DEMOCRATIC PEACE THEORY AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY: A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE

States, just like humans, primarily strive to survive and maintain territorial integrity. They develop strategies against security threats from inside or outside. These security strategies may vary according to the state's geopolitical and geostrategic structure, economic base, population and perceived threat. Although some tools are different, the aim is usually the same; firstly, it is to keep the state alive without disturbing the territorial integrity of the country by eliminating existing threats and preventing imminent threats and to provide a peaceful and safe life for its citizens. Increased security concerns after the Cold War escalated after the September 11 attacks. There are many tools used to solve international security problems such as war, armaments, and the alliance. It will be examined in this study whether one of these tools, democracy and democratization efforts, can overcome these problems. Also predicted by the democratic peace literature, democratic institutions are the ones that are required for the world to be a peaceful place which forms the basis of another variable whether it is or all of them; and hence the same stability and control as a mechanism of democratic institutions the institutions to work with countries that have another condition that is needed to be able to create peace is necessary, whether answers to questions will be sought.

PDF

___

Ağır, B. (2011). “Güvenlik Kavramını Yeniden Düşünmek: Küreselleşme, Kimlik ve Değişen Güvenlik Anlayışı”. Güvenlik Stratejileri, 22: 97-131.

Aydınlı, E.& Rosenau, J. (2005). Globalization, Security and the Nation State: Paradigms in Transition. New York: New York Press.

Ayoob, M. (1994). “Security in the Third World: Searching Forth the Core Variable”, Norman A. Graham (com.) Seeking Security and Development –The Impact of Military Spending and Arms Transfers. USA: Lynee Reinner Publishers.

Baldwin, D. (1997). “The Concept of Security”. Review of International Studies, 23: 5-26.

Baldwin, D. (2003). “Güvenlik Kavramı”. Avrasya Dosyası Güvenlik Bilimleri, 9(2): 5-35.

Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for İnternational Security Studies in Post-Cold War Era. News York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Buzan B. (1998). Security: A New Framework For Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers Büyükbaş, H. (2012). ” Liberal Demokratik Barış Kuramı: Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme”. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 40: 1-19.

Cural, A. (2011). Bush Doktrini ve Askeri Gücün Önalıcı ve Önleyici Savaş Kapsamında Kullanılması, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Çetinkaya, Ş. (2012). “Güvenlik Algılaması ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorilerinin Güvenliğe Bakış Açıları”. 21.Yüzyıda Sosyal Bilimler, 2: 241-260.

Dedeoğlu, B. (2003). Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Strateji. İstanbul: Derin Yayınları.

Deudney, D. (2004). “Publius Before Kant: Federal-Republican Security and Democratic Peace”. European Journal of International Relations, 10(3): 315-356.

Dixon, H. (1995). “On The Threeshold – Environmental Changes as Cause of Acute Conflict” Sean M. Lynn (Com.) Global Dangers –Changing Dimensinos of International Security. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Doğan, N. (2007). “Demokrasi ve Orta Doğu’nun Geleceği”, 13 Şubat 2019 tarihinde http://www.ayk.gov.tr/wpcontent/uploads/2015/01/DO%C4%9EAN-Nejat-DEMOKRAS%C4%B0-VEORTADO%C4%9EU%E2%80%99NUN-GELECE%C4%9E%C4%B0.pdf, adresinden alınmıştır.

Doyle, M. (2000). “Peace, Liberty and Democracy: Realists and Liberals Contest a Legacy”, Michael Cox (Com). American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies,and Impacts. New York: Oxford University Press.

Doyle, M. (2000). “Liberalism and Word Politics”. American Political Science Review, 80: 1151-1169.

Ekmekçi, F. (2011). “Demokratik Barış Teorisi: Bir Değerlendirme”. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 7(26): 107-124.

Farber H. & Gowa J., (1997). “Common Interests or Common Polities? Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace”. The Journal of Politics, 59(2): 393-417.

Farnham, B. (2003). “The Theory of Democratic Peace and Threat Perception”. International Studies Quarterly, 47:395 – 415.

Gjejlani, E. (2007). Değişen Uluslararası Güvenlik Bağlamında Yugoslavya’nın Dağılması ve Kosova’nın Nihai Statü Sorunu. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa.

Gleditsch, P. (1995). “Geography, Democracy and Peace”. International Interactions, 20(4) :302-328.

Henderson, E. (1999). “Neoidealism and the Democratic Peace”, Journal of Peace Research, 36(2):203-231.

İşyar, Ö. (2008). “Günümüzde Uluslararası Güvenlik Stratejileri: Kavramsal Çerçeve ve Uygulama”. Akademik Bakış ,2(3): 1-42.

Kant, I. (1795). “Toward Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch” 12 Aralık 2018 tarihindehttps://archive.org/stream/perpetualpeaceph00kantuoft/perpetualpeaceph00kantuoft_djvu. txt adresinden alınmıştır.

Kaldor, M. (1991). “Rethinking Cold War History”. Ken Booth (Com). New Thinking About Strategy and International Security. London: Harper Collins Academic.

Kegley, C. (1995). “Neoliberal Challenge to Realist Theories of World Politics: An Introduction”. Charles W.Kegley (Com.). Contraversies in International Relations Theory, Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. New York: St.Martin’s Press.

Kıyıcı, H. (2012). Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorilerinde Güvenlik Kavramı. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Antalya.

Krause, K.& Williams,M. (1996). “Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods”. Mershon International Studies Review .40(2): 229-254.

Küçük, M. (2009). “Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramında Konstrüktivist Dönüş”. Ege Academic Review, 9(2): 771-795.

Levy, M. (1995). “Is the Environmental a National Security Issue?”. International Security, 20(2): 35-62.

Levy, J. (1988). “Domestic Politics and War”. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(2): 640-674.

Lieven, A. (2006). “Wolfish Wilsonians: Existential Dilemmas of the Liberal Internationalists”. Orbis, 50(2): 243- 257.

Lind, M. (2006). The American Way of Strategy: U.S. Foreign Policy and The American Way of Life, U.S: Oxford University Press.

Mansfield, E.D.& Snyder, J. (1995). “Democratization and War”. Foreign Affairs, 74(3): 79-97.

Masala, C. (1999). “Demographic Pressure and Ecological Restraints: The Case of Mediterrian”. Kurt R. Spillman (Com.). İnternational Security Challenges in a Changing World. Bern: Peter Lang.

Maoz, Z.& Russett, B. (1993). “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986”. The American Political Science Review, 87(3): 624-638.

Miller, B. (2001). “The Concept of Security: Should it be Redefined?”. The Journal of Strategic Studies. 24(2): 13- 42.

Mütercimler, E. (2001). “Değişen Güvenlik Kavramı ve Küresel Stratejiler”. Savunma ve Strateji Dergisi,97: 17- 25.

NATO 2020: Assured Security; Dynamic Engagement Analysis and Recommendations Of The Group of Experts On A New Strategic Concept For Nato, NATO, Brüksel, 17 Mayıs 2010.

Oneal, J.(a.o). (2003). “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885- 1992”. International Studies Quarterly, 47(3) :371-393.

Örmeci, O. (2016). “Demokratik Barış Teorisi”. 14 Şubat 2019 tarihinde http://politikaakademisi.org/2016/10/14/demokratik-baris-teorisi/ adresinden alınmıştır.

Özdemir, H. (2007). “Demokratik Barış Teorisi”. Haydar Çakmak (Der.). Uluslararası İlişkiler Giriş, Kavram ve Teoriler, Ankara: Platin Yayınları.

Özkeçeci T. (2019)., “Demokratik Barış”, Güvenlik Yazıları Serisi.7:1-5.

Rummel, R.J. (1983). “Libertarianism and International Violence”. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27: 27-71.

Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the Demopctaic Peace. New Jersey: Princetion University Press.

Small, M. & Singer D. (1982). Resort to Arms: International and Civil War,1816–1980. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Somuncuoğlu, A. (2009). A.B.D’nin Demokrasi Özendirme Politikası: Kazakistan Örneği. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Şahin, K. (2014) “Demokratik Barış Teorisi’nin Argümanlarına Yönelik Eleştiriler”. 11 Kasım 2018 tarihinde http://akademikperspektif.com/2013/04/01/demokratik-baris-teorisinin-argumanlarina-yonelikelestiriler/ adresinden alınmıştır.

Tansi, D. (2005). “A.B.D.’nin Ulusal Güvenlik Anlayışı ve Türkiye”. Jeopolitik Dergisi, 46: 25-37.

Tavas, T. (2011). Uluslararası Güvenlik Sisteminde Değişim: Kolektif Müdahale Doktrinin Yükselişi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Usul, A. (2014). “Demokrasi, Otoriterlik, Uluslararası Politika: Entegre Bir Yaklaşım Arayışı”. 10 Ocak 2019 tarihinde http://sam.gov.tr/tr/demokrasi-otoriterlik-uluslararasi-politika-entegre-bir-yaklasim-arayisi/ adresinden alınmıştır.

Walt, S. (1991). “The Renaissance of Security Studies”. International Studies Quarterly, 35(2): 212-225

Waltz, K. (1992). “Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory”. Robert L. Rothstein (Der.). The Evolution of Theory in International Realtions. S.Carolina:University on South Carolina Press.

Weart, S. (1998). Never at War: Why Democracies Will Not Fight One Another. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Zacher, M., Mattehew, R. (1995). “Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands”. Charles W. Kegley (Der.). Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. New York: St. Martin’s Press.