Spasmal normativity: Reassembling nationality

Günümüzde; yaşanılan hiper-teknolojik dönüşümün, mekân zamansal sonuçları itibariyle, türlü kimlik tariflerini kifayetsizleştiren ontolojik ve epistemolojik bir krize yol açtığı söylenebilir. Bu kriz, anlama ve muhakemeye ilişkin mutlak bir felci yansıtmasa da, yaygın ve sürekli bir spazm hali olarak tecrübe edilir. İlk olarak, çalışma boyunca‘ spazmal normativite’, bu krizin etkilerinden sakınmak üzere ortaya konulan normatif tarifleri içine alan şemsiye bir kavram olarak önerilmektedir. İkinci olarak, çalışma; çağdaş politika teorisinde görülen, kimlik ve tanınma meselelerine normatif yönelimi ‘ olumlayıcı evrenselcilik’ çerçevesinde yorumlamaktadır. Üçüncü olarak çalışma, olumlayıcı evrenselciliğin kimlik merkezli okumasından ayrılarak, tanınmayı; plastisite, alagmatik ve rizomatiğe dayanan bir farklılık yorumu üzerinden ele almayı mümkün kılan ‘ kiyazmik milliyet’ kavramını tanıtmaktadır.

Spazmal normativite: milliyeti yeniden kurmak

Today, it might be possible to argue that the hyper- technological transformation, with its spatiotemporal consequences, has provided an ontological and epistemological crisis weakening various delineations of identity. Rather than reflecting an absolute paralysis of meaning and interpretation, this crisis has been experienced as a disseminated and everlasting state of spasm. Throughout the study, first, ‘ spasmal normativity’ is introduced as an umbrella concept enclosing normative interpretations posited to avoid this crisis. Second, this study interprets the normative orientation on questions of identity and recognition in contemporary political theory within the framework of ‘ affirmative universalism’. By disengaging with the identity- oriented reading of affirmative universalism; third, the study introduces ‘ chiasmic nationality’ as a concept enabling to discuss recognition vis - à- vis the interpretation of difference drawn upon plasticity, allagmatics and rhizomatics.

___

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Refl ections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.
  • Arneson, R. J . (2003). “Consequentialism vs. Special - ties P artiality” . The Monist, 86 (3), 382- 401.
  • Bauböck, R. (2000). “Why Stay Together? A Pluralist Approach to Secession and F ederation”. In W. Kymlicka & W. Norman (Eds.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies (pp. 366- 94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bauböck, R. (2006). “Autonomy, Power- sharing and Common Citizenship: Principles for Accommodating National M inorities in Europe” . In J. McGarry & M. Keating (Eds.), European Integration and the Nationalities Question (pp. 85- 102). London: Routledge.
  • Bhabha, H. K. (2007). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
  • Brubaker, R. (1998). “Myths and Misconceptions in the Study of Nationalism”. In M. Moore (Ed.), National Self- determination and Secession (pp. 233 - 265). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bryant, L. R. (2014). Onto- Cartography: An ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Buchanan, A. (1991 ). Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Buchanan, A. (1997). “Self- determination, Secession and the Rule of Law”. In R. McKim & J. McMahan (Eds.), The Morality of Nationalism (pp. 301 - 323). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Buchanan, A. (2004). Justice, Legitimacy, and Self- determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Calhoun, C. (2005). “Constitutional Patriotism and the Public Sphere: Interests, Identity, and Solidarity in the Integration of Europe” . International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18 (3/4), 257- 280.
  • Calhoun, C. (2006). “Nationalism M atters ” . In D. H. Doyle & M. A. Pamplona (Eds.), Nationalism in the New World (pp. 16- 40). Georgia: The University of Georgia Press.
  • Canovan, M. (1998). Nationhood and Political Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (2005). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Derrida, J. (1981). Dissemination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International . London: Routledge.
  • Derrida, J. & Stiegler, B. (2002). Echographies of Television: Filmed Interviews . Cambridge: Polity.
  • Elden, S. (2013). The Birth of Territory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Gellner, E. (1964). Thought and Change. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  • Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Guattari, F. (2013). Schizoanalytic Cartographies . London: Bloomsbury.
  • Guibernau, M. (1999a). Nations without States: Political Communities in a Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Harvey, D. (1992). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change . Cambridge: Blackwell.
  • Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Hastings, A. (2006). The Construction of Nationhood: Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of S pirit . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1983). Hegel and the Human Spirit: A Translation of the Jena Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit (1805- 1806) with Commentary. Leo Rauch (Ed.). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). The Science of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heidegger, M. (2003). “Overcoming M etaphysics ”. In The End of P hilosophy, (pp. 84- 110). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Hetherington, K. (1997). The Badlands of Modernity: Heterotopia and Social Ordering. London: Routledge.
  • Hurka, T. (1997). “The Justification of National P artiality”. In R. McKim & J. McMahan (Eds.), The Morality of Nationalism (pp. 139- 157). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or, the Cultural Logic of Lat e Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Keating, M. (1996). Nations against the State: The New Politic s of Nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland. London: Macmillan.
  • Keating, M. (1997). “Stateless Nation- building: Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland in the Changing State S ystem”. Nations and Nationalism, 3 (4), 689–717.
  • Kymlicka, W. (1991). Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kymlicka, W. (1996). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kymlicka, W. (1997) “The Sources of Nationalism: Commentary on Taylor ”. In R. McKim & J. McMahan (Eds.), The Morality of Nationalism (pp. 56- 65). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kymlicka, W. (2000). “Nation- building and Minority Rights: Comparing West and East ” . Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies , 26 (2), 183 – 212.
  • Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kymlicka, W. (2005a). “Federalism and S ecession”. In R. Máiz & F. Requejo (Eds.), Democracy, Nationalism and Multiculturalism (pp. 108- 126). London: Frank Cass.
  • Kymlicka, W. (2005b). “Renner and the Accommodation of Sub - state Nationalisms ”. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics (pp. 137- 149). London: Routledge.
  • Lecours, A. (2000). “Ethnic and Civic Nationalism: Towards a New Dimension” . Space and Polity, 4 (2), 153 – 165.
  • Lefort, C. (1986). The Political Forms of Modern Society: Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Malabou, C. (2009). The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic. London: Routledge.
  • Malabou, C. (2010). Plasticity at the Dusk of Writing: Dialectic, Destruction, Deconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • May, S., Modood, T. & Squires, J. (2004). “Ethnicity, Nationalis m, and Minority Rights: Charting the Disciplinary D ebates ” . In S. May, T. Modood & J. Squires (Eds.), Ethnicity, Nationalism and Minority Rights (pp. 1 - 23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McGarry, J. & O’Leary, B. (1996) . “Eliminating and Managing Ethnic Differences ” . In J. Hutchinson & A. D. Smith (Eds.), Ethnicity (pp. 333 - 341). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McMahan, J. (1997). “The Limits of National P artiality”. In R. McKim & J. McMahan (Eds.), The Morality of Nationalism (pp. 107- 138). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, D. (1993). “In Defence of Nationality” . Journal of Applied Philosophy, 10 (1), 3 – 16.
  • Miller, D. (1998). “Secession and the Principle of Nationality” . In M. Moore (Ed.), National Self- determination and Secession (pp. 62- 78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, D. (2000). Citizenship and National Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Miscevic, N. (1999). “Close Strangers: Nationalism, Proximity and Cosmopolitanism” . Studies in East European Thought, 51 , 109–125.
  • Moore, M. (1998). “The Territorial Dimension of S elf- determination”. In M. Moore (Ed.), National Self- determination and Secession (pp. 134- 157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Moore, M. (1999). “Nationalist Arguments, Ambivalent Conclusions ” . The Monist , 82 (3), 469- 490.
  • Moore, M. (2001a). The Ethics of Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Moore, M. (2001b). “Normative Justifications for Liberal Nationalism: Justice, Democracy and National I dentity” . Nations and Nationalism, 7 (1), 1 – 20.
  • Musgrave, T. D. (1997). Self- determination and National Minorities . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nagel, T. (1991). Equality and P artiality. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nielsen, K. (1998). “Liberal Nationalism and S ecession”. In M. Moore (Ed.), National Self- determination and Secession (pp. 103 - 133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Norman, W. (1999). “Theorizing Nationalism (normatively): The First S teps ”. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing Nationalism (pp. 51 - 65). New York: St ate University of New York Press.
  • Norman, W. (2005). “From Nation- building to National Engineering: The Ethics of Shaping Identities ” . In R. Máiz & F. Requejo (Eds.), Democracy, Nationalism and Multiculturalism (pp. 79- 95). London: Frank Cass.
  • Norman, W. (2006). Negotiating Nationalism: Nation- building, Federalism, and Secession in the Multinational State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Renan, E. (1996). “What is a Nation? ”. In G. Elley & R. G. Suny (Eds.), Becoming National: A Reader (pp. 42- 55). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ricoeur, P. (2005). The Course of Recognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Ripstein, A. (1997). “Context, Continuity, and F airness ”. In R. McKim & J. McMahan (Eds.), The Morality of Nationalism (pp. 209- 226). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Simondon, G. (1995). “The Genesis of the I ndividual” . In J. Crary and S. Kwinter (Eds.), Incorporations (pp. 297- 319). New York: Zone. Sloterdijk, P. (2013). “In the Auto- operatively Curved Space: New Human B eings between Anesthesia and B iopolitics ”. In You Must Change Your Life (pp. 369- 403). Cambridge: Polity.
  • Smith, A. D. (1990). “The Supersession of Nationalism? ”. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 31 (1 - 2), 1 – 31.
  • Stiegler, B. (2014). Symbolic Misery–Vol. 1: The Hyperindustrial Epoch. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Tamir, Y. (1993). Liberal Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Taylor, C. (1994). “The Politics of Recognition” . In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition/Charles Taylor...(et al.) (pp. 25- 73). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Taylor, C. (1997). “Nationalism and M odernity”. In R. McKim & J. McMahan (Eds.), The Morality of Nationalism (pp. 31 - 55). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Vattimo G (1987). “Verwindung: Nihilism and the Postmodern in Philosophy” . SubStance, 16 (2), 7 - 17.
  • Vattimo G. (2012). “ Dialectics, Difference, Weak Thought ”. In G. Vattimo G. & A. Rovatti (Eds.). Weak Thought (pp. 39- 52). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Virno, P. (2007). A Grammer of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Walker, R. B. J. (1995). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pr ess.
  • Weinstock, D. (1999). “National P artiality: Confronting the Intuitions ” . The Monist , 82 (3), 516- 541.
  • Wood, D. (2007). “Topologies of Transcendence” . In J. D. Caputo and M. J. Scanlon (Eds.), Transcendence and Beyond: A Postmodern Inquiry (pp. 169- 187). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Young, I. M. (2004). “Two Concepts of S elf- determination”. In S. May, T. Modood & J. Squires (Eds.), Ethnicity, Nationalism and Minority Rights (pp. 176- 195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.