek stratejilerle ilgili görüşlerini paylaşmışlardır. Araştırma betimsel araştırma yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilmiş, verilerin analizinde ise içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Veriler üç araştırmacı tarafından bağımsız okunarak kodlanmış ve sorular kapsamındaki temalara yerleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre katılımcılar Hilda Taba stratejilerine yönelik olumlu görüşler sunmuşlardır. Stratejilerin kalabalık sınıf mevcudundan kaynaklı bazı uygulama güçlükleri olabileceğini ancak analitik düşünmeyi geliştirdiğini, olumlu öğrenme ortamı oluşturduğunu ve özel yetenekli öğrencilerin gelişimine katkı sunduğunu belirtmişlerdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

analitik düşünme, Hilda Taba stratejileri, özel yetenekliler eğitimi, yükseköğretim

Views of Graduate Students in Gifted Education on Hilda Taba Strategies

Higher education in Türkiye has an important place in training specialists in the field of gifted education. This study aimed at revealing the student views on Hilda Taba strategies that emerged during the discussions held as part of the Analytical Thinking Models course in a gifted education Master’s program. All of the six participants taking this course in the spring semester of the 2021-2022 academic year were included in the study. Since the participants are candidates teachers and experts who will work in the field, their views on strategies are important. The course covers four Hilda Taba strategies: concept development, data interpretation, application of generalizations, and conflict resolution. The graduate students learned these strategies in more than one practical way and prepared original strategy plans. At the end of the course, the participants shared their opinions about the strategies by answering the open-ended questions in the opinion form. The study was carried out with the descriptive research method, and content analysis was used for the data analysis. The data were read and coded independently by three researchers and placed in the themes created in line with the research questions. According to the results of the research, the participants presented very positive opinions about Hilda Taba strategies. They stated that the strategies may have some implementation difficulties due to the large class size, but that they improve analytical thinking, create a positive learning environment and contribute to the development of gifted students.

Keywords:

Analytical thinking, Hilda Taba strategies, gifted education, higher education,

PDF

___

Amer, A. (2006). Reflections on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research In Educational Psychology. 4(8), 213-230.
Akkuş Çakır, N., & Senemoğlu, N. (2016). Yükseköğretimde analitik düşünme becerileri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(3), 1487-1502.
Arıol, Ş. (2009). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının bütüncül (holistik) ve analitik düşünme stillerinin matematiksel problem çözme becerilerine etkisi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Baysal, Z. N., Çarıkçı, S., & Yaşar, E. B. (2016). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin düşünme becerileri öğretimine yönelik farkındalıkları. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(1), 7-28.
Beyer, B. (1991). Teaching thinking skills: A handbook for elementary school teachers. Allyn and Bacon.
Bilen, M. (2002). Plandan uygulamaya öğretim. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. Longmans, Green.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education an introduction to theory and methods (7th Ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Brown, T. (2004). Higher order thinking skills. In Kincheloe, J. L. & Danny, K. W. (Eds.). Critical Thinking and Learning: An Encyclopedia for parents and teachers. (p. 458-463). Greenwood Publishing Group.
Burns, D. E., & Reis, S. M. (1991). Developing a thinking skills component in the gifted education program, Roeper Review, 14(2), 72-79.
Chaijaroen, S., Kanjug, I., & Samat, C. (2012). Development and efficiency improvement of the learning innovations enhancing learners’ thinking potential. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3460-3464.
Chonkaew, P., Sukhummek, B., & Faikhamta, C. (2016). Development of analytical ability and attitudes towards science learning of grade-11 students through science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM education) on the study of stoichiometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 16(17), 842-861.
Chuah, H. C. (2009). Building the past, engineering the present, educating the future. Journal-The Institution of Engineers,, 2(71), 1-4.
Clark, B. (2002). Growing up Gifted: Developing the Potential of Children at Home and at School (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River. Merrill Prentice Hall
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative research. (3rd Ed.). NJ: Pearson Education
Crockett, L. (2022). Critical thinking vs analytical thinking vs creative thinking. Retrieved from: https://blog.futurefocusedlearning.net/ critical-thinking-vs-analytical-thinking-vs-creative-thinking).
Çelik, H., Gürpınar, C., Başer, N., & Erdoğan, S. (2015). Öğrencilerin analitik düşünme becerisinin gelişimi üzerine fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin görüşleri. Akademik Platform, 396-408. http:// www.iscat.info/PastConferences/ISCAT2015/ISCAT2015/ papers/C4-ISCAT2015ID61.pdf
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 2007(1), 1-23.
Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking. The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93-104.
Gürkaynak, İ., Üstel F., & Gülgöz S. (2003). Eleştirel düşünme, Sabancı Üniversitesi, Eğitim Reformu Girişimi.
Hall, W. C., & Myers, C. B. (1977). The effect of a training program in the Taba teaching strategies on teaching methods and teacher perceptions of their teaching, Peabody Journal of Education, 54(3), 162-167.
Halpern, D. (2003). Thought & knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hammouri, H. A. (2003). An investigation of undergraduates’ transformational problem solving strategies: Cognitive/ metacognitive processes as predictors of holistic/analytic strategies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(6), 571-586.
Hanninen, G. E. (1989). The effects of the Hilda Taba teaching strategies on critical and creative thinking (Order No. 8918535). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (303704611). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/ effects-hilda-taba-teaching-strategies-on/docview/303704611/ se-2
Kanyılmaz, B. M., & Yücel Özata, E. (2020). The evaluation of teachers’ in-class practices and opinions for developing analytical thinking skill of primary school students in the course of science. Education & Science, 1(45), 23-29.
Kocabaş, H. (2021). Ortaokul fen bilimleri dersi 8. Sınıf enerji dönüşümleri ve çevre bilimi ünitesinde kullanılan bağlam temelli öğrenmenin öğrencilerin analitik düşünme becerilerine ve çevresel tutumlarına etkisinin incelenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Kocaman, B. (2021). Analitik düşünme temelli çevrimiçi Stem öğretim programının geliştirilmesi ve etkililiğinin incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Krathwohl, D. R., & Anderson, L. W. (2010). Merlin C. Wittrock and the revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 64-65.
Kutlu, Ö., Doğan, C. D., & Karakaya, İ. (2010). Öğrenci başarısının belirlenmesi; performansa ve portfolyoya dayalı durum belirleme (Ölçme ve değerlendirme uygulamaları). PegemA Yayıncılık.
Lassig, C. J. (2003). Gifted and talented education reforms: Effects on teachers’ attitudes. In Bartlett, B., Bryer, F. and Roebuck, D. (Eds.). Proceedings 1st Annual International Conference on Cognition, Language, and Special Education Research: Reimagining Practice: Researching Change 2, pages pp. 141-152, Surfers Paradise.
Loury, A. A. (2004). The Effectiveness of the use of taba’s strategies for teaching higher thinking skills on the development of some higher thinking skills (analysis, synthesis and evaluation): A comparative study. Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences, 5(1), 59-80.
Maker, C. J., & Schiever, S. W. (2005). Teaching models in education of the gifted. (3rd. ed). Pro-ed Inc.
Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Experts in Assessment. Corwin Press, Inc., A Sage Publications Company.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications, Inc Montaku, S., Kaittikomol, P., & Tiranathanakul, P. (2012). The model of analytical thinking skill training process. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(1), 17-20.
Parks, S. (2009). Teaching analytical and critical thinking skills in gifted education. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (3rd ed., pp. 261-300). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34-72.
Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Renzulli, J.S., Gubbins, E.J., McMillen, K.S., Eckert, R.D., & Little, C.A. (2009). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (2nd ed.). Routledge. h t t p s : / / d o i . org/10.4324/9781003419426
Robbins, J. K. (2011). Problem Solving, Reasoning, and Analytical Thinking In a Classroom Environment. The Behaviour Analyst Today, 12(1), 41.
Sak, U. (2011). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları modeli (ÜYEP) ve sosyal geçerliği [An overview and social validity of the education programs for talented students model (EPTS)]. Education and Science, 36 (161), 213-229.
Sak, U. (2012). Üstün zekalılar özellikleri, tanılanmaları ve eğitimleri. Vize Akademik.
Sandelowski, M. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1), 77-84
Satmaz, İ., & Gencel, İ. E. (2016). Bilim sanat merkezlerinde görevlendirilen öğretmenlerin hizmet içi eğitim sorunu. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (42), 59-73.
Schiever, S. (1991). A Comprehensive Approach to Teaching Thinking. USA: Allyn and Bacon.
Sebetci, Ö., & Aksu, G. (2014). Öğrencilerin mantıksal ve analitik düşünme becerilerinin programlama dilleri başarısına etkisi [The effect of logical and analytical thinking skills on computer programming languages. Eğitim Bilimleri e Uygulama. 13(25), 65-83
Sexton, T. (2013). Develop analytical & critical thinking. Wise Leader Group Ltd.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 109–137.
Taba, H. (1966). Teaching strategies and cognitive functioning in elementary school children. Cooperative Research Project No. 2404. San Francisco State College.
Taba, H., Durkin, M. C., Fraenkel, J. R., & McNaughton, A. H. (1971). A teacher’s handbook to elementary social studies. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Tomlinson, C. A. & Jarvis, J.M. (2009). Differentiation: Making Curriculum work for all students through responsive planning and Instruction. In J.S. Renzulli, E.J. Gubbins, K.S. McMillen, R.D. Eckert & C.A. Little (Eds.), Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented. (2nd Ed: 599-628). Mansfield Center CT: Creative Learning Press
Trezise, R. L. (1972). The Hilda Taba teaching strategies in English and reading classes. English Journal, 61 (4), 577-580, 593.
Unnanantn, T., & Boonphadung, S. (2015). The attitudes of pre-service teachers towards analytical thinking skill development based on Miller’s model. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences. 9(2). 515-519. https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.1099296
Uysal, Ö. (2004). Çözüm mühendisliği. I.Ulusal Mühendislik Kongresi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir: 21-23 Mayıs 2004.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L.D., Little, C., &Hughes, C. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation of curriculum innovation: The impact of the William and Mary units on schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 244-272.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (11. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yulina, I.K, Permanasari, A., Hernani, & Setiawan, W. (2019). Analytical thinking skill profile and perception of pre service chemistry teachers in analytical chemistry learning. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1157:042046.