RE-SERVICE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON DESIGN THINKING APPROACH

Design thinking approach, which focuses on both needs and problems, has been used in the field of education as well as business and management in recent years. Within the scope of this study, design thinking approach was applied to pre-service social studies teachers and then their opinions on the approach were obtained. The study group is composed of pre-service teachers studying in the social studies (n=19) teacher program at Artvin Çoruh University, Faculty of Education. In the study, where qualitative research method was used, focus group interviews were conducted with interviews with pre-service teachers after the implementation. The data were analyzed in descriptive and content analysis. The data were divided into categories and codes and visualized in different ways. As a result of the study, the participants considered design thinking as a method, process and approach, indicated the benefits of the process as to gain experience in design processes, to determine the needs in educational environments, to make practical materials, stated the difficulties as unable to focus on the process and creating content, focused on the skills such as criticizing, multi-dimensional thinking, manual skills while explaining the approach, and explained the difference from other design approach processes as in design thinking the product is designed at the end of the process and mostly need-focused design is created.

___

Aziz, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri ve teknikleri (6.Baskı). Ankara: Nobel.

Baş, T., Çamır, M. & Özmaldar, B. (2013). Odak Grubu Çalışması. (Ed. Türker Baş & Ulun Akturan). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri (2.Baskı) içinde (ss.103-109). Ankara: Seçkin.

Baş, T., Usta, Y. & Uyar, E. Ö. (2013). Derinlemesine Görüşme. (Ed. Türker Baş & Ulun Akturan). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri (2.Baskı) içinde (ss.111-116). Ankara: Seçkin.

Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspres innovation. New York: HarperCollins.

Cabello Llamas, A. (2015). Human-centered innovation processes, the case of design thinking in nascent and large firm. Programme Doctoral en Management de la Technologie, École Polytechnıque Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, İsviçre.

Darbellay, F., Moody, Z. & Lubart, T. (Eds) (2017), Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Springer: Singapore, ilgili esere www.springer.com/la/book/9789811075230 Accessed: 15.10.2018

De Souza, A. F. B., Ferreira, B. M. & Conte, T. (2017). Aplicando design thinking em engenharia de software: um mapeamento sistemático. Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering: Experimental Software Engineering Latin America Workshop (CıbSE-ESELAW), 719-732.

Diefenthaler, A., Moorhead, L., Speicher, S., Bear, C., & Cerminaro D. (2017). Thinking & Acting Like a Designer: How design thinking supports innovation in K-12 education. Ed. Wise & Ideo. (https://www.wise- qatar.org/sites/default/files/rr.1.2017_-_ideo.pdf Accessed: 19.10.2018)

Freimane, A. (2015). Case study: design thinking and new product development for school age children. LearnXDesign, The 3rd International Conference for Design Education Researchers, 188-213. 10.13140/RG.2.1.1200.7520.

Fer, S. (2011). Öğretim tasarımı. (2.Baskı). Ankara: Anı.

Goldman, S. & Kabayadondo, Z. (2017). Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners and classrooms (Ed. Shelley Goldman & Zaza Kabayadondo) Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners and classrooms içinde(3-19).New York,NY: Routledge,

Hacıhasanoğlu, I. (2003). Evrensel tasarım. Tasarım+Kuram Dergisi, (3), 93-101.

Hasso Plattner Institute, (2018). https://hpi.de/en/school-of-design-thinking/design-thinking/mindset.html Accessed: 22.10.2018

Holloway, M. (2009). How tangible is your strategy? How design thinking can turn your strategy into reality. Journal of Business Strategy (Emerald Group Publishing), 30(2/3), 50-56.

IDEO & Riverdale (2012). Design thinking for educators. (https://designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/ sayfasından 03.03.2017 tarihinde erişilmiştir.)

Ilıpınar, G., Johnston, W. J., Montaña, J., Spender, J. C. & Truex, D. P. (2011). Design thinking in the postmodern organization. China-USA Business Review, 10(11), 1203-1212.

Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J. ve Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121-146.

Kwek, S.H. (2011). Innovation in the Classroom: Design Thinking for 21st Century Learning. Master’s Thesis. http://www.stanford.edu/group/redlab/cgibin/publications_resources.php.

McKilligan, S., Dhadphale, T. & Ringholz, D. (2017). Speed dating with design thinking: an empirical study of managers solving business problems with design. The International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference, Cincinnati.

Örten, H., Keskin, Y. & Ekici, Ö. (2013). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde materyal hazırlamanın temelleri. (Ed. R. Sever & E. Koçoğlu) Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminden eğitim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarımı İçinde; (69-88). Ankara: Pegem.

Reinecke, S. (2016). What is it that design thinking and marketing management can learn from each other? (Ed. W. Brenner & F. Uebernickel) Design Thinking for İnnovation: Research and practice içinde (ss.151-162) Freiberg: Springer.

Retna, K. S. (2016). Thinking about "design thinking": A study of teacher experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36, 5–19.

Ryan, M. B. (2012). Design Thinking in Education, An Exploration of the Benefits, Challenges and Possibilities. Master’s Thesis, Savannah College of Art and Design, Fine Arts in Graphic Design, Savannah.

Sega, N. J. (2017). Beyond the ovop through design thinking approach. Master’s Thesis, Ritsumeika Asia Pasific University, Business Administration, Beppu-shi, Japonya.

Stanford University (2014). The design thinking process. (http://dschool.stanford.edu. Accessed: 15.03.2015)

Şentürk, G. (2014). Broşür tasarımı ve basımı özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksel Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

Ulu Kalın, Ö. (2011). Sosyal bilgiler 4.sınıf için tasarlanan “insanlar ve yönetim” adlı ünitenin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve kavram algılama düzeylerine etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (7.baskı). Ankara: Seçkin.

Yıldız, U. C. (2018). İnsan odaklı tasarım, insan kaynaklarında tasarım odaklı düşünce ve çevik yaklaşım. İstanbul: Sola Yayınları.