Ali Rıza İNCE, Mehmet Zahit ŞİMŞEK

Firmaların Endüstri 4.0 Olgunluk Düzeylerinin Tespitine Yönelik Bir Araştırma: Sivas İli Örneği

Rekabet dengelerini büyük ölçüde değiştirebilme potansiyeline sahip Endüstri 4.0’ın önemini kavrayan firmalar, stratejilerini yeni sanayi devrimi çerçevesinde şekillendirme, yatırımlarda bulunma, uygulamalarını ilerletme gayreti içine girmişlerdir. Firma ve sektörler açısından yapılması gereken ilk iş bu devrime hazırlık düzeylerinin tespitidir. Ancak hazırlık düzeylerinin tespitinden sonra, yol haritaları hazırlanabilir, kaynaklar tahsis edilebilir ve uygulamaya geçilebilir. Genel olarak firmaların Endüstri 4.0 hazırlık düzeyleri hakkında fikir sahibi olmak, özellikle de Sivas ilindeki imalat firmalarının Endüstri 4.0 olgunluk düzeylerini ve bu konudaki zayıf ve güçlü yönlerini tespit edebilmek amacıyla bu çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada “Endüstri 4.0 Hazırlık Değerlendirme Aracı” isimli 6 boyut, 37 alt boyut ve 4 değerlendirme seviyesinden oluşan olgunluk modeli kullanılmıştır. Yeniden düzenlenerek ankete dönüştürülen modelin uygulaması,Sivas ili organize sanayi bölgesindeki imalat firmalarına uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen verilere betimleyici istatistikler uygulanarak, olgunluk modeli boyutlarının ve boyutların firmaların demografik verilerine göre değerlendirmeleri yapılmış ve bulgular yorumlanmıştır. Olgunluk modelinde tüm boyutlar göz önüne alındığında, çalışmaya katılan firmaların Endüstri 4.0 hazırlığı konusunda genel anlamda orta seviyenin altında bir düzeyde yer aldıkları; yine firmaların Ürün ve Hizmetler boyutunda en fazla hazırlıklı oldukları; Üretim ve İşlemler ile Strateji ve Organizasyon boyutunda ise en az hazırlıklı oldukları söylenebilir.

A Research on Determination of the Companies' Industrial 4.0 Maturity Levels: Case of Sivas Province

The firms, that understand the importance of Industry 4.0, which has the potential to change the competitive balances to a large extent, have attempted to shape their strategies within the framework of the new industrial revolution, make investments, and improve their practices. The first thing to do in terms of companies and sectors is the determination of the levels of preparation for this revolution. Only after determining the maturity levels, road maps can be prepared, resources can be allocated to this issue and implemented. This study was carried out in order to have an idea about the Industry 4.0 maturity levels of the companies, In particular, in order to determine the Industry 4.0 maturity levels and weaknesses and strengths of the companies in Sivas. In the study, the maturity model consisting of 6 dimensions, 37 sub-dimensions and 4 evaluation levels named “An Industry 4.0 Readiness Assessment Tool” was used. The application of the model, which was reorganized and turned into a questionnaire, was applied to manufacturing companies in the Sivas organized industrial zone. Descriptive statistics used in the evaluation of the original maturity model were used in the data obtained. The maturity model dimensions and dimensions were evaluated according to the demographic data of the companies and the findings were interpreted. Considering all the dimensions in the maturity model, it was found that the firms participating in the study were at a level below the middle level in terms of Industry 4.0 preparation. It can be said that companies are the most prepared in terms of dimension of Products and Services, and they are the least prepared in terms of dimensions of Production and Operations, Strategy and Organization.

PDF

___

Akdil, K. Y., Ustundag, A., & Cevikcan, E. (2018). Maturity and readiness model for industry 4.0 strategy. In Industry 4.0: Managing the digital transformation (pp. 61-94). Springer, Cham.
Alguliyev, R., Imamverdiyev, Y., & Sukhostat, L. (2018). Cyber-physical systems and their security issues. Computers in Industry, 100, 212-223.
Bahrin, M. A. K., Othman, M. F., Azli, N. N., & Talib, M. F. (2016). Industry 4.0: A review on industrial automation and robotic. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(6-13), 137-143.
Ceruti, A., Marzocca, P., Liverani, A., & Bil, C. (2019). Maintenance in aeronautics in an Industry 4.0 context: The role of Augmented Reality and Additive Manufacturing. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 6(4), 516-526.
De Bruin, T., Freeze, R., Kaulkarni, U., & Rosemann, M. (2005). Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model.
Ding, D., Han, Q. L., Xiang, Y., Ge, X., & Zhang, X. M. (2018). A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber-physical systems. Neurocomputing, 275, 1674-1683.
Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15-26.
Geissbauer, R., Vedso, J., & Schrauf, S. (2016). Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise. Retrieved from PwC Website: https://www. pwc. com/gx/en/industries/industries-4.0/landing-page/industry-4.0-building-your-digital enterprise-april-2016.pdf.
https://www.crimsonandco.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Industry-4-readiness-assessment tool-report-Oct-2017.pdf, erişim tarihi: 12 Şubat 2020
https://www.dijitalakademi.gov.tr/dijital-olgunluk, erişim tarihi: 12 Şubat 2020
ITU (2015). ITU-TX.1205: series X: data networks, open system communications and security: telecommunication security: overview of cybersecurity
ITU (2012). Series y: Global information infrastructure, internet protocol aspects and next generation networks next generation networks–frameworks and functional architecture models. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland, Recommendation ITU-T Y, 2060.
Khoshgoftar, M., & Osman, O. (2009, August). Comparison of maturity models. In 2009 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (pp. 297-301). IEEE.
Lichtblau, K., Stich, V., Bertenrath, R., Blum, M., Bleider, M., Millack, A., ... & Schröter, M. (2015). IMPULS-industrie 4.0-readiness. Impuls-Stiftung des VDMA, Aachen-Köln.
Manyıka, James, et al. Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition. and productivity. Technical report, McKinsey Global Institute, 2011.
Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST definition of cloud computing.
Rockwellautomation: The Connected Enterprise Maturity Model. 12 (2014).
Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54-89.
Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., ten Hompel, M., & Wahlster, W. (2017). Industrie 4.0 maturity index. Managing the digital transformation of companies. Munich: Herbert Utz.
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Cirp, 52(1), 161-166.
Scremin, L., Armellini, F., Brun, A., Solar-Pelletier, L., & Beaudry, C. (2018). Towards a framework for assessing the maturity of manufacturing companies in Industry 4.0 adoption. In Analyzing the Impacts of Industry 4.0 in Modern Business Environments (pp. 224-254). IGI Global.
Shafranek, R. T., Millik, S. C., Smith, P. T., Lee, C. U., Boydston, A. J., & Nelson, A. (2019). Stimuli-responsive materials in additive manufacturing. Progress in Polymer Science.
Sung, T. K. (2018). Industry 4.0: a Korea perspective. Technological forecasting and social change, 132, 40-45.
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution, Mega-study Corporation, Seoul.
Zhu, W., Owen, C. B., Li, H., & Lee, J. H. (2004). Personalized in-store e-commerce with the promopad: an augmented reality shopping assistant. Electronic Journal for E-commerce Tools and Applications, 1(3), 1-19.

Turkish Studies - Information Technologies and Applied Sciences-Cover

ISSN: 2667-5633
Yayın Aralığı: 4
Başlangıç: 2006
Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ