YABANCI DİL ÖĞRENENLERİN SINAV KAYGI DÜZEYLERİ

Bu çalışma, İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen üniversite öğrencilerinin sınav kaygı düzeylerini iki alt boyuta göre belirlemeyi ve bu kaygı boyutlarının cinsiyet, yaş, okuyacakları bölüm, zorunlu veya isteğe bağlı hazırlık okuma gibi bağımsız değişkenlerle ilişkisini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, durumu betimlemeye yönelik ve tarama modeline uygun olarak yapılmıştır. Araştırmaya 2014-2015 öğretim yılında Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Yabancı Diller Yüksek Okulu'nda öğrenim görmekte olan 301 (211 kız, 90 erkek) öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştımanın verileri, Spielberger (1980) tarafından geliştirilen ve Öner (1990) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan Sınav Kaygı Envanteri ile toplanmıştır. 20 maddeden oluşan Likert tipi bu ölçek Kuruntu ve Duyuşsallık olmak üzere iki alt boyuttan oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın sonucunda elde edilen bulgular Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Yabancı Diller Yüksek Okulunda öğrenim görmekte olan öğrencilerin sınav kaygılarının her iki alt boyutta da düşük orta düzeyde olduklarını göstermektedir. Araştırmaya katılan öğrencilerin Sınav Kaygı Envanterinin Duyuşsallık ve Kuruntu alt ölçeklerinden aldıkları puanlar cinsiyete göre karşılaştırıldığında; kız öğrencilerin hem kuruntu hem de duyuşsallık alt ölçeğine ilişkin sınav kaygısı düzeyleri ile erkeklerin arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğu belirlenmiştir. Kız öğrencilerin erkeklerden daha kaygılı oldukları belirlenmiştir. Sınav kaygısı ile yaş arasında anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmamıştır. Ayrıca, zorunlu hazırlık sınıflarında okuyan öğrencilerin kuruntu değil ama duyuşsallık boyutunda hazırlık sınıfını isteyerek okuyan öğrencilere göre daha kaygılı oldukları belirlenmiştir. Sosyal ve sayısal alanlar olmak üzere iki ana başlık altında toplanılan bölümlere göre yapılan değerlendirmede sosyal alanlarda öğrenim görecek öğrencilerin sınav kaygılarının hem kuruntu hem de duyuşsallık boyutunda sayısal alanlarda öğrenim görecek öğrencilerden daha yüksek oldukları sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

TEST ANXIETY LEVELS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNERS

The complex process of foreign language learning cannot be adequately explained solely by cognitive or non-affective factors. It is obvious that in a holistic understanding of language learning process, affective variables need to be examined so that learners' diverse needs and interests can be better understood and addressed. Since the 1970s, research interest in foreign language learning has shifted from teachers to learners and increasing numbers of studies have been undertaken from the learners' perspectives. These studies have focused on learners’ affective variables such as self-esteem, risk taking, inhibition, empathy, tolerance of ambiguity, beliefs, attitudes, motivation and especially anxiety. Anxiety is one of the key factors that has considerable influence on language learning. Spielberger (1966), defines anxiety as subjective, consciously perceived feelings of apprehension and tension, accompanied by and associated with activation or arousal of the autonomic nervous system. Test anxiety refers to phenomenological, physiological, and behavioral responses that accompany concern possible negative consequences and failure on an exam or similar evaluative situation (Zeidner, 1998). According to Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1986), foreign language anxiety is separate complicated phenomenon of self-perception, beliefs, feelings and behavior related to classroom language learning process. Horwitz et al. (1986) defines three components of Foreign Language Anxiety (FLA). They associate FLA with the fear of negative evaluation, test anxiety and communication apprehension. Fear of negative evaluation consists of the feelings of apprehension related to other people’s evaluations, refraining from the situations that need evaluation and false perception that they will always be evaluated in a negative way. Foreign language learners often experience this fear as they are evaluated both by their teachers and by their peers. Test anxiety arises from a fear of failure and includes worry because of tested. Communication apprehension is a type of shyness characterized by fear or anxiety sbout communicating with people. It derives from the personal knowledge that one will almost certainly have difficuly understanding others. Liebert and Morris (1967) described two major components of test anxiety: a cognitive component they labeled "worry," that referred to concerns about being evaluated and about the consequences of failure, and an affective component they labeled "emotionality," that referred to the perception of autonomic reactions evoked by the test situation. It can be easily observed that there is an ever-growing body of research on Foreign Language Anxiety, research in test anxiety levels in two subscales receives much less interest. In order to fill this gap, this study aims to determine test anxiety levels of university preparatory students learning English as a foreign language. Another purpose of the study is to find out whether there is a significant relationship between learners’ gender, age, the department which they will study, compulsory or voluntary status of the students and two subscales of test anxiety. Yabancı Dil Öğrenenlerin Sınav Kaygı Düzeyleri 245 Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 10/7 Spring 2015 Method: The participants of the study were 301 (211 female and 90 male) students aged between 17-22 years old attending a one-year EFL preparatory school at Ondokuz Mayıs University, School of Foreign Languages. Students, who will study at Foreign Language Department and Faculty of Medicine, are obliged to enroll in the preparatory school (n= 187). The students of other departments attend voluntarily (n= 114). The TAI (Test Anxiety Inventory) developed by Spielberger (1980) was used to collect the data. The TAI is a self-report scale that was designed to measure individuals’ test anxiety as a situation-specific trait, it consists of 20 items which are to be responded by using a four-point rating-scale format. In addition to a total score, separate scores for worry (8 items) and emotionality (12 items) can be obtained. Turkish version of TAI adapted by Öner (1990) was used in the present study. Cronbach alpha of worry subscale was to be 0.89, for emotionality subscale was found to be 0.93 by the researcher. The analysis of the data was carried out using SPSS (Version 17.0). Descriptive statistics such as means, standard deviations, an independent-t test and ANOVA were used. Results: This study aims to determine worry and emotionality scores in test anxiety of university students learning English as a foreign language and also investigate the effects of variables such as gender, age, compulsory or voluntary status of the students and departments they will study on the students’ worry and emotionality subscales. The results showed that the participants in the current study exhibited relatively low level anxiety in both worry and emotionality subscales of test anxiety. The second research question examined if there is a significant relationship among gender and test anxiety subscales. The results indicated that female students’ mean scores were higher than those of male students in both worry and emotionality subscales. Females reported higher levels of test anxiety than males. This suggests that females are significantly more anxious than males in two subscales of test anxiety. According to results, age wasnot significant statistically. Another research question investigated whether there is a relationship between compulsory and voluntary status of the students and subscales of test anxiety. The results showed that there was no meaningful relationship between compulsory and voluntary status of the students and emotionality subscale of test anxiety. On the other hand, it was clearly evident that compulsory preparatory students’ scores were higher than those of volunteer students in emotionality subscale of test anxiety. This result suggests that volunteer students were less anxious than compulsory preparatory students. In the present study, the departments are categorized into two headings as social and science. According to results of the study, the students who will study in social departmentswere more anxious than those of science departments in both worry and emotionality subscales of test anxiety. The foreign language teachers should help and train their learners to raise the awareness in order to alleviate the negative effect of test anxiety.

PDF

___

AYDIN, S., YAVUZ, F. ve YEŞİLYURT, S. (2006). Test anxiety in foreign language learning. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16, 145-160.
AYDIN. S. (2013). Factors affecting the level of test anxiety among EFL learners at elementary schools. e-international Journal of Educational Research 4(1), 63-81.
AYSAN, F., THOMPSON, D. ve HAMARAT, E. (2001). Test anxiety, coping strategies and perceived health group of high school students: A Turkish sample. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162(4), 402-411.
ALYAPRAK, İ. (2006). Üniversite sınavına hazırlanan öğrencilerde sınav kaygısını etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir. ASHWORTH, P. (2002). Psychology and Human Nature. International Journal of Human Sciences. 11(2).
BACANLI, F. ve SÜRÜCÜ, M. (2006). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin sınav kaygıları ve karar verme stilleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 45,7-35.Gazi Üniversitesi: Ankara.
BAŞOĞLU, S. T. (2007). Sınav kaygısı ile özgüven arasındaki ilişkinin erinlik döneminde incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
BAİLEY, P., ONWUEGBUZİE, A. J. ve Daley, C. E. (2000). Correlates of anxiety at three stages of the foreign language learning process. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 474-490.
BANDALOS, D. L., YATES, K. ve THORNDİKE-CHRİST, T. (1995). Effects of math selfconcept, perceived self-efficacy, and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 611-623.
BROWN, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman. BROWN, M. M. (2002). The effect of test anxiety on the achievement test scores of high school students as measured by the Preliminary Scholastic Test. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. South Carolina State University.
CASSADY, C. J. ve JOHNSON. E. R. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270-29.
ÇANKAYA, Ö. (1997). Lise son sınıf öğrencilerinde sınav kaygısı, benlik saygısı ve akademik başarı ilişkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTÜ, Ankara.
DENDATO, K. ve DİENER, D. (1986). Effectiveness of cognitive relaxation therapy and study. Skills training in reducing self repordet anxiety and improving the academic performance of test anxious students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33, 131-135.
DEFFENBACHER, J. L. (1986). Cognitive and physiological components of test anxiety in real life exams. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10(60), 635-644.
Dİ MARİA, F. ve Dİ NUOVO, S. (1990). Gender differences in social and test anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 525-530.
DOCTOR, R. M. ve ALTMAN, F. (1969). Worry and emotionality as compenent of test anxiety: replication and further data. Psychological Reports, 24, 563-568.
EKŞİ, P. (1998). Sınav kaygısının üniversite adayı ergenlerde incelenmesi (İstanbul İli, Bakırköy İlçesi Örneği), Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul
ELLİS, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ERKAN, S. (1991). Sınav kaygısının öğrenci seçme sınavı başarısı ile ilişkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
ERZEN, E. ve ODACI, H. (2014). Kimler daha fazla sınav kaygısı yaşıyor? Kişisel akademik ve aileye dayalı bazı değişkenlere göre bir araştırma. International Journal Human Sciences, 11(2), 401-419.
HANIMOĞLU, E. (2010). Seviye belirleme sınavına girecek olan ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinde sınav kaygısı, mükemmeliyetçilik ve anne-baba tutumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana. HEMBREE, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 47-77.
HORWİTZ, E. K., HORWİTZ, M. B. ve COPE, J. (1986). Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-132.
HORWİTZ, E. K. ve YOUNG, D. J. (1991). Language anxiety: From theory and research to classroom implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
LİEBERT, R. M. ve MORRİS, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety: A distinction and some initial data. Psychological Reports, 20(3), 975-978.
KÖKLÜ, N. (1994). Üniversite öğrencilerinin istatistiksel sınav kaygılarının cinsiyete göre karşılaştırılması. Çağdaş Eğitim, 197, 24-26.
ÖNEM, E. (2011). İngilizcenin yabancı dil olarak öğreniminde sınav kaygısıyla başarı düzeyi arasındaki ilişki ve bir öğretim yaklaşımı. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
ÖNER, N. (2008). Türkiye’de kullanılan psikolojik testler. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
ÖNER, N. (1990). Sınav kaygısı envanteri el kitabı. Yükseköğretimde Rehberliği Yayma Vakfı Yayını No:1, İstanbul.
ÖK, M. (1990). 13-15 yaş grubu ortaöğretim öğrencilerinde kaygı düzeyi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
RASOR, l. T. ve RASOR, R. A. (1998). Test anxiety and study behavior of community college students in relation to ethnicity, gender and age. (ED 415942)
RİCHARDS, A., FRENCH, C. C., KEOGH, E., ve CARTER, C. (2000). Test anxiety, inferential reasoning and working memory load. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 13, 87-109.
RİMOLDİ, H. A., RAİMONDO, R., ERDMAN, J. B. ve HOJAT, M. (2002). Intra and intertercultural comparisons of the personality profiles of medical students ın Argentina and USA Adolescence, 37(147), 477-494.
SARASON, I. G. (1975). Test anxiety and the self-disclosing coping model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(2), 148-153.
SARASON, I. (1984). Stress, anxiety and cognitive interferences: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 929-938.
SARASON, I.G. (Ed). (1980). Test anxiety: Theory research and applications. Hillsdale, Ns. Erlbaum.
SARASON, I. G., SARASON, B. R. ve PİERCE, G. R. (1991). Anxiety, cognitive interference and performance. In M. Booth-Butterfield (Eds.), Communicaton, cognition and anxiety. (pp. 1-8). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Press.
SARASON, I. G., PİERCE, G. R. ve SARASON, B. R. (1996). Domains of cognitive interference. In I. G. Sarason, G. R. Pierce, and B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Cognitive interference-theories, methods and findings. (pp. 139-152). New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
SPİELBERGER. C. D. (1966). Theory and research on anxiety. In C.D. Spielberger (Eds.), Anxiety and behavior. New York: Academic Press.
SPİELBERGER, C. D., MORRİS, L. W. ve LİEBERT, R. M. (1968). Cognitive and emotional compenents of test anxiety temporal factors. Psychological Reports, 5, 179-186.
SPİELBERGER, C. (1972). Theory and Research in Anxiety, New York, Academic Press.
SPİELBERGER, C. D. (1980). Preliminary professional manual for the test anxiety inventory. California, USA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
SPİELBERGER, C. D. ve VAGG, P. R. (1987). The treatment of test anxiety: A transactional process model. In R. Schwarzer, H. M. Van Der Ploeg, and C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in Test Anxiety Research. (pp.179-186). Lisse/Hillsdale, NJ: Swets and Zeitlinger/Erlbaum Associates.
SPİELBERGER, C. D. ve VAAG, P. R. (1995). Test anxiety: A transactional process model. In C. D. Spielberger, and P. R. Vaag (Eds.), Test Anxiety: Theory, Assessment and Treatment. (pp. 1-14). Washington DC, USA: Taylor and Franchis.
STÖBER, J. (2004). Dimensions of test anxiety: relations to ways of coping with pre-exam anxiety and uncertainity. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 17(3), 213-226.
ŞENER, S. (2015). Yabancı dil öğrenme kaygısı ve başarı: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesiöğrencilerinin durum değerlendirmesi. Turkish Studies- International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic-, 10(3), Winter 2015, pp. 875-890,ISSN:1308-2140, www.turkish.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.7732, ANKARA-TURKEY.
TUNÇEL, H. (2014). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçeye yönelik kaygı ve kaygının yabancı dil başarısına etkisi. Turkish Studies- International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History f Turkish or Turkic-, 9(5), Spring 2014, pp. 1987-2003, ISSN: 1308-2140, ANKARATURKEY
ÜNAL, A. (2006). Oks (Lgs)’ye hazırlanan öğrencilerin sınav kaygıları ile benlik saygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
ZEİDNER, M. (1990). Does test anxiety bias sholastic apptitude test performance by gender and socio-cultural group? Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(1), 145-160.
ZEİDNER, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum.
ZEİDNER, M. ve SCHLEYER, E. J. (1999). The big-fish–little-pond effect for academic selfconcept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 305-329.
ZEİDNER, M. ve MATTHEWS, G. (2005). Evaluation anxiety-Current theory and research. In A. J. Elliot and C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation. (pp.141-163). New York: The Guilford Press.