TÜRKİYE’DE ÇATIŞMA ÇÖZÜM ÇABALARI: EŞİT ETNİK TEMSİLİYETİN ETKİSİZLİĞİ

Son birkaç onyıldır eşit etnik temsiliyet olgusu – seçim mühendisliği –, etnik şiddetin önlenebilmesi ve toplumsal istikrarın temin edilebilmesi amacıyla etnik çalışmalar literatüründe siyasi bir strateji olarak kendini göstermiştir. 30 kadar ülkenin seçim yasalarında, etnik grupların temsilinin sağlanabilmesi için farklı seçim kotası düzenlemeleri uygulanmaktadır. Türkiye, bu ülkelerden biri olmamakla birlikte; Türk seçim sistemi – orantılı temsil –, etnik partiler vasıtasıyla etnik temsiliyeti yüzde 10’luk baraj ile sınırlandırır iken, etnik olmayan partiler ile etnik temsiliyeti mümkün kılmaktadır. 2015 genel seçimlerinde sürpriz bir şekilde; yüzde 10’luk seçim barajı Halkların Demokratik Partisi (HDP) oy oranının artmasını sağlayan bir mekanizma görevi görmüş ve partinin Meclis’teki sandalye sayısı rekor düzeye ulaşmıştir. HDP’nin bu başarısı sayesinde, Kürt konusu ile ilgili iki yıldan fazla süredir devam eden görüşmelerin daha da hızlanacağı sanılmış, ancak mevcut literatürün aksine seçimlerden hemen sonra çatışmasızlık sona ermiştir. Bu makalede, eşit etnik temsiliyetin seçim mühendisliği metodlarında iddia edildiği gibi her zaman beklenen sonuçları vermeyeceği açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu kapsamda; devam eden çatışmasızlık ortamı ve fazla etnik temsil oranlarına rağmen, etnik hareket içindeki herhangi bir fraksiyonun kendi ajandasını uygulamak amacıyla şiddete tekrar yönelebiliceği ileri sürülmüştür.

CONFLICT RESOLUTION ATTEMPTS IN TURKEY: INEFFICACY OF EQUAL ETHNIC REPRESENTATION

In last decades, the phenomenon of equal ethnic representation –electoral engineering – emerged as an important political strategy toprevent ethnic violence and to ensure societal stability in ethnic studiesliterature. To provide ethnic group representation, different kinds ofelectoral quotas have been adapted to electoral laws in about 30countries. Though Turkey is not among these countries, Turkish electoralsystem – proportional representation – enables ethnic representationthrough non ethnic parties while limiting the representation throughethnic parties via the general threshold practice of 10 per cent.Suprisingly, in 2015 general elections; 10 per cent threshold inelectoral law served as mechanism for increasing share of votes ofPeoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) – Kurdish Ethnic Party –, and that partyattained the record number of chairs in the Turkish assembly. It wasexpected that more than two years lasting negotiations on Kurdish issuewould be implemented easier than before because of the HDP electoralsuccess, but on the contrary of the literature, cease fire was finalized justafter the elections.In this article, it is aimed to explain that equal ethnicrepresentation do not always have the anticipated effects as argued inelectoral engineering methods. A faction of ethnic movement may againturn to violence in order to implement its own agenda in case of a lack ofconsensus between subgroups.

___

  • “AKP Breaks Ice In 1st Round of Coalition Negotiation Talk”, Turkish Daily News, 16 July 2015
  • “AKP Saldırı”, http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2013/03/130320_akp_saldiri, retrieved on 08.03.2016
  • “Clashes”, Turkish Daily News, 10 June 2015
  • “HDP Seeks Strong Return to Kurdish Peace Process”, Turkish Daily News, 14 July 2015
  • “HDP Urges End to Violence before Coalition Talks with AKP”, Turkish Daily News, 15 July 2015
  • “Heykelden Haberimiz Yoktu”, http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/haber/kck-heykelden-haberimiz- yoktu, retrieved on 08.03.2016
  • “ISIL Cells Await Order to Hit in Turkey: HDP”, Turkish Daily News, 13-14 June 2015
  • “Kurdish Bid to Go On If Promises Fulfilled”, Turkish Daily News, 9 July 2015
  • “Milletvekili Genel Seçimleri (General Elections): 1923-2011”, Türkiye İstatistik Enstitüsü (Turkish Statistical Institute), June 2012
  • “No Ceasefire until Meet with PKK Head”, Turkish Daily News, 17 July 2015
  • “Ocalandan Bayrak Yorumu”, http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/haber/ocalandan-bayrak-yorumu- provokasyon, retrieved on 08.03.2016
  • “ParisAssasination”,http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2013/01/130110_paris_assasinati on.shtml, retrieved on 08.03.2016
  • “Perceptions and Expectations Survey in Kurdish Issue”, KONDA Research and Consultancy, Mai 2011
  • “PKK Killed Soldier: PM”, Turkish Daily News, 21 July 2015
  • “PKK Threatens to Attack Dams, One Killed in Clash”, Turkish Daily News, 13 July 2015
  • “Polls and Voter Analysis of June 7th", KONDA, 18 June 2015
  • “Racial Discrimination in Sri Lanka Report”, Non-Governmental Organization International Movement Against All Forms of Discrimination and Racism, http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CERD/Shared%20Documents/LKA/INT_CERD_ NGO_LKA_24535_E.pdf, July 2016, retrieved 01 October 2016, p. 3.
  • “Shooting”, Turkish Daily News, 24 July 2015
  • “The Evaluation of Electoral Accountability in Turkey: Cyclical Evolutions in Programmatic and Clientelistic Politics”, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), Sweden, 2012
  • “The Latest Outlook on Turkish Polls”, Turkish Daily News, 6-7 June 2015
  • “Voters Want Peace Bid to Continue: Deputy PM”, Turkish Daily News, 4-5 July 2015
  • Akyol, Mustafa, “Who Killed Turkey-PKK Peace Process”, http://www.al- monitor.com/pulse/en/originals/2015/08/turkey-syria-iraq-pkk-peace-process-who- killed-kurds.html#, retrieved 08.03.2016
  • Akyol, Taha, “The National Will”, Turkish Daily News, 09 June 2015
  • Beki, Akif, “How Will the HDP Bring Peace to Turkey”, Turkish Daily News, 17 June 2015
  • Brun, Cathrine, “Birds of Freedom: Young People, the LTTE, and Representations of Gender, Nationalism and Governance in Northern Sri Lanka”, Critical Asian Studies, vol. 40, no. 3, 2008, pp. 399-422
  • Buran, Ahmet, “Kurds and Kurdish Language”, Turkish Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, summer 2011, pp. 43- 57
  • Çay A., Haluk, Her Yönüyle Kürt Dosyası (Kurdish File with every Aspect), İstanbul, İlgi Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık, 2010
  • Cenoy, Kamal, “Contending Nationalisms: Kashmir and the Prospects for Peace”, Harvard International Review, fall 2006, pp. 24-27
  • Chowdhary, Rekha, “Democratic Processes in the Context of Separatism and Political Divergence: An Analysis of 2014 Assembly Elections in Jammu and Kashmir”, Studies in Indian Politics, vol. 3, no. 2, 2015, pp. 164-178
  • Diamond, Larry, Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1999
  • Erdem, Tarhan, “How Many Kurds Live in Turkey”, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/how- many-kurds-live-in-turkey-.aspx?pageID=238&nID=45644&NewsCatID=396 , 26.04.2013, retrieved 07.03.2016
  • Fayaz, Sadia, “Kashmir Dispute Between Pakistan and India: The Way Out”, The Dialogue, vol. XI, no. 1, pp. 65-82
  • Goodhand, Jonathan; Clem, Bart and Korf, Benedikt, “Religion, Conflict and Boundary Politics in Sri Lanka”, European Journal of Development Research, vol. 21, no. 5, 2009, pp. 679-698
  • Güzel, Hasan Celal, “Türkiye’de Kürt Nüfusu Nedir (How many Kurds live Turkey”,http://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/guzel/2013/04/23/turkiyede-kurt- nufusu-nedir-2, retrieved 07.03.2016 in
  • Haniffa, Farzana, “Three Attempts at Peace in Sri Lanka: A Critical Muslim Perspective”, Journal of Peace Building and Development, vol. 6, no. 1, 2011, pp. 49-62
  • Horowitz, Donald L., Ethnic Groups in Conflict, 2nd ed., University of California Press, London, 2000
  • Hussain, Syed Rıfaat, “Resolving the Kashmir Dispute: Blending Realism with Justice”, The Pakistan Development Review, vol. 48, no. 4, Winter 2009, pp. 1007-1035
  • Jeyapal, Daphne, “Since When Did We Have 100,000 Tamils? Media Representations of Race Thinking, Spatiality, and the 2009 Tamil Diaspora Protests”, Canadian Journal of Sociology, vol. 38, no. 4, 2013, pp. 557-578
  • Kaya, Yakup; Özalp, Görken Ozan, “Cumhuriyet Doneminde Suleyman Sah Turbesinin Korunması- Protection of the Tomb of Suleyman Shah in the Republican Period”, Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 10/9 Summer 2015, pp. 263-302, ISSN: 1308-2140, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8595, ANKARA-TURKEY
  • Kleinfeld, Margo, “Strategic Troping in Sri Lanka: September Eleventh and the Consolidation of Political Position”, Geopolitics, vol. 8, no. 3, 2003, pp. 105-126
  • Koç, İsmer, “Demographic Differentiation and Integration Levels of Native Turkish and Kurdish Population in Turkey”, presented in workshop in 21st Century Institute, 16 December 2006
  • Krook, Mona Lena and Zetterberg, Pér, “Electoral Quotas and Political Representation: Comparative Perspectives”, International Political Science Review, vol. 35, no. 1, 2014, pp. 3-11
  • Lijphart, Arend, “The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation”, American Political Science Review, vol. 90, no. 2, June 1996
  • Lilja, Jannie, “Ripening Within? Strategies Used by Rebel Negotiators to End Ethnic War”, Negotiation Journal, vol. 27, no .3, July 2011, pp. 311-342
  • Lokman, Turgut, “Is There a Peace Process for the Resolution of Kurdish Issue in Turkey”, presented at the conference “Governing Diversity: The Kurds in a New Middle East”, Beirut, November 2013
  • Mathur, Shubh, “Memory and Hope: New Perspectives on the Kashmir Conflict – an Introduction”, Race and Class, vol. 56 (2), 2014, pp. 4-12
  • McGregor, Lorna, “Beyond the Time and Space of Peace Talks: Re-appropriating the Peace Process in Sri Lanka”, International Journal of Peace Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, Spring/Summer, 2006, pp. 39-57
  • Nabi Fai, Ghulam, “Resolution of the Kashmir Dispute: A Way Forward”, Strategic Studies, vol. 32, no. 1, winter 2012, pp. 1-14
  • Ongun, Selin, “Uc gorus (Three points of View)”, Cumhuriyet, 9 November 2015
  • Önal, Tekin; Özdağ, Abdullah, “Korfez Savası ve Turk Dıs Politikasına Etkileri-Gulf War and Its Effects on Turkish Foreign Policy”, Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 11/16 Fall 2016, pp. 53-70, ISSN: 1308-2140, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.9950, ANKARA-TURKEY
  • Pandita, Ramesh, “Jammu & Kashmir’s repeated reaffirmed faith in the democratic setup of India: A Study of the State’s Public Participation in the General Elections of India (1967-2014)”, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, vol. 51, 2015, pp. 125-138
  • ParliamentaryMinutes,https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/TUTANAK/TBMM/d23/c007/b02 9/tbmm230070290161.pdf retrieved 07.03.2016; http://www2.tbmm.gov.tr/d23/7/7-0862s.pdf retrieved 07.03.2016
  • Reilly, Benjamin, Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001
  • Ross, James, “Jaffna Dispatch: Prey”, The New Republic, May 3, 2004
  • Schou, Arild, “Conflict Resolution Attempts in Self-determination Disputes: The Significance of Local Minority Groups Concerns in the Philippines and Sri Lanka”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 37, no. 2, 2014, pp. 302-321
  • Stokke, Kristian, “Building the Tamil Eelam State: Emerging State Institutions and Forms of Governance in LTTE-controlled Areas in Sri Lanka”, Third World Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 6, 2006, pp. 1021-1040
  • Stokke, Kristian, “Crafting Liberal Peace? International Peace Promotion and the Contextual Politics of Peace in Sri Lanka”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 99, no. 5, 2009, pp. 932-939
  • Tamer, Aytül and Bozbeyoğlu, Alanur Çavlin, “The Place of Census 1927 in Nation-building in Turkey: Reflections on Press”, Nüfusbilim Dergisi, no. 26, 2004, pp. 73-88
  • Tavares, Rodrigo, “Resolving the Kashmir Conflict: Pakistan, India, Kashmiris and Religious Militants”, Asian Journal of Political Science, vol. 16, no. 3, December 2008, pp. 276-302
  • Wolff, Stefan, and Weller, Marc, “Self Determination and Autonomy: A Conceptual Introduction”, Autonomy, Self Governance and Conflict Resolution: Innovative Approaches to Institutional Design in Divided Societies, ed. Marc Weller and Stefan Wolff, London, Routledge, pp. 1- 22
  • Yusuf, Moeed and Najam, Adil, “Kashmir: Ripe for Resolution”, Third World Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 8, 2009, pp. 1503-1528
  • Zeyneloğlu, Sinan and others, “Anthropological and demographic dimensions of the Kurdish question: Findings from census and survey data”, Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 1, 2011, pp. 336-384
  • Zutshi, Chitralekha, “An Ongoing Partition: Histories, Borders, and the Politics of Vivisection in Jammu and Kashmir”, Contemporary South Asia, vol. 23, no. 3, 2015, pp. 266-275