Türkiye'de İklim Değişikliği, Yeşil Ekonomi, Hidroelektrik Enerji Gelişimi ve Sosyo-Ekolojik Çatışmalar

İklimdeğişikliğininetkileriniazaltmaamacıyla,Türkiye’deçevreyeduyarlısürdürülebilirekonomiyeilgiartmaktadır. Budoğrultudayenilenebilirenerjiüretimineyönelikgirişimlerartmıştır.Bugelişmelerideolojikfarklılıklarıönemsemeyen; neoliberal capitalist yaklaşımları, piyasaekonomisiniveyönetişimmodelinibenimseyenpolitikalarınsonucudurlar.DüşükkarbonluekonomiyegeçişolarakyenilenebilirenerjiyeyapılanyatırımlaraekolarakTürkiye'determiksantrallerdenenerjiüretiminiartırmaplanıbüyükbirçelişkioluşturmaktadır.Bu durum, mevcutpolitikalardavarolançelişkiyiüretmeklekalmamışaynızamandasosyo-ekolojiktartışmaların da artmasındaroloynamıştır.Türkiye'dehidro-elektriksantral (HES) projelerinekarşıolanmuhalefetbuprojelerin, birçokolumsuzekolojikvetoplumsalsonuçlardoğuracağını; mevcutsuvetopraksorunlarınıhızlandırdığınıönesürmüştür.Muhalefetegöre, bu durum sürdürülebilirlikkavramıiletutarsızlıkgöstermektedir.HES’ler, ekosisteminvesağlıklıekosistemlerebağımlıolanyerelekonomik, sosyalvekültürelsistemlerinsürdürülebilirliğinisağlamadabaşarısızgörünmektedir.Hidroelektrikprojelerininortayaçıkardığısosyo-ekolojiksorunlarıincelemek, yeşilekonomiyoluylaiklimdeğişikliğinihafifletmetasarımındakiçelişkileri, tutarsızlıklarıvesorunlarıortayaçıkarmadaverimliolabilir.Yeşilekonomiyi, ekolojikkrizdenziyadeekonomikkriziçingelişmişbiryöntemolarakkavramsallaştırmakdahadoğrudur.Çünküyeşilekonomininsöylemlerivepolitikalarıiklimdeğişikliğininaltındayatangerçekyapısalfaktörleri–büyümeyebağımlıvepiyasatemellicapitalist system vefosilyakıtabağlıendüstriyelgelişme-gizlemektedir.Yeşilekonominin, mevcutdüzeniteşviketmektenbaşkabirşeyyapmadığınıanlamakiçinyerelsosyal, ekolojikveekonomikaktörlerindüşüncelerininöğrenilmesindeyararvardır.

Climate Change, Green Economy, Run-of-River Hydro Power Developmentand Socio-Ecological Conflicts in Turkey

In the name of climate change mitigation, initiatives for the greening of the economy in Turkey through the post-politicization procedure have accelerated renewable energy developments. The investment in renewable energy, as a transition to a low-carbon economy, along with the plan to increase the energy production through coal mining in Turkey reproduced the contradiction involved with the current policies for transitioning to low-carbon energy path at the global level, and it has also perpetuated socio-ecological conflicts in Turkey. The oppositions to the run-of-river hydropowerdevelopment projects (HEP) in Turkey have illustrated that these hydro projects have been accelerating the already-existing water and land grabbing issues that exert various adverse ecological and social consequences, which is directly inconsistent with the conceptofsustainability.Run-of-riverhydroelectricitydevelopmentappearstofailinensuringthe sustainability of the vital ecosystem and that of the local economic, social, and cultural systems that depend on healthy ecosystems. Examining the socio-ecological conflicts that emerged due to the run-of-river hydropowerdevelopment may prove to be fruitful in revealing the contradictions, inconsistencies, and problems in the design of climate change mitigation through green economy. It is more accurate to conceptualize green economy as a method advanced for economic crisis rather than the ecological crisis, because the discourses and policies of green economy conceal the real structural factors underlying the climate change –the growth-dependent and market-based capitalist system and the fossil-fuel dependent industrial development. Local social, ecological and economic actors should be listened in order to understand that green economy encourages the business as usual attitude.

___

  • Banerjee, S. B. (1998). Globalization, sustainable developmentandecology: a critical examination. In C. P. Rao(ed.),Globalization, privatization, and the market economy(pp. 47-62).Quorum Books.
  • Böhm, S. &Siddhartha, D.(2009).Upsetting the offset: the political economy of carbon markets. Mayfly Books.
  • Bridge, G.(2014). Resource geographies II: the resource-state nexus. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 118–130.
  • Brockington, D.(2012). A radically conservative vision?the challenge of UNEP’s toward a green economy.Development and Change, 43(1), 409–422.
  • Burkett, P.(1999).Marx and nature: a red and green perspective.St. Martin’s Press.
  • DSİ (2017).Devletsuişlerifaaliyetraporu.http://www.dsi.gov.tr/docs/stratejik-plan/dsi–2017-faaliyet-raporu.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
  • Dunlap, A.,&Fairhead, J.(2014). The militarisation and marketisation of nature: an alternative lens to climate-conflict.Geopolitics, 19(4), 937–961.
  • Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: the making and Unmaking of the third world.1945–1992. Princeton University Press.
  • ESMAP (energy sector management assistance program)(2012a).Renewable energy resource mapping. Washington, DC.
  • ESMAP (energy sector management assistance program) (2012b).Renewable energy resource mapping.Washington, DC.
  • Fairhead, J., Leach, M., &I. Scoones.(2012). Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies,39(2), 237–261.
  • Foster, J. B., Clark, B., &York, R.(2010).The ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth. Monthly Review Press.
  • Friedman, L. T.(2008). Hot, flat, and crowded: why we need a green revolution—and how it can renew America.Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Goodman, J. &Salleh, A.(2013). The ‘green economy’: class hegemony and counter-hegemony.Globalizations, 10(3), 411–424.
  • Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world.Harvard Business Review,January/February, 6–76.
  • Islar, M. (2012a). Struggles for recognition: privatization of water use rights of Turkish Rivers. Local Environment, 17(3), 317–329.
  • Işlar, M. (2012b). Privatized hydropower development in Turkey: a case of water grabbing? Water Alternatives, 5(2), 376–391.
  • Jacobs, M. (1994). The limits to neoclassicism: toward aninstitutional environmental economics.In M. Redclift and T. Benton(eds.),Social theory and the global environment(pp. 67-91).Routledge.
  • Jessop, B.(2012). Economic and ecological rises: green new deals and no-growth economies. Development, 55(1), 17–24.
  • Kennis, A., &Lievens, M. (2016). Greening the economy or economizing the green project? when environmental concerns are turned into a means to save the market.Review of Radical Political Economics,48(2), 217–234.
  • Klitgaard, K.(2013).Heterodox political economy and the degrowth perspective. Sustainability, 5(1), 276–297.
  • Konak, N., &Sungu-Eryilmaz, Y. (2016). Does small run-of-river hydro power development in Turkey deliver on its sustainability premise? Society & Natural Resources,29(7), 807–821.
  • McCartyh, J.(2015). A socioecological fix to capitalist crisis and climate change? possibilities and limits of renewable energy.Environment and Planning A,47(12), 2485–2502.
  • Mehta, L., Veldwisch, G. J., &Franco, J.(2012). Introduction to the special issue: water grabbing? focus on the (re) appropriation of finite water resources.Water Alternatives, 5(2), 193–107.
  • Ministry of Forestry and Environment.(2016). Carbon market in Turkey.http://www.csb.gov.tr/projeler/iklim/index.php?Sayfa=sayfa&Tur=webmenu&Id=12461.[
  • Mueller, T., &Passadakis, A. (2010).Another capitalism is possible? from world economic crisis to green capitalism.In K. Abramsky(ed.),Sparking a worldwide energy revolution: social struggles in the transition to a postpetrol world(pp. 554-567). AK Press.
  • NCCAP.(2011). Republic of Turkey national climate change plan 2011–2023.Ankara: The Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General Directorate of Environmental Management, Climate Change Department. http://www.dsi.gov.tr/docs/iklim-degisikligi/%C4%B1depeng.pdf?sfvrsn=2.Accessed.
  • OECD.(2011). Green growth strategy synthesis report.https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/48012345.pdf.
  • Peluso, N. L., &Lund, C.(2011). New frontiers of land control: introduction.Journal of Peasant Studies,38(4), 667-681.
  • Pittock, J. (2011). National climate change policies and sustainable water management: conflicts and synergies.Ecology and Society,16(2),http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art25/
  • REN21. (2014). Renewables 2014 global status report, renewable energy policy network for the 21st century.http://www.ren21.net/Portals/0/documents/Resources/GSR/2014/GSR2014_KeyFindings_low%20res.pdf.
  • Schneider, F., Kallis, G., &Martinez-Alier, J.(2010).Crisis or opportunity?economicdegrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Clean Production, 18, 511–518.
  • Scoones, I., Newell, P., &M. Leach, M.(2015). The politics of green transformations. In I.Scoones, P. Newell, and M. Leach (eds.),The politics of green transformations(pp. 1-46). Routledge.
  • Şekercioglu, Ç.H.,Anderson, S., Akçay, E., &Bilgin, R.(2011a). Turkey’s rich natural heritage under assault.Science,334, 1637–1638.
  • Şekercioglu, Ç. H., Anderson, S., &E. Akşay, E.(2011b).Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis.Biological Conservation,144(12), 2752–2769.
  • Strategic Plan 2015–2019. Republic of Turkey ministry of energy and natural resources 2015–2019 strategicplan. http://www.enerji.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2F1%2FDocuments%2FStrategic%20Plan%2FStrategicPlan2015–2019.pdf.
  • Shiva, V.(1991). The violence of the green revolution: third world agriculture, ecology and politics. Zed Books.
  • Smith, N.(2006). Nature as accumulation strategy.InL. Panitch and C. Ley(eds.), Socialist register 2007. coming to terms with nature(pp. 16-36). The Merlin Press.
  • Swyngedouw, E.(2013). The non-political politics of climate change.ACME. An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 12(1), 1–8.
  • Tamanini, J., Bassi, A., Hoffman, C., &Valenciano, U. (2014). The global green economyindex GGEI. measuring national performance in the green economy. 4th edition. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=1678&menu=1515.
  • Tienhaara, K.(2014). Varieties of green capitalism: economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis.Environmental Politics,23(2), 187–104.
  • TMMOB (Turkish union of chambers of Turkish engineers and architects)(2011). TMMOB hydroelectric facilities report [TMMOB hidroelektriksantrallerraporu].Ankara, Turkey: TürkMühendisveMimarlarOdalarıBirliği, MattekBasınYayınTanıtım Tic. San.Ltd. Sti.
  • TGGPP.(2013). Turkey green growth policy paper: toward a greener economy.Washington DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/914651468311113361/Turkey-green-growth-policy-paper-toward-a-greener-economy.
  • TSDR. (2012). Turkey’s sustainable development report: claiming the future.Ankara: Ministry of Development.https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/853turkey.pdf.
  • Turkey Clean Technology Investment Plan.(2009). http://www-cif.climateinvestmentfunds.org/sites/default/files/CTF_Turkey_Investment_Plan_01_16_09_web.pdf.
  • Turkish State Official Newspaper.(2003). Water use right.http://www. mevzuat.adalet.gov.tr/html/21493.html.
  • UN.(2012).The future we want. resolution adopted by the general assembly united nations.http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/rio20_outcome_document_complete.pdf.
  • UNEP.(2009). Global green new deal. UNEP.
  • UNEP.(2011). Toward a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. UNEP.
  • Uzlu, E., Akpınar, A., &Kömürcü, M. İ. (2011).Restructuring of Turkey’s electricity market and the share of hydropower energy: the case of the Eastern Black Sea basin. Renewable Energy, 36(2), 676–688.
  • Visvanathan, S.(1991).MrsBrundtland’s disenchanted cosmos.Alternatives, 16, 377–384.
  • Wanner, T. (2015). The new ‘passive revolution’ of the green economy and growth discourse: maintaining the ‘sustainable development’ of neoliberal capitalism.New Political Economy,20, 21–41.
  • Weber, G., &Cabras, I.(2017).The transition of Germany's energyproduction, green economy, low carbon economy, socio-environmental conflicts, and equitable society.Journal of Cleaner Production, 167(1), 1222–1231.
  • World Bank. (2012).Inclusive green growth: the pathway to sustainable development. World Bank.
Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics-Cover
  • ISSN: 2667-5625
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ