Successful peacekeeping by regional organizations: Necessarily hybrid

Soğuk Savaş’ın bitişi barışı koruma operasyonlarına olan ihtiyacı ar- tırdığı gibi bu operasyonların parametrelerini de değiştirdi. Bu durum, Birleşmiş Milletler’in temel barışı koruma enstrümanı oluşunu ve bu çerçevede oynadığı rolü tamamen değiştirmese de uluslararası politika- ya yeni bir eğilim getirdi: bölgesel barışı koruma operasyonları. Bu yeni eğilim, Soğuk Savaş sonrası beliren ve uluslararası barışı tehdit eden yeni sorunları giderebilmek için Birleşmiş Milletler ile bölgesel örgütlen- melerin barışı koruma çabalarının birleştirilmesinin en iyi çözüm ola- cağını öngörmekteydi. Bölgesel örgütler, tek başlarına bir barışı koruma operasyonunu tamamıyla yürütüp başarı ile sonuçlandırabilecek kabi- liyetlere sahip değillerdir ve bu nedenle Birleşmiş Milletler’e yaslanırlar. Birleşmiş Milletler açısından ise bölgesel örgütlenmeler bölgesel barışı koruma operasyonları için yerel bir farkındalık ve ek bir operasyonellik sağlama potansiyeline sahiptirler. Ancak başarılı bölgesel barışı koru- ma operasyonları için bölgesel örgütlenmelerin çabalarının basitçe Bir- leşmiş Milletlerinkilerle birleştirilmesi yeterli değildir. Bu çalışma bir dizi bölgesel barışı koruma örneklerini inceleyerek bölgesel barışı ko- ruma operasyonlarının başarılı olabilmeleri için gereken unsurları or- taya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmada ortaya konan unsurlar; açık direktif- ler/talimatlar, uluslararası meşruiyet, yeterli askeri kabiliyet, örgüt içi bağlılık, uygun kurumsal yapı ve Birleşmiş Milletler ile işbirliği şeklinde sıralanabilir. Bu unsurların incelenmesi çerçevesinde araştırmanın id- diası, bölgesel barışı koruma operasyonlarının başarılı olması için ne Birleşmiş Milletler ne de bölgesel örgütlenmeler tek başlarına yeterli ka- biliyetlere sahip olmadıklarıdır. Buna ek olarak bölgesel örgütlenmeler de bölgesel barışı koruma operasyonlarında yegane aktör olarak kabul edilemezler. Bu bağlamda çalışma, yukarıda sayılan bölgesel örgütlen- melerin yasal, siyasi ve askeri kabiliyetleri güçlendirilmedikçe ve bölge- sel örgütlenmelerle Birleşmiş Milletler arasındaki işbirliğinin yasal ve uygulama şeması gözden geçirilmedikçe bölgesel işbirliği ile ilgili yeter- sizliklerin kolay kolay giderilemeyeceğini göstermeye çalışmaktadır.

Bölgesel organizasyonlar tarafından başarılı barışı koruma: Kaçınılmaz olarak karma

The end of the Cold War not only increased the need for peacekeep- ing operations but also changed their parameters. The United Nations’ role as the major international peacekeeping actor did not change but it brought a new trend: regional peacekeeping. This new trend reflected the localization of international relations relying on the combined effort of the United Nations and regional organizations to solve post-Cold War conflicts. Regional organizations lacked sufficient capability to carry out entire operations (thereby leaning on the UN), while the UN, for its part, found the legitimacy of its peacekeeping missions reinforced by the local awareness and operability of regional organizations. The change required more than the simple merging of regional organizations’ ef- forts with the United Nations. This study analyses a number of regional peacekeeping cases to illustrate the requirements needed for successful regional peacekeeping operations today. These include clear (and work- able) mandates, international legitimacy, sufficient military capability, cohesiveness within the organization, suitable organizational structure, and cooperation with the United Nations. This study argues that in the post Cold War era, neither the UN nor regional organizations have suf- ficient capabilities alone to ensure successful peacekeeping missions, and that without the support of the UN, regional organizations can- not – yet – be accepted as sole actors in regional peacekeeping missions. Without strengthening the requirements listed above to improve region- al organizations’ legal, political and military capabilities, and without re-evaluating the modes of cooperation between regional organizations and the United Nations, the inadequacies of regional peacekeeping can- not be easily overcome.

___

  • Aboagye, Festus Boahen, ECOMOG : A Sub-regional Experience in Conflict Resolution Management and Peacekeeping in Liberia (Accra : Sedco, 1999).
  • Adibe, Clement E., “The Liberian Conflict and the ECOWAS-UN Partnership”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1997, p. 471-488.
  • Akuffo, Edward Ansah, “Cooperating for Peace and Security or Competing for Legiti- macy in Africa? The Case of the African Union in Darfur”, African Security Review, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2010, p. 74-89.
  • Alagappa, Muthiah, “Regional Institutions, the UN and International Security: A Fra- mework for Analysis”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1997, p. 421-441.
  • Alan, James, Peacekeeping in International Politics (London: MacMillan Ltd., 1990). Alao, Abiodun, “ECOMOG in Liberia: The Anaemic Existence of a Mission”, Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1993.
  • Aning, Emmanuel Kwesi, “Eliciting Compliance from Warlords: The ECOWAS Expe- rience in Liberia, 1990–1997”, Review of African Political Economy, Vol. 26, No. 81, 1999, p. 335-348.
  • Barltrop, Richard, Darfur and the International Community (London: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd, 2011).
  • Barnidge, Robert P., “The United Nations and the African Union: Assessing a Partners- hip for Peace in Darfur”, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 14 No. 1, 2009, p. 93–113.
  • Boshoff, Henri, “The African Union Mission In Sudan Africa Watch Technical and Operational Dimensions”, African Security Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2005, p. 57-60.
  • Boutros-Ghali, Boutros, “An Agenda for Peace Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-keeping”, Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to the Statement Adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council, 17 June 1992, A/47/277 - S/24111.
  • Bures, Oldrich, “Regional Peacekeeping Operations: Complementing or Undermining the United Nations Security Council?”, Global Change, Peace & Security: formerly Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2006, p. 83-99.
  • Center on International Cooperation, Annual Review of Global Peace Operations 2011 (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2011).
  • Chapter Viii: Regional Arrangements, http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/ chapter8.shtml. Charter of the United Nations, 1945, Chapter VII, Article 53.
  • Chrisman, Robert and Nathan Hare, Pan-Africanism (Indianapolis: Bobb -Merrill Company Inc, 1974).
  • Diehl, Paul E., Young-Im D. Cho, “Passing the Buck in Conflict Management: The Role of Regional Organizations in the Post-Cold War Era”, Brown Journal of World Affairs, Vol. XII, No. 2, Winter/Spring 2006, p. 191- 202.
  • Flint, Julie and Alex de Waal, Darfur: A New History of a Long War (London: Zed Books, 2008).
  • Gelot, Linnéa, Legitimacy, Peace Operations and Global-Regional Security: The Afri- can Union-United Nations Partnership in Darfur (London : Routledge, 2012).
  • Gibbons, Elizabeth D., Sanctions in Haiti: Human Rights and Democracy under Assa- ult (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999).
  • Gillian, Goh, “The “ASEAN Way” Non-Intervention and ASEAN’s Role in Conflict Management”, Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs, Spring 2003, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 113-118.
  • Hagan, John and Wenona Rymond-Richmond, Darfur and the Crime of Genocide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009). Hartwig, Charles W., “Peacekeeping in Liberia: ECOMOG and the Struggle for Order”, Liberian Studies Journal, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2005, p. 94-105.
  • Howe, Herbert, “Lessons of Liberia, ECOMOG and Regional Peacekeeping”, Internati- onal Security, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 1996-97, p. 145-176.
  • Ihonvbere, J.O., “Pan-Africanism: Agenda for African Unity in the 1990s”, All-African Student’s Conference, University of Guelph, Ontario, 27 May 1994.
  • Jit, Rikhye Indar, The Theory and Practice of Peacekeeping, (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1984). Johnson, Douglas, The Root Causes of Sudan’s Civil Wars (London: James Currey, 2003).
  • Keith, Adam, “The African Union in Darfur: An African Solution to a Global Prob- lem?”, Journal of Public and International Affairs, Vol. 18, Spring 2007, p. 149-164.
  • Languille, H. Peter and Tania Keefe, “The Future of Peacekeeping”, Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2004, p. 31-46.
  • Legum, Colin, ed., African Contemporary Record (New York: Africana, 1980-81).
  • Lemarchand, René, “Chad: The Misadventures of the North-South Dialectic”, African Studies Review, Vol. 29, No. 3, September 1986, p. 27-41. “Liberia: Problematic Peacekeeping”, Africa Confidential, Vol. 35, No. 5, 4 March 1994, p. 2-3.
  • Magyar, Karl P., Peacekeeping in Africa : ECOMOG in Liberia (New York : S. Martin’s Press, 1998). Massaquoi, Bamayangay Jose, “Conflict Resolution: The OAU and Chad”, TransAfrica Forum, Vol. 7, No. 4, Winter 90/91, p. 83-100.
  • May, Roy and Simon Massey, “The OAU Interventions in Chad: Mission Impossible or Mission Evaded?”, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 5, No.1, 1998, p. 46-65.
  • Mays, Terry M., Africa’s First Peacekeeping Operation: The OAU in Chad, 1981-1982 (Westport, Conn: Praeger, 2002).
  • MINUSTAH, United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti http://www.un.org/en/pe- acekeeping/missions/minustah/background.shtml.
  • Morris, Justin and Hilaire McCoubrey, “Regional Peacekeeping in the Post-Cold War Era”, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1999, p. 129-151.
  • Mullenbach, Mark J., “Deciding to Keep Peace: An Analysis of International Influences on the Establishment of Third-Party Peacekeeping Missions”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 49, 2005, p. 529–555.
  • Mwanasali, Musifiky, “The African Union, the United Nations, and the Responsibility to Protect: Towards an African Intervention Doctrine”, Global Responsibility to Protect, Vol. 2, 2010, s. 388-413.
  • Nguyen, Thi Hai Yen, “Beyond Good Offices? The Role of Regional Organizations in Conflict Resolution”, Journal of International Affairs, Spring 2002, Vol. 55, No. 2, s. 463-484.
  • OAU Charter, http://www.au.int/en/sites/default/files/OAU_Charter_1963_0.pdf. Ojo, Olusola, “The OAU and Conflict Management: the Case of Chad”, International Problems, Vol. 27, No. 3/4, 1988, p. 33-47.
  • Paliwal, Suyash, “The Primacy of Regional Organizations in International Peacekee- ping: The African Example”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2010, p. 185-230. “Peacekeeping Fact Sheet”, www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/resources/statistics/factshe- et.shtml. “Security Council Presidential Statement on United Nations Peacekeeping Opera- tions: Transition and Exit Strategies”, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2011, p. 129-131.
  • Sesay, Amadu, “The Limits of Peace-Keeping by a Regional Organization: The OAU Peace-Keeping Force in Chad”, Conflict Quarterly, Vol. 11, 1991, p. 7-26.
  • Smith-Cannoy, Heather, “Defending Democracy? Assessing the OAS’s 2002 Diploma- tic Intervention in Haiti”, Civil Wars, Vol. 14 No. 3, September 2012, p. 431-450.
  • Tacsan, Joaquiân, “Searching for OAS/UN Task-sharing Opportunities in Central America and Haiti”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1997, p. 489-507.
  • Taft-Morales, Maureen, “Haiti: Developments and U.S. Policy Since 1991 and Current Congressional Concerns”, CRS Report for Congress, 1 December 2004. “The UN and the Situation in Liberia”, UN Reference Paper, April 1995.
  • Thompson, Virginia and Adloff Richard, Conflict in Chad (London: C.Hurst and Com- pany, 1981).
  • Tuck, Christopher, “’Every Car Or Moving Object Gone’ The ECOMOG Intervention in Liberia”, African Studies Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 1, Spring 2000, p. 1-16.
  • Udofia, Offiong E., “The Organization of African Unity and Conflicts in Africa: The Chadian Crisis”, Journal of Asian & African Affairs, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1989, p. 19-33. UN General Assembly, “Report of the Special Committee on the Charter of the Uni- ted Nations Organization and on the Strengthening of the Role of the Organizati- on”, A/RES/46/58, (9 December 1991), http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/46/ a46r058.htm. UNAMID, http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unamid/.Vogt, M.A. and A.E. Ekoko, eds., Nigeria in International Peacekeeping, (Lagos: Malthouse Press, 1993).
  • Weller, Mark, ed., Regional Peacekeeping and International Enforcement: the Liberian Crisis, Cambridge International Document Series, Vol. 6 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
  • Williams, Paul D., “Military Responses to Mass Killing: The African Union Mission in Sudan”, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2006, p.168-183.
  • Yamashita, Hikaru, “Peacekeeping Cooperation between the United Nations and Re- gional Organizations”, Review of International Studies, January 2012, Vol. 38, No. 1, p. 1-22.
Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika-Cover
  • ISSN: 1305-5208
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 5 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: Uluslararası Stratejik Araştırmalar Kurumu