2015

Bazı ibreli ağaçların kar yükü altında görsel algılanmasındaki farklılıklar

Bu çalışmada, Düzce il merkezindeki bazı ibreli ağaç türlerinin görsel değerlerini belirlemek ve mevsimlere göre görsel algılanışlarındaki farklılıkları ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla 2004 yılının karlı geçen günlerinde ve diğer günlerde belirlenen ağaçların fotoğrafları çekilmiştir. Bu fotoğraflar A.İ.B.Ü. Orman Fakültesi öğrencileri tarafından anlamsal farklılaşma yöntemi kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Değerlendirme sonucu elde edilen veriler korelasyon analizi kullanılarak görsel algılamadaki (görsel kalite ve güç) farklılıklara göre yorumlanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda, Düzce ilinde bulunan bazı ibreli ağaçların görsel kalite ve güç değerlerinde mevsimlere göre farklılıklar olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

iğne yapraklı ormanlar, Pinopsida, algı

Differences ini visual perception of some coniferous trees under snow load

In this study deals with determining visual values of some coniferous tree forms in Düzce city downtown and suggesting the differences in their visual perceptions according to seasons. For this purpose on snowy days of 2004 and on other days selected trees were photographed. These photographs were evaluting by A.İ.B.Ü. Forestry Faculty students by using Semantical Differential Scale Technique. The data taken out of the evaluation were interpreted according to differences in visual perception (visual quality and strength) by using correlation analysis. As a result of this study it was observed that there are seasonal differences in visual quality and strenght values of some coniferous trees in Düzce city.

Keywords:

coniferous forests, Pinopsida, perception,

PDF

___

Anderson, L.M. 1981. Land Use Designations Affect Perception of Scenic Beauty in Forest Landscape. Forest Science. V: 27(2). pp 392-400.

Brown T.C., Daniel, T.C. 1984. Modeling Forest Scenic Beauty: Concepts and Application to Ponderosa Pine.

Daniel, T.C., Boster, R.S. 1976. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167.

Fisher, J.D., Bell, P.A., Baum, A. 1984. Environmental Psychology. Second Edition. ISBN:0-03- 059867-3. NY,USA.

Habron, D. 1988. Vissual Perception of Wildland in Scotland. Landscape and Urban Planning V: 42(1). pp 45-56.

Hess, G.R. King, T.J. 2002. Planning Open Spaces for Wildlife, I. Selecting Focal Species Using aDelphi Survey Approach. Landscape and Urban Planning. V:58(1), 25-40.

Hull, R.B., Stewart, W.P. 1992. Validity of Photo-based Scenic Beauty Judgements. Journal of Environmental Psychology. V:12. pp 101-114.

Kaplan, R. 1979. Visual Resources and the Public: An Empirical Approach. In: Elsner, G.H., Smardon, R.C., (Coodinators). Our National Landscape, A Conference on Applied Tecniques orAnalysis and Management of the Visual Resource, 209-215. Navada.

Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S.,1989. The Experience of Nature. A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 340 pp .

Misgav, A. 2000. Visual Preference of the Public for Vegetation Groups in Israel. Landscape and Urban Planning. V:48. 143-159.

Osgood, C.E., May, W.H., Miron, M.S. 1975. Cross-cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Shelby, B., Harris, R., 1985. Comparing Methods for Determining Visitor Evaluations of Ecological Impacts: Site Visits, Photographs and Written Descriptions. Journal of Leisure Research. V:17(1). pp 57-67.

Strumse, E. 1996. Demographic Differances in the Visual Preferences for Agrarian Landscape in Western Norway. Journal of Psychology. 16(1).17-31.

Summit, J., Sommer, R. 1999. Further Studies of Preferred Ttree Shapes. Environment and Behavior, V: 31(4). pp 550-576.

Tahvanainen, L., Tyrvainen, L., Ihalainen M., Vuorela, N., Kolehmainen, O. 2001. Forest Management and Public Perceptions-Visual Versus Verbal Information. Landscape and Urban Planning, V: 53. pp 53-70.

Tyrvainen, L., Tahvanainen, L. 1999. Using Computer Graphics for Assessing the Scenic Value of Large-Scale Rural Landscape. Forthcoming Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research V:14. pp 282-288.

Ulrich, R.S. 1986. Human Responses to Vegetation and Landcapes. Landscape and Urban Planning. V:13. pp: 29-44.

Ulrich R.S., Simons R.F, Losito B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A., Zelson, M. 1991. Stress Recovery During Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology. V: 11. pp: 201-230.