Algılanan Örgütsel Destek ile Algılanan İş Performansı Arasındaki İlişkide İş Tatmininin Aracı Rolü

Bireylerin çalıştıkları kurumlardan destek aldıklarını hissetmeleri iş tatminlerini arttırmada önemli bir rol oynamaktadır (Eisenberger vd., 1997). Sosyal Değişim Teorisi’ne göre (Blau, 1964) belirli koşullar altında, bireyler fayda gördükleri kişi ve örgütlere faydalı olarak karşılık verme çabası içine girmektedirler. Bu teoriyi doğrular şekilde, iş tatmini yüksek olan çalışanların işlerinden duydukları memnuniyetin bir yansıması olarak performanslarını arttırdıkları yapılan bazı çalışmalar sonucunda ortaya konmuştur (örn: Judge vd., 2001; Fisher, 2003). Yine Sosyal Değişim Teorisi’nden yola çıkarak, çalıştığı örgüt tarafından desteklendiğine inanan çalışanların performans arttırma çabasına girmeleri de beklenmekte ve yapılan çeşitli çalışmalar sonucunda da bu beklenti doğrulanmaktadır (Örn: Byrne ve Hochwarter, 2008; Riggle vd., 2009). Benzer şekilde, algılanan örgütsel destek, çalışanların artan performanslarının örgüt tarafından görüleceği ve ödüllendirileceğine dair inançlarını beslemekte ve bu durum da çalışanları daha çok performans sergilemeye teşvik etmektedir (Guan vd., 2014). Sosyal Değişim Teorisi’nin bakış açısına göre söz konusu üç değişkenin etkieşim içinde olacağı öngörüsünden ve bu değişkenlerin birlikte değerlendirildiği araştırma sayısındaki yetersizlikten de yola çıkarak, bu çalışma ile literatüre bir katkı ve gelecek çalışmalara bir perspektif sunmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda yukarıda sıralanan beklenen ilişkilerin yanı sıra, akademik literatürde daha önce yeteri kadar değerlendirilmemiş olan, algılanan örgütsel destek ile iş performansı arasında iş tatmininin aracılık rolü özellikle araştırılmıştır. Ankara’da özel bir hastanede 253 katılımcı üzerinde gerçekleştirilen araştırma sonuçlarına göre, algılanan örgütsel desteğin iş tatmini ve algılanan iş performansı üzerinde anlamlı ve olumlu bir etkiye sahip olduğu ve aynı zamanda iş tatmininin de algılanan iş performansı üzerinde anlamlı ve olumlu bir etkiye sahip olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Ayrıca, algılanan örgütsel desteğin algılanan iş performansı üzerindeki etkisinde iş tatminin tam aracı rolüne sahip olduğu da belirlenmiştir.

The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Support and Perceived Job Performance

Employees’ sense of getting supported by their organizations they work has an important role in increasing their job satisfaction (Eisenberger et al., 1997). According to Social Exchange Theory (Blau, 1964) under certain circumstances, individuals try to respond by being beneficial to their persons or organizations which benefits them. Confirming this theory, some researches found out that employees with high job satisfaction levels tend to increase their performance as a reflection of their happiness (eg. Judge et al., 2001; Fisher, 2003). Depending on the same theory, the employees who believe to be supported by their organizations are expected to increase their performance and this expectation is confirmed by various studies (eg. Byrne and Hochwarter, 2008; Riggle et al., 2009). Similarly, organizational support perception of employees make them believe that their increasing performance can be seen and rewarded by the organization and this belief encourages them to perform more (Guan et al., 2014). Depending on the expectation of the interaction among three variables based on Social Exchange Theory and the inadequacy of researches about that interaction, this study aims to make a contribution to the literature and present a perspective for the future researches. In this concept, besides the relationships mentioned above, this study also investigates the mediating role of job satisfaction in the relationship between perceived organizational support and perceived job performance, which is not evaluated enough in the academic literature before. In the present research, the data were gathered from 253 participants who are the employees of a private hospital located in Ankara, Turkey. The results of the analysis showed that perceived organizational support had a positive and significant effect on both job satisfaction and perceived job performance. Job satisfaction was also found to be positively and significantly related to perceived job performance. The results also indicated that job satisfaction fully mediated the relationship between perceived organizational support and perceived job performance.

___

  • Ahmad, Z. A., ve Yekta, Z. A. (2010). Relationship between perceived organizational support, leadership behavior, and job satisfaction: An empirical study in Iran. Intangible Capital, 6(2), 162-184.
  • Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. ve Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 288–297.
  • Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator{mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6):1173.
  • Behrman, D. N. ve Perreault, W. D., Jr (1984). A role stress model of the performance and satisfaction of industrial salespersons. Journal of Marketing, 48(4), 9–21.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
  • Borman, W. C. ve Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bowling, N. A. (2007). Is the job satisfaction-job performance relationship spurious? A metaanalytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 167–185.
  • Byrne, Z. S. ve Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 54-72.
  • Christen, M., Iyer, G. and Soberman, D. (2006). Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, and Effort: A Reexamination Using Agency Theory, Journal of Marketing, Januaryr, Vol. 70, pp. 137-150.
  • Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C. Ve Gue, K. R. (2014). Employees’ adaptability and perceptions of change-related uncertainty: Implications for perceived organisational support, job satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 269–280.
  • Dolbier, C.L., Webster, J.A., McCalister, K.T., Mallon, M.W. ve Steinhardt, M.A. (2005) Reliability and Validity of a Single-item Measure of Job Satisfaction. Am. J. Health Promot. 19, 194– 198.
  • Ehsani, M., Sofdel, H. S., Amiri, M., Masrur, F. F. ve Hossini, N. S. (2013). Relationship between perceived organizational support with job satisfaction and organizational commitment of sports departments staff. International Journal of Sport Studies, 3(12), 1302-1306.
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. ve Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507
  • Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S. ve Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 812-820.
  • Fisher, C. D. (2003). Why do lay people believe that satisfaction and performance are correlated? Possible sources of a commonsense theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 753– 777.
  • Fu, J., Sun, W., Wang, Y., Yang, X. ve Wang, L. (2013). Improving job satisfaction of Chinese doctors: the positive effects of perceived organizational support and psychological capital. Public Health. 127, 10: 946-951, Elsevier.
  • Guan, X., Sun, T., Hou, Y., Zhaou, L., Luan, Y. ve Fan, L. (2014). The relationship between job performance and perceived organizational support in faculty members at Chinese universities: a questionnaire survey. BMC Medical Education, 14(50), 1-10.
  • Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A. ve Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Metaanalytic comparisonsof integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal,49,305–325.
  • Heskett, J. L., Jones, T., Loveman, S., Sasser, J. W. E. ve Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 164.
  • Hulin, C. L. Ve Judge, T. A. (2003). Job attit Udes. In W. C. Borman, D. R. ligen, and R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 255-276). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E. ve West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 25, 129–145.
  • Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E. ve Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376-407.
  • Kwak, C., Yae, B., Xu, Y. ve Eun, J.C. (2010). International Journal of Nursing Studies Relationship of job satisfaction with perceived organizational support and quality of care among South Korean nurses: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47, 1292- 1298.
  • Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1:1297-1343.
  • Miao, R. ve Kim, H. (2010). "Perceived Organizational Support, Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance: An Chinese Empirical Study," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 257-264.
  • Mirvis, P. H. ve Lawler, E. E., III. (1977). Measuring the financial impact of employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(1), 1-8.
  • Mullins, L.J, (1996), “Management and Organizational Behaviour”, Fourth ed., Pitmon Publishing, London.
  • Nagy, M.S. (2002) Using a Single-Item Approach to Measure Facet Job Satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 77-86.
  • Nunnally, J. ve Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Organ, D. W. (1977). A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes-performance hypothesis. The Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 46-53.
  • Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R. ve Armeli, S. (2001), “Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, pp. 825-36.
  • Rhoades, L. ve Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4):698.
  • Riggle, R. J., Edmondson, D. R. ve Hansen, J. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research, 62: 1027-1030.
  • Riketta, M. (2008). The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology,93,472–481.
  • Robbins, S. P., ve Judge, T. (2009). Organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Robert, R. J., Diane, E. R., John, H. D. (2009) A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research, 62:1027-1030
  • Rousseau, D. M., ve P. J. McLean. (1993) “The Contracts of Individuals and Organizations”, Research in Organizational Behavior, no. 15: 1-43.
  • Rutherford, B. B., Boles, J. S., Hamwi, G. A., ve Rutherford, L. G. (2009). Perceived organizational support and the seven facets of salesperson job satisfaction. Journal of Selling and Major Account Management, 28 (4), 387-401.
  • Scarpello, V. ve Campbell, J.P. (1983), "Job Satisfaction: are all the parts there?" Personal Pschology, Vol.36, pp.557-600.
  • Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93-105.
  • Shore, L. M., ve Shore, T. H. (1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. In R. S. Cropanzano & K. M. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace: 149-164. Westport, CT: Quorum.
  • Shore, L. M., ve Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective organizational commitment and continuance commitment at perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 774-780.
  • Smith, P. C., ve Cranny, C. (1968). Psychology of men at work. Annual Review of Psychology, 19, 467–496.
  • Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service and satisfaction: Development of the job satisfaction survey. American journal of community psychology, 13(6):693-713.
  • Spector, P.E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes and conseque- nces. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
  • Walster E, Berscheid E, Walster GW: New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25(2):151.
  • Wann-Yih, W. ve Htaik, S. (2011) “The Impacts of Perceived Organizational Support, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Job Performance in Hotel Industry”, The 11th International DSI and the 16th APDSI Joint Meeting, July 12-16 2011, Taiwan.
  • Williams, L. J., ve Podsakoff, P. M. (1989). Longitudinal-field methods for studying reciprocal relationships in organizational-behavior research-toward improved causal-analysis. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 247–292.
  • Williams, R. S., Managing Employee Performance: Design and Implementation in Organizations. London, UK: Thompson Learning, 2002.
  • Witt, L. A. ve Carlson, D. S. (2006). The work-family interface and job performance: Moderating effects of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 343–357.