Türkiye Otomotiv Dış Ticaretinin Belirleyicileri: 2009-2017 Dönemine İlişkin Ampirik Bulgular

Son otuz yılda Türkiye ekonomisi dışa açıldıkça Türkiye otomotiv sektörünün dış ticaretteki rolü de artmıştır. 2008 yılındaki küresel finans krizi sonrasında da Türkiye’nin otomotiv dış ticareti hem partner ülke hem de hacim olarak artmıştır. Bu bağlamda Türkiye’nin otomotiv dış ticaret belirleyicilerini analiz etmek önem kazanmıştır. Nitekim çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’nin otomotiv dış ticaretinin belirleyicilerini panel çekim modeli çerçevesince analiz etmektir. Bu kapsamda Türkiye’nin otomotiv ihracat, ithalatı ve dış ticareti üç ayrı eşitlikle tahmin edilmiştir. Analiz 2009-2017 döneminde Türkiye’nin otomotiv dış ticaretinde ilk 20 sırada olan ülkeler için uygulanmıştır. Üç eşitliğin bulguları birbirinden farklıdır. Analize konu olan altı değişkenden kişi başı GSYH, nüfus, uzaklık ve döviz kuru Türkiye’nin otomotiv ihracatının en önemli belirleyicileridir. Gümrük birliğine üyelik vekil değişkeni ile otomotiv ihracatı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki bulunamamıştır. Türkiye’nin otomotiv dış ticaret modeli için ise bu değişkenlerden kişi başı GSYH dışında diğerleri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı sonuç vermiştir. Üretim kapasitesi değişkeni ise hem ihracat hem de dış ticaret eşitlikleri için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir. Otomotiv ithalat fonksiyonun belirleyicileri için ise analize dahil edilen açıklayıcı değişkenler olan kişi başı GSYH oranı, nüfus, uzaklık, gümrük birliği, üretim kapasitesi ve döviz kurunun tamamı istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır. Ancak uzaklık değişkeni beklentilerin aksine Türkiye’nin otomotiv ithalatını pozitif yönde etkilemektedir.

The Determinants of Turkey’s Automotive Trade: Empirical Findings for the 2009-2017 Period

The role of the Turkey’s automotive industry in foreign trade has increased as the Turkey’s economy has opened to world markets in the last thirty years. After the global financial crisis in 2008, Turkey's automotive foreign trade increased both as a partner country and by volume. Thus, it is important to analyze Turkey's automotive foreign trade determinants. In fact, the aim of the study is to analyze the determinants of Turkey's automotive foreign trade within the framework of the panel data model. In this context, Turkey's automotive exports, imports and foreign trade were estimated in three separate equations. The analysis was applied for the top 20 countries in Turkey's automotive foreign trade in the period 2009-2017. The findings of the three equations are different from each other. Per capita GDP, population, distance and the exchange rate are the most important determinants of Turkey's automotive exports for the six different variables. However, no significant relationship has been found between custom union proxy variable and Turkey’s automotive exports. For the trade model of Turkey’s automotive industry, these variables are statistically significant except for per capita GDP. Production capacity variable is not statistically significant both for export and trade equations. For the determinants of the automotive import function, all of the explanatory variables -which are per capita GDP ratio, population, distance, customs union, production capacity and exchange rate- are statistically significant. However, contrary to the expectations, the variable of distance affects Turkey's automotive imports positively.

___

  • Abedini, J. ve Peridy, N. (2009). “The Emergence of Iran in the World Car Industry: An Estimation of its Export Potential.” World Economy, 32(5): 790-818.
  • Anderson, J.E. (1979). “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation.” American Economic Review, 69(1): 106–16.
  • Armstrong, D., Strange, J., Utkarshini, S. ve Gatz-Schulz, L. (2017). “The Gravity Model: What Does The Data Say About International Trade and Distance Between Countries?” Price waterhouse Coopers (PWC), LLP, http://www.iberglobal.com/files/2018/pwc-the-gravitymodel. pdf, (21.03.2019).
  • Avsar, V. ve Türkcan, K. (2013). “Exchange Rate Volatility and US Auto-Industry Exports: A Panel Cointegration Approach.” International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(4): 772-787.
  • Baltagi, B.H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. West Sussex: John Wiley&Sons, Ltd.
  • Baltagi, B.H. ve Wu, P.X. (1999). "Unequally Spaced Panel Data Regressions with AR (1) disturbances." Econometric Theory, 15(6): 814-823.
  • Baum, C.F. (2006). An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata. Texas: Stata Press Publication.
  • Bedir, A. (2002). “Türkiye’de Otomotiv Sanayi Gelişme Perspektifi”, İktisadi Sektörler ve Koordinasyon Genel Müdürlüğü, Yayın No DPT: 2660, T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı.
  • Belenkiy, M. ve Osborne, S. (2012). “The Effect of Changes in World Crude Oil Prices on US Automobile Exports.” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2(3): 147- 158.
  • Bergstrand, J.H. (1985). “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3): 474–481.
  • Bergstrand, J.H. (1989). “The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and The Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1): 143-153.
  • Berzin, C.J. (2010). “Turkey's Automotive Industry: Driven to Grow.” Perspectives on Business and Economics, Volume 28 - Turkey: Bridging Two Worlds, https://preserve.lehigh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=perspectives-v28, (4.2.2019).
  • Bhargava, A., Franzini, L. ve Narendranathan, W. (1982). “Serial Correlation and the Fixed Effects Model.” The Review of Economic Studies, 49(4): 533-549.
  • Burger, M., Van Oort, F. ve Linders, G.J. (2009). “On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros and Zero-inflated Estimation.” Spatial Economic Analysis, 4(2): 167-190.
  • CEPII (2019). “GeoDist”, http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=6, (07.03.2019).
  • Cieślik, A. (2009). “Bilateral Trade Volumes, The Gravity Equation and Factor Proportions.” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 18(1): 37-59.
  • Deardorff, A. (1998). “Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world?” Frankel, A.J. (Ed.), The regionalization of the world economy içinde (ss. 7-32). University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/chapters/c7818.pdf, (12.08.2018).
  • Disdier, A.C. ve Head, K. (2008). “The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1): 37-48.
  • Evenett, S.J. ve Keller, W. (2002). “On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation.” Journal of Political Economy, 110(2): 281-316.
  • Feenstra, R.C., Markusen, J.R. ve Rose, A.K. (2001). “Using The Gravity Equation to Differentiate Among Alternative Theories of Trade.” Canadian journal of economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 34(2), 430-447.
  • Head, K. (2003). “Gravity for Beginners.” University of British Columbia, http://pioneer.netserv.chula.ac.th/~kkornkar/inter%20trade%20undergrad/term%20paper/gr avity%202.pdf, (26.07.2019).
  • Helpman, E. ve Krugman, P. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Imperfect Competition and the International Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions with Cross-Sectional Dependence. Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312.
  • Hsiao, G. (2003). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Huseyni, I., Çelik, A.K. ve Eren, M. (2019). “Application of Panel Quantile Regression and Gravity Models in Exploring the Determinants of Turkish Automotive Export Industry.” Chahal vd. (Ed.), Understanding the Role of Business Analytics, ss. 31-44, Singapur: Springer.
  • IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2019). “Exchange Rates.” International Financial Statistics. http://data.imf.org/?sk=4C514D48-B6BA-49ED-8AB9- 52B0C1A0179B&sId=1390030341854 (30.3.2019).
  • Investment Map (2019). “Sectors with Potential to Attract Investment.” https://www.investmentmap.org/prioritySector.aspx, (11.04.2019).
  • Isard, W. (1954). “Location Theory and Trade Theory: Short-Run Analysis.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68(2), 305-320.
  • ITC (2019). “Trade Map: Trade Statistics for International Business Development.” https://www.trademap.org/(X(1)S(2mnn0y55akpqv2arklyaunjt))/Product_SelProduct_TS.a spx?nvpm=1%7c%7c%7c%7c%7cTOTAL%7c%7c%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c1%7c2%7c1%7c 1%7c1%7c1, (12.06.2019).
  • Jochem, P. ve Schleich, J. (2012). “Exploring the Drivers Behind Automotive Exports in OECD Countries: An Empirical Analysis” Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation, No. S3/2012.
  • Kepaptsoglou, K., Karlaftis, M.G. ve Tsamboulas, D. (2010). “The Gravity Model Specification For Modeling İnternational Trade Flows And Free Trade Agreement Effects: A 10-Year Review Of Empirical Studies”, The Open Economics Journal, 3(1): 1-13.
  • KPMG (2019). “Otomotiv: Sektörel Bakış”, https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/tr/pdf/2019/04/sektorel-bakis-2019-otomotiv.pdf, (11.04.2019).
  • Martínez-Zarzoso, I. ve Nowak-Lehmann, F. (2003). “Augmented Gravity Model: An Empirical Application to Mercosur-European Union Trade Flows”, Journal of Applied Economics, 6(2), 291-316.
  • OICA (2019a). “Production Statistics”, http://www.oica.net/production-statistics/, (4.3.2019).
  • OICA (2019b). “Registrations or Sales of New Vehicles - All Types.” Sales Statistics, Sales of New Vehicles: 2005-2018, www.oica.net/wp-content/uploads/total_sales_2018.xlsx, (21.06.2019).
  • Otomotiv Sanayi Derneği (OSD) (2018a). “Otomotiv Sanayii 2017 Yılı Küresel Değerlendirme Raporu.” http://www.osd.org.tr/sites/1/upload/files/2017_Kuresel_Degerlendirme_Raporu- 4349.pdf, (27.02.2019).
  • Otomotiv Sanayi Derneği (OSD) (2018b). “Otomotiv Sanayii Genel ve İstatistik Bülteni.” http://www.osd.org.tr/sites/1/upload/files/2018_YILLIK-3299.pdf, (05.08.2019).
  • Otomotiv Sanayi Derneği (OSD) (2019). “Otomotiv Sanayii Genel ve İstatistik Bülteni.” http://www.osd.org.tr/sites/1/upload/files/2019_YILLIK-5401.pdf, (15.04.2019).
  • Pelletiere, D. ve Reinert, K.A. (2004). “Used Automobile Protection and Trade: Gravity and ordered probit analysis.” Empirical Economics, 29(4): 737-751.
  • Pelletiere, D. ve Reinert, K.A. (2006). “World Trade in Used Automobiles: A Gravity Analysis of Japanese and US Exports”, Asian economic journal, 20(2): 161-172.
  • Peridy, N.J. ve Abedini, J. (2008). “The Growing Influence of Emerging Countries in The World Car Industry: An Estimation of Export Potentials in A World Trade Model.” Global Economy Journal, 8(3): 1-26.
  • Porojan, A. (2001). “Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited.” Open Economies Review, 12(3): 265-280.
  • Pöyhönen, P. (1963). “A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade Between Countries.”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90: 93-100.
  • Sichei, M.M., Erero, J.L. ve Gebreselasie, T. (2008) “An Augmented Gravity Model of South Africa's Exports of Motor Vehicles, Parts and Accessories.” South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 11(4): 494-510.
  • Tinbergen J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy. New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.
  • TÜİK (2019). Dış Ticaret İstatistikleri, “Fasıllara Göre İhracat”, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=622, (23.08.2019).
  • UN Comtrade (2019). “International Trade Statistics Database.” https://comtrade.un.org/, (27.2.2019).
  • Verbeek, M. (2008). A Guide to Modern Econometrics. West Sussex: John Wiley&Sons.
  • Westerlund, J. ve Wilhelmsson, F. (2011). “Estimating the Gravity Model without Gravity Using Panel Data.” Applied Economics, 43(6): 641-649.
  • World Development Indicators (WDI) (2019). “Online Veritabanı.” https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators, (3.3.2019).
  • World Trade Organization (WTO) (2019). “International Trade Statistics.” https://data.wto.org/, (4.3.2019).
  • Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2012). Panel Veri Ekonometrisi: Stata Uygulamaları. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş.