Ekonomik Dönüşüm Sürecinde Sanayisizleşme ve Yeniden Sanayileşme

20. yüzyılın ikinci yarısından itibaren önce gelişmiş sanayi ülkelerinde, ardından gelişmekte olan ülkelerde sanayisizleşme süreci ortaya çıkmıştır. Sanayisizleşen ülkelerde imalat sanayisinin ekonomideki göreceli payının azalmasına, hizmet faaliyetlerinin genişlemesi eşlik etmiş ve böylece ekonomik büyümenin itici gücünün hizmetler sektörü büyümesi olduğu yeni bir küresel yapılanma oluşmuştur. Bu çalışmada sanayisizleşme olgusu, sanayileşmesini tamamladıktan sonra sanayisizleşmeye başlayan gelişmiş ülkeler ile sanayileşmesini tamamlayamadan önce “erken sanayisizleşmeye” başlayan gelişmekte olan ülkeler için ayrı ayrı değerlendirilmiştir. Gelişmiş ülkeler açısından; gelirdeki değişikliklerden kaynaklanan nihai talep örüntülerindeki değişimlerin etkisi, temel sektörler arasındaki verimlilik farkları, dış kaynak kullanımının ve dışarıda üretimin artması, emek-yoğun sanayilerin gelişmekte olan ülkelere kayması ve üretimin otomasyonuna bağlı olarak imalat istihdamının azalması gibi sebepler ön plana çıkmaktadır. Erken sanayisizleşmenin söz konusu olduğu gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ise sanayisizleşmenin temelinde politika dönüşümleri yer almakta, ekonomik büyümede reel sektörün azalan etkinliğine karşılık, finansal sektörün belirleyiciliğinin arttığı görülmektedir. Değerlendirmemize göre, sanayisizleşme sürecinde giderek artan işsizlik, ithalata bağımlı üretim, dış açıklara dayalı büyüme gibi Türkiye’nin ve diğer birçok gelişmekte olan ülkenin en kritik ekonomik problemlerinin uzun vadedeki kalıcı çözümü “yeniden sanayileşmektir”. 2008 Küresel Ekonomik Krizinden sonra dünya genelinde yeniden sanayileşmeye yönelik politika tercihleri yükselişe geçmiştir. Bu kavram ile esas olarak imalat sanayisi üretiminin yeniden büyümenin motoru haline getirilmesi ifade edilmektedir. Yeniden sanayileşme konseptinde dinamik karşılaştırmalı üstünlükler uyarınca yeni endüstrilerin geliştirilmesi ve teknoloji üretimi birincil öneme sahiptir. Yeniden sanayileşme, çevresel anlamda daha temiz ve kaynak-etkin üretim süreçlerine dayandığı ve sosyal içerilmeyi gözettiği ölçüde sürdürülebilir olacaktır. Sanayi üretimiyle güçlü bağları olan katma değeri yüksek ve inovatif hizmet alanlarındaki üretimin desteklenmesi de tamamlayıcı bir unsur olarak değerlendirilmektedir.

Deindustrialization and Reindustrialization in the Course of Economic Transformation

From the second half of the 20th century, the process of deindustrialization has emerged firstly in developed industrial countries and then in developing countries. The decline of the relative share of the manufacturing in the economy has been accompanied by the expansion of service activities, thereby creating a new global structure where the driving force of economic growth has been the growth of the services sector. In this study, the deindustrialization phenomenon has been evaluated separately for developed countries that started to deindustrialize after completing their industrialization and for developing countries that started to deindustrialize prematurely before completing their industrialization. For developed countries; the reasons such as the effect of changes in the final demand patterns resulting from changes in income, productivity differences between the main sectors, increased outsourcing and offshoring, shifting of laborintensive industries to developing countries and decreases in manufacturing employment due to automation of production seem to be prominent factors. In developing countries, policy transformations seem to be the main reason of deindustrialization and it is observed that the determination of financial sector has increased despite the decreasing share of the real sector in economic growth. The exit from deindustrialization process, which has a negative effect on developing economies, is through “reindustrialization”. After the 2008 financial crisis, policy preferences towards re-industrialization emerged on a global scale. With this concept, it is aimed to reinstate the manufacturing industry production as the engine of growth. According to our evaluation, the permanent solution to the long-term fundamental economic problems of Turkey and many developing economies, which seem to deteriorate further due to deindustrialization such as increasing unemployment, import-dependent manufacturing and foreign trade deficit-based growth is industrialization. In the reindustrialization concept, the development of new industries in accordance with dynamic comparative advantages and technology production are of primary importance. Reindustrialization will be sustainable to the extent that it relies on environmentally cleaner and resource-efficient production processes and seeks social inclusion. Supporting production in highvalue and innovative service areas that have strong ties with industrial production in our country is also considered as a complementary factor.

___

  • Acemoglu, D. & Restrepo, P. (2017). Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. NBER WP No. w23285. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Acemoglu, D. & Restrepo, P. (2018) The Race Between Machine and Man: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares and Employment. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488-1542.
  • Aghion, P., Jones, B. F. & Jones, C. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth. NBER WP No. w23928. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Alderson, A. (1997). Globalization and Deindustrialization: Direct Investment and the Decline of Manufacturing Employment in 17 OECD Nations. Journal of World Systems Research, 3, 1-34.
  • Alderson, A. (1999). Explaining Deindustrialization: Globalization, Failure, or Success? American Sociological Review, 64(5),701-21.
  • Antràs, P. & Chor, D. (2013). Organizing the Global Value Chain. Econometrica, 81 (6), 2127– 2204.
  • Antràs, P. & Helpman, E. (2004). Global Sourcing. Journal of Political Economy, 112 (31), 552– 580.
  • Autor, D.H. & Dorn, D. (2013). The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553–1597.
  • Autor, D.H., Dorn, D. & Hanson, G.H. (2013). The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121- 2168.
  • Baldwin, R. E. (2016). The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Baumol, W. J. (1967). Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis. American Economic Review, 57(3), 415-426.
  • Baumol, W. J., Blackman, S. A. B. & Wolff, E. N. (1985). Unbalanced Growth Revisited: Asymptotic Stagnancy and New Evidence. American Economic Review, 75(4), 806-817.
  • Berlingieri G. (2014). Outsourcing and the Rise in Services. LSE Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper 1199. Erişim: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1199.pdf
  • Bernard, A. B., Smeets, V., & Warzynski, F. (2017). Rethinking Deindustrialization. Economic Policy, 32(89), 5-38.
  • Bernard, A. B. & Fort, T. C. (2013). Factoryless Goods Producers in the US. NBER Working Paper 19396, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Bessen, J. (2019). Automation and Jobs: When Technology Boosts Employment. Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper.
  • Bluestone, B. & Harrison, B. (1982). The Deindustrialization of America: Plant Closing, Community Abandonment, and the Dismantling of Basic Industry. New York: Basic Books.
  • Brady, D. & Denniston, R. (2006). Economic Globalization, Industrialization and Deindustrialization. Social Forces, 85(1), 297-329.
  • Chang, H. J. (2012). Sanayileşmenin Gizli Tarihi. Ankara, Epos Yayınları.
  • Clark, C. (1940). The Conditions of Economic Progress. Macmillan, New York.
  • Clark, C. (1957). The Conditions of Economic Progress. MacMillan and Company (London), 3rd edition
  • Clark, G. (2014). The Industrial Revolution. Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 2, North- Holland, 217-262.
  • Dandaneau, S. P. (2012). Critical Theory, Legitimation Crisis, and the Deindustrialization of Flint, Michigan. Illuminating Social Life: Classical and Contemporary Theory Revisited, SAGE Publications.
  • Dasgupta, S., & Singh, A. (2006). Manufacturing, Services and Premature Deindustrialization in Developing Countries: A Kaldorian Analysis. WIDER Research Paper No. 2006/49.
  • Doğruel, A. S., & Doğruel, F. (2019). Küreselleşme, Unutulan Sanayi Politikaları ve Sanayisizleşme. Çalışma ve Toplum, 60, 209-230.
  • Endresen, S. (1994). Modernization Reversed? Technological Change in Four Asian Fishing Villages. DPhil. Dissertation, Department of Human Geography, University of Oslo.
  • Eser, U. (2014). Dünya Yeniden Sanayiye Dönerken Türkiye Dünya Sanayinin Neresinde. İktisat ve Toplum, 45, 27-44.
  • Fagerberg, J. & Verspagen, B. (1999). Modern Capitalism’ in the 1970s and 1980s. Growth, Employment and Inflation: Essays in Honour of John Cornwall, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Fisher, A. G. (1952). A Note on Tertiary Production. The Economic Journal, 820-834.
  • Gaston, N. (1998). The Impact of International Trade and Protection on Australian Manufacturing Employment. Australian Economic Papers, 37(2), 119-136.
  • IMF (2020). Finding Solid Footing for the Global Economy. Erişim: https://blogs.imf.org/2020/02/19/finding-solid-footing-for-the-global-economy/
  • Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth in the United Kingdom: Inaugural Lecture at the University of Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kang, S. J. & Lee, H. (2011). Foreign Direct Investment and De-industrialisation. The World Economy, 34(2), 313-329.
  • Kollmeyer, C. (2009). Explaining Deindustrialization: How Affluence, Productivity Growth, and Globalization Diminish Manufacturing Employment. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1644-1674.
  • Krugman, P. (1996). Domestic Distorsions and the Deindustrialization Hypothesis. NBER Working Paper No. 5473. National Bureau of Economic Research
  • Krugman, P. & Lawrence, R. Z. (1993). Trade, Jobs, and Wages. NBER Working paper no. 4478. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Kucera, D. & Milberg, W. (2003). Deindustrialization and Changes in Manufacturing Trade: Factor Content Calculations for 1978–1995. Review of World Economics 139(4), 601-24.
  • Matsuyama, K. (2009). Structural Change in an Interdependent World: A Global View of Manufacturing Decline. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2-3), 478-486.
  • McKinnon, R. (2013). The U.S. Saving Deficiency, Current-Account Deficits, and Deindustrialization: Implications for China. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35(3), 449-458.
  • Meçik, O. & Afşar, M. (2015). Ekonomide Sanayisizleşme ve OECD Ülkelerine Etkileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33, Sayı: 2, 85- 111.
  • Nayyar, G., Cruz, M., & Zhu, L. (2018). Does Premature Deindustrialization Matter? The Role of Manufacturing versus Services in Development. The World Bank.
  • Ngai, L. R. & Pissarides, C. A. (2007). Structural Change in a Multi-Sector Model of Growth. American Economic Review, 97(1), 429-443.
  • Palma, G. (2008). Deindustrialization, Premature Deindustrialization, and the Dutch Disease. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition.
  • Pierce, J. R. & Schott, P. K. (2014). The Surprisingly Swift Decline of US Manufacturing Employment. CESifo Working Paper No. 4563.
  • Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature Deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1-33.
  • Rowthorn, R. & Coutts, K. (2004). De-industrialisation and the Balance of Payments in Advanced Economies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(5), 767-90.
  • Rowthorn, R. & Coutts, K. (2013). De-industrialisation and the Balance of Payments in Advanced Economies. Future of Manufacturing Project: Evidence Paper 31.
  • Rowthorn, R. & Ramaswamy, R. (1999). Growth, Trade, and Deindustrialization. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 46(1).
  • Rowthorn, R. & Wells, J.R. (1987). De-industrialisation and Foreign Trade. Cambridge University Press
  • Rowthorn, R., & Ramaswamy, R. (1997). Deindustrialization: Its causes and implications. International Monetary Fund.
  • Sachs, J. D., Shatz, H., Deardorff, A. & R. E. Hall. (1994). Trade and Jobs in US Manufacturing. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 1–84.
  • Saeger, S. S. (1997). Globalization and Deindustrialization: Myth and Reality in the OECD. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133(4).
  • Singh, A. (1977). UK Industry and the World Economy: A Case of De-industrialisation? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1 (2), 113–36.
  • Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp, 40, 536-541.
  • Stover, R.G., M.L. Lichty & Stover, P.W. (1999). Industrial Socities: An Evolutionary Perspective. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Szirmai, A. (2012). Industrialization as an Engine of Growth in Developing Countries, 1950- 2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4).
  • Szirmai, A. & Verspagen, B. (2011). Manufacturing and Economic Growth in Developing Countries, 1950‐2005. Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Working Paper No: 2011‐069.
  • Taylor, S. (1981). De-industrialisation and Unemployment in the West Midlands. The Political Quarterly, 52(1).
  • Thompson, G., Murray, T. & Jomini, P. (2012). Trade, Employment and Structural Change: The Australian Experience. Policy Priorities for International Trade and Jobs, 113-144.
  • Tregenna, F. (2013). Manufacturing Productivity, Deindustrialization and Reindustrialisation. Pathways to Industrialization in the 21st Century: New Challenges and Emerging Paradigms, Oxford University Press.
  • Tregenna, F. (2015). Deindustrialization, Structural Change and Sustainable Economic Growth. Research, Statistics and Industrial Policy Branch, Working Paper 2/2015.
  • Tregenna, F. (2016). Deindustrialization and Premature Deindustrialization. Elgar Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development.
  • UNIDO (2013). The Industrial Competitiveness of Nations, Competitive Industrial Performance Report 2012/2013. Vienna.
  • UNIDO (2015a). Industrial Development Report 2016: The Role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. Vienna.
  • UNIDO (2015b). Introduction to Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. Director General's Brochure. Vienna.
  • UNIDO (2020). Statistical Databases. Erişim: https://stat.unido.org/
  • Van Neuss, L. (2016). The Economic Forces Behind Deindustrialization: An Empirical Investigation. SSRN: 2817332.
  • Warwick, K. (2013). Beyond Industrial Policy, Emerging Issues and New Trends. OECD Science, Technology and Industrial Policy Papers No. 2.
  • Wood, A. (1995). How Trade Hurt Unskilled Workers. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(3), 57–80.
  • World Bank (2020). World Development Indicators Database. Erişim: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
  • Yeldan, E., & Yıldırım, D. (2015). Küreselleşme ve Sanayisizleşme Bağlamında Türkiye’de ve Dünyada Demokrasi Açığı. Çalışma ve Toplum, 45(2), 65-88.