Farklı kesim ağırlığı, genotip ve cinsiyetin etlik piliçlerde göğüs eti duyusal özelliklerine etkisi

Bu çalışma; farklı kesim ağırlığı, genotip ve cinsiyet faktörlerinin etlik piliçlerde göğüs eti duyusal özellikleri üzerine etkilerini saptamayı hedeflemiştir. Yavaş- (YG) ve hızlı-gelişen (HG) etçi civcivler (Sasso ve Cobb-308) yer bölmelerinde (12 piliç/m2) beslenmiştir. Piliçler düşük, orta ve yüksek canlı ağırlıkta (1.5, 2 ve 2.5 kg) kesime sevk edilmişlerdir. Söz konusu ağırlıklara HG’ler 41., 53. ve 58.; YG’ler ise 62., 73. ve 82. günlerde ulaşmışlardır. Farklı kesim ağırlığındaki her iki genotipten 20’şer (10 erkek, 10 dişi) karkas lezzet paneli için rasgele seçilmiştir. Bunların sağ göğüs etleri derisiz olarak ayrılmış ve tüketici paneline dek -18ºC’de tutulmuştur. Toplam 120 adet göğüs eti çözdürülmüş ve iki taraflı pişirme özelliğine sahip ızgarada, alüminyum folyo arasında pişirilmiştir. Pişirilen örnekler 80 kişiden oluşan bir tüketici paneline sunulmuştur. Panelistler, örnekleri koku, yumuşaklık, tat ve genel beğeni bakımından 10 puan üzerinden (1=aşırı kötü, 10=mükemmel) değerlendirmişlerdir. Koku bakımından yüksek kesim ağırlığına sahip grup daha fazla beğenilmiştir (P

Effect of different slaughter weights, genotype and sex on sensory attributes of chicken breast meat

This study aimed to asses the impact of slaughter weights, genotype and sex on sensory attributes of breast meat. Slow- (SG) and fast-growing (FG) broilers (Sasso and Cobb-308) were raised indoor pens (12 chickens/m2). The birds were slaughtered at light, medium and heavy (1.5, 2 and 2.5 kg) body weight. Slaughter ages were 41, 53, or 58 days for FG and 62, 73, or 82 days for SG. Twenty carcasses (10 female, 10 male) were randomly selected for sensory evaluations from both genotypes in different slaughter weights. The right skinless breast fillets of them were manually dissected and stored at -18ºC until consumer panel. A total 120 breast fillets were thawed and cooked between aluminum foil in two sided grill. Cooked samples were served to 80 consumer panelists. The panelists evaluated samples for odor, tenderness, taste and acceptance on ten-point scales (1=dislike extremely and 10=like extremely). It was observed that the heavy group was most preferred group according to odour scores (P<0.05). Slaughter weight also affected tenderness and acceptability (P<0.05), the lowest scores were obtained for light groups. It was found that meat comes from female was more tender compared to male (P<0.01). Genotype and its interaction with slaughter weight had significant effects (P<0.01) on tenderness, flavour and acceptability; SG in the heavy weight group, FG in the light and medium weight groups performed higher scores.

___

  • Anonymous, 2003. The Welfare of Chickens Kept for Meat Production (Broilers). Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate, http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scah/out39_en.pdf
  • Appleby, M.C. 2004. Public Attitudes and Expectations. In “Measuring and Auditing Broiler Welfare” Edited by C. Weeks and A. Butterworth, Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Based on papers from a conference held in Bristol, UK, May 2003. ISBN 0-85199-805-4, CABI Publishing.
  • Beltrán, J. A., I. Jaime, P. Santolaria, C. Sanudo, P.Alberti and P. Roncales. 1997. Effect of stree-induced high post-mortem pH on protease activity and tenderness of beef. Meat Science, 45(2): 201-207.
  • Berri, C. 2000. Variability of sensory and processing qualities of poultry meat. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 56: 209-224.
  • Bianchi, M., M. Petracci, F. Sirri, E. Folegatti, A. Franchini and A. Meluzzi. 2007. The influence of season and market class of broiler chickens on breast meat quality traits. Poultry Science, 86(5): 959-963.
  • Brown, S.N., G.R. Nute, A. Baker, S.I. Hughes and P.D. Warriss. 2008. Aspects of meat and eating quality of broiler chickens reared under standard, maize-fed, free-range or organic systems. British Poultry Science, 49(2): 118-124.
  • Düzgüneş, O., Kesici, T., Gürbüz, F. 1993. İstatistik Metotları (II. Baskı). Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No:1291, Ders Kitabı: 369, Ankara.
  • Fanatico, A.C., P.B. Pillai, L.C. Cavitt, C.M. Owens and J.L. Emmert. 2005a. Evaluation of slow-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Growth performance and carcass yield. Poultry Science, 84(8): 1321-1327.
  • Fanatico, A.C., L.C. Cavitt, P.B. Pillai, J.L. Emmert and C.M. Owens. 2005b. Evaluation of slower growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Meat quality. Poultry Science, 84(11): 1785-1790.
  • Fanatico, A.C., P.B. Pillai, L.C. Cavitt, J.L. Emmert, J.F. Meullenet and C.M. Owens. 2006. Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Sensory attributes. Poultry Science, 85(2): 337-343
  • Fanatico, A.C., P.B. Pillai, J.L. Emmert and C.M. Owens. 2007a. Meat quality of slowand fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poultry Science, 86(10): 2245-2255.
  • Fanatico, A.C., P.B. Pillai, J.L. Emmert, E.E. Gbur, J.F. Meullenet and C.M. Owens. 2007b. Sensory attributes of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poultry Science, 86(11): 2441-2449.
  • Fanatico, A.C., Pillai, P.B., Hester, P.Y., Falcone, C., Mench, J.A., Owens, C.M. and Emmert, J.L. 2008. Performance, livability, and carcass yield of slow- and fastgrowing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor. Poultry Science, 87(6): 1012-1021.
  • Gordon, S.H. and D.R. Charles. 2002. Niche and Organic Chicken Products. Nottingham University Press. 141 pp.
  • Ipek, A., A. Karabulut, U. Sahan, O. Canbolat and B. Yilmaz-Dikmen. 2009. The effects of different feeding management systems on performance of a slow-growing broiler genotype. British Poultry Science, 50(2): 213-217.
  • Kriese P.R., A.L. Soares, P.D. Guarnieri, S.H. Prudencio, E.I. Ida and M. Shimokomaki. 2007. Biochemical and sensorial evaluation of intact and boned broiler breast meat tenderness during ageing. Food Chemistry, 104(4): 1618-1621.
  • Önenc, A. 2003. Sığır karkaslarında koyu kesimi (dark cutting) önlemeye yönelik üç farklı uygulamanın et kalitesine etkisinin saptanması üzerine bir araştırma. Doktora Tezi. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bornova-İzmir.
  • Remington, H. and J. Culioli. 1995. Meat quality traits of French “Label” chickens. Proceedings of the XII. European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat: 145- 150. 25-29 September 1995, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • SPSS, 2007. Statistics Base 17, User's Guide. SPSS Inc. 233 South Wacker Drive, 11. Floor, Chiago.
  • Touraille, C.1995. Sensory analysis techniques for measuring poultry meat quality. Proceedings of the XII. European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat: 497- 506. 25-29 September 1995, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Touraille, C., J. Kopp, C. Valin and F.H. Ricard. 1981a. Chicken meat quality. 1. Influence of age and growth-rate on physicochemical and sensory characteristics of the meat. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 45(2): 69-76.
  • Touraille, C., F.H. Ricard, J. Kopp, C. Valin and B. Leclercq. 1981b. Chicken meat quality. 2. Changes with age of some physicochemical and sensory characteristics of the meat. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 45(3): 97-104.
  • Van Horne, P.L.M., J.J. Van Harnand and T.B. Rodenburg. 2004. Slow growing broilers: Performance, mortality and welfare. Proceedings of the XXII. World’s Poultry Congress, held on June 8-13, 2004 at İstanbul, Turkey.
  • Westgren, R. E., 1999. Delivering Food Safety, Food Quality, and Sustainable Production Practices: The Label Rouge Poultry System in France. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(5): 1107-11.
  • Zeelender, B., A. Holcman, A. Rajar, L. Gasperlin, and M. Stevanovic. 1995. Meat quality of different provenance of chickens. Proceedings of the XII. European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat: 135-142. 25-29 September 1995, Zaragoza, Spain.