Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Değişen Kar Yapısının Analizi: Ücret Ve Komisyon Gelirlerine Yönelimin Bankaların Performansına Etkisi

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türk bankacılık sektöründe bankaların faiz dışı gelir kalemleri arasında yer alanücret ve komisyon gelirlerinin bankaların performansına etkisinin ortaya konulmasıdır. Bu kapsamda2003-2020 çeyreklik verileriyle Türk bankacılık sektöründe 8 bankanın verileri incelenmiştir. Oluşturulanmodelde bankaların piyasa değerleri ve net karlılıkları ve faiz gelirlerinin ücret ve komisyonlara oranıarasındaki ilişki analiz edilmiştir. Verisetinin yapısı ve öncül analiz bulgularına dayanarak WesterlundEşbütünleşme testiyle Uzun-Kısa Dönem Ortalama Grup Tahmin Sonuçları üretilmiştir. Devamındabulgular arasındaki ilişki, Dumitrescuve Hurlin nedensellik testiyle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmabulgularına göre, kısa vadede ücret ve komisyon gelirlerini arttıran bankaların net karlarında da artışgözlenmektedir fakat bu artış piyasa değerine yansımamaktadır. Öte yandan uzun vadede bankaların hemnet karı hem de piyasa değerinde düşük gözlenmektedir. Uzun vadedeyse faiz gelirlerine odaklananbankaların hem net karlarını hem de piyasa değerlerini arttırdıkları yönünde bulgular elde edilmiştir. Busonuçlara göre ücret ve komisyon gelirlerine odaklanmanın bankacılık sektöründe değer maksimizasyonuiçin doğru strateji olmayacağı söylenebilir.

Analyzing The Changing Profit Structure of Turkish Banks: The Effects Of Fee And Commission Income Shift On Banks’ Performance

The aim of this study is to reveal the effect of fee and commission income, which are among the non-interest income items of banks in the Turkish banking sector, on the performance of banks. In this context, data from 8 banks in Turkish banking sector were analyzed by using quarterly data from 2003 to 2020. In the research model, the relationship between the market values and net profitability of banks and the ratio of interest income to fees and commissions is analyzed. Based on the structure of the dataset and preliminary analysis findings, Long and Short-Run Average Group Estimation Results were produced by using the Westerlund Cointegration test. Subsequently, the relationship between the findings was analyzed using the Dumitrescu and Hurlin causality test. According to the research findings, there is an increase in the net profits of the banks that increase their fee and commission income in the short term, but this increase is not reflected in the market value. On the other hand, both net profits and market value of these banks are observed to be low in the long term. In the long run, it is reported that banks focusing on interest income have increased both their net profits and market values. According to these results, it can be said that focusing on fee and commission income will not be the right strategy for value maximization in the banking sector.

___

  • Ahamed, M. M. (2017). Asset quality, non-interest income, and bank profitability: Evidence from Indian banks. Economic Modelling, 63, 1-14.
  • Al-Tarawneh, A., Abu Khalaf, B., & Al Assaf, G. (2017). Noninterest Income and Financial Performance at Jordanian Banks. International Journal of financial research, 8(1), 166- 171.
  • Andrzejuk, K. (2017). Non-Interest Income and Profitability in Private Banking. Evidence from Liechtenstein. International Journal of Synergy and Research, 6, 175-182.
  • Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1287-1294.
  • Craigwell, R., & Maxwell, C. (2006). Non-interest income and financial performance at commercial banks in Barbados. Savings and Development, 3, 309-328.
  • Çetin, H. (2018). The Impact of Non-Interest Income on Banks’ Profitabilities. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 6 (3), 161-164.
  • Damankah, B. S., Anku-Tsede, O., & Amankwaa, A. (2014). Analysis of non-interest income of commercial banks in Ghana. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 4(4), 263-271.
  • Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  • Gürbüz, A. O., Yanık, S., & Aytürk, Y. (2013). Income Diversification and Bank Performance: E Evidence From Turkish Banking Sector. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, 7(1), 9-29.
  • Hakimi, A., Hamdi, H., & Djelassi, M. (2012). Modelling non-interest income at Tunisian banks. MPRA Paper No. 65114.
  • Li, M., & Feng, T. (2016). Relationship Between Noninterest Income and Bank Valuation: Evidence from the US Bank Holding Companies.
  • Li, D., & Yang, J. (2016, June). A study on the effect of non-interest income and its components on the performance of listed banks in China. In 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
  • Louzis, D. P., Vouldis, A. T., Balfoussia, H., & Papageorgiou, D. (2015). Profitability in the Greek banking system: a dual investigation of net interest and non-interest income. Bank of Greece Working Paper, No: 191.
  • Nguyen, K. N. (2019). Revenue Diversification, Risk and Bank Performance of Vietnamese Commercial Banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(138), 1-21.
  • Özdemir, O. (2015). Bankaların Ücret Ve Komisyon Gelirlerinin Muhasebeleştirilmesi Ve Finansal Göstergelere Etkisi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Temmuz, 55-70.
  • Özek, P. (2017). Non-tradıtıonal actıvıtıes and fundıng structures: an analysıs of commercıal banks ın turkey. International Journal of Economic & Administrative Studies, 18, 53-70..
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Schuermann, T., & Weiner, S. M. (2004). Modeling regional interdependencies using a global error-correcting macroeconometric model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 22(2), 129-162.
  • Saunders, A., Schmid, M., & Walter, I. (2016). Non-interest income and bank performance: Does ring-fencing reduce bank risk. Working Papers on Finance, (2014/17), 1417-1477.
  • Trivedi, S. R. (2015). Banking innovations and new income streams: impact on banks' performance. Vikalpa, 40(1), 28-41.
  • Uzun, U., & Berberoğlu, M. (2019). Faiz Dışı Gelirlerin Banka Performansına Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi. 11 (1). 239-248.
  • Yıldırım, C. & Kasman, A. (2015). Bank Market Power And Non-Interest Income In Emergıng Markets. The Economic Research Forum Working Paper: 930.
  • Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709-748.